Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This work by Gonzalez-Segarra et al. greatly extends previous research from the same group that identified ISNs as a key player in balancing nutrition and water ingestion. Using well-balanced sets of exploratory anatomical analyses and rigorous functional experiments, the authors identify and compile various peptidergic circuits that modulate nutrient and/or water ingestion. The findings are convincing and the experiments rigorous.

Strengths:

- The authors complement anatomically-reconstructed and functionally-validated neuronal connectivity with extensive and intensive morphological and synaptic reconstruction.

- Neurons and genes involved in specific components of feeding control are undoubtedly challenging, because numerous neurons and circuits redundantly and reciprocally regulate the same components of feeding behavior. This work dissociates how multiple, parallel and interconnected, peptidergic circuits (dilp3, CCHa2, CCAP) modulate sucrose and water ingestion, in tandem and in parallel.

- The authors address some of the incongruencies / discrepancies in current literature (IPCs) and try to provide explanations, rather than ignoring inconsistent findings.

Weaknesses:

- Is "function" of the ISNs to balance "nutrient need" or osmolarity? Balancing hemolymph osmolarity for physiological homeostasis is conceptually different from balancing thirst and hunger.

- The final schematic nicely sums up how the different peptidergic pathways might work together, but it is unclear which connections are empirically-validated or speculative. It would be informative to show which parts of the model are speculative versus validated. For example, does FAFB volume synapse = functional connectivity and not just anatomical proximity? A bulk of the current manuscript relies on "synapses of relatively high confidence" (according to Materials and methods: line 522). I recommend distinguishing empirically tested & predicted connections in the final schematic, and maybe reword/clarify throughout the manuscript as "predicted synaptic partners"

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

There are a number of outstanding questions concerning how cohesin turnover on DNA is controlled by various accessory factors and how such turnover is controlled by post-translational modification. In this paper, Nasmyth et al. perform a series of AlphaFold structure predictions that aim to address several of these outstanding questions. Their structure predictions suggest that the release factor WAPL forms a ternary complex with PDS5 and SA/SCC3. This ternary complex appears to be able to bind the N-terminal end of SCC1, suggesting how formation of such a complex could stabilize an open state of the cohesin ring. Additional calculations suggest how the Eco/ESCO acetyltransferases and Sororin engage the SMC3 head domain and thereby protect against WAPL-mediated release.

This work thus demonstrates the power of AF prediction methods and how they can lead to a number of interesting and testable hypotheses that can transform our understanding of cohesin regulation. These findings require orthogonal experimental validation, but the authors argue convincingly that such validation should not be a pre-requisite to publication.

As the authors did not systematically include model confidence scores it is difficult for the reader to evaluate the reliability of the models obtained. The caveat is that many readers will by default assume that the presented models are correct, when in fact, some of them may score poorly and require careful assessment. As numerous readers will not be very familiar with the AF confidence scoring mechanisms, it would be important to include such metrics and indicate what these scores mean for the different interfaces (Acceptable, Medium and High confidence?). pLDDT and PAE plots should be included. When they report on a key interaction (E.g. WAPL-SCC1) they should indicate the key region (SCC1 N-terminus) on the PAE plot. False positives are always possible even with good scores, especially when many protein pairs are tried. It would therefore be important to also include a table showing the global scores for pTM and ipTM to summarise the confidence scores of interfaces.

