87 Matching Annotations
  1. May 2025
    1. Ferangís was frantic with grief when she was told of the sad fate of her husband, and all her household uttered the loudest lamentations. Pílsam gave the intelligence to Pírán and the proverb was then remembered: "It is better to be in hell, than under the rule of Afrásiyáb!"

      This translation uses more emotional language than the Helen Zimmern translation. This simultaneously lessens and widens the gap between the depiction of Iranians and Turanians, depending on the context. Ferangís, for instance, is a more sympathetic character, whereas Afrásiyáb is condemned more harshly. CC BY-NC-SA

    2. The reception of Saiáwush by Afrásiyáb was warm and flattering. From the gates of the city to the palace, gold and incense were scattered over his head in the customary manner, and exclamations of welcome uttered on every side.   "Thy presence gives joy to the land,   Which awaits thy command;     It is thine! it is thine!   All the chiefs of the state have assembled to meet thee,   All the flowers of the land are in blossom to greet thee!"

      This version of the epic leans into the celebration that Saiáwush received when arriving in Túrán. It generally seems to emphasize how beloved he was. Through this, differences between the Iranians and the Turanians are marked. As soon as Saiáwush arrives, the people essentially beg him to rule over them. This suggests that he is equipped to do what the locals cannot, therefore he should have power, putting Iranians in a favorable position and building a sense of national pride. At the same time, a distinction between them and the foreign group is established. CC BY-NC-SA

    1. Garsivaz rode forth bearing the letter, and he sware unto Siawosh that he would cement the peace that was broken. But when he came unto Afrasiyab he delivered not the writing, but spake evil things of Siawosh, and maligned him. And he fed the anger of Afrasiyab, until the King commanded that the army be led forth to go against Siawosh his friend, and he took the lead thereof himself.

      Ultimately, these characters from Turan turn on Siawosh. This could be a way of othering them, and differentiating them from the Iranians. The epic may have been set up so that the friendship between Siawosh and the Turanians was always fated to fall apart, because they were from different groups, and could not reconcile that fact. Thus, the notion of the “Other” is cemented. CC BY-NC-SA

    2. Piran gave counsel unto Siawosh that he should ask of Afrasiyab the hand of his daughter to wife. For he said- "Thy home is now in Turan, wherefore it behoveth thee to establish thy might; and if Afrasiyab be thy father indeed, there can no hurt come near to thee.

      Siawosh marrying Afrasiyab’s daughter further demonstrates the blurring of lines separating the “Us” of the story from the “Them”. It’s a union in all senses. With Siawosh residing in Turan for much of his story, he makes connections with people from Turan. These connections are key to humanizing the characters. CC BY-NC-SA

    3. the sight of Siawosh became a light to the eyes of the King of Turan and a joy unto his heart, and he loved him like to a father.

      The foreign group is relatively humanized and developed, to a greater extent than in stories such as the Ramayana or Josephs. While divisions are still drawn, the people of Turan are written as near equals, capable of the same complexity as the Iranians. CC BY-NC-SA

    4. it was written that Siawosh would bring destruction upon Turan

      By having the hero of the story be destined to destroy Turan, Iran is clearly shown as the "Us" and Turan as the "Them". If it's what Siawosh must do, then it must be correct, and Turan must deserve that fate. Unlike Iran, which may also have a corrupt king, but doesn’t deserve the same as Turan, by virtue of not being the “Other”. CC BY-NC-SA

    1. So Pharaoh said to Joseph, "Since God has shown you all this, there is none so discerning and wise as you.

      Joseph, being monotheistic, is uniquely special. His abilities are something that the Egyptians cannot emulate, which implies that the Egyptians are generally less capable. The narrative shows how the Canaanites are distinct from the Egyptians through their skills, allowing monotheists to form a separate identity. CC BY-NC-SA

    2. 16 Joseph answered Pharaoh, saying, "It is not in me. God will answer Pharaoh with favor."

