If proven, these failures would constitute infringements of Articles 34(1) and (2), 35(1) and 42(2) of the DSA.

he Commission has extended its ongoing formal proceedings opened against X in December 2023 to  establish whether X has properly assessed and mitigated all systemic risks, as defined in the DSA, associated with its recommender systems, including the impact of its recently announced switch to a Grok-based recommender system.

The new investigation will assess whether the company properly assessed and mitigated risks associated with the deployment of Grok's functionalities into X in the EU. This includes risks related to the dissemination of illegal content in the EU, such as manipulated sexually explicit images, including content that may amount to child sexual abuse material.

OpenHands demonstrated strong capabilities, particularly for complex refactoring tasks. With better configuration and more explicit instructions about development workflows, it could likely match Copilot's reliability. The open-source nature also makes it attractive, since the entire system can be self-hosted and confugred for every team's or project's needs.

OpenHands: Capable but Requiring InterventionI connected my repository to OpenHands through the All Hands cloud platform. I pointed the agent at a specific issue, instructing it to follow the detailed requirements and create a pull request when complete. The conversational interface displayed the agent's reasoning as it worked through the problem, and the approach appeared logical.

When an agent doesn't deliver what you expected, the temptation is to engage in corrective dialogue — to guide the agent toward the right solution through feedback. While some agents support this interaction model, it's often more valuable to treat failures as specification bugs. Ask yourself: what information was missing that caused the agent to make incorrect decisions? What assumptions did I fail to make explicit?This approach builds your specification-writing skills rapidly. After a few iterations, you develop an intuition for what needs to be explicit, what edge cases to cover, and how to structure instructions for maximum clarity. The goal isn't perfection on the first try, but rather continuous improvement in your ability to delegate effectively.

One effective technique for creating comprehensive specifications is to use AI assistants that have full awareness of your codeba

A complete task specification goes beyond describing what needs to be done. It should encompass the entire development lifecycle for that specific task. Think of it as creating a mini project plan that an intelligent but literal agent can follow from start to finish.

we tend to underspecify because we're exploring, experimenting, and can provide immediate course corrections. We might type a quick prompt, see what the AI produces, and refine from there. This exploratory approach works when you're actively engaged

The fundamental rule for working with asynchronous agents contradicts much of modern agile thinking: create complete and precise task definitions upfront. This isn't about returning to waterfall methodologies, but rather recognizing that when you delegate to an AI agent, you need to provide all the context and guidance that you would naturally provide through conversation and iteration with a human developer.

The ecosystem of asynchronous coding agents is rapidly evolving, with each offering different integration points and capabilities:GitHub Copilot Agent: Accessible through GitHub by assigning issues to the Copilot user, with additional VS Code integrationCodex: OpenAI's hosted coding agent, available through their platform and accessible from ChatGPTOpenHands: Open-source agent available through the All Hands web app or self-hosted deploymentsJules: Google Labs product with GitHub integration capabilitiesDevin: The pioneering coding agent from Cognition that first demonstrated this paradigmCursor background agents: Embedded directly in the Cursor IDECI/CD integrations: Many command-line tools can function as asynchronous agents when integrated into GitHub Actions or continuous integration scripts

isn't just about saving time — it's about restructuring how software gets built.

several of these tasks running in parallel, each agent working independently on different parts of your codebas

You prepare a work item in the form of a ticket, issue, or task definition, hand it off to the agent, and then move on to other work.

While interactive AI keeps you tethered to the development process, requiring constant attention and decision-making, asynchronous agents transform you from a driver into a delegator.

Asynchronous coding agents — also called background agents or cloud agent

why asynchronous agents deserve more attention than they currently receive, provides practical guidelines for working with them effectively, and shares real-world experience using multiple agents to refactor a production codebase.

asynchronous coding agents represent a fundamentally different — and potentially more powerful — approach to AI-augmented software development. These background agents accept complete work items, execute them independently, and return finished solutions while you focus on other tasks.