It is exciting to see AF-multimer predictions being applied to cohesin. As some of the reported interactions are not universally conserved and some involve relatively small interfaces the possibility arises that these interfaces show poor or borderline confidence scores. As some of these interfaces map to mutants that have previously been obtained by hypothesis-free genetic screens and mutational analyses they appear nevertheless valid. Thus, an important point to make is that even interfaces that show modest confidence scores may turn out to be valid while others may be not. The authors therefore should emphasize that the proposed models are just predictions and that additional orthogonal validations are required.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This paper presents extensive numerical simulations using a model that incorporates up to second-order epistasis to study the joint effects of microscopic epistasis and clonal interference on the evolutionary dynamics of a microbial population. Previous works that explicitly modeled microscopic epistasis typically assumed strong selection & weak mutation (SSWM), a condition that is generally not met in real-life evolutionary processes. Alternatively, another class of models coarse-grained the effects of microscopic epistasis into a generic distribution of fitness effects. The framework introduced in this paper represents an important advance with respect to these previous approaches, allowing for the explicit modeling of microscopic epistasis in non-SSWM scenarios. The modeling framework presented promises to be a valuable tool to study microbial evolution in silico.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Ibar and colleagues investigate the function of spectrin in Drosophila wing imaginal discs and its effect on the Hippo pathway and myosin activity. The authors find that both βH-Spec and its canonical binding partner α-Spec reduce junctional localization of the protein Jub and thereby restrict Jub's inhibitory effect on Hippo signaling resulting in activation of the Hippo effector Yorkie regulating tissue shape and organ size. From genetic epistasis analysis and analysis of protein localization, the authors conclude that βH-Spec and α-Spec act independently in this regulation. The major point of this study is that the apical localization of βH-Spec and myosin is mutually exclusive and that the proteins antagonize each other's activity in wing discs. In vitro co-sedimentation assays and in silico structural modeling suggest that this antagonization is due to a competition of βH-Spec and myosin for F-actin binding.

The study's strengths are the genetic perturbation that is the basis for the epistasis analysis which includes specific knockdowns of the genes of interest as well as an elegant CRISPR-based overexpression system with great tissue specificity. The choice of the model for such an in-depth analysis of pathway dependencies in a well-characterized tissue makes it possible to identify and characterize quantitative differences between closely entangled and mutually dependent components. The method of quantifying protein localization and abundance is common for multiple figures which makes it easy to assess differences across experiments. The flow of experiments is logical and in general, the author's conclusions are supported by the presented data. The findings are very well embedded into the context of relevant literature and both confronting and confirming literature are discussed.

The study shows how components of the cytoskeleton are directly involved in the regulation of the mechanosensitive Hippo pathway in vivo and thus ultimately regulate organ size supporting previous data in other contexts. The molecular mechanism regulating myosin activity by out-competing it for F-actin binding has been observed for small actin-binding proteins such as cofilin but is a new mode for such a big, membrane-associated actin-binding protein. This may inspire future experiments in different morphogenetic contexts for the investigation of similar mechanisms. For example, the antagonistic activity of βH-Spec and myosin in this tissue context might help explain phenomena in other systems such as spectrin-dependent ratcheting of apical constriction during mesoderm invagination (as the authors discuss). Against the classical view, the work shows that βH-Spec can act independently of α-Spec. Together the results will be of interest to the cell biology community with a focus on the cytoskeleton and mechanotransduction.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This manuscript by Mahlandt, et al. presents a significant advance in the manipulation of endothelial barriers with spatiotemporal precision, and in the use of optogenetics to manipulate cell signaling in vascular biology more generally. The authors establish the role of Rho-family GTPases in controlling the cytoskeletal-plasma membrane interface as it relates to endothelial barrier integrity and function, and adequately motivate the need for optogenetic tools for global and local signaling manipulation to study endothelial barriers.

Throughout the work, the optogenetic assays are conceptualized, described, and executed with exceptional attention to detail, particularly as it relates to potential confounding factors in data analysis and interpretation. Comparison across experimental setups in optogenetics is notoriously fraught, and the authors' control experiments and measurements to ensure equal light delivery and pathway activation levels across applications is very thorough. In demonstrating how these new opto-GEFs can be used to alter vascular barrier strength, the authors cleverly use fluorescent-labeled dextran polymers of different sizes and ECIS experiments to demonstrate the physiological relevance of BOEC monolayers to in vivo blood vessels. Of particular note, the resiliency of the system to multiple stimulation cycles and longer time course experiments is promising for use in vascular leakage studies.

Given that dozens of Rho GTPase-activating GEFs exist, expanded rationale for the selection of p63, ITSN1, and TIAM1 in the form of discussion and literature citations would be helpful to motivate their selection as protein effectors in the engineered tools. Extensive tool engineering studies demonstrate the superiority of iLID over optogenetic eMags or rapamycin-based chemogenetic tools for these purposes. However, as the utility of iLID and eMags has been demonstrated for manipulation of a variety of signaling pathways, the iSH-Akt demonstration does not seem necessary for these systems.

