- Nov 2024
-
4thgenerationcivilization.substack.com 4thgenerationcivilization.substack.com
-
Domain-specific alliances
for - adjacency - SRG planetary boundary / earth system boundaries working groups - domain specific alliances - Magisteria of the Commons
adjacency - between - SRG planetary boundary / earth system boundaries working groups - domain specific alliances - Magisteria of the Commons - adjacency relationship The domain specific alliances of the Magisteria of the commons is similar to the SRG idea of developing funds version divisions of wealth system boundaries
-
- Sep 2024
-
www.thelancet.com www.thelancet.com
-
Our estimated safe ESB is that around 50–60% of global land surface should be in largely intact, natural condition to halt species extinction, secure biosphere contributions to climate regulation, and stabilise regional water cycles.
for - stats - earth system boundary - biodiversity - intact natural systems - 50 to 60% global land need to be intact
-
from 6–15% in some landscapes (eg, riparian ecosystems, agricultural landscapes with high crop diversity) to 50% in others (eg, in sloping landscapes, or landscapes where erosion or natural hazards are frequent).
for - earth system boundary - biodiversity - human modified ecosystems - minimum varies depending on specific local context
-
The exact area, quality, and spatial configuration required varies by contribution and location, and thus could not be estimated on a global scale, necessitating local translation, assessment of local context, demand for specific NCP, and application of best practices.
for earth system boundary - biodiversity - human modified ecosystems - only local translation is possible
-
10% of natural or semi-natural habitat per km2 is a sharper threshold, below which evidence suggests that many NCP would almost no longer be provided.
for - stats - earth system boundary - biodiversity - human modified ecosystems -absolute minimum of 10% - below this, many of Nature's contribution to people would no longer be provided
-
safe boundary of at least 20–25% of natural or semi-natural habitat per km2 in human-modified lands (ie, urban and agro-ecosystems) is needed to support both Earth-system NCP and local NCP, in addition to the functions provided by largely intact lands.
for - stats - earth system boundary - biodiversity - human modified ecosystems - minimum of 20 to 25% natural / semi-natural habitat per square kilometer
-
human-modified ecosystems, we systematically analysed six critical NCP at local scales
for - stats - earth system boundary - biodiversity - human modified ecosystems - 6 critical Nature's Contribution to People at local scales
stats - earth system boundary - biodiversity - human modified ecosystems - 6 critical Nature's Contribution to People at local scales - pollination pest and disease control - water-quality regulation - soil protection - natural hazards mitigation - recreation
-
The amount of intact natural land as of 2018 was around 15% below this ESB, but could be increased through restoring degraded ecosystems or previously converted ecosystems,102,103,106102.Strassburg, BBN ∙ Iribarrem, A ∙ Beyer, HL ∙ et al.Global priority areas for ecosystem restorationNature. 2020; 586:724-729CrossrefScopus (536)PubMedGoogle Scholar103.Jung, M ∙ Arnell, A ∙ de Lamo, X ∙ et al.Areas of global importance for conserving terrestrial biodiversity, carbon and waterNat Ecol Evol. 2021; 5:1499-1509CrossrefScopus (162)PubMedGoogle Scholar106.Wolff, S ∙ Schrammeijer, EA ∙ Schulp, CJE ∙ et al.Meeting global land restoration and protection targets: what would the world look like in 2050?Glob Environ Change. 2018; 52:259-272CrossrefScopus (72)Google Scholar with conservation efforts distributed across all ecoregions.
for - stats - earth system boundary - biodiversity - intact natural systems - 15% below ESB in 2018
-
A justice approach, by contrast, requires at least boundaries that minimise significant harm to human health and wellbeing and to other species (panel 2) while ensuring access to necessary resources and services.
for - just earth system boundary - why it's needed
Tags
- earth system boundary - biodiversity - human modified ecosystems - only local translation is possible
- stats - earth system boundary - biodiversity - human modified ecosystems -absolute minimum of 10% - below this, many of Nature's contribution to people would no longer be provided
- stats - earth system boundary - biodiversity - human modified ecosystems - minimum of 20 to 25% natural / semi-natural habitat per square kilometer
- stats - earth system boundary - biodiversity - human modified ecosystems - 6 critical Nature's Contribution to People at local scales
- stats - earth system boundary - biodiversity - intact natural systems - 15% below ESB in 2018
- earth system boundary - biodiversity - human modified ecosystems - minimum varies depending on specific local context
- stats - earth system boundary - biodiversity - intact natural systems - 50 to 60% global land need to be intact
- just earth system boundary - why it's needed
Annotators
URL
-
- Aug 2024
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development
for - World business council - adopted planetary boundary strategy
-
We don't have a control variable for ocean biology, and we don't have a control variable for the big ocean conveyor belt system, which holds the big potential tipping point systems
for - planetary boundaries - lack of ocean biological boundary
-
- Apr 2024
-
-
Das Wasserversorgungssystem des Iran ist vor allem wegen der Entnahme des Wassers für Landwirtschaft und Industrie komplett und irreparabel zusammengebrochen. Dabei ist das Land immer mehr Hitzewellen ausgesetzt, bei denen in einigen Gebieten Temperaturen von über 55° C erreicht werden. Durch die Verarmung in den letzten Jahren ist die Bevölkerung in den betroffenen Provinzen besonders verwundbar. Reportage der New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/23/world/middleeast/iran-heat-water.htmltopic
-
- Jan 2024
-
docdrop.org docdrop.org
-
computational boundary of the self notion is simply a way to try to be able to think about very diverse kinds of uh beings diverse kinds 00:08:12 of intelligences all all on one scale
for: purpose - computational boundary of self - it's utility is to have one idea that can help define intelligence non-anthropomorphically, not just of humans
-
it's easy for us to look at us and think okay we're 30 trillion human cells give or take we're about 39 trillion bacterial cells at what point do we consider ourselves bacteria or at what point do we consider ourselves 00:07:46 human
for - question - identity - individual cell vs multicellular organism
question - identity - individual cell vs multicellular organism - This is a fascinating question as it looks at our evolutionarily composite nature - as a multi-scale competency architecture - Certainly our ordinary consciousness operates as the governance system for the entire population of collaborating cells and microbes - but can we actually directly identify with each individual cell or microbe in this vast integrated collection? - how does Levin's computational boundary of self help to shed light on this question?