Further ReadingI’m not gonna pretend to be an expert here (any more than I’m an expert Obsidian plugin developer :p) but here are some resources that helped me figure out Claude CodeKent writes a lot about how he uses Obsidian with Claude Code.This is an incredible hub of resources for using Claude Code for project management, by someone who also uses Obsidian.This take on Claude Code for non-developers helped solidify my understanding of how it all works; it hallucinates less, for one thing.Eleanor Berger has fantastic tips for working with asynchronous coding agents and is incredibly level-headed about the LLM landscape.This article does a great job of breaking down all the nitty-gritty of how Claude Code works.Damian Player has a step-by-step guide on using Claude Code as a non-technical person that goes into more depth.Here’s a tutorial from a pro that breaks down best practices for using Claude Code, like the importance of planning and thinking things through, and exactly why a good CLAUDE.md file matters.

Little Tips for Claude Code + Obsidian

Terminal Practice with GamesSome folks I’ve talked to are a little intimidated by the terminal. Want to practice in a low-stakes way?

As for the privacy concerns? There isn’t anything private in my vault, so I don’t really care about Anthropic access.

My favorite kind of problem is a solvable problem. I know a lot of people who just brute force or deal with their issues, but I try to notice pain points and deal with them. This isn’t just an AI thing, this is a life thing.

Building the habit of delegating — and using language clear and precise enough for a teenaged girl who doesn’t live in my house to understand — has really helped with leveraging LLMs.

and I don’t need to bother my friends to get stuff done.

Suddenly, I can actually make use of the APIs I’ve always known existed.

I’m already finding better ways to batch my tasks. Making smarter to-do lists that include more context

But these days I’m not generally trying to do things faster, I’m trying to do them with less attention. All these searches and tasks run in the background, which means they actually get done. When I had to actively sit there and click through things, half of it never happened because something else more important would come up, or I just didn’t feel like doing grunt work just then.

Setting Claude Code Up in ObsidianI was genuinely surprised at how easy the terminal plugin was to install for Obsidian. In Obsidian, I went to community plugins, searched for “terminal,” and installed the Terminal plugin by polyipseity. Then I clicked the “open terminal” button on the left-hand side. That’s it.There’s a dedicated Claudian plugin (subtly different from the Claudsidian solution people), but the Terminal felt a little higher fidelity to how I’m used to doing things, and a little simpler to understand. Plus, Claudian looks great but honestly I don’t think I can live without plan mode, which the readme says it doesn’t currently support. Plan mode is nice because it asks questions, really thinks things through, and can be trusted not to do dumb destructive things.

If you have been following along with me for years you know I don’t hype things just because people are hyping things. But Claude Code finally has made AI a core part of my processes instead of just a thing I use sometimes as an extra source or bonus spell checker or quicker way to reformat files.

The UI feels so intuitive, like an old-school MUD.

ICE is angry, ICE is terrified, of how deeply unpopular it is.

May I encourage all reading this to find ways to talk to people, to nudge people to take action, to become “upstanders” (as opposed to “bystanders”). An upstander is someone who takes positive action, no matter how small, to counter evil.

While there are questions around the implications of the ownership structure, AWS’s European Sovereign Cloud still provides a greater level of sovereignty compared to its standard public cloud service in terms of enabling regulatory compliance, according to analysts. This could appeal to European organizations, they said, depending on their sovereignty requirements.

“The AWS European Sovereign Cloud is a step in the right direction. It signals that they acknowledge the problem.”

“There has been a pivotal shift in the last few months; we have seen a fundamental switch from just interest in sovereign solutions to actual buying behaviors,” said Maisto. “The demand is there. Organizations are investing money into sovereign migration projects, and we have not seen this before,” he said.

In the end, most customers will opt for strategies that comprise a mix of sovereignty levels depending on their needs.

Google and Thales, for instance, or Microsoft and Bleu, a joint venture between Orange and Capgemini. This involves the hyperscaler providing access to its technology, while the two companies remain independent. Buest said the arrangement provides a higher level of “operational sovereignty” compared to AWS European Sovereign Cloud, though it still involves some level of technological dependence on the hyperscaler.

