The word graphics reminds me of a computer of video game and how good the graphics are

This reminds me of when my mother was pregnant with my younger sister. My aunt would always make sure my mom was good with whatever it was.

This just reminds me Trump during his debate with one of his predecessors when he asked him to speak English instead of Spanish.

This reminds me of China where there are many different dialects.

It reminds me of the American Constitution's 3/5 Compromise, which counted enslaved blacks as 3/5 person, from almost a century earlier. But in fact, looking over the course of human history, it is more accurate to say that racial equality [as a fact] is a new concept. After all, where there is inequality and imbalanced influence, discrimination in the interest of the majority power emerges. Nationalistic superiority was an overarching theme of WWII later on. Even today, the Chinese government's sentiments of Han superiority have forced Uighurs into labor camps. Blacks in majority-white society (or really as a minority of any nation if you consider examples of those in Japan, Korea, Philippines, Brazil, etc.) still face varying levels of discrimination everyday life, the least of which may be bias in social media like those described in the beginning of the article. So against these odds, I hope that the modern notions of racial equality will end up as a turning point of the next millennia, rather than an outlier.

One of the biggest justifications of colonization was that the Europeans were helping the African civilizations through their colonizing efforts. It reminds me of the different portrayals of Africa in postcolonial literature. In Heart of Darkness, the African people as barbaric and in need of leadership. On the other hand, Things Fall Apart is meant to accurately portray African society as a fully formed and complex civilization prior to colonialism. The latter book, interestingly, never portrays African society as perfect, but it shows how the Europeans didn't bring civilization to Africa.

This reminds me of our discussion about Glubb. In the sense that, these accounts are coming from people who were actively involved in the events.

This paragraph reminds me of a similar time period in American history, the Andrew Jackson Presidency, where white men wanted more democracy and "power to the people." Except power to the "people" meant white middle class men and no mention of women. Here we have the same issue but within a different culture where once again the nationalist movement is designed for better opportunities and experiences for men. This includes anything from more economical gain, higher status, and domination in culture/customs.

This reminds me of a lot of people I know at Central College

This reminds me of Descartes' methodic doubt, and is a good lesson to apply for our age of near limitless access to information. Whatever we find striking enough to remember could at least be doubted until the information we compartmentalize is both specific to our experience and generalizable enough to share, that way truth can be found in its application to reality as we see it and as others see it.

I can agree with this. It reminds me of what we learned in Fatherhood of having sensitive parents and having a secure attachment relationship between the parents and the child. In other words, the parents are able to satisfy the child’s needs in distress in a timely manner. In doing so, they create a trustworthy relationship between the parent and child because the child will learn that in distress he knows he can trust on his parents to be there.

This reminds me of how we discussed media bias and how the rendering of facts to fit a story influences ideas by citizens listening. In an issue with multiple levels of gov't, there is even more confusion leading to misunderstanding in citizens' minds and therefore misinformation that causes improper involvement in our democratic gov't.

This quote reminds me a little bit of Wikipedia. When I first began completing research projects in upper elementary school, Wikipedia seemed like a great resource to use. Now understanding a little more, it seems to have a legitimate domain. However, I was taught that it does not have high-quality or unbiased information. Anyone can go on a Wikipedia page and edit it, including with false or biased information/opinions. It's interesting to see just how many websites pose as having legitimate domains. This can really impact students when they are looking to find specific research, information, etc.

This style of impermanent, adaptive thinking reminds me of that which Thomas Kuhn advocates for in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. In order to build upon our knowledge of the world around us we have to be willing to accept when old systems of understanding are no longer viable and must be changed. The resulting paradigm shift ultimately elevates our knowledge on a given subject while progressing its field of work.

This reminds me of the tree diagram we went over in school when learning which one was capital and which one was lower case.

This again reminds me of the first reading's statement: "I can succeed by working hard and using my talents; if I fail, it will be my own fault." Because of this belief, teachers treat their students differently which affects their success which was also outlined in Ryan and Deci's Self Determination Theory.

This reminds me of a foundational philosophy of RIE

The term parrhesia is borrowed from the Greek, and Foucault introduced this concept into academic field, believing that parrhesia is extremely courageous and that one must be prepared to take risks when choosing parrhesia. This also reminds me of the concept of panopticism proposed by Foucault. In 1975, Foucault reintroduced the panopticism of Bianchin's "panopticon" in Discipline and Punish, considering it not only an architectural innovation, but also "an event in the history of human thought".

This reminds me of what Bruce Lee said. Paraphrased, when fighting an opponent, one must observe your opponents fighting behavior and assess the possibilities. Decide on a combo of attacks and then implement. After you implement, you stand back and analyze/observe the results of your attack and cycle through the process again.

From what I understand about this case. it vaguely reminds me of the case of a baker who refused to bake a cake for a gay couple due to his religious beliefs. I think it made it to the state supreme court and they ruled he was within his constitutional right to refuse service. Since they ruled here that they could not force him to deliver the commissions (even though he did violate the law) did this case have any affect on the ruling of the more current case? I know that it said in a previous module that they have to follow precedent set by previous cases.

