Information quality=precision

Nope (re: offline). You're confusing "browser-based" and "Web-based" (sort of the way people confuse statically typed" versus strongly typed*). They're different. You can have a fully offline browser-based interface. Most common browsers are every bit as amenable as being used as simple document viewers as Preview.app or Microsoft Word is. The browser's native file format is just a different sort—not DOCX, and not PDF (although lots of browsers can do PDF, too; you can't write apps in PDF, though—at least not in the subset supported by typical browsers). Instead of Office macros written in VBA, browsers support scripting offline documents in JS just like online documents. You can run your offline programs using the browser runtime, unless they're written to expect otherwise.

Si nous restons fidèle au titre de cette sous-partie, la préférence accordée aux logiciels libres ne concerne pas que l'interopérabilité. L'enjeu principal est de garder la possibilité de décrire une vision du monde particulière. Celle-ci passe par l'agencement de l'espace numérique, plus facileemnt aménageable du côté des logiciels libres que des logiciels propriétaires.

Un logiciel propriétaire est par définition fermé : il impose sa vision du monde et l'utilisateur ne peut pas modifier cette dimension là.

Pensez à d'abord faire une présentation de la technologie avant d'en présenter les limites

Très bien.

Attention à ne pas aller trop vite ! Le terme "limite" utilisé dans un titre sous-entend que vous émettez des réserves sur les technologies d'OCR. Ce sont des technologies très récentes (seulement quelques années) sur lesquelles nous avons peu de recul... Oui il y a des limites à pointer, mais ce sont des technologies qui évoluent très rapidement !

définir ce qu'est la numérisation et l'enjeu de la numérisation vis-à-vis de l'accessibilité

C'est bien de le préciser. Toutefois, ne pas traiter cette question ne veut pas dire qu'il ne faut pas en tenir compte !

et humaines ..! Après tout, ce sont les "humanités" numériques !

l'emploi de méthodes computationnelles ou des outils numériques ne fait pas des chercheurs en humanités numériques des développeurs !

référence ?

quelles technologies ? soyez plus précise

12 Felix Frankfurter, Some Reflections On the Reading of Statutes, 47 CoLUm . L. rev. 527, 528 (1947), reprinting Felix Frankfurter, Sixth Annual Benjamin N. Cardozo Lecture, 2 Rec. Bar Ass'n City of N.Y. (No. 6, 1947).

11 Guy de Maupassant, Selected Short Sto- ries 10-11 (Roger Colet ed., 1971) (Maupassant quoting French writer Gustave Flaubert).

The running program, that is (as just described).

@1:10:20

With HTML you have, broadly speaking, an experience and you have content and CSS and a browser and a server and it all comes together at a particular moment in time, and the end user sitting at a desktop or holding their phone they get to see something. That includes dynamic content, or an ad was served, or whatever it is—it's an experience. PDF on the otherhand is a record. It persists, and I can share it with you. I can deliver it to you [...]

NB: I agree with the distinction being made here, but I disagree that the former description is inherent to HTML. It's not inherent to anything, really, so much as it is emergent—the result of people acting as if they're dealing in live systems when they shouldn't.

However, while URLs allow you to locate a resource, a URI simply identifies a resource.

Very untrue/misleading! It doesn't simply (only) identify it. It includes URLs, so a URI may be a locator, a name, or both!

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986 states it better and perfectly:

A URI can be further classified as a locator, a name, or both. The term "Uniform Resource Locator" (URL) refers to the subset of URIs that, in addition to identifying a resource, provide a means of locating the resource by describing its primary access mechanism (e.g., its network "location").

This means that a URI is not necessarily intended as an address to get a resource. It is meant just as an identifier.

The "is not necessarily" part is correct. The "is meant" part is incorrect; shoudl be "may only be meant as".

"secure" is used in this context to mean, roughly, "work with adversarial input"

Example of when "proprietary" is not an antonym of "open source".

What even is a locked wiki insofar as the ways it differs from traditional (pre-wiki) content publishing pipelines? Where's the wiki part of it?

See algorithmic languages.

What the re-education around REST needs is a catchy label for what people call REST that works well as a light pejorative. Two-Bit History gave it a shot, coining the ad hoc acronym "FIOH", but it doesn't have the desired properties.

je ne comprens pas, il semble manquer un concept ou un bout de phrase ?!

Il est peut-être nécessaire ici de bien rappeler la solution de partage et son éventuel caractère illégal pour comprendre les "conséquences prévisibles". Le texte détaille bien la situation et le problème, mais passe très vite sur la solution trouvée et ses modalités (le partage de pair à pair de documents sous droits). "L'atteinte au droits d'auteurs" arrivent alors un peu abruptement.

The first known precision-geared mechanism is a sundial and calendar of Byzantine origin dating to circa 600 C.E.