The other one that happened was just before Russia invaded Ukraine, they managed to disable the Viasat modems. And this is an interesting case. These modems are used for satellite communications. And they were able to attack these modems so that they physically disabled themselves. It was not like the denial of service attack on the network. No, they managed to wipe the firmware of all these modems in such a way that it could not be replaced. The reason we know about this stuff so well is it turns out there were lots of windmills that also had these modems. In Germany, apparently 4,000 of these modems stopped working. And there were 4,000 wind turbines that could no longer be operated. So this was a military cyber attack that happened as Russia was invading Ukraine. And it was of great benefit to them because it disabled a lot of military communications in Ukraine. But this is the kind of thing that can happen, only that it’s quite rare.

The best time to learn how to work together with a group of people is before a crisis, not during it. Crisis engineering tells us that a team is more likely to be successful if everyone has already worked together.

Most of the antennas that ship with evaluation boards are not very good. One option for an upgrade if you’re using the recommended 868 MHz network is the Taoglas TI.08.A. IMPORTANT: Never turn on a LoRa device without an antenna attached! The power sent to the antenna can destroy the device if there is no antenna attached to radiate it.

LILYGO T-Echo If you’d like a device that good for hacking and comes in a small case, The LILYGO T-Echo is a simple small low-power ready-to-use handheld device for about €80. It has ~3cm square e-ink display, a case with a few buttons, Bluetooth, GPS, and about a day’s worth of battery. Input/output/charging is via USB-C (but use a USB-A to USB-C cable). Received messages are displayed on the e-ink screen and can be cycled through with the buttons. Sending messages requires connecting with another device via Bluetooth.

This is a great option for your “everyday carry” Meshtastic node. It’s the size and shape of a few credit cards. It’s also convenient to give to your less technical family and friends.

Heltec V4 or later If you have more time than money, try the Heltec V4 or later, currently one of the cheapest boards available at around €20. It has a postage stamp-sized OLED screen, a couple of tiny buttons, WiFi/Bluetooth, and USB-C input/power (but use a USB-A to USB-C cable). Received messages are displayed on the OLED and can be cycled through with tiny buttons. Sending messages requires connecting to it via WiFi or Bluetooth. It has no case, but the little plastic box it comes in can easily be turned into one with a sharp pen knife. It also has no battery, but it is a good idea to have a separate power bank anyway since you need a working phone or computer to send messages. It has no GPS.

SenseCap Solar P-1 Pro For people who can afford €100, this is the best option to add a LoRa node that will keep running without external power. It is a solar-powered battery-backed LoRa node ready to attach to your balcony or roof or fence. The P-1 Pro includes batteries and GPS; the P-1 does not.

Solar powered, battery-backed outdoor: SenseCap Solar P-1 Pro Cheapest: Heltec V4 Everyday carry and/or for non-techies: SenseCap Card Tracker 1000E Portable, good for hacking: LILYGO T-Echo

How to form an Internet Resiliency Club: Collect a group of internet-y people within ~10 km of each other Decide how to communicate normally (Signal, Matrix, email, etc.) Buy everyone LoRa (Long Range) radios and a powerbank with trickle charge Install Meshtastic on the LoRa radios Choose a LoRa channel to communicate on Organize meetups, send messages over Meshtastic, have fun If you work for a internet infrastructure company, you can suggest giving interested employees a LoRa radio, a mobile phone powerbank, and maybe even a small solar panel for their personal use (perhaps as part of an annual gift or bonus).

Amsterdam announced that it is planning for three weeks without electricity

Ham radio is too expensive, difficult, and power-hungry Initially I looked into ham radio, but it is just too expensive, difficult, and power-hungry to be practical. Then Alexander Yurtchenko told me about LoRa (Long Range) radio and Meshtastic, a cheap, low-power method of sending text messages across a few kilometers.

I started thinking about what I could personally do without any help from government or businesses. What if I could organize a group of volunteer networking experts who could communicate without any centralized infrastructure? We could effectively bootstrap communications recovery with just a few volunteers and some cheap hardware.

class I took on Crisis Engineering from Layer Aleph, on how organizations facing an existential crisis either swiftly transform themselves into a more functional form, or they fail and become even more dysfunctional.

What made me finally take action is watching a video created by Ukrainian IXP 1-IX to teach other European countries what Ukrainian internet operators have learned about hardening and repairing internet infrastructure leading up to and following the 2022 Russian invasion. The practical realities of keeping networks operating during war were sobering: building camoflouged router rooms with 3 days of generator power, replacing active fiber optic cable with passive, getting military service exemptions for their personnel, etc.. You can watch the most recent version, “Network Resilience: Experiences of survival and development during the war in Ukraine”, a 30 minute presentation at RIPE 90.