This line reminds me about other resources we have read since beginning this program involving how the size of adults can interfere or impose upon a child potential invitation to play for example.

Reminds me of Kaczynski's cabin. Obviously he would have been in their generation, and as an MKUltra victim, he would have been subjected to similar chemical compounds. Very curious...

And of course, both groups rejected modernity to some extent — the difference was that they did so from opposite angles

Reminds me of when we were kids and thought there were monsters under the bed.

This all reminds me a lot of a courtroom.

This text reminds me of a situation where a powerful and wealthy father of two daughters wants to retire and settle down. But before that happens, he needs to find a worthy successor for his position. However, his daughters are fighting for their father's resources so they each look for a valuable husband with good genes that suits what the grandfather is looking for. In the end, both daughters gave birth to one child and the mother of the son got her father's blessing over the mother of the daughter. This scene that I just described was depicted from a show, and it's clear that the motive behind both the daughter's action is to claim money/status. I wonder if Gaia's intentions are in that same direction. Is she trying to be a dominant figure in order to gain validation or is there something more to this? In other words, what is her reason for wanting to overthrow everyone else --> creating a powerful child?

This reminds me of the situation we are currently in with the pandemic and Covid-19. Covid-19 has effected many lives negatively but personally I feel like people who work in the medical profession were some of the people who had been impacted the most. When Covid-19 was at its peak, there would be hundreds and sometimes thousands of people being hospitalized on the daily. This put a lot of pressure on doctors, nurses, and PA's because thousands of people's lives depended on them and many people died in their care. It was emotionally taxing because they had to deal with death everyday and some of them felt as if it were their fault. Dealing with a human life is something that is very stressful and having your patients die on you can make a person experience burnout and feel like they are not good enough.

Bauer in this moment and choice of dialogue inclusion reminds me of Bly's encounter with the doctor. In Bly's book "Then Days in a Madhouse" when Bly refuses to open her tongue for the doctor to see he makes a point that he is in fact the doctor. In the highlighted text, it is a similar case of power dynamics and seat privilege in which the COs have a higher position and hence demand stuff rather than asking, with the expectation of ultimate submission.

Whenever I hear the word model, it always reminds me of the model cars i would have and how mechanics of how they work

Hypothesis: Arousing curiosity is another effctive marketing strategy.

NOTE: This reminds me of Welsch Grape Juice. The history of how it was made is printed at the back of every bottle. I always feel satisfaction reading it whenever I get tempted to buy the grape juice. And in a way, I feel like family, because the process of creating the juice was shared to me. Like, this delicious juice that I'm having was created through the process of pasteurization.

Even after their death the plight of the plebs the Gracchus brothers brought up is taken up as a full political movement, reminds me a lot of the Language Caesar used.

This reminds me of reoccurring themes in Jose Vargas's Dear AmericaItalic**, the idea that despite how long one resides in a country, no matter how dedicated or committed one is, one can never truly belong.

This somewhat reminds me of the Instagram feature to block someone to no longer see their content (which would be exit) and another function to report a post from an individual, for which several options appear to voice feedback (voice-based). I wonder where else this has been implemented.

This reminds me of learning through Zoom. I know people who'd record their lectures and play them back at a more efficient time for them.

This reminds me of the early days of YouTube. It had no commercials, and now it plays a commercial before nearly every video. It's very irritating, so I can imagine how annoyed listeners were by advertising-supported broadcasting in the 1920's.

I had to search this but I think it's important to note that Delphiniums are flowers that symbolize cheerfulness and goodwill but also a protective plant that symbolizes truth. Thinking about the last line in the poem of "an iron cortex" it ties into the idea of Delphiniums being a protective plant as iron is a protective metal. In regards to truth it reminds me of the last few lines and the idea of knowing rather than remaining ignorant to the worlds truths. I do question what truths exactly Millay is saying need protection? or in what way the truth protects us?

This line really stuck with me because it reminds me of a quote i always heard growing up. You may be alone on your path because other people arent willing to do the work ot get where they want to be. Yet it makes all the difference because it molds you into the person youre striving to be. arriving to the destination is not the important part, the journey to get there is.

The speaker is beginning to realize that there isn't really a need for the wall. There's no point of constantly going through the struggle of repairing it. The neighbor points out that the wall essentially keeps the peace between them. This reminds me of the political talk of boarders and it's as if they're two different sides of that argument.

It's interesting to me that authors chose to publish through self-representation. In this case it makes sense considering the shortage of literary agents, but this instance reminds me of other creative industries, like the modeling or music industries where models can chose to work unrepresented by an agency, or 'freelance', while some musicians chose not to create with a label and make music independently.