-
- Dec 2023
-
www.arup.com www.arup.com
-
-
for: downscaled planetary boundaries, planetary boundary cities, ARUP - planetary boundary design
-
comment
- There is no threshold information, just general design methods
-
-
- Nov 2023
-
www.repubblica.it www.repubblica.it
-
Einer chinesischen Studie zufolge könnte Mikroplastik in der Atmosphäre die Wolkenbildung beeinflussen. Die Partikel werden bei längerem Aufenthalt in der Atmosphäre rauher, wodurch sie zur Wolkenbildung beitragen könnten. https://www.repubblica.it/green-and-blue/2023/11/15/news/microplastiche_aria_nuvole_meteo_inquinamento-42036412/
Studie: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00729#
-
- Sep 2023
-
docdrop.org docdrop.org
-
an overview of the paper
- for: paper overview, paper overview - the computational boundary of a self
-
paper overview
- motivated by 2018 Templeton Foundation conference to present idea on unconventional and diverse intelligence
-
Levin was interested in any conceivable type of cognitive system and was interested in find a way to universally characterize them all
- how are they detected
- how to understand them
- how to relate to them and
- how to create them
-
Levin had been thinking about this for years
- Levin adopts a cybernetic definition of intelligence proposed by William James that focuses on the competency to reach a defined goal by different paths
- Navigation plays a critical role in this defiinition.
-
the computational boundary of a self
-
-
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
-
-
for: self, self - computational boundary, Michael Levin
-
title: The Computational Boundary of a “Self”: Developmental Bioelectricity Drives Multicellularity and Scale-Free Cognition
- author: Michael Levin
- date: Dec. 13, 2019
- source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6923654/#:~:text=Any%20Self%20is%20demarcated%20by,and%20limits%20of%20its%20cognition.
- annotate
-
-
- Aug 2023
-
docdrop.org docdrop.org
-
- for: earth system boundaries, safe and just boundaries, planetary boundaries, doughnut economics, bend the curve
- title Earth System Boundaries for a Just World on a Safe Planet
- source
- Future Earth, Earth Commission
- date
- June 2023
-
- Jul 2023
-
docdrop.org docdrop.org
-
- for: safe and just boundaries, earth system justice, planetary boundaries
-
this is now quantifying this this safe space but for the first time also doing it for justice so measuring the maximum allowed 00:15:33 of significant harm to people and the key take home here is the following in the outer ring here the red and green you see the safe boundary definitions 00:15:45 the blue lines are the assessment of justice so not surprisingly if we care about people the safe bound is about the stability of the planet but if we care about avoiding significant harm to hundreds of millions of people across 00:15:58 the world the climate boundary shrinks from 1.5 down to one degree
- for: earth system boundaries, planetary boundaries, safe and just boundaries, earth system justice, just boundaries
- key finding
- if we include justice in the planetary boundaries, then the 1.5 Deg C target becomes 1.0 Deg C.
- In other words, we have already breached the safe and just boundary!
-
- Jun 2023
-
www.scinexx.de www.scinexx.de
-
. „Klimamodellen zufolge hat der Grundwasserbestand in der Zeit von 1993 bis 2010 um 2.150 Gigatonen abgenommen“, berichten Seo und seine Kollegen. Anhand eines Modells sowie Schwerefeldmessungen und Daten zur Polwanderung haben sie rekonstruiert, wie sich dies auf die Bewegung der Erdachse ausgewirkt hat.
Zwischen 1993 und 2010 hat der Grundwasserbestand der Erde durch menschliche Entnahmen um 2150 abgenommen – vor allem in den mittleren Breiten. Die Erhöhung des Meeresspiegels dadurch ist so groß, dass sich die Drift der Erdachse dadurch leicht verändert hat. https://www.scinexx.de/news/geowissen/unser-wasserverbrauch-verschiebt-die-erdachse/
Studie: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GL103509
-
- May 2023
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Rose therefore recommended "explicit consistency checks in a protocol ... even if they impose implementation overhead".
-
- Apr 2023
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
-
Eine neue Studie ergibt, dass die Konzentration von PFAs oder "Forever Chemicals" im norwegischen Polareis die Ökosysteme dort bedroht und zusammen mit der globalen Erhitzung für kombinierten Stress sorgt.
-
- Jan 2023
-
docdrop.org docdrop.org
-
1.5 degrees Celsius is the safe boundary this aligns with the intergovernmental panel on climate change with one difference we emphasize that this is a physical limit push it beyond that point 00:05:23 and we risk permanent damage on societies and the world economy
!- first boundary : 1.5 deg C is a physical boundary - we cannot it it we want to retain a planet safe for human civilization - “ If the world breaches 1.5C, we are likely to trigger at least five tipping points, including the irreversible melting of the Greenland ice sheet and loss of the world’s tropical coral reef systems. This will be devastating for future generations. It will literally change the world, and yet every month we use 1% of the remaining carbon budget for 1.5ºC.” From earth commission website: https://earthcommission.org/news/earth-commission-news/pioneering-science-reveals-set-of-earth-system-boundaries-that-can-secure-a-safe-and-just-planet-for-all/
-
finally the boundary on air pollution on aerosols a boundary which we today have scientific evidence that it actually has 00:07:02 impacts on regulating the state of the atmosphere and the hological cycle pushing the monsoon systems in the southern hemisphere particularly into less rainfall
Fifth boundary : air pollution
-
fertilizer use one of these boundaries that are today overloading and causing dead zones pollutants also 00:06:38 greenhouse gas massive implications on water quality and coastal zones we quantify here at the global level the maximum allowed loading of reactive nitrogen and reactive phosphorus used 00:06:50 predominantly in fertilizer systems
!- Fourth boundary : fertilizer
-
third boundary is on fresh water here we have two boundaries one is that 00:06:14 we have to keep at least 20 percent of natural flows and rivers intact for ecosystem services in aquatic systems the second is very basic on groundwater that extraction of groundwater levels 00:06:25 must be less than the recharge levels across the world on fertilizer use one of the
!- Third boundary : fresh water - At last 20 percent of natural flows and rivers must be intact to provide ecosystem services in aquatic systems - Extraction of ground water must not exceed recharge rate
-
we are today concluding that we're outside even of the just boundary on climate
!- climate boundary : currently exceeding
-
within the next decade we are at risk of pushing ourselves outside of the safe 00:10:15 boundary of 1.5 degrees Celsius
!- 1.5 deg C boundary : at risk of exceeding in the next decade
-
on the biosphere we're also outside of the safe and just boundaries which is already recognized 00:10:27 in the Kunming in Montreal cbd15 of the necessity of halting and reversing the loss of biodiversity by 2030 which entirely aligns with the Earth commission's assessment that we now need to keep 50 to 60 percent of the Earth's 00:10:41 surface intact this means from now onwards zero loss of intact nature across the world economy
!- biosphere boundary : exceeding - zero headroom for destroying any more natural habitat
-
the biosphere is a fundamental basis for all human well-being and we have two 00:05:36 boundaries defined for the biosphere the first one is the conclusion that at least 50 to 60 percent of intact nature must be remained on Earth to be able to 00:05:48 support the world economy and the resilience of the entire Earth system the second boundary is for all the managed land agriculture forestry urban areas that at least 25 percent of every 00:06:00 square kilometer has to have natural levels of fluorine fauna to be able to remain healthy and support the economy
!- Second boundary : biosphere - 50 to 60 percent of nature must remain intact - 25 percent of every kilometres of managed agricultural land must have natural and healthy levels of flora and fauna
-
-
-
Excellent article on the complex nature of rape. The key point for me is that too many people think it's always a black-and-white matter. In fact, the boundary between rape and not-rape is not that crisp. There is a boundary layer here. I think that if more people realized every boundary is really a boundary layer, there would be fewer conflicts about such matters.