I am Valerie Aurora, a systems software engineer with 25 years of experience in open source software, operating systems, networking, file systems, and volunteer organizing. When I moved from San Francisco to Amsterdam in 2023, I started looking for ways to give back to my new home. In addition to systems consulting, I am a special rapporteur for the EU’s Cyber Resilience Act, serve as a RIPE Meeting program committee member, and speak at European technical conferences.

Organizations that understand the Al Capone theory of sexual harassment have an advantage: they know that reports or rumors of sexual misconduct are a sign they need to investigate for other incidents of misconduct, sexual or otherwise. Sometimes sexual misconduct is hard to verify because a careful perpetrator will make sure there aren’t any additional witnesses or records beyond the target and the target’s memory (although with the increase in use of text messaging in the United States over the past decade, we are seeing more and more cases where victims have substantial written evidence). But one of the implications of the Al Capone theory is that even if an organization can’t prove allegations of sexual misconduct, the allegations themselves are sign to also urgently investigate a wide range of aspects of an employee’s conduct.

While the initial results fall short, the AI field has a history of blowing through challenging benchmarks. Now that the APEX-Agents test is public, it’s an open challenge for AI labs that believe they can do better — something Foody fully expects in the months to come.

“The way we do our jobs isn’t with one individual giving us all the context in one place. In real life, you’re operating across Slack and Google Drive and all these other tools.” For many agentic AI models, that kind of multi-domain reasoning is still hit or miss.

The new research looks at how leading AI models hold up doing actual white-collar work tasks, drawn from consulting, investment banking, and law. The result is a new benchmark called APEX-Agents — and so far, every AI lab is getting a failing grade. Faced with queries from real professionals, even the best models struggled to get more than a quarter of the questions right. The vast majority of the time, the model came back with a wrong answer or no answer at all.

increase options in order to rebuild sovereignty – sovereignty that was once grounded in rules, but will increasingly be anchored in the ability to withstand pressure.This room knows this is classic risk management. Risk management comes at a price, but that cost of strategic autonomy, of sovereignty can also be shared.

A country that can't feed itself, fuel itself or defend itself, has few options. When the rules no longer protect you, you must protect yourself.But let's be clear eyed about where this leads.A world of fortresses will be poorer, more fragile and less sustainable. And there is another truth. If great powers abandon even the pretense of rules and values for the unhindered pursuit of their power and interests, the gains from transactionalism will become harder to replicate.Hegemons cannot continually monetize their relationships.Allies will diversify to hedge against uncertainty.

The multilateral institutions on which the middle powers have relied – the WTO, the UN, the COP – the architecture, the very architecture of collective problem solving are under threat. And as a result, many countries are drawing the same conclusions that they must develop greater strategic autonomy, in energy, food, critical minerals, in finance and supply chains.

But more recently, great powers have begun using economic integration as weapons, tariffs as leverage, financial infrastructure as coercion, supply chains as vulnerabilities to be exploited.

This bargain no longer works. Let me be direct. We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition.

We knew the story of the international rules-based order was partially false that the strongest would exempt themselves when convenient, that trade rules were enforced asymmetrically. And we knew that international law applied with varying rigour depending on the identity of the accused or the victim.This fiction was useful, and American hegemony, in particular, helped provide public goods, open sea lanes, a stable financial system, collective security and support for frameworks for resolving disputes.So, we placed the sign in the window. We participated in the rituals, and we largely avoided calling out the gaps between rhetoric and reality.

Václav Havel, later president, wrote an essay called The Power of the Powerless

AkademikerPension verwaltet nach den Angaben auf seiner Webseite zufolge ein Vermögen von insgesamt 164 Milliarden Dänischen Kronen. Dies entspricht umgerechnet knapp 26 Milliarden Dollar oder etwa 22 Milliarden Euro. Der Verkauf der US-Anleihen betrifft damit einen vergleichsweise kleinen Teil des Gesamtportfolios, hat aber eine hohe symbolische Bedeutung.