This setup reminds me most of Reddit, where there are different subreddits, or in this case discussion boards, where people can contribute their own ideas, either commenting under others' posts or beginning a new one. It is quite fascinating to think of the WELL as one of the first kinds of social media that people engaged in. Equally important, I find it important to address what groups of people (white, male, middle-to-upper class) initially engaged in online community and conversation, and how the beginnings of social media have influenced the way it is today. I also find it fascinating that there wasn't much advertising and actual shopping that stemmed from posting these products online, but rather more of a conversation about them and it is quite interesting to see how social media has flipped on its head to engage with consumer purchases and influencer marketing.

As the Trojan and Achaian forces rage against each other on the blood-soaked battlefield littered with bodies from both sides, Zeus grants Hektor the glory of being the first to break the wall of the Achaians--a glory he earlier denied to another Trojan warrior, Aias. With the blessing of Zeus, Hektor rallies the Trojans, and as he approaches the gates of the Achaian wall, he lifts a great stone with the intention to break down the wall as “easily carries the fleece of a wether” by a shepherd to carry home, comparing the ease with which Hektor moves toward his destructive goal with the domesticity of the task of a shepherd in peacetime. The domestic task of a shepherd tending to his flock is paralleled with the violent work of the warrior Hektor to knock down the Achaian wall. This comparison illustrates the tension between these seemingly disparate spheres of Greek life, and so by paralleling the shepherd’s care with Hektor’s burden, Homer links pastoral life with war life and perhaps implies that the two are more closely related than they may seem. Is the work of a warrior as universal as that of a shepherd? In this way, are violence and glory expected to be as much a part of life as domesticity and home?

This connection reminds me of the epithet “shepherd of the people” which is awarded to different leaders in the war and which also overlays the realm of domestic life with that of war.

Maddie

This reminds me of the idea of character archetypes in literature. There are certain characters with recurring traits that can be found throughout many stories, both in the past and present. Although these archetypes are not completely detached from each other and their basis, they are still very different. One character could be vastly different from a character of the same archetype because they each have different backstories, experiences, and goals. In this way, even though they are both replicas of the same general archetype, they revive it by showing it in a new way.

This reminds me of the word "etymology" that I learned in a different class - every word or symbol has a lineage or history behind it that gives it meaning. Similarly, without understanding the context behind a work of art or seeing the process that went into it, even a perfect reproduction can never be truly perfect.

I find this very interesting because so many stories have been recreated and trends cycle a lot so this technique has probably become even more popular now Reminds me of Disney live action remakes which hasn't been able to resurrect any of the same feelings they did before

This reminds me of Piaget's theory of learning. A child is in equilibrium when there is a balance between assimilation and accommodation, meaning that no new change to any mental structures is needed. Disequilibrium occurs when knowledge cannot assimilated into existing structures. When this happens, accommodation is needed to return to equilibrium--that is, a cause (accommodation) is needed to have a certain effect that restore the state of equilibrium.

Reading about different tenses reminds me of learning Spanish, which further goes to show how AAVE should be respected as its own language

this is interesting and reminds me of the can-do statements. These should have an effect on creating an autonomy-supportive environment. I wonder if it would be interesting to research how can-do statements influence intrinsic motivation (or if this has been done before)

Reference to the title aka main idea of the entire piece Reminds me of Sylvia Plath's poetry

This reminds me of cloud technology. It's interesting to think that cloud technology has only now recently become increasingly popular among individuals and companies, despite its concept being imagined for decades now. I wonder how Bush would reimagine cloud technology if he were to witness it today.

This reminds me of the development of the world wide web by physicists at CERN to facilitate collaboration and information-sharing by scientists around the world. I think it speaks to the highly intersectional nature of early computing and hypermedia advancements. The utility of computing power made computer scientists out of researchers across the sciences and furthered discovery in these fields like never before.

This reminds me of the theory that human life itself originated in africa and as people migrated to different places with colder or hotter temperatures, they adjusted and generation after generation became lighter

This reminds me of my experience working with City Year. During orientation, the team facilitators made us, corps member, reflect on how we can be better listeners to our students as well as our teammates.

I think this is such an important sentiment. It reminds me of a quote my dad always tells me when I am nervous about something (such as giving live presentations, which always feel like they'll be the death of me), which is "confront the dragon, get the gold."

This reminds me of an anecdote I read about a teacher who asked the students in his classroom to raise their hand if they thought they were of above average intelligence, and ~80 percent of students in the room raised their hand. I think it is common for us to think of ourselves as having higher than average intelligence, but what is "average"? "Average" in terms of what? I like to stray from describing myself or others as "intelligent" or "smart" (or to use the word from the article, "competent") because everyone brings different types of intelligence and competence to the table. So to summarize, I agree with the importance of humility as a quality for teachers to possess, because I think it opens the gates for us to learn as much from our students as they (hopefully) learn from us.

Personally, I can relate to this so much. This reminds me of someone in a show I follow on YouTube talking about how important it is to leave your ego at the door and be willing to be wrong about something and to say that you're wrong--and how hard that can be for all of us because we're often so invested in being right.