      Similarly to the Quranic version, Joseph also emphasizes his religion in the Biblical interpretation. This makes sense, since both are religious texts used to spread their respective faiths. It shows that the differing beliefs of the Egyptians and Canaanites are at the heart of their division. They can never be the same as long as that core difference remains. CC BY-NC-SA

    1. I have forsaken the tradition of people who do not believe in God; and regarding the Hereafter, they are deniers.” 38. “And I have followed the faith of my forefathers, Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob. It is not for us to associate anything with God. This is by virtue of God’s grace upon us and upon the people, but most people do not give thanks. 39. “O My fellow inmates, are diverse lords better, or God, the One, the Supreme?” 40. “You do not worship, besides Him, except names you have named, you and your ancestors, for which God has sent down no authority. Judgment belongs to none but God. He has commanded that you worship none but Him. This is the right religion

      The contrast of beliefs is an important way of emphasizing the otherness of the Egyptians, who may be a stand-in for polytheists in general. The condemnation of other religions successfully creates a divide between groups. Religion is one of the greatest tools to forge a sense of identity with, seeing as how it builds community. It follows, then, that it would also be one of the greatest tools to other a foreign nation. CC BY-NC-SA

    2. when they saw him, they marveled at him, and cut their hands. They said, “Good God, this is not a human, this must be a precious angel.”

      While not directly stated, his beauty may be mentioned in order to contrast him with the Egyptians. This could be a way of portraying the Canaanites as more desirable than other groups, which would contribute towards building a sense of national identity. In the context of the Quran, it could also be something more similar to a religious identity. Either way, having more attractive physical traits places the Canaanites above foreign groups. CC BY-NC-SA

    1. ATOSSA     What monarch reigns, whose power commands their ranks? LEADER     Slaves to no lord, they own no kingly power.

      When compared to E. D. A. Morshead’s translation, Robert Potter’s translation clearly identifies the context of this statement. The Athenians are not slaves to any monarch, specifically. Aeschylus’s belief that monarchies were comparable to slavery is still present, this time more accurately, drawing a clean division between the Persians and Athenians. Both translators named were English, albeit from different centuries, so the change in phrasing may reflect their political beliefs. Therefore, praise for the Athenian form of government would have been framed according to each man’s support for the monarchy. At the time of Potter’s 1777 translation, Enlightenment ideals were popular; a blatant anti-monarchy stance may have reflected that. CC BY-NC-SA

    1. XERXES. Ah woe to us, ah joy to them who stood against our pride!

      Xerxes praising the Athenians for standing against him could be a subtle way of showing the Persians as the "Other". This is because he's depicted as praising the enemy, in a somewhat unrealistic way. It reads as an attempt of portraying the Athenians as righteous and just, whereas the Persians are left no choice but to accept that as fact. They're not "Us", so their suffering cannot be unfair; they're "Them", so the suffering is deserved. CC BY-NC-SA

    2. How can we Persians fare towards hope again? GHOST OF DARIUS. By nevermore assailing Grecian lands, Even tho’ our Median force be double theirs— For the land’s self protects its denizens.

      The Greeks are being painted as inherently more deserving of respect and reverence. The narrative feeds into the Athenian nations' superiority by claiming the Persians can only prosper by leaving them alone, because Greece is simply more successful. Thus, the Persians and the Athenians are not equal parties in the story. Still, they are much more equal than, for instance, the opposing parties of the Ramayana. The Persians stands out for the general sympathetic portrayal of the people from the Achaemenid Empire. CC BY-NC-SA

    3. ATOSSA. And who is shepherd of their host and holds them in command? CHORUS. To no man do they bow as slaves, nor own a master’s hand.

      Aeschylus is emphasizing Athenian democracy, as their unique form of government was a point of pride. It would be very easy to foster a national identity around this concept, which is what he was leaning into. However, his bias in the writing is evident, seeing as how the Persians very famously freed slaves. The use of the word "slave" here, then, is interesting. Athens did actually have slaves, but the point here is to compare other forms of government to slavery, not to talk about real slavery in society. Aeschylus took the opportunity to highlight the democratic values of Athens, in contrast to the values of the Achaemenid Empire, regardless of how accurate the assessment may or may not have been. CC BY-NC-SA

    4. ATOSSA. Is it in skill of bow and shaft that Athens’ men excel? CHORUS. Nay, they bear bucklers in the fight, and thrust the spear-point well.