-
-
alexsteffen.substack.com alexsteffen.substack.com
-
Alex Steffen über die Rekordregenfälle in Kalifornien und über die Wasser-Infrastruktur des Bundesstaats.
-
- Aug 2022
-
www.sciencedirect.com www.sciencedirect.com
-
Corner, A., Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2011). The psychological mechanism of the slippery slope argument. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.10.002
-
-
f.hubspotusercontent20.net f.hubspotusercontent20.net
-
Gut aufbereiteter Bericht zum Verlust der Biodiversität, sehr viele Infografiken
-
- Feb 2022
-
fivethirtyeight.com fivethirtyeight.com
-
First, consider who gets to make the rules. Tenured scholars who, as we’ve noted, are mostly white and male, largely make the rules that determine who else can join the tenured ranks. This involves what sociologists call “boundary work,” or the practice of a group setting rules to determine who is good enough to join. And as such, many of the rules established around tenure over the years work really well for white scholars, but don’t adequately capture the contributions of scholars of color.
Boundary work is the practice of a group that sets the rules to determine who is and isn't good enough to join the group.
Link to Groucho Marx quote, "I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member."
-
-
Local file Local file
-
Research is needed to determine the situations in which the redundancy principle does not hold
p. 144-145
The authors describe limits to the research (circa 2016) as follows: 1. Kinds of learners, 2. kinds of material, and 3. kinds of presentation methods. Each of these situations present interesting possibilities for research related to the use of closed captions used by first-year law students while watching course-related videos.
When considering how "kinds of learners" might be relevant, the authors ask how redundant on-screen text might hurt or help non-native speakers of a language or learners with very low prior knowledge. It is probably reasonable to consider first-year law students as having "very low prior knowledge". Is there any sense in which those same students could be understand as having overlapping characteristics with TBD
-
boundary conditions.
p. 131-132
Clark and Mayer provide a brief summary of the boundary conditions, the situations in which learners benefit from the use redundant on-screen text. These situations include adding printed text when 1) there are no graphics, 2) the presentation rate of the on-screen text is slow or learner-controlled, 3) the narration includes technical or unfamiliar words, and the 3) on-screen text is shorter than the audio narration.
The first three conditions described bear some similarity to closed caption use by students in legal education watching class lecture videos, especially students in first-year courses. Typically, the students are viewing videos with very few detailed graphics, they have control over the speed, pause, review, and advance features of the video player, and the narration provides numerous legal terms.
Although closed captions are intended for hard of hearing and deaf viewers, they may have some benefits for other learners if the boundary conditions described by the authors turn out to be true. Dello Stritto and Linder (2017) shared findings from a large survey of post-secondary students reporting that a range of students found closed captions to be helpful.
Dello Stritto, M. E., & Linder, K. (2017). A Rising Tide: How Closed Captions Can Benefit All Students. Educause Review Online. https://er.educause.edu:443/articles/2017/8/a-rising-tide-how-closed-captions-can-benefit-all-students
-
- Oct 2021
-
ndpr.nd.edu ndpr.nd.edu
-
For Plessner, the living boundary is both a liminal zone that mediates between organism and the outer medium, itself being neither, and yet also an enactively self-defining and enforcing circumference and outer-limit. The organism moves outward in the expansion and assimilation of its liminal zone and moves inward, taking the outer within, re-establishing itself and reasserting its perimeter. The living boundary already introduces a subject-object status that prefigures for Plessner the overcoming of dualisms between inner and outer, interiority and exteriority. The living boundary is an on-going enactment of an exteriority that it defines and yet also reaches into and assimilates and of an interiority that is both sustained and transformed. The motive force of the dynamic living state is this double aspectivity of its existence and the dialectical tension which drives it forward.
Plessner defines the interiority and exteriority condition of a living organism, giving a biological context for the hard problem of consciousness.
-
Pace Dilthey, Plessner's "Levels" is not about interpreting historical contingencies, nor about the more familiar evolutionary sedimentation of frozen accidents, but rather is about looking to establish transcendental conditions (or categories) of biotic possibility that he refers to as "modals of the organic." As with Hegel he challenges us with a proposed logic of life always mobilized by dialectical tensions, albeit not on the basis of any form of idealism and bereft of a Hollywood ending. For Plessner, that which is both the sine qua non of the living state and that generative 'principle' from which organic modals can be derived is the on-going performance of a self-positioning boundary, and it is highly unlikely that anybody has ever thought as deeply about the implications of what this means.
"Modals of the organic" are the levels at which emergent qualities at the higher level cannot be explained from the lower level, and give rise to the highest constitutive level, human consciousness.
-
- Sep 2021
-
www.mdpi.com www.mdpi.com
-
Such boundary objects play a brokering role involving translation, coordination, and alignment among the perspectives of different communities coming together in a kind of meta-community [26], which is the case in our fractalized community networks.
-
boundary objects
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Aug 2021
-
softwareengineering.stackexchange.com softwareengineering.stackexchange.com
-
Special case check = Non-obvious, non-boundary special values, for example log(1 + the smallest floating point number).
-
Edge / Boundary check = The maximum or minimum input which is expected to produce correct output
.