This is interesting because it reminds me of how someone would see or sense danger and move away. Is this the same thing as touching a hot pot and moving your hand away instantly?

This reminds me of the term "replication crisis". The replication crisis is when studies are impossible to be replicated. This is really important that it was included in the reading. Prior to reading this, I have never thought about variations of Watson's method being unsuccessful. This shows the importance of doing research. This also put conditioning in a new light for me.

Reminds me of the Pomodoro method. 25 min of work, 5 min of break (real break) Found an Android App yesterday that looked quite cool, but I've never tried the method so far. Usually I'll take breaks naturally.

The cadence here reminds me of Donne's "XIV. MEDITATION":

If we consider Eternity, into that, Tyme never entred; Eternity is not an everlasting flux of Tyme; but Tyme is a short parenthesis in a longe period; and Eternity had been the same, as it is, though time had never beene.

Among the Nandi an occupational definition of time evolved covering not only each hour but half hours of the day.

This reminds me of hearing attorneys journaling their day down to 7 1/2 minute increments for billing their clients.

But based on science and with computers, we're now able to discriminate things down to the time it takes atoms to vibrate and we can date and timestamp things in our worklives to the nth degree. Even this post will have a timestamp on it down to the thousandth of a second.

This reminds me of how squirrels will bury their nuts for later! Though they can often forget where they buried them.

resistance-reminds me of all of the acts of native resistance from Gord Hill's book

reminds me of The White Man's Burden

This reminds me of the beginning of "In the Cart." There, Chekhov introduces us to Marya through the contradictions between her attitude and the attitude our narrator deems appropriate for the weather conditions. Here, the disagreement characterizing Dunraven is a little more extreme. Dunraven introduces his "ancestral land" as if he's inherited the stars, but it's an undeniable reality that it's actually a sparse patch of land and a collapsing building. Borges emphasizes this effect when writing about the building by placing Dunraven's perceptions and reality side by side. The phrase "majestic, tumbledown edifice" flip-flops like crazy. "Majestic" and "edifice" (which is usually used for large buildings) clearly fit Dunraven's vision, but "tumbledown" splits them up with its completely contradictory meaning. In the end, reality wins out, and we learn that this structure actually looks "like a stable fallen upon hard times."

vaguely reminds me of the De Vaca writing when they talked about eating raw meat so that it wasn't stolen from them by someone who smelled the cooked meat

This reminds me of why my parents always had a policy when I was younger to "read the book before watching the movie." The space left between the lines in a text allow for someone to really imagine and make the story unique to them, and it's a lot different than watching a movie where everything is laid out for you to just passively consume. I wonder if there are Harry Potter fans who haven't read the books but have watched the movies, who might be missing out on contextual evidence for other people's interpretations of the text and if that could be a reason why there is such a divide between fans - because the movies are supposedly so strictly adherent to JK Rowling's interpretation of the books. I have neither read the books nor watched the movies so I don't know how true that statement is, but I believe it was mentioned in the Vanity Fair article "JK Rowling's Tweet Shows the Divide Between the Writer and the Phenomenon She Created."

reminds me of a video where in a herd of horses, one foal couldn't stand so the male of the herd managed to grab it by the neck and flung it around until it died. The mare had tried in vain to get the foal standing and then protect it from the male.

just reminds me of De Vaca's account of the tribes going without food for a few days in a row and it just being how they are.

this reminds me of a modern day forbidden love story like Romeo and Juliet just with a twist...their love is forbidden because he cannot marry someone that has one-eight percent of black...it just shows how far behind the times were, whereas people of color weren't judged by their character but rather by the color of their skin. George seemed to overlook that because he fell in love with the context of her character and that's what won his heart overall.

I am really digging the self-awareness, stream of consciousness nature of this adaptation. This reminds me of the Grotowski / Woyzeck discussion board post we did about keeping theatre unique and relevant. Nothing is more unique to theatre than the "aliveness" of it. If someone said this same line I highlighted in a film, maybe I would crack a smile. But hearing it live makes it funnier and more palpable. BJJ breaking the fourth wall with his candid, charming personality is what gives this adaptation a boost over the original. The audience feels like a character in the play as well, creating a more casual atmosphere, but not in a negative way. Naturally, one feels more invested in a story they are a part of, which is what BJJ accomplishes here.

This reminds me of the image above, and that image makes me think, once with the native Americans and their sacred land wasn't enough, they did plentiful times.

https://jamesg.blog/2021/08/24/ordering-espresso-at-cafes

This reminds me that I ought to be more adventurous in cafes myself. Of course the pandemic ending could help in that area as well.

He reminds me of one of my students, going round and round answering a question or admitting fault to someone. It is interesting how he has a different personality and allowable shared information depending on the person that he is with, seems someone could have a hard time with that and mix up some information or give up something that shouldn't be given up to that particular person.

showing describing the individual being interviewed

i find it hard to believe this could be reliable - it reminds me of our discussion in class about people seeing a portion of the brain "light up" and coming to erroneous conclusions about what could be causing that activiy.