      Here, the differences in weaponry highlight the overall differences between the groups. It's not just about using particular tools, it's about what those tools say about a culture. From an Athenian perspective, a bow may seem like a more cowardly weapon. Calling attention to this perception could be a way of disparaging the foreign Persians while also building a sense of national pride around the Athenians’ own choice of weapon. CC BY-NC-SA

    1. 01:16:46:13 Surphanaka is the one with the really ugly nose.

      Be it through caricatures or descriptions, differences in physical features have always been an incredibly common way of othering groups. Surphanaka, Ravana's sister, having a so-called “ugly nose” exemplifies this phenomenon. A similar sentiment about Ravana is also expressed: “Your ugly yellow eyes should fall out of your head as you stare at me so lustfully, Ravana.” (Paley, 00:27:16 - 00:27:21). In his case, Ravana’s yellow eyes serve to dehumanize him. Where distinct features emphasize a difference, inhuman features—like yellow eyes—only widen that gap. CC BY-NC-SA

    2. 01:15:00:08 Ravana was the evil king of Lanka 01:15:05:18 and he just stole Sita. 01:15:10:08 He was an incredibly learned man. 01:15:13:22 Actually the only bad thing he seems to have done... 01:15:16:09 ...is capture Sita.

      As a modern retelling of the Ramayana, Sita Sings the Blues is not afraid to critique the original story, often using a lighthearted tone to do so. In this part, the narrative acknowledges how Ravana is portrayed as evil, despite his accomplishments. If it weren’t for his foreignness, he may have been a more nuanced character. Since that wasn’t the case, he was unambiguously villainous. One step out of line proved him to be in the wrong. The group that controls the narrative is waiting for the outsider to fail, in order to justify their preconceived ideas about their nature. Sita Sings the Blues uses humor to comment on this narrative of nation, because it was intentionally made as commentary on the Ramayana. CC BY-NC-SA

    1. There where the wild she-demons kept Their watch around, she sighed and wept.

      Sita cries due to being captured by the evil "Other". It's made clear that it’s not just the king that's evil, but also the subjects that are called "wild she-demons". This is a very direct example of othering a foreign people by perceiving them as uncivilized. This lays the groundwork for the judgment of others’ unique customs, which in turn, builds an identity around one’s own customs. CC BY-NC-SA

    1. Before the king Márícha placed Food never known to human taste.

      The king—and by extension his people—eat food that regular people wouldn't, which is another way of othering them. This portrayal likely stems from them not being written as human in the first place. Rather, they're giants. Thus, their race feeds into the narrative of foreigners being a distinct type of person. The idea is taken to the extreme, as they’re not even human. CC BY-NC-SA

    2. The charioteer the order heard. And yoked with active zeal the best Of chariots at his lord's behest. Asses with heads of goblins drew That wondrous car where'er it flew.

      By having goblin-headed creatures pull Rávan's chariot, the people of Lanká are painted as strange and abnormal. Rather than use regular donkeys, Rávan uses monstrous donkeys, a reflection of the perceived culture in Sri Lanka. Modifications such as these exotify and mystify the foreign group. CC BY-NC-SA

    1. Never can mighty Ráma be O'vercome in fight, my King, by thee. Thy giant host the day might win From him, if heaven were gained by sin.

      This line suggests that there is an inherent difference between Ráma and Rávan. Rávan’s character is shown to be naturally inferior and sinful when compared to Ráma, which is part of a broader narrative about the Sri Lankans. This inequality is acknowledged directly by Akampan, one of the giants himself. So, regardless of which group one belongs to, the imbalance between the sides is made apparent. In a sense, the giants seemingly accept and give in to Ráma’s superiority. CC BY-NC-SA

    2. But of the host of giants one, Akampan, from the field had run And sped to Lanká 1 to relate In Rávan's ear the demons' fate:

      Here, the Sri Lankans are described both as giants and demons. Overall, there is a preference for the term "giant" over "demon" in this translation. The decision suggests that this version of the Ramayana was trying to portray the giants more neutrally. The translator, an Englishman from the 19th century, would have less of a need to highlight distinctions between Indians (particularly from Ayodhya) and Sri Lankans. For one, both territories were British colonial possessions at the time of translation (1870-1874). Furthermore, the translator and his anglophone audience would not feel a strong connection to either group. Thus, one of the original goals—nation-building—would be diminished. CC BY-NC-SA

    1. 'Champion of Gods, as man appear,      This cruel Rávan slay,    The thorn that saints and hermits fear,      The plague that none can stay.    In savage fury uncontrolled      His pride for ever grows:    He dares the Lord of Gods to hold      Among his deadly foes.'