Es handele sich um Papiere im Wert von rund 100 Millionen Dollar

The study also considers future scenarios. If 15% of this spending were retained within the European economy by 2035, around 500,000 direct, indirect, and induced jobs would be created, benefiting the European economy.

80% of total spending on cloud software and services for business use in Europe went to US companies, representing a volume of €265 billion.

This spending, relating exclusively to cloud software and services for business use, represents approximately 2 million direct, indirect, and induced jobs in the US.

programma: Czkawka. Het is Pools voor “hik”

Waarom ik nooit opruimde#Eerlijk? Omdat ik het niet meer overzag.Als je één map hebt met rommel, ruim je die op. Maar als je tien mappen hebt, op zes verschillende plekken, met allemaal dezelfde soort inhoud - waar begin je dan? Welke is de “echte”? En wat als je per ongeluk iets weggooit dat je nog nodig had?Dus startte ik iedere keer dapper met opruimen. En stopte dan weer net zo snel.

73QRTSK

destroying an emergency lifeline that historically coordinates rescue operations when all other forms of communication fail.

The most terrifying aspect for operators worldwide is how our most sacred tradition has been weaponized as an indictment. Our QSL confirmation cards and logbooks are being treated as criminal evidence of foreign contact.

If this crackdown had reached me when I was still active in the country, my own call sign would have certainly placed me in front of a firing squad

But logic does not exist in a state ruled by technical savages. To them, the fact that you can solder an antenna, track a weather satellite, or understand the physics of wave propagation makes you an existential threat

The charges they face are staggering. These men have been indicted for High Treason and Espionage. Under the Belarusian Criminal Code, these charges carry sentences of life imprisonment or even the death penalty

we watched our colleagues – Andrey Repetiy (EW1ABT) and Nikita Krasko (EW1AEH) – being forced to publicly repent for the “crime” of technical curiosity and international communication. They were coerced on screen to renounce their own technical expertise as something harmful. Vyacheslav Benko (EW1ACE) remains behind bars alongside them.

ollowing the purge of Wikipedia editors and independent researchers, the regime has launched the “Radio Amateurs Case.” This chilling title deliberately echoes the infamous “Doctors’ Plot” of the Stalin era, where an entire group of the country’s best specialists was designated as enemies of the state.

You can’t reform a concentration camp regime. You have to dismantle it and replace it. We have a thousand ways to do it. And most U.S. citizens—particularly white ones—have the freedom to act, for now, with far less risk than the many people currently targeted.

without a complete dismantling of the targeting and detention systems we’ve created, we’re bound to return to this again and again. If it isn’t stopped, it can and will get much worse. p span[style*="font-size"] { line-height: 1.6; } Still, just as the U.S. has a heritage of oppression, it also has a vast inheritance from those who believed and worked for the best that the country could become

if you happen to be thinking, “Well, Japanese American detention camps were stopped. America refused all that,” I would answer that in that case, the camps were stopped within that critical three-to-five year period I’ve been discussing today. (And that camp system was never quite dismantled even then, but for decades continued to remain a closer call than you might imagine.)

People often think the Nazi system was a single static thing. But it evolved over time, just as our system of detention is evolving right now. It was in November 1938, just over five years into Nazi rule and Dachau’s existence, that the Nazis first swept tens of thousands of Jews en masse into camps in Germany and its territories during Kristallnacht.

The way camps work is that they come into being in a police state and help the police state to become more of a police state. Camps ratchet up the speed and the efficiency of harm the state does, particularly killing.

Congress has already allocated funding that will create a camp system that could, on its own, surpass our existing (massive) prison system. The state is already trying to use modern surveillance methods to control communities both outside and inside the camps. Concentration camp systems take the worst abuses of the existing system then expand and weaponize them.

Slave patrols combined a quasi-official role with citizen vigilantism. At the far end of the spectrum, the U.S. government has had an overt and vicious history of harming civilians from its founding, with Native genocide and chattel slavery.

both the international history of camps and domestic U.S. history are critical to understanding what’s going on and where we are in the current process.