Reminds me of the many possibilities technology such as this can help improve even our own brain capabilities sometime in the future

This reminds me so much of classroom teaching. When I was getting my master's degree, the professor that did my observations wrote FLEXIBLE, FLEXIBLE, FLEXIBLE at the bottom of my last observation because without fail every observation that she tried to perform came with a set of challenges (testing day so the school wouldn't let her in for example). I am strongly a type A personality, so that was a hard one for me to learn.

This reminds me of a quote by a late mentor of mine: "Success is the attainment of goals you create for yourself." - Howard Terry

Wren's definition of leadership is the actions and interactions of success. This is similar to my working definition thus far. I haven't thought about Mr. Terry in many years, but can see through my working definition of leadership that his influence played a role in how I view success and leadership in my own life.

this reminds me of something that was talked about in crash course. How before the songs of Dionysus became theatre, women would worship this god by going out in the night and slaughtering an animal.

I also brought this up in last weeks annotation, but this reminds me of the lawsuit that was brought up at a nearby school due to students being discriminated against due to their usage of AAVE.

Reminds me of the reading about discourses and how we talk to teachers, parents, friends, and significant others all differently.

This reminds me of our student discussion on how there was no set definition for what SAE is, or who came up with that other than upper-middle class/old boring white people.

The author is asking the audience to predict the future by looking at the past. This first line already reminds me of Toni Morrison's piece "Be your own Story" from last week where she was telling her audience the same thing: the past holds the answers to the future

This line reminds me of how I do almost the exact same thing over and over every single day between daily routines, going to class, and going to work. So it would be easy to predict what happens next. But if we are talking about years from now it might be a little less likely that everything will be the same. I know years from now I will be doing something I never done before.

That's why our admin is always reminding us to write the children's learning narratives through a strengths-based lens. It also reminds me of a quote shared by one of my colleagues: when her young daughter was telling someone about her little brother, she was trying to say "he was born with disabilities," but instead said "he was born with possibilities." Viewing disabilities as possibilities shifts thinking from what a child can't do to what a child is capable of if the adults in their lives pause and reflect on them as individuals.

this reminds me of Junji ito's uzumaki and the chapter in which a man disfigures his body in pursuit of a perfect shape

This entire section reminds me of one of the main symbols of christianity and how gruesome Jesus on the cross can be depicted. It's a horrific act but is often displayed in beautiful stained glass or sculptures

reminds me of horror movies that mainly consist of horrific violence against women

For some reason, this reminds me of Bandura's Stanford Prison Experiment.. He said one of its purposes was to find out if humans are naturally "evil".. and whether altruistic behavior is developmental rather than (at least partially) innate. Participants who were assigned the role of an officer were shown to abuse their power because they were unregulated and anonymous, but I remember that they may have also been encouraged by Bandura, not just unregulated. In any case, the experiment makes me think of the Abu Ghraib prisoner camp in Iraq, which completely breaks my heart.

Still, I honestly don't agree with Bandura's suggestion/ conception of human nature. Humans still feel guilt.. I like Hobbes' argument about the necessity of order nonetheless. It's common sense at this point I guess.

This reminds me of last week's reading when the author discussed how politics is about the competition over power during struggles. This power is the ability to enforce their will and having the group accept it.

I wonder why states allow themselves to become weak to that degree? The statement above reminds me of Taliban’s recent control of the weak state of Afghanistan, though I am not sure if I gave a correct example.

This reminds me of the Pomodoro technique

This reminds me so much of Anne Lamott's writing "First Drafts"

Reminds me of how Kath Murdoch says to "Let the children do the heavy lifting!"

This reminds me of a lot of sitcoms and comedies where a main character chases a girl all at the cost of their own pride.

It's such a unique and unfortunate reality if fantastical literature sees women so highly there, but are treated so poorly in the real world. It reminds me very much of how the Amazon's were written as they independent, matriarch clan that heavily contradicted the patriarchy led world.

Although slightly unrelated, this description of the Seljuks and their supposed brutality reminds me quite extensively of the later mongol campaigns against many countries. Specifically their sacking of Baghdad, these forces would be a reckoning to both the Islamic and Christian world.

However, considering the time of this writing was during the 11th century, this was an accurate description of how a foreign, non-Christian group would be interpreted. A very Christian, somewhat Eurocentric view of events.

This reminds me that books should have massively larger margins for writing notes.

Throughout these lines Audre Lorde tells us, the audience, how each of us have the possibility of self-transformation. We are creative and powerful in our own way but only when we let our capabilities unhidden. This reminds me of another reading from a different class that has a similar idea of being scared of the unknown. However, it's nothing to be afraid about but instead turn to excitement.