      This disparaging description paints Rávan as unreasonable and deeply evil. The lack of consideration for his perspective fuels the reading of him and his people as inferior beings. Vocabulary choices such as “savage fury uncontrolled” don’t describe just any angry man. They describe a ruthless, dangerous person that cannot be trusted. He is a villain by all means, and his belonging to a separate people furthers that narrative. CC BY-NC-SA

    2. Rávan, who rules the giant race, Torments us in his senseless pride, And penance-loving saints beside.

      Rávan, the king of Ceylon (present-day Sri Lanka) would be an example of the "Other" in the Ramayana. Describing him as "senseless" is one way of othering him and his people, making them seem incomprehensible and fundamentally different. This feeds into the narrative of nation, wherein the Indian people are rational and sympathetic, and the Sri Lankans are not. Instead, they are their own separate, lesser people. CC BY-NC-SA

  2. Jan 2025
  3. Dec 2024
    1. imagine that all these various biomes are feeding social ecologies in service to a different type of superstructure. The current superstructure we call neoliberalism or capitalist modernity, that thinking of it in a in a mycelial way, how do we create resilient bio, regional, sovereign communities that are not divided by artificial state lines,

      for - transition - from neoliberal divisions of nation states, provinces, states, cities - to bio-regional sovereignty not divided by artificial state lines - Post Capitalist Philanthropy - Alnoor Ladha - Lynn Murphy - 2023

  4. Nov 2024
    1. there is no longer a proper set of institutions that can restore the equilibrium in the new global world order: the Nation is no longer able to force the State to regulate the Market.

      for - quote - the Nation (state) is no longer able to force the State to regulate the Market - Michel Bauwens - climate crisis - transnational capitalism escapes the regulation of nation states - example - COP conferences and climate change

    2. for the first time in history, transnational capital could significantly escape the regulation of the nation-states, rendering the latter inoperative

      for - quote - transnational capitalism escapes the regulation of nation states - Michel Bauwens - climate crisis - transnational capitalism escapes the regulation of nation states - example - COP conferences and climate change quote - transnational capitalism escapes the regulation of nation states - Michel Bauwens (see below) - The nation-state equilibrium started to be disrupted in the 1980s. - Neoliberalism is in fact, also a failed attempt at global regulation. - Several events, such as - the conservative counter-revolution of Thatcher and Reagan, - the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989-91, and - the failure of the first attempt at democratic coordination of the economy in Chile (Cybersyn), - contributed to the emergence of a new world order in which, for the first time in history, - transnational capital could significantly escape the regulation of the nation-states, rendering the latter inoperative. - This was of course done consciously and with the collaboration of neoliberal nation-states.

      comment - This is why climate change agreements at the nation-state level, such as COP conferences, are such dismal failures - Trump was bought out by billionaires who wanted to maintain their status quo money-making-machines - In this sense, this is conservatism at work - Economic, fossil-fuel incumbents teamed up with Christian fundamentalists to make a last valiant attempt at preserving the old order - Unfortunately, if they succeed, it will definitely accelerate their demise as well as the entire biosphere

  5. Jul 2024
    1. This basic mismatch between the scale of the problem and the scale of possible solutions is a source of many of today’s failures of global governance. Nation-states and the global governance institutions they have formed simply aren’t fit for the task of managing things such as viruses, greenhouse gases and biodiversity, which aren’t bound by political borders, but only by the Earth system.