The demonstration of orthogonality in GTPase- and VE-cadherin-blocking antibody-mediated barrier function decreases and is compelling, even without full elucidation of the role of cell size or overlap in barrier strength. The discussion section presents a mature and thoughtful description of the limitations, remaining questions, and potential opportunities for the tools and technology developed in this work. Importantly, this manuscript demonstrates a commitment to scientific transparency in the ways in which the data are visualized, the methods descriptions, and the reagent and code sharing it presents, allowing others to utilize these tools to their full potential.

Joint Public Review:

In this study, Anthoney and coworkers continue an important, unique, and technologically innovative line of inquiry from the van Swinderen lab aimed at furthering our understanding of the different sleep stages that may exist in Drosophila. Here, they compare the physiological and transcriptional hallmarks of sleep that have been induced by two distinct means, a pharmacological block of GABA signaling and optogenetic activation of dorsal fan-shaped-body neurons. They first employ an incredibly impressive fly-on-the-ball 2-photon functional imaging setup to monitor neural activity during these interventions, and then perform bulk RNA sequencing of fly brains at different stages. These transcriptomic analyses leads them to (a) knocking out nicotinic acetyl-choline receptor subunits and (b) knocking down AkhR throughout the fly brain testing the impact of these genetic interventions on sleep behaviors in flies. Based on this work, the authors present evidence that optogenetically and pharmacologically induced sleep produces highly distinct brain-wide effects on physiology and transcription.

The study is of significant interest, is easy to read, and the figures are mostly informative. However there are features of the experimental design and the interpretation of results that diminish enthusiasm.

a - Conditions under which sleep is induced for behavioral vs neural and transcriptional studies

1) There is a major conceptual concern regarding the relationships between the physiological and transcriptomic effects of optogenetic and pharmacological sleep promotion, and the effects that these manipulations have on sleep behavior. The authors show that these two means of sleep-induction produce remarkably distinct physiological and transcriptional responses, however, they also show that they produce highly similar effects on sleep behavior, causing an increase in sleep through increases in the duration of sleep bouts. If dFB neurons were promoting active sleep, the sleep it produces should be more fragmented than the sleep induced by the drug, because the latter is supposed to produce quiet sleep. Yet both manipulations seem to be biasing behavior toward quiet sleep.

2) The authors show that the pharmacological block of GABA signaling and the optogenetic activation of dorsal fan-shaped-body neurons cause different responses on brain activity. Based on these recordings and the behavioral and brain transcriptomic data they then claim that these responses correspond to different sleep states and are associated with the expression and repression of a different constellation of genes. Nevertheless, neural activity in animals was recorded following short stimulations whereas behavioral and transcriptomic data were obtained following chronic stimulation. In this regard, it would be interesting to determine how the 12-hour pharmacological intervention they employed for their transcriptomic analysis changes neural activity throughout the brain - 12 hours will likely be too long for the open-cuticle preps, but an in-between time-point (e.g. 1h) would probably be equally informative.

b - Efficiency of THIP treatment under different conditions

1) There are no data to quantify how THIP alters food consumption. It is evident that flies consume it otherwise they would not show increased sleep. However, they may consume different amounts of food overall than the minus THIP controls. This might have an influence on the animal's metabolism, which could at least explain the fact that metabolism-related genes are regulated (Figure 5). Therefore, in the current state, it is not possible to be certain that gene regulation events measured in this experiment are solely due to THIP effects on sleep.

2) A similar problem exists in the sleep deprivation experiments. If flies are snapped every 20 seconds, they may not have the freedom to consume appropriate amounts of food, and therefore their consumption of THIP or ATR may be smaller than in non-sleep deprived controls. Thus, it would be crucial to know whether the flies that are sleep-deprived (i.e. shaken every 20 seconds for 12 hours) actually consume comparable amounts of food (and therefore THIP) as those that are undisturbed. If not, then perhaps the transcriptional differences between the two groups are not sleep-specific, but instead reflect varying degrees of exposure to THIP.

3) The authors should further discuss the slow action of THIP perfusion vs dFB activation, especially as flies only seem to fall asleep several minutes after THIP is being washed away. Is it a technical artifact? If not, it may not be unreasonable to hypothesize that THIP, at the concentration used, could prevent flies from falling asleep, and that its removal may lower the concentration to a point that allows its sleep-promoting action. The authors could easily test this by extending THIP treatment for another 4-5 minutes.

c - Comments regarding the behavioral assays

1) L319-322: the authors conclude that dFB stimulation and THIP consumption have similar behavioral effects on sleep. However, this is inaccurate as in Figure S1 they explain that one increases bout number in both day and night and the other one only during the day.