While the appeal to patriotism is very much present throughout Douglass' speech (seeing as it was given on July fourth), this part stood out to me--here Douglass reminds his audience that the idea of independence from the British Empire was "alarming and revolutionary" at the time. It may have appeared as though it was always meant to be, but it had to be taken away from the British (this seems obvious, but is sometimes lost in all the pageantry of our country, take for example, how Benjamin Franklin wanted the fancy statue of himself, as if he had fulfilled a destiny like a god rather than participated in a reckless revolution). Oftentimes, people who err on the conservative side and fear progression use the argument that the agendas being pushed are happening at too fast a pace; that people must be more patient even when pushing for something like basic human rights. I remember reading a letter that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote to a reverend from jail arguing against the fairytale of gradual and passive, nondisruptive change for the purpose of white comfort. But back to this passage--the way I interpreted this was that he was making a connection between the right to declare independence from the British and the right to be treated equally as a Black man in America, which would hopefully sway people who argue that change has to be "gradual" and not "extreme" in order for it to be morally right.

This reminds me of how in the aristocratic values the corruption of the aristocratic elites slowly bleed into the senate

I chose this quote since it reminds me of my family my dad and mom came to America for the so called American dream just to give their kids a better chance at life than my parents did so this I relate to a lot.

This also reminds me of the idea of code switching, which was heavily discussed in one of my classes last year

This reminds me of the time where I had to help tutor a young Spanish kid in English during high school and he really struggled with different "common" ideas of mannerisms in English

This passage reminds me of some of the criticisms from Köpsell's poem. Köpsell heavily criticizes scholars who ignore the negative impact their scholarship may have on the society around them. In the second to last stanza he says, "Knowledge creates weapons" and "with a power point presentation - kill dead!" In this way, both Köpsell and Kacandes agree that this connection cannot be ignored.

I posted this article in the class Slack for a couple of reasons. First, this particular argument reminds me of Benjamin, which we're currently reading, and how she shows that the problem of underexposure wasn't taken seriously until it interfered with capital. But, second, I also used it to point out that despite that, it's important to remember that we sometimes have to make arguments for specific audiences--i.e., that it isn't necessarily that Daley only cares about workplace productivity, or even that she prioritizes it, but that she's writing for an audience that does prioritize workplace productivity over basic humanity. So, the rhetorical situation may call for making such an argument rather than appealing to humanity, morality, or equity.

This reminds me of a Journalism class I took years ago where the teacher told the class that the Midwest accent is what most broadcasters try to go for when working since it's easily understood. I'm not sure how true that actually is, or if there was more social aspects I wasn't aware of at the time in play.

This reminds me of thinking negatively of people who use a lot of "filler words/phrases" when talking. Filler words/phrases are things you say to give your brain a second to catch up, the words "like" and "uh" are two common ones that I use.

reminds me of wendigo legends, where wendigos were once warriors who were cut off from any food source save for their fellow people and became cannibals who over time developed and unending hunger for flesh.

reminds me again of the reality of artificial borders and the ongoing effects of colonialism

This reminds me of having "Syllabus". In the U.S., professors and teachers always send out syllabus at the beginning of the term so that everyone can arrange their schedule properly. However, in China, schedule will always change base on what's happening, so exam times and assignments due date are never settled.

(SPOILER ALERT) This reminds me of chapter 2 of The Hobbit. TL;DR the Dwarves-- partial epitomes of fantasy heroes in their masculinity and hunting/weapons proclivity-- are captured in bags by trolls, and in a subversion of who tends to be the savior in fantasy at that time, it's the hobbit who bails them out. Hobbits have a proclivity for potatoes and rabbit.

Reminds me of Blake's invocation at the beginning of "Milton"

Come into my hand

By your mild power; descending down the Nerves of my right arm From out the Portals of my Brain, where by your ministry The Eternal Great Humanity Divine planted his Paradise,

This imagery reminds me of the lines/phrases "his historical neck broken...broken many professorial necks" that Adams uses in “The Dynamo and the Virgin”. I wonder why they both choose to use the imagery of broken necks? What is the symbolism in it?

This is my favorite line in the piece. (It also reminds me of Steve Martin pretending to be Micheal Caine's brother Ruprecht in Dirty Rotten Scoundrels.) This is the dividing line between John's rational and unsympathetic world (a world that values fresh air over the needs of the narrator for mental stimulation and a raison d'etre) and the narrator's ability to ignore its harmful effects. This line provides the reader with a valuable insight into the house's powerful effects on the isolated individual; it happened to the previous shut-in too... One cannot help but wonder how John could ignore the presence of those rings on the wall, the torn and smudged wallpaper? Does Gilman intend to reveal that John nudges the narrator toward mental deterioration?

Gilman uses anaphora to highlight the wife is tired of being sick. She has become weaker that she isn't sure if she should write. It reminds me of Du Bois not wanting to break down the "vail" between the white and black folks. When he was younger Du Bois mention he had no intention of breaking down the wall which is similar to John's wife losing motivation to write.