      for - governance - failure of nation state - on global issues

  6. May 2024
    1. a digital Nation today on a nation today is like way too big like we we don't have kinship with all the people

      for - comparison - kinship in digital vs nation state

      comparison - between - digital or network state - nation state - comparison statement - kinship is key to forming digital / network states, but are impossible in nation states - nation states are far too large for any real intimacy - The raison d'etre of network states is strong kinship, it's what defines them - Indyweb is designed to catalyze network states - @GyuriLajos

    2. economies of scope

      for - answer - size of a digital nation - definition - economy of scope

      answer - size of a digital nation - In contrast to nation states with the concept of economy of scale, - in Network states, we have the concept of economy of scope

      definition - economy of scope - for small group through strong alignment of interests and values, to foster close kinship - then expand to other similarly aligned groups with synergies between groups

    1. CoordiNations

      for - definition - Coordi-Nation

      definition - Coordi-Nation - virtual, digital, non-territorial groups of Network States with strong degress of interdependency and kinship and that digitally coordinate their mutual sovereignty - author - Primavera de Filippi

      to - Primavera De Filippi Edcon 2023 talk - The Rise of the Network State and Coordi-Nations - https://hyp.is/3etQygi4Ee-17K-Lej3Fzg/docdrop.org/video/F-ckcvpSttA/

  7. Apr 2024
  8. Mar 2024
    1. “Inherent in the dynamics of capitalism is a powerful drive to earn profits, invest them, innovate and thus grow the economy….These features of capitalism, as they are constituted today, work together to produce an economic and political reality that is highly destructive of the environment.” (7) Much of the book explores this drive of capitalism toward unlimited quantitative growth, the role of the market in this drive, the centrality of the corporation in carrying out accumulation, the wastefulness of consumption under capitalism, and the domination of the corporations over governments.

      "domination of the corporations over governments"

    1. The basis of imperialism is the division of the world into an “anarchic” system of independent nation-states. There is no larger structure of decision-making that regulates human society on a global scale. Nation-states are thus only constrained in their conduct on the world stage by fear of what other states can do to them. Competition between nation-states puts pressure on each state to maximize its power to avoid subordination to others. States that have little power will be under severe pressure to align themselves with more muscular states that have major military and economic forces at their disposal. The logic of the nation-state system is similar to that of competition in the sphere of production. The world’s productive forces are divided into competing business organizations where each can survive only as long as its sales revenue is greater than its costs. Competition forces companies to constantly seek innovations that lower their per unit costs, especially labor costs. A company with greater resources will be much more likely to survive in the constantly changing world of market forces and attempts by competitors to take away their market share. A company must pursue economic expansion to survive in such a world. Competition between nation-states has the same logic, leading inevitably to the “arms race,” that is, technological innovation to enhance the destructive power that a state can bring to bear on the world scene. “Dominate or be dominated” is as much the logic of competition between nation-states as between businesses. The imperialist tendency is inherent in every state. The formation of new nation-states can no more put an end to imperialism than the formation of new businesses can put an end to capitalism. The “defeat” of one empire in this or that region, or the long-term decline of a formerly dominant power, will not bring an end to the system of imperialism but merely facilitate the rise of a new empire, or the rise of numerous mini-imperialist tendencies, with all the dangers of military conflict that implies.
  9. theanarchistlibrary.org theanarchistlibrary.org
    1. The State, therefore, is the most flagrant, the most cynical, and the most complete negation of humanity. It shatters the universal solidarity of all men on the earth, and brings some of them into association only for the purpose of destroying, conquering, and enslaving all the rest. —Mikhail Bakunin[1]
  10. Dec 2023
    1. Rupert Read has the best idea I have heard re international climate negotiations: countries that are serious should have their own conference where they collaborate on strong targets, plans, etc. Part of which should be recognising the dangers of remaining reliant on the petrostates, planning to transcend that reliance and sanctioning them
      • for: good idea - COP alternative, COP alternative - coalition of the willing, COP alternative - social tipping point, Rupert Read - alternative to COP