2) The behavioral definitions used for active and quiet sleep do not fit well with strong evidence that deep sleep (defined by lowered metabolic rates) is probably most closely associated with bouts of inactivity that are much longer than the >5min duration used here, i.e., probably 30min and longer (Stahl et al. 2017 Sleep 40: zsx084). Given that the authors are providing evidence that quiet sleep is correlated with changes in the expression of metabolism related genes, they should at least discuss the fact that reductions in metabolism have been shown to occur after relatively long bouts of inactivity and might reconsider their behavioral sleep analysis (i.e., their criteria for sleep state) with this in mind.

d - Comments regarding the recordings of neuronal activity

1) There is an additional concern regarding the proposed active and quiet sleep states that rest at the heart of this study. Here these two states in the fly are compared to the REM and NREM sleep states observed in mammals and the parallels between active fly sleep and REM and quiet fly sleep and NREM provide the framework for the study. The establishment of such parallel sleep states in the fly is highly significant and identifying the physiological and molecular correlates of distinct sleep stages in the fly is of critical importance to the field. However, the proposal that the dorsal fan shaped body (dFB) neurons promote active sleep runs counter to the prevailing model that these neurons act as a major site of sleep homeostasis. If quiet sleep were akin to NREM, wouldn't we expect the major site of sleep homeostasis in the brain to promote it? Furthermore, the authors state that the effects of dFB neuron excitation on transcription have "almost no overlap" (line 500) with the transcriptomic effects of sleep deprivation (Supplementary Table 3), which is not what would be expected if dFB neurons are tracking sleep pressure and promoting sleep, as suggested by a growing body of convergent work summarized on page four of the manuscript. Wouldn't the 10h excitation of the dFB neurons be predicted to mimic the effects of sleep deprivation if these neurons "...serve as the discharge circuit for the insect's sleep homeostat..." (line 60)? Shouldn't their prolonged excitation produce an artificial increase in sleep drive (even during sleep) that would favor deep, restorative sleep? How do the authors interpret their results with regard to the current prevailing model that dFB neurons act as a major site of sleep homeostasis? This study could be seen as evidence against it, but the authors do not discuss this in their Discussion.

2) Regarding the physiological effects of Gaboxadol, to what extent is the quieting induced by this drug reminiscent of physiology of the brains of flies spontaneously meeting the behavioral criterion for quiet sleep? Given the relatively high dose of the drug being delivered to the de-sheathed brain in the imaging experiments (at least when compared to the dose used in the fly food), one worries that the authors may be inducing a highly abnormal brain state that might bear very little resemblance to the deeply sleeping brain under normal conditions. As the authors acknowledge, it is difficult to compare these two situations. Comparing the physiological state of brains put to sleep by Gaboxadol and brains that have spontaneously entered a deep sleep state therefore seems critical.

3) There are some issues with Figure 3, in particular 3C-D. It is not clear whether these panels show representative traces or an average, however both the baseline activity and fluorescence are different between C and D, in particular in their amplitude. Therefore, it is difficult to attribute the differences between C and D to the stimulation itself or to the previously different baseline. In addition, the fact that flies with dFB activation seem to keep a basal level of locomotor activity whereas THIP-treated ones don't is quite striking, however it is not being discussed. Finally, the authors claim that the flies eventually wake up from THIP-induced sleep (L360-361), however there are no data to support this statement.

4) In Figure 4C, it is strange that the SEM is always exactly the same across the whole experiment. Readers should be aware that there might have been an issue when plotting the figure.

e - Comments regarding the transcript analyses

1) General comment: the title of this manuscript is inaccurate - the "transcriptome" commonly refers to the entirety of all transcripts in a cell/tissue/organ/animal (including genes that are not differentially expressed following their interventions), and it is therefore impossible to "engage two non-overlapping transcriptomes" in the same tissue. Perhaps the word "transcriptional programs" or transcriptional profiles" would be more accurate here?