-
- May 2021
-
-
The 60-Year-Old Scientific Screwup That Helped Covid Kill | WIRED. (n.d.). Retrieved May 22, 2021, from https://www.wired.com/story/the-teeny-tiny-scientific-screwup-that-helped-covid-kill/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=onsite-share&utm_brand=wired&utm_social-type=earned
-
- Mar 2021
-
www.routledge.com www.routledge.com
-
Scientific Imperialism: Exploring the Boundaries of Interdisciplinarity. (n.d.). Routledge & CRC Press. Retrieved 20 February 2021, from https://www.routledge.com/Scientific-Imperialism-Exploring-the-Boundaries-of-Interdisciplinarity/Maki-Walsh-Pinto/p/book/9780367889074
Tags
- lang:en
- analysis
- philosophy
- imperialism
- is:webpage
- boundary
- economy
- interdisciplinary
- political
- ethics
- discipline
- research
- science
Annotators
URL
-
- Feb 2021
-
elizabethreddy.files.wordpress.com elizabethreddy.files.wordpress.com
-
rethink the intricate, and increasingly inti-mate, configurations of the human and the machine.
-
- May 2020
-
www.psychologicalscience.org www.psychologicalscience.org
-
APS Backgrounder Series: Psychological Science and COVID-19: Working Remotely. (n.d.). Association for Psychological Science - APS. Retrieved April 21, 2020, from https://www.psychologicalscience.org/news/backgrounder-covid-19-remote-work.html
-
- Apr 2020
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
r/BehSciAsk—How can scientists judge the boundary between scientific advice and the political? (n.d.). Reddit. Retrieved April 24, 2020, from https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciAsk/comments/g6j1tq/how_can_scientists_judge_the_boundary_between/
-
-
www.mdpi.com www.mdpi.com
-
sociocultural factors
Faktor sosiokultur (budaya) adalah yang utama.
Pemahaman usang tentang publikasi ilmiah lebih banyak yang diturunkan dari senior ke para yuniornya. Para yunior ini dalam waktu 10 tahun akan menjadi senior juga yang kemudian akan menurunkan paham usang yang sama.
-
- Nov 2019
-
drive.google.com drive.google.com
-
This makes me think shrines to birth sites should also be possible, and would also mark the boundary between life and death.
-
- Jan 2019
-
wendynorris.com wendynorris.com
-
hus, we believe challenges occur in all three indica-tors of the level of development of a TMS—expertisespecialization, credibility, and expertise coordination—requiring a need to consider extending theorizing abouteach indicator for emergent response groups.
Ways to extend TMS to emergent groups:
"1. Reconceptualize the Role of Expertise Specialization as a Basis for Task Assignment"
"2. Assessing Credibility in Emergent Response Groups"
"3. Expertise Coordination in Emergent Response Groups"
These extensions evoke boundary objects and invisibility
-
-
wendynorris.com wendynorris.com
-
third response to manage tensions is to promoteknowledge collaboration by enacting dynamic bound-aries. In social sciences, although boundaries divide anddisintegrate collectives, they also coordinate and inte-grate social action (Bowker and Star 1999, Lamont andMolnár 2002). Fluidity brings the need for flexible andpermeable boundaries, but it is not only the propertiesof the boundaries but also their dynamicity that helpmanage tensions.
Cites Bowker and Star
Good examples of how boundaries co-evolve and take on new meanings follow this paragraph.
-
Based on our collective research on to date, we haveidentified that as tensions ebb and flow, OCs use (or,more precisely, participants engage in) any of the fourtypes of responses that seem to help the OC be gen-erative. The first generative response is labeledEngen-dering Roles in the Moment. In this response, membersenact specific roles that help turn the potentially negativeconsequences of a tension into positive consequences.The second generative response is labeledChannelingParticipation. In this response, members create a nar-rative that helps keep fluid participants informed ofthe state of the knowledge, with this narrative havinga necessary duality between a front narrative for gen-eral public consumption and a back narrative to airthe differences and emotions created by the tensions.The third generative response is labeledDynamicallyChanging Boundaries. In this response, OCs changetheir boundaries in ways that discourage or encouragecertain resources into and out of the communities at cer-tain times, depending on the nature of the tension. Thefourth generative response is labeledEvolving Technol-ogy Affordances. In this response, OCs iteratively evolvetheir technologies in use in ways that are embedded by,and become embedded into, iteratively enhanced socialnorms. These iterations help the OC to socially and tech-nically automate responses to tensions so that the com-munity does not unravel.
Productive responses to experienced tensions.
Evokes boundary objects (dynamically changing boundaries) and design affordances/heuristics (evolving technology affordances)
-
Fluidity recognizes the highly flexible or permeableboundaries of OCs, where it is hard to figure out whois in the community and who is outside (Preece et al.2004) at any point in time, let alone over time. Theyare adaptive in that they change as the attention, actions,and interests of the collective of participants change overtime. Many individuals in an OC are at various stagesof exit and entry that change fluidly over time.
Evokes boundary objects and boundary infrastructures.
-
-
wendynorris.com wendynorris.com
-
Recently, Brown and Duguid (2001, p. 208) sug-gested that coordination of organizational knowledgeis likely to be more challenging than coordination ofroutine work, principally because the “elements to becoordinated are not just individuals but communitiesand the practices they foster.” As we found in ourinvestigation of coordination at the boundary, signif-icant epistemic differences exist and must be recog-nized. As the dialogic practices enacted in responseto problematic trajectories show, the epistemic dif-ferences reflect different perspectives or prioritiesand cannot be bridged through better knowledge
Need to think more about how subgroups in SBTF (Core Team/Coords, GIS, locals/diaspora, experienced vols, new vols, etc.) act as communities of practice. How does this influence sensemaking, epistemic decisions, synchronization, contention, negotiation around boundaries, etc.?
-
Boundarywork requires the ability to see perspectives devel-oped by people immersed in a different commu-nity of knowing (Boland and Tenkasi 1995, Star andGriesemer 1989). Often, particular disciplinary focilead to differences in opinion regarding what stepsto take next in treating the patient.
Differences in boundary work can lead to contentiousness.
-
The termdialogic—as opposed to monologic—recognizes dif-ferences and emphasizes the existence of epistemicboundaries, different understandings of events, andthe existence of boundary objects (e.g., the diagnosisor the treatment plan). A dialogic approach to coordi-nation is the recognition that action, communication,and cognition are essentially relational and highlysituated. We use the concept of trajectory (Bourdieu1990, Strauss 1993) to recognize that treatment pro-gressions are not always linear or positive.
Cites Star (boundary objects) and Strauss, Bourdieu (trajectory)
-
In knowledge work, several related factors sug-gest the need to reconceptualize coordination.
Complex knowledge work coordination demands attention to how coordination is managed, as well as what (content) and when (temporality).
"This distinction becomes increasingly important in complex knowledge work where there is less reliance on formal structure, interdependence is changing, and work is primarily performed in teams."
Traditional theories of coordination are not entirely relevant to fast-response teams who are more flexible, less formally configured and use more improvised decision making mechanisms.