At this point, John's wife is sick of the "Yellow wallpaper" which frustrates her to be in the room. I think it's interesting that the word 'because' is capitalized since it emphasizes she’s tired of following orders from John. The thought is on the back of her head 24/7. The narrator hinted the wife is trying to get a better understanding of the wall-paper. This similarity reminds me of Adam and Lansley having different thoughts to understand how the dynamo worked and how it was going to change their society.

Something I noticed in this line was that John doesn't really like his wife knowing how to write. It seems that John likes to follow old traditions which reminds me of Adam. In the "The Dynamo the Virgin" Adam was determined to learn math and science. Here, the wife seems passionate to write but knows her husband will not let her. In Du Bois passage, he mention that knowledge is power and that everyone should get an education which makes me believe that John is afraid of that.

The story up to this point has slowly moved away from tangible reality to an abstract conveyance of the narrator’s perspective of her mental state; this final act is so far into absurdity that it can only be perceived as some kind of allegorical abstraction rather than a literal plot. This way in which the story is told reminds me of Adam’s notions of the ways in which individual’s perception of the world is what brings its meaning. Perkins goes to great lengths in this story to portray the protagonist’s perception by engaging the reader with her moment-to-moment consciousness- almost in a stream of consciousness way- and the abstract/ enigmatic nature of the narrator’s perception helps to convey her declining mental state, successfully giving the reader a sense of how she sees the world.

John holds his power and knowledge over his wife, almost treating her like a little girl. He is constantly telling her what is benefiting her and what is damaging to her. He doesn’t listen to her needs and ignores her true requests. Every time he reminds her of her health it’s almost like saying “I’m smart, a physician, and a man, so you must listen to me”. Similar to how Du Bois expresses how education does give a person something to talk about, almost as if it puts someone on a pedestal. These type of actions also remind me of the teachers Adams writes about, men who are much more educated and believe they have an advantage.

By reading the first few lines I can infer that this couple is wealthy since they are able to have a house for the summer. This reminds me to how Du Bois talks about white wealthy people having opportunities like this. They are able to escape for a season, the wife doesn’t work (her husband forbids her). Her husband and brother are physicians. They have a life that many would have dreamed too have at the time. These are the kinds of experiences that Du Bois would not be able to have because of his race and the way people viewed him and his ancestors.

The “Ghostliness” or haunted aspect of the house reminds me of the Shadow motif in the Du Bois memoir. The haunting here is symbolic of a history of potential power in femininity which has been oppressed- the room itself acting as the physical oppressor of the main character, and her husband as the oppressor. This is like the Shadows which loom in Du Bois’ memoir and represent the powerful history of Africans that has been oppressed by white society in America. The motifs themselves (shadows and hauntings) are similar in their obscure and macabre nature, lending to the atmosphere of each narrative.

interesting- the reference to sea-waters yielding fish reminds me of biblical stories of Christ's miracles upon the waters- but here those powers of heaven are relegated to the whims of the gods

reminds me a bit of someone like Boo Radley or even, in some ways, Jesus

Have you heard of "genre-based" pedagogy? This is whatt this kind of reminds me off. I always thought of it as pretty limiting but maybe in this scope, it makes sense.

This reminds me of the Ted Talk we watched from Lillian Medville, as well as the infographic about Peggy McIntosh's work, about the necessity to first acknowledge our own privilege before we can start a dialogue about privilege and/or inclusivity.

this section and particularly the allusion to generational politics with 'baby boomers' reminds me of ongoing online discussions about the online left and the practice of reading every post as uncharitably as possible as part of some sort of moral crusade to have the most correct possible political opinions. paranoia and the death of nuance.

This reminds me when people were first getting the vaccine, there was a lot of tiktoks of people supposedly getting full body sort of spasms, and even though it was made as a joke, there was a lot of people who actually believed it was true and stopped themselves from getting vaccinated.

I work as a medical assistant, and this statement just reminds of what the doctors' experience inside the clinics at the time when the virus grew exponentially. I remember one of them telling me that there was days when people were actually scared to come in, and patients were always difficult to deal with when they did come in. Doctors need a lot more praise in this current world.

This is also an important take away. This reminds me of the paper we read about readers- we need to educate the individuals, so that each individual can and will think for themselves. This is so crucial! When we have individual citizens capable of utilizing tools and researching (properly) for themselves, rather than simply watching their favorite news station or listening to their friends and family's perspective, then we can truly have progress in the form of moving forward with educated responses.

This reminds me of the common saying in the special education world to "presume competence" How are we presuming competence in ourselves and students to be "better"?

The hook provides both minor shock value and an immediate scene that the reader can envision. It reminds me of a journalistic approach to an introduction. Generally articles begin with a "lede." A lede is intended to draw in the reader by providing a description of a relevant moment that relates to the piece.