2) Given the sensitivity of transcriptomic methods, there is a significant concern that the optogenetic experiments are not as well controlled as they could be. Given the need for supplemental all-trans retinal (ATR) for functional light gating of channelrhodopsins in the fly, it is convenient to use flies with Gal4-driven opsin that have not been given supplemental ATR as a negative control, particularly as a control for the effects of light. However, there is another critical control to do here. Flies bearing the UAS-opsin responder element but lacking the GAL4 driver and that have been fed ATR are critical for confirming that the observed effects of optogenetic stimulation are indeed caused by the specific excitation of the targeted neurons and not due to leaky opsin expression, or the effect of ATR feeding under light stimulation or some combination of these factors. Given the sensitivity of transcriptomic methods, it would be good to see that the candidate transcripts identified by comparing ATR+ and ATR- R23E10GAL4/UAS-Chrimson flies are also apparent when comparing R23E10GAL4/UAS-Chrimson (ATR+) with UAS-Chrimson (ATR+) alone.

3) Figures about qPCR experiments (5G and 6G) are problematic. First, whereas the authors seem satisfied with the 'good correspondence' between their RNA-seq and qPCR results, this is true for only ~9/19 genes in 5G and 2/6 genes in 6G. Whereas discrepancies are not rare between RNA-seq and qPCR, the text in L460-461 and 540-541 is misleading. In addition, it is unclear whether the n=19 in L458 refers to the number of genes tested or the number of replicates. If the qPCR includes replicates, this should be more clearly mentioned, and error bars should be added to the corresponding figures.

4) There is a lack of error bars for all their RNAseq and qPCR comparisons, which is particularly surprising because the authors went to great lengths and analyzed an applaudably large amount of independent biological replicates, yet the variability observed in the corresponding molecular data is not reported.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Ritvo and colleagues present an impressive suite of simulations that can account for three findings of differentiation in the literature. This is important because differentiation-in which items that have some features in common, or share a common associate are less similar to one another than are unrelated items-is difficult to explain with classic supervised learning models, as these predict the opposite (i.e., an increase in similarity). A few of their key findings are that differentiation requires a high learning rate and low inhibitory oscillations, and is virtually always asymmetric in nature.

This paper was very clear and thoughtful-an absolute joy to read. The model is simple and elegant, and powerful enough to re-create many aspects of existing differentiation findings. The interrogation of the model and presentation of the findings were both extremely thorough. The potential for this model to be used to drive future work is huge. I have only a few comments for the authors, all of which are relatively minor.

1. I was struck by the fact that the "zone" of repulsion is quite narrow, compared with the zone of attraction. This was most notable in the modeling of Chanales et al. (i.e., just one of the six similarity levels yielded differentiation). Do the authors think this is a generalizable property of the model or phenomenon, or something idiosyncratic to do with the current investigation? It seems curious that differentiation findings (e.g., in hippocampus) are so robustly observed in the literature despite the mechanism seemingly requiring a very particular set of circumstances. I wonder if the authors could speculate on this point a bit-for example, might the differentiation zone be wider when competitor "pop up" is low (i.e., low inhibitory oscillations), which could help explain why it's often observed in hippocampus? This seems related a bit to the question about what makes something "moderately" active, or how could one ensure "moderate" activation if they were, say, designing an experiment looking at differentiation.

2. With real fMRI data we know that the actual correlation value doesn't matter all that much, and anti-correlations can be induced by things like preprocessing decisions. I am wondering if the important criterion in the model is that the correlations (e.g., as shown in Figure 6) go down from pre to post, versus that they are negative in sign during the post learning period. I would think that here, similar to in neural data, a decrease in correlation would be sufficient to conclude differentiation, but would love the authors' thoughts on that.

3. For the modeling of the Favila et al. study, the authors state that a high learning rate is required for differentiation of the same-face pairs. This made me wonder what happens in the low learning rate simulations. Does integration occur? This paradigm has a lot of overlap with acquired equivalence, and so I am thinking about whether these are the sorts of small differences (e.g., same-category scenes and perhaps a high learning rate) that bias the system to differentiate instead of integrate.

4. For the simulations of the Schlichting et al. study, the A and B appear to have overlap in the hidden layer based on Figure 9, despite there being no similarity between the A and B items in the study (in contrast to Favila et al., in which they were similar kinds of scenes, and Chanales et al., in which they were similar colors). Why was this decision made? Do the effects depend on some overlap within the hidden layer? (This doesn't seem to be explained in the paper that I saw though, so maybe just it's a visualization error?)