Ira, still wearing a mask, Hyman. (2020, November 26). @SciBeh @Quayle @STWorg @jayvanbavel @UlliEcker @philipplenz6 @AnaSKozyreva @johnfocook Some might argue the moral dilemma is between choosing what is seen as good for society (limiting spread of disinformation that harms people) and allowing people freedom of choice to say and see what they want. I’m on the side of making good for society decisions. [Tweet]. @ira_hyman. https://twitter.com/ira_hyman/status/1331992594130235393

The only solution is probably to advocate for moving away from "REST" entirely—for all parties. Mend the discord by coining two new terms and clearly articulate the two meanings that should be attached to them.

("Indian" is another word like this, but that did not get fully deprecated. This is resulted in lots of confusion. "'Indian'? Like Native Americans?" "No, Indian as in 'from India'" "Oh, all right." A similar thing is happening with "open source".)

This probably involves making the terms (or at least one of them—so long as it's the right one) somewhat cool. Maybe the non-REST term should be AROH (pronounced like "arrow") for "Application RPC Over HTTP".

Wilkinson, Jack, Kellyn F. Arnold, Eleanor J. Murray, Maarten van Smeden, Kareem Carr, Rachel Sippy, Marc de Kamps, et al. ‘Time to Reality Check the Promises of Machine Learning-Powered Precision Medicine’. The Lancet Digital Health 0, no. 0 (16 September 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30200-4.

The Alchemy of Us: How Humans and Matter Transformed One Another | IndieBound.org. (n.d.). Retrieved August 26, 2020, from https://www.indiebound.org/book/9780262043809

peut-être préciser que l'interdit se retrouve dans le lexique de la vue qui devient transgressive (épier, rôder)

Morey, R. D. (2020, June 12). Power and precision. Medium. https://medium.com/@richarddmorey/power-and-precision-47f644ddea5e

According to Ericsson deliberate practice for knowledge work is not possible because the criteria are not objective (you don't know if you're doing well).

This collides with Dr. Sönke Ahrens' contention that note taking, specifically elaboration, instantiates two feedback loop. One feedback loop in that you can see whether you're capturing the essence of what you're trying to make a note on and a second feedback loop in that you can see whether your note is not only an accurate description of the original idea, but also a complete one.

Put differently, note taking instantiates two feedback loops. One for precision and one for recall.

hum j'aurai besoin d'une rapide définition

rapidement dis les grands thèmes de l'oeuvre qui t'ont poussé à la choisir elle

Il faudrait que tu expliques en quelques mots (genre une parenthèse) ce que tu entends par cette expression de devenir humain

j'expliciterai en quoi elle est épuisée, des exemples rapides après l'ouverture de deux points.

An actual number may have been more useful here. In other words, did only 1 not say it? Or some only said it indirectly?

Example: In cancer research you may want higher recall, Since you want all actual positive observations to classified as True Positive. A lower Precision maybe alright because some healthy people classified as cancerous can be rectified later.

Perhaps the most important measure to keep precision medicine initiate alive. Surge in risk and treatment response prediction in genomic assays is of little value without practical means of affordable molecular profiling of a patient's tumor or more importantly, pre-diagnosis genomic screen.

different and inconsistent patterns

Hypothesising

no or low (<10%)

My data suggest that it is possible to qualitatively

considered quantitative

primer sets are not tissue-specific; you used them for all tissues; only the measurements themselves are tissue-specific

transcription

qRT-PCR cannot show transcription termination: all it can do is verify the RNAseq data, i.e., more relatively more transcription upstream of an active CGI compared to transcription across the CGI. It is important to be precise about what qRT-PCR can and cannot do.

transcription

transcription extends across

transcription

reactions

orders of magnitude more

sodium metabisulfite

depth-of-sequencing-normalised and log-transformed read coverage data

scatter

transcriptional activity

reducing the potential of tissue-specific host promoter activity confounding the observations

scatter

scatter

(low blue data point)

terminating upstream

(high red data point)

(low x value)

(large difference in y values: high blue versus low red data point)

(large x value)

amount of fragments spanning

(scaled) amount of cDNA fragments mapping

scatter

no difference between across and upstream

extending across than terminating upstream

A scatter plot of intragenic CGI activity versus the upstream and across quantities for all 30 tissues was

scaling across tissues to make quantities comparable

randomly permuting the intragenic CGI activities across tissues

aligned sequenced cDNA fragments

spanning across the intragenic CGI

host gene exon-anchored

separately for the sense and antisense orientations of transcription from the CGI relative to the host gene

CGI transcriptional states

during cell division

in vertebrates (in bacteria, 5mA is common)

too vague

what is 'it'?

3'UTR

mitotically or meiotically heritable