      • good idea: COP alternative

        • This could work based on the principle of social tipping points
        • The current COP pits the powerful incumbents of the old system delaying as long as possible rapid system change, these are the conservatives
          • This puts the liberals at distinct disadvantage from the conservatives because in a consensus reached agreement, the conservatives can veto any strong and binding language that represents rapid system change
        • In an alternative conference where the 100+ nation states are already in agreement, action in this smaller coalition OF THE WILLING, will lead to rapid action.
        • This could lead to breaking the threshold of system change via reaching the 25% social tipping point threshold
      • question: alternative COP

        • If an alternative COP was held, is the nation state the best level to approach?
        • What about a city level COP?
      • reference

  11. Nov 2023
    1. As you have read over to us several of the former Treaties with our Forefathers, We think itwould be better to come wholly upon a new Footing, for all those former

      This to me suggests that the Penobscot's value the stability of a treaty and the promises to uphold it- by acknowledging that previous treaties have been broken due to hidden ill intentions this demonstrates that they .take the premise of a new treaty very seriously and do not wish for it to be an empty promise

    1. first day of October Yearly, so long as they shall Continue inFriendship, Receive Presents of Blankets, Tobacco, and some Powder & Shot; and the saidIndians promise once every Year, upon the first of October to come by themselves or theirDelegates and Receive the said Presents and Renew their Friendship and Submissions.7. That the Indians shall use their best Endeavours to save the lives and goods of any PeopleShipwrecked on this Coast, where they resort, and shall Conduct the People saved to Halifaxwith their Goods, & a Reward adequate to the Salvadge shall be given them.8. That all Disputes whatsoever that may happen to arise between the Indians now at Peace,and others His Majesty's Subjects in this Province shall be tryed in His Majesty's Courts of CivilJudicature, where the Indians shall have the same benefit, Advantages and Priviledges, as anyothers of His Majesty's Subjects.

      This treaty seems to be equally beneficial for both sides, not only in terms of aid and provisions but in promoting general peace. It is one thing to use the allure of presents and provisions to ensure compliance, though number 7 for example actually suggests the fostering of genuine goodwill between the people

    2. and on the other hand if any of the Indians refusing to ratify this Peace, shall make Warupon the Tribe who have now confirmed the same; they shall upon Application have such aidand Assistance from the Government for their Defence, as the case may require.

      Interesting, in this regard the previous treaty only went as far as discussion Wabanaki obligations to diplomatically enforce peace- and while this does reiterate that it showcases that that is to be expected reciprocally via Government aid and assistance

  12. Oct 2023
    1. My land which I received from God alone, my land of which no king nor foreign power hasbeen allowed or is allowed to dispose against my will

      I find this interesting given the fact that one justification for colonialism by Europeans is God and religion, I am in another class where we read a document by John Cotton who likened expansion to God's promise to David. By introducing religion to Indigenous people the Europeans essentially gave them tools to witness the hypocrisy of the Europeans (beyond of course the obvious factors, this is just an interesting irony)

    1. [But this made me much better when he inspired in your majesty these sentiments ofgreat compassion for me, that he seems well disposed to facilitate the enjoyment ofthis happiness in so many ways.

      Interesting choice of words here, certainly seems as though it could be an insinuation for fighting against the English with "so many ways"

    2. My king, my Father,

      We have discussed in previous weeks how a drive for religious conversion went twofold with obtaining French subjects. By referring to the King as "My king, my father" suggects that the abenaquis do see themselves as French subjects

    3. I am contentto have someone beside me with whom I am tightly united by religion and wholikewise supports me from afar with the strong hand of someone that I regard as thegrandest prince on earth and, who for me, takes the place of father.

      As we know Catholicism was brought to the Natives from Europe, and it would seem that the Christian Faith has become more important to the Abenaki, and for the Abenaki the alliance with the French is as much a Religious one as it is a political one.

  13. Jan 2023
    1. Much of what they do can be done without eliciting the ire of nation-states. Bike shares, pedestrian zones, insulated buildings, renovated port facilities, congestion fees, car emission limits, furnace specifications, fuel upgrades (from oil to gas to alternative energy) and white paint roofs, for example, are only some of the innovations city officials can promote to effect significant reductions in emissions and pollutants.