5. It seems as though there were no conditions under which the simulations produced differentiation in both the blocked and intermixed conditions, which Schlichting et al. observed in many regions (as the present authors note). Is there any way to reconcile this difference?

6. A general question about differentiation/repulsion and how it affects the hidden layer representation in the model: Is it the case that the representation is actually "shifted" or repelled over so it is no longer overlapping? Or do the shared connections just get pruned, such that the item that has more "movement" in representational space is represented by fewer units on the hidden layer (i.e., is reduced in size)? I think, if I understand correctly, that whether it gets shifted vs. reduce would depend on the strength of connections along the hidden layer, which would in turn depend on whether it represents some meaningful continuous dimension (like color) or not. But, if the connections within the hidden layer are relatively weak and it is the case that representations become reduced in size, would there be any anticipated consequences of this (e.g., cognitively/behaviorally)?

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors present a carefully controlled set of experiments that demonstrate an additional complexity for GPCR signalling in that endosomal signalling make be different when beta-arrestin is or isn't associated with a G protein-bound V2 vasopressin receptor. It uses state of the art biosensor-based approaches and beta-arrestin KO lines to assess this. It adds to a growing body of evidence that G proteins and beta-arresting can associate with GPCR complexes simultaneously. They also demonstrate the possibility that Gq might also be activated by the V2 receptor. My sense is one thing they may need to be considered is the possibility of such "megacomplexes" might actually involve receptor dimers or oligomers.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In their research article, Sapiro et al. overcome the technical burden of low B. burgdorferi numbers during infection by physically enriching for spirochetes prior to RNA-sequencing/mass spectrometry. This technology, which has potential broad applications, was applied to B. burgdorferi-infected ticks, generating datasets for future studies.

Sapiro et al. addressed many of the reviewers' comments including the addition of experimental details, comparisons to other studies and some caveats to their approach. The manuscript has been significantly improved and I appreciate the efforts to address our critiques. There are a few remaining comments that the authors should consider before creating the final Version of Record.

The authors sought to develop technology for a transcriptomic analysis of B. burgdorferi directly from infected ticks. The methodology has exciting implications to better understand pathogen RNA profiles during specific infection timepoints, even beyond the Lyme spirochete. The authors demonstrate successful sequencing of the B. burgdorferi transcriptome from ticks and perform mass spectrometry to identify possible tick proteins that interact with B. burgdorferi. This technology and first dataset will be useful for the field. The study is limited in that no transcripts/proteins are followed-up by additional experiments and no biological interactions/infectious-processes are investigated.

Remaining critiques:

Experimental data regarding the sensitivity of this approach are missing. What is the limit of detection for this protocol? While the authors have stated that they were unable to sequence B. burgdorferi from unfed nymphs, the number of bacteria needed for antibody enrichment are not tested. The starting CFU in their infected nymphal ticks was also not reported (the authors only report reisolation data from 12 ticks). Page 18, line 458 the authors claim their approach "captured the vast majority" of Bb inside of the tick. Data are missing to demonstrate this. Understanding the limits of this approach will be critical for future applications, especially when using B. burgdorferi infected material with low bacterial burden.

The authors should clarify the term "genes" in the abstract and throughout the manuscript. I think they actually mean "open reading frames" or "annotated mRNAs".

More information regarding the efficacy of RNA-seq coverage is still warranted and lacking from the results, especially on page 6. The authors skip right to differential expression analysis without fully examining sequencing effectiveness. This is especially important given their development of a new technique. What was the numbers of detected genes for each sample? How is this affected by bacterial burden of the sample? What is the distribution of reads among tRNAs, mRNAs, UTRs, and sRNAs? How reproducible is the coverage for one gene across replicates? A few browser images of RNA-seq data (ex. of BAM files) across different genes would be useful to visualize the read coverage per gene.

Downregulated genes are largely ignored and should be commented on further.