These more flexible groups also are more multi-disciplinary communities of practice with different epistemic standards, work practices, and contexts.
"Thus, because of differences in perspectives and interests, it becomes necessary to provide support for cross-boundary knowledge transformation (Carlile 2002)."
Evokes boundary objects/boundary infrastructure issues.
-
-
wendynorris.com wendynorris.com
-
signifies a new epistemology insofar as it portraysevents as discrete and isolated; knowledges as mod-ifiable, categorizable, and abstractable; and locally-situated knowledges as best understood by thoseworking remotely
Evokes complexity of creating classifications and boundary objects that can provide relational data, e.g., report of fire and report of car bombing.
-
-
wendynorris.com wendynorris.com
-
. Previously, scholars have generally ignored any notion of time. Now, we need to make explicit our use of time in understanding disaster. Such an application, I believe, will give us a much deeper understanding on defining disaster, how and why such events unfold, and how various social entities attempt to return to normal after the event. Finally, the use of social time in disaster can provide sociologists a deeper look into understanding key theoretical issues related to social order, social change and social emergence, along with voluntaristic versus deterministic patterns of behavior among various units of analysis.
Scarcity of temporal considerations in previous work.
Connects sociotemporal experiences and enactment of time to social order, social change, volunteer behavior and new units of analysis.
Here's my central thesis.
-
the field. Such a fresh approach possibly improves a wide range of conceptual issues in disasters and hazards. In addition, such an approach would give us insights on how disaster managers, emergency responders, and disaster victims (recognizing that these “roles” may overlap in some cases) see, use and experience time. This, in turn, could assist with a number of applied issues (e.g., warning, effective “response,” priorities in “recovery”) throughout the process of disaster.
Neal cites his 1997 paper about the need to develop better categories to describe disaster phases. Here, her attempts to work through those classifications with a sociotemporal bent.
Evokes Bowker and Star's work on classification and boundary objects/infrastructures but also Yakura (2002) on temporal boundary objects.
-
-
wendynorris.com wendynorris.com
-
The next logical step to aid analysis would be to cross-tabulate the temporal periods of "before, during, and after" with functional activities. This type of analysis and consideration could be further extended by including both the unit of analysis and various social categories such as social class or ethnicity. This type of three-dimensional approach would also strongly highlight the idea that disaster phases are multilayered. Overall, not only do different groups and units of analysis experience the phases at different times, but that multiple aspects of time (i.e., objective and subjective; before, during, after a disaster) intermesh with specific activities.
Evokes temporal boundary objects and classification alongside feminist and post-colonial HCI approaches.
-
We must differentiate whether the use of any phrase refers to temporal or functional aspects of disaster. They should not have multiple meanings
Sensemaking ia a big problem, especially when it comes to multiple stakeholders involved in a disaster (responders, victims, effected people, policy wonks, legislators, researchers, etc.)
Evokes boundary objects work
-
Second, the manner the field handles the issue of disaster phases actually reflects a larger problem in the field. Specifically, how do we define disaster? Kreps (1984, p. 324) comes closest to recognizing the relationship among disaster phases, the theoretical components of disaster (i.e., social order and social action), and the definition of disaster (primarily in a heading in his paper). Unfortunately, he does not elaborate upon the connection of defining disaster and disaster phases. Thus, recognizing and recasting our notion of disaster phases may actually help the field more precisely understand or define "disaster."
Has this changed since 1997? Cites a passage from Quarantelli that argues disaster research is not well defined.
Evokes Bowker and Star's boundary objects work.
-
Mileti, Drabek, and Haas developed their six categories of: 1) preparedness/adjustment; 2) warning; 3) pre-impact, early actions; 4) post-impact, short-term actions; 5) relief or restoration, and 6) reconstruction. They justify these categories by noting that "Numerous researchers have documented how activities and nonnative definitions appear to vary across time and vary greatly among events" (Mileti, Drabek, Haas 1975, p. 9). The six phases serve as a central component of the authors' codification effort (it organizes the book chapters). Yet, the authors do not provide a more specific definition for each category. Other theoretical underpinnings in the book receive much more detailed justification (e.g., collective stress, social nature of disaster).
An update to Barton and Dyne's work by Mileti, Drabek and Haas continues to give short-shrift to theoretical underpinnings of the classifications, per Neal.
Evokes Bowker and Star's work on classifications.
-
-
wendynorris.com wendynorris.com
-
Under the stress of the situation, with too many peopledoing too many things at once, the socio-technical infrastructure that underliestheirwork practice wasbreaking down. Star and Ruhleder [25] explain that infrastructure becomes visible only at these points of breakdown. Volunteers directedtheir attention to their social configuration as the critical infrastructure here (the technical infrastructure remains take
Evokes Star's work on the invisibility of boundary infrastructure until a breakdown.
-
-
wendynorris.com wendynorris.com
-
It is boundaries that help us separate one entity from another: "To classify things is to arrange them in groups ... separated by clearly determined lines of demarcation .... At the bottom of our conception of class there is the idea of a circumscription with fixed and definite outlines. "7 Indeed, the word define derives from the Latin word for boundary, which is finis. To define something is to mark its boundaries, 8 to surround it with a mental fence that separates it from everything else. As evidenced by our failure to notice objects that are not clearly differentiated from their surroundings, it is their boundaries that allow us to perceive "things" at all.
Social reality is constructed by defining boundaries and visibility to objects. Evokes Bowker and Star's classification and boundary object framework.
-
es an entity with a distinctive meaning5 as well as with a distinctive identity that sets it apart from everything else. The way we cut up the world clearly affects the way we organ
Zerubavel posits that meaning is made by distinguishing objects/events from one another. These contrasts are further delineated by classification and/or making things invisible.
-
Nonetheless, without some lumping, it would be impossible ever to experience any collectivity, or mental entity for that matter. The ability to ignore the uniqueness of items and regard them as typical members of categories is a prerequisite for classifying any group of phenomena. Such ability to "typify"106 our experience is therefore one of the cornerstones of social reality
Classification is the mechanism for making sense of disparate objects through the process of lumping and making differences invisible.
-
A mental field is basically a cluster of items that are more similar to one another than to any other item. Generating such fields, therefore, usually involves some lumping.
Evokes Bowker and Star's boundary object work re: the mental models of lumping and splitting
-
A frame is characterized not by its contents but rather by the distinctive way in which it transforms the contents' meaning.
How does this square with the definition of "boundary objects"?
-
Temporal differentiation helps substantiate elusive mental distinctions. Like their spatial counterparts, temporal boundaries often represent mental partitions and thus serve to divide more than just time.