Again, we need to do more than stop the construction of additional facilities, more than just get ICE agents to behave more politely. We need to dismantle the current system and remove the possibility for it to exist again. In my opinion, that is what “Abolish ICE” should mean.

we’re on the verge of entrenching a massive system, which is a very bad place to be. It’s my opinion that we have a limited window in which to act. What happens this year will be critical for significantly dismantling the existence of and any future capacity for building the extrajudicial camp network the government is constructing today.

We may already be living in a concentration-camp regime, but it hasn’t yet hardened into the kind of vast system that becomes the controlling factor in the country’s political future.

But Trump has since returned to office. And if we count the Biden administration as simply a pause on the Trump agenda in several ways, the U.S. is currently approaching the end of that three-to-five year window.

More often, as in the early years of Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany, the struggle over concentration camps took place between competing powers within the solidifying police state. Under Hitler, nearly three years into Nazi rule, the pro-camps faction of that struggle won, leading to an expanded camp system, which eventually blanketed the country then the continent.

In other cases, the external pressure applied is different. Three years into mass detentions in Chile in the 1970s, the situation was volatile enough that the U.S.—the major state supporting Pinochet’s dictatorship there—pressed for changes to DINA, the Chilean secret police. The organization was eliminated and replaced. That subsequent force was still abhorrent and continued to practice arbitrary detention. But one byproduct of the shift was that any expansion of mass detention into a broader, permanent camp system was halte

Sometimes the power struggle that determines the future of a camp system is external—for instance, defeat in war. Four years into the Khmer Rouge’s complete destabilization of Cambodia, Vietnam invaded.

In most cases, there’s a three-to-five-year window after a ruling party or leader or revolutionary brigade comes to power and asserts the right to arbitrarily detain and punish civilians. At some point toward the end of that window, a struggle typically begins over whether to massively expand the quasi-legal sites of detention into a more permanent system.

In the U.S., we currently have the existing brutality of the carceral system, cultural acceptance of disparate treatment for people of color, forced Native American exile to reservations, the long echoes Japanese American internment during World War II, the continuing operation of places like Guantanamo, and the willingness of both major political parties to use a detention-based punitive approach to immigration. These are the domestic weaknesses that helped to make the country susceptible to becoming a concentration camp regime.

Concentration camps involve the mass detention of civilians without due process on the basis of political, racial, ethnic, or religious identity. And that is where we’re at right now.

I’ll make clear that not all concentration camps are death camps

And also keep in mind that the U.S. is currently holding three times as many people as were detained in the Nazi concentration camp system in spring 1939—six years into the Third Reich and just before the start of World War II. In addition, the Department of Homeland Security, in its language and images in press releases and on social media, is directly aping Nazi propaganda.

A recent report from the American Immigration Council counts some 66,000 people in immigration detention at the end of 2025. That’s an increase of almost 75% since Trump returned to office. But it falls far short of the goal the government had hoped to reach, having planned to expand capacity to more than 100,000 beds and fill them.

As far as we know at present, seven people have died in immigration detention this year. Two died by suicide (despite facility responsibility to prevent self-harm). Two died of heart issues. One is said to have died from fentanyl withdrawal, and one was reportedly choked to death by guards. One more was found unconscious and unresponsive, with details of his death yet to come.

Today I’ll write about how a society comes to concentration camps, the process we’re already deep into, why the ways we’re talking about events in the U.S. may be unhelpful, and how we can undo it this mess.

What I’m saying is that the camps have already taken root and are on a fast-track to get exponentially worse. We’re already deep inside the process.

It’s critical to recognize that each of the societies that has had camps underwent a lengthy process. This process is often easier to see happening in your own country if you first look at an example in another one.

we need massive reform to the way in which ICE and DHS are currently conducting themselves.” Note that the “massive reform” mentioned is to the way that the agencies conduct themselves, not to the bad-faith mission of these agencies.

Uiterlijk 11 februari – bewust een week voor het begin van Chinees Nieuwjaar, als China twee weken feestviert – doet de rechter uitspraak.

De Nederlandse staat beschikt zelfs over informatie dat Wingtech zelf bij Beijing zou hebben aangedrongen op de industrie-ontwrichtende exportbeperkingen van chips uit de Chinese Nexperia-fabriek. Deze Chinese maatregel, die inmiddels is versoepeld, was vorig jaar reden voor wereldwijde paniek bij onder andere autofabrikanten.