Page 11, line 258-260: authors state Rpos, Rrp1, and RelBbu are the "three main Bb regulatory programs active in the tick." Yes, these three regulons have been well studied but there could be other uncharacterized regulatory programs. Please consider changing the language.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This paper looks at nutrient-responsive Ca++ flux in islet cells of eight genetically diverse mouse strains. The investigators correlate Ca++ flux with insulin secretory capacity, demonstrating that calcium parameters in response to different nutrients are a better predictor of insulin secretory capacity than average calcium. They also correlate Ca++ flux with previously collected islet protein abundance followed by integration with human genome-wide association studies. This integration allows them to identify a sub-set of proteins that are both relevant to human islet function and that may play a causal role in regulating islet Ca++ oscillations. All data have been deposited in a searchable public database. There are many strengths to this paper. To my knowledge, this is the first work to assess the genetics of nutrient-responsive Ca++ flux in islets. Given the importance of Ca++ for beta cell insulin secretion, this work is of high importance. Investigators also use the founders of two powerful genetic mouse models: the diversity outbred and collaborative, opening up several avenues of future research into the genetics of Ca++ flux. By looking at multiple parameters of Ca++ flux, investigators are able to start to understand which parameters may be driving low or high insulin secretion. Integration with protein abundance and human GWAS has allowed identification of proteins with known roles in insulin secretory capacity, as well as several novel regulators, again opening up several avenues of future research. Finally, the public database is likely to be useful to multiple investigators interested in following up specific protein targets or in conducting future genetic studies. I found only minor weaknesses in this paper, mainly regarding clarity in certain areas. One specific area to be improved is Figure 4A, B where in addition to the heat maps, it would be useful to see regression plots that show the differences per sex and strain for the insulin secretion vs Ca++ parameters.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors take on the challenge of defining the core nucleus for amyloid formation by polyglutamine tracts. This rests on the assertion that polyQ forms amyloid structures to the exclusion of all other forms of solids. Using their unique assay, deployed in yeast, the authors attempt to infer the size of the nucleus that templates amyloid formation by polyQ. Further, through a series of sequence titrations, all studied using a single type of assay, the authors converge on an assertion stating that a single polyQ molecule is the nucleus for amyloid formation, that 12-residues make up the core of the nucleus, that it takes ca. 60 Qs in a row to unmask this nucleation potential, and that polyQ amyloid formation belongs to the same universality class as self-poisoned crystallization, which is the hallmark of crystallization from polymer melts formed by large, high molecular weight synthetic polymers. Unfortunately, the authors have decided to lean in hard on their assertions without a critical assessment of whether their findings stand up to scrutiny. If their findings are truly an intrinsic property of polyQ molecules, then their findings should be reconstituted in vitro. Unfortunately, careful and rigorous experiments in vitro show that there is a threshold concentration for forming fibrillar solids. This threshold concentration depends on the flanking sequence context on temperature and on solution conditions. The existence of a threshold concentration defies the expectation of a monomer nucleus. The findings disagree with in vitro data presented by Crick et al., and ignored by the authors. Please see: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320626110. These reports present data from very different assays, the importance of which was underscored first by Regina Murphy and colleagues. The work of Crick et al., provides a detailed thermodynamic framework - see the SI Appendix. This framework dove tails with theory and simulations of Zhang and Muthukumar, which explains exactly how a system like polyQ might work (https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3050295). The picture one paints is radically different from what the authors converge upon. One is inclined to lean toward data that are gleaned using multiple methods in vitro because the test tube does not have all the confounding effects of a cellular milieu, especially when it comes to focusing on sequence-intrinsic conformational transitions of a protein. In addition to concerns about the limitations of the DAmFRET method, which based on the work of the authors in their collaborative paper by Posey et al., are being stretched to the limit, there is the real possibility that the cellular milieu, unique to the system being studied, is enabling transitions that are not necessarily intrinsic to the sequence alone. A nod in this direction is the work of Marc Diamond, which showed that having stabilized the amyloid form of Tau through coacervation, there is a large barrier that limits the loss of amyloid-like structure for Tau. There may well be something similar going on with the polyQ system. If the authors could show that their data are achievable in vitro without anything but physiological buffers one would have more confidence in a model that appears to contradict basic physical principles of how homopolymers self-assemble. Absent such additional evidence, numerous statements seem to be too strong. There are also several claims that are difficult to understand or appreciate.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Secondary cell walls support vascular plants and conduct water throughout the plant body, but are also important resources for lignocellulosic feedstocks. Secondary cell wall synthesis is under complex transcriptional control, presumably because it must only be initiated after cell growth is complete. Here, the authors found that two Musashi-type RNA-binding proteins, MSIL2 and MSIL4 are redundantly required for secondary cell wall development in Arabidopsis. The plant phenotypes could be complemented by the wild-type version of either protein, but not by a MSIL4 version that carries mutations in the conserved RNA-binding domains, and the authors localized MSIL2 & 4 to stress granules, implicating the RNA-binding function of MSIL4 in the cell wall phenotype. Upon closer inspection, the secondary cell wall phenotypes included changes in vasculature morphology, and minor changes to lignin and hemicellulose (glucuronoxylan). While there were no changes to likely cell wall target genes in the transcriptome of msil2msil4 plants, proteomics experiments found glucuronoxylan biosynthesis components were upregulated in the mutants, and they detected an increase in substituted xylan via several methods. Finally, they documented MSIL4 binding to RNA encoding one of these targets, suggesting that MSIL2 and MSIL4 act to post-transcriptionally regulate glucuronoxylan modification. Altogether, this is a new mechanism by which cell wall composition could be regulated.