Temporal boundaries (and the objects inherent in them) are used to convey additional meaning and context. These partitions are used to describe historical distinctions ("The Great Depression", "Vietnam Era"), life distinctions (work vs private time vs religious observance).
Examples above are from the chapter.
-
In order to endow the things we perceive with meaning, we normally ignore their uniqueness and regard them as typical members of a particular class of objects (a relative, a present), acts (an apology, a crime), or events (a game, a conference).2 After all, "If each of the many things in the world were taken as distinct, unique, a thing in itself unrelated to any other thing, perception of the world would disintegrate into complete meaninglessness. "3 Indeed, things become meaningful only when placed in some category.
Connect this to Bowker and Star (2000) Sorting Things Out.
-
The perception of supposedly insular chunks of space is probably the most fundamental manifestation of how we divide reality into islands of meaning. Examining how we partition space, therefore, is an ideal way to start exploring how we partition our social world
Zerubavel describes how we use space to partition meaning from large, complex or unfamiliar objects.
Evokes the notion of a boundary object.
-
-
wendynorris.com wendynorris.com
-
These protocols, formal structures, plans, procedures, and schemes can be con-ceived of asmechanismsin the sense that they (1) are objectified in some way(explicitly stated, represented in material form), and (2) are deterministic or at leastgive reasonably predictable results if applied properly. And they aremechanisms ofinteractionin the sense that they reduce the complexity of articulating cooperativework.
People apply "mechanisms of interaction" to reduce the complexity of the articulation work.
Schmidt and Bannon use these examples:
• Formal and informal organizational structures • Planning and scheduling • Standard operating procedures (see Suchman's work on situated action) • Indexes and classifications for organizational and retrieval (see Bowker and Star on boundary objects/infrastructures)
-
In this section of the paper we broach two aspects of this articulation issue, onefocusing on the management of workflow, the other on the construction and manage-ment of what we term a ‘common information space’. The former concept has beenthe subject of discussion for some time, in the guise of such terms as office automa-tion and more recently, workflow automation. The latter concept has, in our view,been somewhat neglected, despite its critical importance for the accomplishmentof many distributed work activities
A quick scan of ACM library papers that tag "articulation work" seems to indicate the "common information space" problem still has not attracted a lot of study. This could be a good entry point for my work with CSCW because time cuts across both workflow and information space.
Nicely bundles boundary infrastructure, sense-making and distributed work
-
- Dec 2018
-
wendynorris.com wendynorris.com
-
Resistance Realily is 'that which resists,' according to Latour's (1987) Pragmatistinspired definition. The resistances thal designers and users encounter will change lhc ubiquitous networks of classifications and standards. Although convergence may appear at times to create an inescapable cycle of feedback and verification, the very multiplicity of people, things and processes involved mean lhat they are never locked in for all time.
Questioning the infrastructural inversion via ubiquity, material and texture, history, and power shapes the visibility and invisibility of the infrastructure that society creates for itself.
-
Infrastructure and Method: Convergence These ubiquitous, textured dai;sifications and standards help frame our representation of the past and the sequencing of event� in the present. They (:an best be understood as doing the ever local, ever partial work of making it appear that science describes nature (and nature alone) and that politics is about social power (and social power alone).
"Standards, categories, technologies, and phenomenology are increasingly converging in large-scale information infrastructure." (p. 47)
Convergence gets to how things work out as "scaffolding in the conduct of modern life."
-
Practical Politics �1 ·he fourch major theme is uncovering the practical politics of classifying awl standardizing. 'fhi<; is the de.sign end of the spectrum of investigating categories and standards as technologies. There are two processes associated with these politics: arriving at categories and standards, and, along the way, deciding what will be visible or invisible within the system.
Politics, as in power dynamics, leadership, negotiation, and decision-making authority, play a role in determining how classifications and standards infrastructures are perceived as visible/invisible.
-
The Indeterminacy of the Past: Multiple Times, Multiple Voices The third methodological theme concerns ihe f1asl as indetc,rr,1inate. 10 We are constantly revising our knowledge of the past in light of new developments in the present.
Visibility can be obtained by peeling back the history of the infrastructure -- how it began, how it was added to, how it changed/adapted over time.
Looking back in time also provides an opportunity to consider how different people/perspectives influenced the infrastructure. Who was vocal? Who was silent? Who was silenced?
-
Materiality and Texture The second methodological departure point is that. classifications and standards are material, as well as symbolic.
Another way to make infrastructures visible is to envision their physical presence (materiality) and texture (experience).
Metaphors play an important role here.
-
This categorical saturation furthermore forms a complex web. Although it is possible to pull out a single dassilication scheme or standard for reference purposes, in reality none of them stand alone. So a subproperty of ubiquity is interdependence, ,md frequently, integration. A systems approach might see the proliferation of both standards and classilications as purely a matter of integration-almost like a gigantic web of interoperability. Yet the sheer density of these phenomena go beyond questions of interoperability. They are layered, tangled, textured; they interact lo form an ecology as well as a flat set of compatibilities.
Ubiquitous classifications and standards are also interdependent and integrated, thus creating complex systems that work but the components of which tend to be invisible.
Example: Other classifications when the phenomena/object don't fit elsewhere or the "cumulative mess trajectory" which occurs when categories and standards interact in messy ways
-
Ubiquity The first major theme is the ubiquity of classifying and standardizing. Classification schemes and standards literally saturate our environment.
Methodological themes for infrastructural inversion -- how to make the invisible visible
-
A definition of infrastructure
Definition of infrastructure
-
This chapter offers four themes, methodological points of departure for the analysis of these complex relationships. Each theme operates as a gestalt switch-it comes in the form of an i11fras/:ruclural inversion (Bowker 1994). This inversion is a struggle against the tendency of infrastructure to disappear (except when breaking down). Tt means learning to look closely at technologies and arrangements that, by design and hy habit, tend to fade into the woodwork (sometimes literally!). Infrastructural inversion means recognizing the depths of interdependence of technical networks and standards, on the one hand, and the real work of politics and knowledge production8 on the other.
Definition of infrastructural inversion
How normally invisible structures become visible (gestalt -- whole is perceived as more than the sum of its parts) when there is a breakdown
-
Standards Classifications and standards are closely related, but not identical. \-Vhile this book focuses on classificalion, standards are crucial components of the larger argument. The systems we discuss often do become standardized; in addition, a standard is in part a way of classifying the world. What then are standards? The term as we use it in the book has several dimensions:
Definition of standards
"What are standards?" Cited verbatim from the book
- A set of agreed-upon rules for the production of objects
- Spans more than one community of practice. It has temporal reach since it persists over time.