Intussen heeft de belangrijke Nexperia-fabriek in de Chinese provincie Guangdong zich feitelijk afgesplitst van de rest van het bedrijf. Daardoor is de productie van Nexperia-chips nog altijd verstoord.

Wing, zo betogen de advocaten van Nexperia, koos liever voor een vlucht naar China dan macht op te geven.Wingtech ontkent dat er sprake was van het leegtrekken van de Europese tak van Nexperia. De grootschalige aankopen om WingSkySemi te helpen zouden passen bij de strategie om Nexperia’s aanvoerlijnen diverser te maken – extra urgent met het oog op mogelijke Amerikaanse sancties. In plaats van ‘bruusk’ en ‘eenzijdig’ in te grijpen, hadden de minister en de Nexperia-bestuurders eerst het gesprek moeten aangaan, aldus een advocaat.

Nexperia wilde rugdekking van het ministerie van Economische Zaken. Daarvoor moest het zijn bedrijfsstructuur zo aanpassen dat de Chinese invloed kleiner zou worden. Anders was het overtuigen van de Amerikanen volgens het ministerie een onbegonnen zaak.

Dit alles gebeurde tegen de achtergrond van dreigende Amerikaanse sancties vanwege Nexperia’s banden met China.

Deze Chinese fabrikant maakt wafers, de siliciumschijven waarvan chips worden gefabriceerd. Ook Nexperia’s Europese fabrieken, in Hamburg en Manchester, maken wafers.

Nexperia was al klant bij WingSkySemi. Maar vorig jaar wilde Wing er een bestelling van 200 miljoen dollar plaatsen, ruim 100 miljoen dollar meer dan Nexperia nodig had. Volgens de bestuurders wilde Wing zo de diepe zakken van Nexperia misbruiken om zijn eigen, verlieslatende waferfabriek overeind te houden.

De Ondernemingskamer moet nu bepalen of er een onderzoek naar Wings handelen komt en of zijn schorsing in stand blijft. Wing, zo betogen de advocaten van Nexperia, wilde het chipbedrijf ‘volledig afhankelijk’ maken van China en een ander bedrijf waarvan hij zelf eigenaar is: WingSkySemi.

Wing is er woensdag niet bij. Al maanden is zijn verblijfplaats onbekend.

Wing is er woensdag niet bij. Al maanden is zijn verblijfplaats onbekend.

Zhang Xuezheng, ook wel bekend als Wing, de geschorste Chinese CEO van Nexperia en eigenaar van Wingtech

Volgens zijn medebestuurders was Wing stiekem bezig de Europese activiteiten van Nexperia over te hevelen naar China. Hij zou technologie laten verplaatsen en bijna de helft van het Europese personeel willen ontslaan. Daarom stapten drie bestuurders, die waren ontslagen nadat ze kritiek hadden geuit, op 1 oktober naar de Ondernemingskamer.

Die greep ongekend snel in en schorste Wing nog diezelfde dag als CEO. De aandelen van Nexperia werden tijdelijk onder curatele geplaatst

Een nog altijd voortslepend conflict met China was geboren, zeker omdat demissionair minister Vincent Karremans (Economische Zaken) een dag eerder ook al de bevoegdheden van Wing had ingeperkt.

Die greep ongekend snel in en schorste Wing nog diezelfde dag als CEO. De aandelen van Nexperia werden tijdelijk onder curatele geplaatst

Small, focused diffs have almost always served me better. They have several advantages:

Small, focused diffs have almost always served me better. They have several advantages:

Avoid wandering through the code

Generally, doing less is faster and easier! Depending on the task, you may be able to soften the requirements.

Software, like writing, can benefit from a rough draft

How good should this be?

600.000 bedrijven hangen aan Exact Online, wat op AWS draait. Exact is zelf ook een Amerikaans bedrijf tegenwoordig, overigens.

“Dear Jonas: Considering your Country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America. “Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they have a ‘right of ownership’ anyway? There are no written documents, it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there, also. “I have done more for NATO than any other person since its founding, and now, NATO should do something for the United States. The World is not secure unless we have Complete and Total Control of Greenland. Thank you! President DJT”