      !- cities actions : can be done without eliciting ire of nation state - bike shares - pedestrian zones - insulated buildings - renovated ports - congestion fees - car emission limits - furnace specifications - fuel upgrades - white paint roofs - cities are the right level for focusing on effective global climate action

    2. here states have grown dysfunctional and sovereignty has become an obstacle to global democratic action—as when the United States (or China, France, or Canada) refuses to compromise its sovereignty by permitting the international monitoring of carbon emissions on its soil—cities have increasingly proven themselves capable of deliberative democratic action on behalf of sustainability, as they have actually done in intercity associations like the C-40 or ICLEI. If presidents and prime ministers cannot summon the will to work for a sustainable planet, mayors can. If citizens of the province and nation think ideologically and divisively, neighbors and citizens of the towns and cities think publicly and cooperatively.

      !- claim : cities can mitigate corrupted democracy and foster global cooperation - ie. C40 or ICLEI (also Covenant of Mayors) - cities are not plagued by the problems of state actors who cannot reach any meaningful agreement at COP conferences

  14. Sep 2022
    1. Renan's definition of a nation has been extremely influential. This was given in his 1882 discourse Qu'est-ce qu'une nation? ("What is a Nation?"). Whereas German writers like Fichte had defined the nation by objective criteria such as a race or an ethnic group "sharing common characteristics" (language, etc.), Renan defined it by the desire of a people to live together, which he summarized by a famous phrase, "avoir fait de grandes choses ensemble, vouloir en faire encore" (having done great things together and wishing to do more).
  15. Aug 2022
  16. Mar 2022
  17. Nov 2021
  18. Sep 2021
  19. Jul 2021
  20. Jun 2021
    1. Mike: But I believe that if you're really, really dedicated, anything is possible, and I feel like that country made me realize it. That hope. That even though I'm here, if I made it out there I could make it out here. And I just love America. There's nowhere else that's the same as that spot. It taught me a lot of things and I feel like both of them are like my mother countries. They're just like my stepmother. But I love both countries to death.

      Reflections, The United States, Favorite parts

    2. Mike: I feel like I'm a Mexican American. You learn to love your country when you're young, because of your parents and your culture, but at the same time you see all these opportunities that are given to you by going to the United States. And a lot of things that people say in the United States is bullshit.

      Reflections, Identity, Mexican/ American

  21. May 2021
  22. Mar 2021
  23. Oct 2020
  24. Sep 2020
  25. Aug 2020
    1. Hogan, A. B., Jewell, B. L., Sherrard-Smith, E., Vesga, J. F., Watson, O. J., Whittaker, C., Hamlet, A., Smith, J. A., Winskill, P., Verity, R., Baguelin, M., Lees, J. A., Whittles, L. K., Ainslie, K. E. C., Bhatt, S., Boonyasiri, A., Brazeau, N. F., Cattarino, L., Cooper, L. V., … Hallett, T. B. (2020). Potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria in low-income and middle-income countries: A modelling study. The Lancet Global Health, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30288-6

  26. Jul 2020
  27. Apr 2019
    1. It is more to the point that Kalakaua’s reign was, in a material sense, the golden age of Hawaiian histor

      This is an important economic context to note, because it establishes a certain legitimacy to Kalakaua in economic terms, but it is also important to consider what other consequences were such as sustainable polices. What specific changes exactly made things shift?

  28. Sep 2018
  29. Sep 2017
    1. nothing, more than education, adorning the prosperity, the power and the happiness of a nation

      Regarding the lens in which we view the world in my engagement class entitled Race, Racism, Colony, and Nation, this reference to the "prosperity...power, and the happiness of a nation," can be connected to the differences between the experience of the colony and the nation within America. The colony, in this case, referring to the slaves and other marginalized communities unable to enjoy these rights that Jefferson believes are adorned by education. The nation, referring to the community of white people that is clearly who this document (and at this time, the university) was made by and for.