- Deployed in making things work together over distance and heterogeneous metrics
- Standards are enforced by some legal/regulatory/professional/government body.
- There is no natural law that the best standard wins
- Standards can be difficult and expensive to change
-
Infrastructures are never transparent for everyone, ancl lheir '\\•orkabilit y as they scale up becomes increasingly complex. Through due methodological attention to the architecture and use of these syslems, we can achieve a deeper understanding of how it is that individuals and communities meet infrastructure. ·we know that this means, at Lhe leasl, an understanding of infraslructure that includes these points:
Cited verbatim from book:
- A historical process of development of many tools, arranged for a wide variety of users and made to work in concert
- A practical match among routines of work practice, technology, and wider scale organizational and technical resources
- A rich set of negotiated compromises ranging from epistemology to data entry that are both available and transparent to communities of users
- A negotiated order in which all of the above, recursively, can function together.
-
The sheer density of the collisions of classification schemes in our lives calls for a new kind of science, a new set of metaphors, linking traditional social science and computer and information science. We need a tqpography of things such as the distribution of ambiguity; the fluid dynamics of how classification systems meet up-a plate tectonics rather than a static geology. This nevi science will draw on the best empirical studies of work-arounds, information use, and mundane tools such as desktop folders and file cabinets (perhaps peering backwards out frorn the Web and into the practices). It will also use the best of object-oriented programming and other areas of computer science to describe this territory. It will build on years of valuable research on classification in library and information s<:ience.
"Why it is important to study classification systems"
-
Information infrastrucLUre is a tricky thing to analyze_l; Good, usable systems disappear almost by deiinition. The easier they arc lo use, the harder they are to see.
The invisibility of infrastructure
-
A� we know from studies of work of all sorts, people do not do the ideal joh, but the doable job. \Vhen faced with too many alternatives and too much information, they satisfice (Mard1 and Simon 1958).
Satisficing as a sensemaking strategy
-
Forms like Lhe death certificate, ·when ag6TTcgated, form a case of what Kirk and Kutd1ins (1992) call "the substitution of precision for validity" (see also Star 1989b). That is, when a seemingly neutral data collection mechanism is substituted for ethkal conflict about the contents of the forms, the moral debate is partially erased. One may get ever more prn:ise knowledge, without having resolved deeper questions, and indeed, by burying those questions.
Real dilemma for humanitarian data: "the substitution of precision for validity"
-
we ·define boundary o4_jects as those o�jects that both inhabit several communities of practice and satisfy the informational requirements of each of them. In working practice, tJ1ey are objects that are able both to travel across borders and maintain some sort of constant identity. They can be tailored to meet rhe needs of any one community (they arc plastic.: in this sense, or customizable). At the same time, they have common identities across settings. 'Ibis is achieved by aJlowing the objects to be weakly structured in wmmon use, imposing stronger structures in the individualsite cailored use. They a.re thus both ambiguous and constant; they may be abstract or concrete.
Definition of boundary objects
Description of how boundary objects are structured
-
Classifications may or may not become standardized. If they do not, they are ad hoc, limited to an individual or a local community, and/or of Limited duration. At the same time, every successful standard imposes a classification system, al the very least between good and bad ways of organizing acLions or things. And the work-arounds involved in the practical use of standards frequently entail the use of ad hoc nonstandard categories.
This is an important point for classifying and standardizing modes of time and temporal representations in information systems. What comes first? The class or the standard?
-
Nomenclature and dassifi<:at..ion are frequently confused, howevc1; since attempts are often made to model nomenclature on a 1>ingle, stable system of classification principles, as for example with bot.any (Bowke1; in press) or anatomy.
Nomenclature is an "agreed-upon naming scheme, one that does not follow any classificatory principles."
-
Clas.�ification A classification is a spatial, temporal, or sjH1ti11-lemporal segmm,tation rif lhe world. ,\ "classification system" is a set of boxes (rnelaphorical or literal) inlo which things can be pul to then do some kind of work-bureaucratic or knowledge production. In an abstract, .ideal sense, a classification system exhibits the frillowing properties:
Definition of classification
"A classification system exhibits the following properties:"
- There are consistent, unique classificatory principles in operation
- The categories are mutually exclusive
- The system is complete
-
vVe have a moral and ethical agenda in our querying of these systems. Each standard and each category valorizcs some point of view and silences another. This is not inherently a bad thing-indeed it is inescapable.
Key point here about the power of classification to make objects/phenomena visible or invisible.
In thinking about classifications of time/temporality, what does the standardization of some forms (ISO, commonly accepted terms/metaphors) say about the systems we design to account for time-based information? Is it simply an argument of ease/difficulty in formatting temporal data or is there some other social/cultural issue at play?
-
-
wendynorris.com wendynorris.com
-
Table 1.1 A definition of infrastructure
Definition of infrastructure
-
This categorical saturation furthermore forms a complex web. Although it is possible to pull out a single classification scheme or standard for reference purposes, in reality none of them stand alone. So a_ subproperty of ubiquity is interdependence, and frequently, integrat10n. A systems approach might see the proliferation of both standards and classifications as purely a matter of integration-almost like a gigantic web of interoperability. Yet the sheer density of these phenomena go beyond questions of interoperability. They are layered, tangled, textured; they interact to form an ecology as well as a flat set of compatibilities.
Ubiquitous classifications and standards are also interdependent and integrated, thus creating complex systems that tend to be invisible.
Example: Other classifications when the phenomena/object don't fit elsewehre or the "cumulative mess trajectory" which occurs when categories and standards interact in messy ways
-
Ubiquity __ The first major theme is the ubiquity of classifying and standardmng. Classification schemes and standards literally saturate our environment.
Methodological themes for infrastructural inversion -- how to make the invisible visible
-
This chapter offers four themes, methodological points of departure for the analysis of these complex relationships. Each theme operates as a gestalt switch-it comes in the form of an infrastructural inversion (Bowker 1994). This inversion is a struggle against the tendency of infrastructure to disappear (except when breaking down). It means learning to look closely at technologies and arrangements that, by design and by habit, tend to fade into the woodwork (sometimes literally!). Infrastructural inversion means recognizing the depths of interdependence of technical networks and standards, on the one hand, and the real work of politics and knowledge production8 on the other.