This reminds me of what we talked about in our last class. That is, how we believe that someone else is wrong because their "logic" is faulty. Such a belief implies that logic is purely objective, when it in fact, may not be. The question that arises from this observation is: who is to say who perceives the world clearly and who "misperceive[s] it?" How can we decipher which belief is correct?

this reminds me of an episode of dance moms where Nia is given a pretty overtly sexual dance for her age and when her mom is upset about it, TLC poses her as the instigator and villain

It reminds me of the reading "Stealing a Bag of Potato Chips" because the boy was trying to resist the system and the criminalization of youth. He was trying to make a change just like mr. Jacob.

This kind of reminds me of the article we just read. She would already donate but once she realized that the way she is getting her money is not good and how it looks outside of her POV she decided that there was no better way of using her money than donating.

Reminds me of last classes activity when we found out how wealth is distributed in the United States and how unevenly distributed it is.

reminds me of that one quote in the heise reading that had to do with progress that we went over in class.

Unless I'm missing something, plotwise, Kristin doesn't really need to be here for a lot of the play. There's a good chunk where she doesn't contribute any dialogue and is only there to sleep, which made me question why she was there at all. This bit, though, reminds me of the times in my real life where my dreams are just replays of my day at work. I feel like her sleeping on stage may actually be a sort of character exposition, as her being so exhausted and dreaming of work is indicative of her working-class status and juxtaposes her against Miss Julie.

Jean's monologue which turns out to be a lie is an example of manipulation. The objective of the lie most likely being to seduce Julie, not because Jeans loves her, but because Jean wishes to use her class status to advance his own social position. In a way this reminds me of the contemporary term, gaslighting

This quote reminds me of a very interesting video I saw a few years about about treating education as an industrial system that churns out educated adults.

The speaker is Sir Ken Robinson who passed away last year.

https://youtu.be/zDZFcDGpL4U

Laissa Innocent. This is an observation I can make that connects this line to a buddhism class that I took in my previous school. We learned that the Buddha meant the enlightened one. In addition, they gain wisdom. This connects to the reading because they mention the "attainment of knowledge." When they mention the "purification of heart," it reminds me of the positive attributes the Buddha has. I can see how it relates to the goals of the encyclopedia.

All very good questions. This reminds me of me, overthinking everything. I found the best way is to throw myself into it and stay mentally resilient.

This reminds me exactly of Hegel's master slave dialect.

Reminds me of the rule of excepting critisiscm. For example, you can express your thoughts, opinions, and ideas but also grow as a writer by accepting critiscm.

The existence of homogenous racial enclaves reminds me of elements of both the Ethnic City and the Divided City. The Raffles Plan's division of Singapore into segregated ethnic areas was a way to best benefit the European traders.

This reminds me of Behaviorism in a way, but not exactly. The denial of mental states due to their general inability to be truly observed is very much the same. But whereas Behaviorism is strongly empirical in a scientific sense, this Sensationalism often gives way to a Humean type of philosophical empiricism.

The word "bellowed" really reminds me of an animal. It showed the wildness of Bertha's character; however, in reading Wide Sargasso Sea we understand Antoinette as a character instead of a plot tool.

Reminds me of Maslow's hierarchy of needs.

This reminds me a lot of what was happening a couple months ago with the Black Lives Matter protest sparked by George Floyd's death. Some of the protestors also destroyed property and many were wounded by the "protection" that was put in place to calm them down.

This reminds me of Aaron Swartz. I feel like this sentence pretty much describes his life mission. The sharing and passing down of knowledge and information is all we have to offer for the future!

This phrase reminds me of when people talk about "trickle down economics" and that it will eventually get to the poor because that's "how it's designed", but they don't take into account greed and that the wealthy will just get richer and hoard their wealth and the poor will struggle at the bottom no thanks to them. A horrible society in my opinion.

This reminds me of the BLM movement at the beginning of 2020, when the former president announced a similar threat of shooting to protestors who looted stores.

Reminds me of Amazon headquarters. Treating workers like machines and not humans.

This scene was just terrifying. He decapitated the bird she said she loved much and then she went into a speech of her hatred of men and wanting Jean dead. I found it interesting as well as pathetic. She reminds me of Macbeth in a way, talks a lot of big game but never really goes through with it. It's not the first time she's rude or says she hates Jean and just wants him dead. Her hatred for men is also something that should prompt her to do SOMETHING but apparently this weakness she mentions earlier stops her. It's strange someone could have such a big contrast in them. Say all of these things to him out loud after what he's done to her and still not really act on any of it and go right back to the idea of running away with him and even taking Kristin with them.

This reminds me of a specific part in the Everyday Utopias video, where the children were able to make proposals of what jobs and activities that they wanted to participate in during the day. Then their teacher validates their choices and follows through with coordinating with the other teachers and students so everyone can explore what they wanted to.

Reminds me of feedback loops from programming.

This reminds me of when i was in elementary school, there would be kids just like this but a little younger at my school. He is trying to keep his childhood alive without even realizing it.