  30. Jul 2017
    1. The remaining major factor underlying wealth and poverty is the state of the natural environment. All human populations depend to varying degrees on renewable natural resources—especially on forests, water, soils, and seafood. It’s tricky to manage such resources sustainably. Countries that excessively deplete their resources—whether inadvertently or intentionally—tend to impoverish themselves, although the difficulty of estimating accurately the costs of resource destruction causes economists to ignore it. It helps explain why notoriously deforested countries—such as Haiti, Rwanda, Burundi, Madagascar, and Nepal—tend to be notoriously poor and politically unstable.
    2. Thus, geographical latitude acting independently of institutions is an important geographic factor affecting power, prosperity, and poverty. The other important geographic factor is whether an area is accessible to ocean-going ships because it lies either on the sea coast or on a navigable river. It costs roughly seven times more to ship a ton of cargo by land than by sea. That puts landlocked countries at an economic disadvantage, and helps explain why landlocked Bolivia and semilandlocked Paraguay are the poorest countries of South America. It also helps explain why Africa, with no river navigable to the sea for hundreds of miles except the Nile, and with fifteen landlocked nations, is the poorest continent. Eleven of those fifteen landlocked African nations have average incomes of $600 or less; only two countries outside Africa (Afghanistan and Nepal, both also landlocked) are as poor.
    3. Two major factors contribute to the poverty of tropical countries compared to temperate countries: diseases and agricultural productivity. The tropics are notoriously unhealthy. Tropical diseases differ on average from temperate diseases, in several respects. First, there are far more parasitic diseases (such as elephantiasis and schistosomiasis) in tropical areas, because cold temperate winters kill parasite stages outside our bodies, but tropical parasites can thrive outside our bodies all year long. Second, disease vectors, such as mosquitoes and ticks, are far more diverse in tropical than in temperate areas.
    4. The remaining factor contributing to good institutions, of which Acemoglu and Robinson mention some examples, involves another paradox, termed “the curse of natural resources.” One might naively expect countries generously endowed with natural resources (such as minerals, oil, and tropical hardwoods) to be richer than countries poorer in natural resources. In fact, the trend is opposite, the result of the many ways in which national dependence on certain types of natural resources (like diamonds and oil) tends to promote bad institutions, such as corruption, civil wars, inflation, and neglect of education.
    5. The various durations of government around the world are linked to the various durations and productivities of farming that was the prerequisite for the rise of governments. For example, Europe began to acquire highly productive agriculture 9,000 years ago and state government by at least 4,000 years ago, but subequatorial Africa acquired less productive agriculture only between 2,000 and 1,800 years ago and state government even more recently. Those historical differences prove to have huge effects on the modern distribution of wealth. Ola Olsson and Douglas Hibbs showed that, on average, nations in which agriculture arose many millennia ago—e.g., European nations—tend to be richer today than nations with a shorter history of agriculture (e.g., subequatorial African nations), and that this factor explains about half of all the modern national variation in wealth. Valerie Bockstette, Areendam Chanda, and Louis Putterman showed further that, if one compares countries that were equally poor fifty years ago (e.g., South Korea and Ghana), the countries with a long history of state government (e.g., South Korea) have on the average been getting rich faster than those with a short history (e.g., Ghana).
    6. There is no doubt that good institutions are important in determining a country’s wealth. But why have some countries ended up with good institutions, while others haven’t? The most important factor behind their emergence is the historical duration of centralized government. Until the rise of the world’s first states, beginning around 3400 BC, all human societies were bands or tribes or chiefdoms, without any of the complex economic institutions of governments. A long history of government doesn’t guarantee good institutions but at least permits them; a short history makes them very unlikely. One can’t just suddenly introduce government institutions and expect people to adopt them and to unlearn their long history of tribal organization.That cruel reality underlies the tragedy of modern nations, such as Papua New Guinea, whose societies were until recently tribal. Oil and mining companies there pay royalties intended for local landowners through village leaders, but the leaders often keep the royalties for themselves. That’s because they have internalized their society’s practice by which clan leaders pursue their personal interests and their own clan’s interests, rather than representing everyone’s interests.
  31. Nov 2016
  32. Sep 2016
    1. studies indicate that a text needs to be about 98% comprehensible in order for it to help the reader acquire new vocabulary

      Source: Hu and Nation - seems to contradict "context clue" argument for uncovering new vocab. This may work if 98% is already there. May still be dark for jargon and technical terms.