Definition of infrastructural inversion
How normally invisible structures become visible (gestalt -- whole is perceived as more than the sum of its parts) when there is a breakdown
-
Infrastructures are never transparent for everyone, and their workability as they scale up becomes increasingly complex. Through due methodological attention to the architecture and use of these systems, we can achieve a deeper understanding of how it is that individuals and communities meet infrastructure. We know that this means, at the least, an understanding of infrastructure that includes these points:
Cited verbatim from book:
• A historical process of development of many tools, arranged for a wide variety of users and made to work in concert • A practical match among routines of work practice, technology, and wider scale organizational and technical resources • A rich set of negotiated compromises ranging from epistemology to data entry that are both available and transparent to communities of users • A negotiated order in which all of the above, recursively, can function together.
-
Information infrastructure is a tricky thing to analyze.6 Good, usable systems disappear almost by definition. The easier they are to use, the harder they are to see. As well, most of the time, the bigger they are, the harder they are to see.
The invisibility of infrastructure
-
The sheer density of the collisions of classification scheme� in_ our liv�s calls for a new kind of science, a new set of metaphors, hnkmg traditional social science and computer and information scien�e. We ne�d a topography of things such as the distribution of ambiguity; the flu_,d dynamics of how classification systems �eet u�-a plate tectomcs rather than a static geology. This new science will draw on the best empirical studies of work-arounds, info�mation use, and �undan_e tools such as desktop folders and file cabmets (perhaps peering backwards out from the Web and into the practices). It will also use th<: best of object-oriented programming and other areas of compute, science to describe this territory. It will build on years of valuablt research on classification in library and information science.
"Why it is important to study classification systems"
-
s we know from studies of work of all sorts, people do not do the ideal job, but the doable job. When faced with too many alternatives and too much information, they satisfice (March and Simon 1958).
Satisficing as a sensemaking strategy
-
Forms like the death certificate, when aggregated, form a case of what Kirk and Kutch ins ( 1992) call "the substitution of precision for validity" (see also Star 1989b). That is, when a seemingly neutral data collection mechanism is substituted for ethical conflict about the contents of the forms, the moral debate is partially erased. One may get ever more precise knowledge, without having resolved deeper questions, and indeed, by burying those questions.
Real dilemma for humanitarian data: "the substitution of precision for validity"
-
we define boundary objects as those objects that both inhabit several communities of practice and satis� the informational requirements of each of them. In working practice, they are objects that are able both to travel across borders and maintain some sort of constant identity. They can be tailored to meet the needs of any one community (they are plastic in this sense, or customizable). At the same time, they have common identities across settin�s. This is achieved by allowing the objects to be weakly structured m common use, imposing stronger structures in the individualsite tailored use. They are thus both ambiguous and constant; they may be abstract or concrete.
Definition of boundary objects
Description of how boundary objects are structured
-
Classifications may or may not become standardized. If they do not, they are ad hoc, limited to an individual or a local community, and/or of limited duration. At the same time, every successful standard imposes a classification system, at the very least between good and bad ways of organizing actions or things. And the work-arounds involved in the practical use of standards frequently entail the use of ad hoc nonstandard categories.
This is an important point for classifying and standardizing modes of time and temporal representations in information systems. What comes first? The class or the standard?
-
Standards Classifications and standards are closely related, but not identical. While this book focuses on classification, standards are crucial components of the larger argument. The systems we discuss often do become standardized; in addition, a standard is in part a way of classifying the world.
Definition of standards
"What are standards?"
- A set of agreed-upon rules for the production of objects
- Spans more than one community of practice. It has temporal reach since it persists over time.
- Deployed in making things work together over distance and heterogeneous metrics
- Standards are enforced by some legal/regulatory/professional/government body.
- There is no natural law that the best standard wins
- Standards can be difficult and expensive to change
-
Nomenclature and classification are frequently confused, however, since attempts are often made to model nomenclature on a single, stable system of classification principles,
Nomenclature is an "agreed-upon naming scheme, one that does not follow any classificatory principles."
-
Classification A classification is a spatial, temporal, or spatio-temporal segmentation of the world. A "classification system" is a set of boxes (metaphorical or literal) into which things can be put to then do some kind of work-bureaucratic 9r knowledge production.
Definition of classification
"A classification system exhibits the following properties:"
- There are consistent, unique classificatory principles in operation
- The categories are mutually exclusive
- The system is complete
-
We have a moral and ethical agenda in our querying of these systems. Each standard and each category valorizes some point of view and silences another.
Key point here about the power of classification to make objects/phenomena visible or invisible.
In thinking about classifications of time/temporality, what does the standardization of some forms (ISO, commonly accepted terms/metaphors) say about the systems we design to account for time-based information? Is it simply an argument of ease/difficulty in formatting temporal data or is there some other social/cultural issue at play?
-
-
wendynorris.com wendynorris.com
-
Members of organizations sometimes have differing (and multiple)goals, and conflict may be as important as cooperation in obtaining is-sue resolutions (Kling, 1991). Groups and organizations may not haveshared goals, knowledge, meanings, and histories (Heath & Luff,1996; Star & Ruhleder, 1994).
A lot to unpack here as this bullet gets at the fundamental need for boundary objects (Star's work) to traverse sense-making, meanings, motives, and goals within artifacts.
-
- Aug 2018
-
wendynorris.com wendynorris.com
-
empirical literature on organizational time has extended research on time as a control variable of boundary condition (George & Jones, 2000; Langley, Smallman, Tsoukas, & Van de Ven, 2013)
How is boundary condition being used here? As a boundary object or something else?
See: Busse 2017 (in Mendeley)
-
-
wendynorris.com wendynorris.com
-
And the determination of organizational age illustrates the constructed, enacted nature of the past, because what at first glance seems like a simple, even objective matter becomes ambiguous when mergers and acquisitions are involved. Is the founding date the date that the oldest of the merger partners began operations, or is it the date when the last partners merged? Families can face the same ambiguities when one or both spouses have been married previously and they and their children combine to form new families. As the definition of the situation principle teaches (see Chapter 1), the important issue is when the people in the organization or family believe it was founded.
Ambiguity about "founding date" of a merged organization is akin to the friction point for SBTF data collection -- is the date/timestamp the original social media post or the shared post (either of which may occur at different points in the stream). What is the boundary?
-
- Jul 2018
- Oct 2017
-
rampages.us rampages.us
-
According tothe Healthcare Hashtag Project, there are 3,646 hashtags for 8,710health topics, as of January 2014.
If we consider the number of hashtags and health topics on the Twitter, creating a network of extensive number of nodes and links may become strenuous or even impossible. Here, we will have to decide the network boundary as it may pertain to our specific research question.
-
- Jun 2015
-
caseyboyle.net caseyboyle.netjay.pdf1
-
However much a boundary, it is always a permeable membrane between self and other.
The body as a limit that separates what it also joins.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-