Overall, the manuscript is well-written, the data are generally high-quality, and the authors typically use several independent methods to support each claim. However, several important questions remain unanswered by this work in its current state and the model presented in Figure 7 is quite speculative. For example, the link between the striking plant phenotype and GXM misregulation is unclear since GXM overexpression doesn't alter plant phenotypes or lignin content (Yuan et al 2014 Plant Science), so misregulation of GXMs in msil2msil4 mutants clearly is not the whole story. It also remains to be determined why one particular secondary cell wall synthesis enzyme is regulated likely post-transcriptionally, while so much of the pathway is regulated at the transcriptional level. There are likely other targets for MSIL2- and MSIL4-mediated regulation since it seems that MSIL2 and MSIL4 are expressed in tissues that are not synthesizing secondary cell walls.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This study presents a conceptual and analytical framework for tracking the impacts of human activities on freshwater ecosystems over time. It demonstrates the application of the framework to a 100-year record of community-level biodiversity, climate change, and chemical pollution from sediments cores of Lake Ring, Denmark. By reconstructing biodiversity using environmental DNA (eDNA) and pollutant inputs using mass spectrometry, the authors identify the taxonomic groups responding positively and negatively in different phases of the lake's environmental history. Furthermore, they identify the independent and additive effects of climate variables and pollutants on biodiversity throughout the 100-year record.

Strengths:

The advances in paired molecular and machine learning analyses are an important step towards a better understanding of 20th/21st century trajectories of biodiversity and pollution.

The finding that taxonomic groups so central to ecosystem assessment in Europe (i.e., diatoms) do not appear to respond to degradation or amelioration - providing at least a partial explanation as to why "ecological status" (as defined under the EU Water Framework Directive) has proved so difficult to improve.

The framework shows how both taxonomic and functional indicators can be used to better understand ecological degradation and recovery.

The identification of individual biocides and climate variables driving observed changes is a particular strength.

Limitations:

The analytical framework is not sufficiently explained in the main text.

The significance of findings in relation to functional changes is not clear. What are the consequences of enrichment of RNA transport or ribosome biogenesis pathways between pesticides and recovery stages, for example?

The impact of individual biocides and climate variables, and their additive effects, are assessed but there is no information offered on non-additive interactions (e.g., synergistic, antagonistic).

The level of confidence associated with results is not made explicit. The reader is given no information on the amount of variability involved in the observations, or the level of uncertainty associated with model estimates.

The major implications of the findings for regulatory ecological assessment are missed. Regulators may not be primarily interested in identifying past "ecosystem shifts". What they need are approaches which give greater confidence in monitoring outcomes by better reflecting the ecological impact of contemporary environmental change and ecosystem management. The real value of the work in this regard is that: (1) it shows that current approaches are inappropriate due to the relatively stable nature of the indicators used by regulators, despite large changes in pollutant inputs; (2) it presents some better alternatives, including both taxonomic and functional indicators; and (3) it provides a new reference (or baseline) for regulators by characterizing "semi-pristine" conditions.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study, the authors use prospective sorting and microarray analyses, extended by single-cell RNA sequencing, in the neural stem cell niche of the subventricular zone (SVZ) to identify and refine a series of states along the continuum from quiescent neural stem cells to mature progeny. Of note, changes in the levels and subgroups of RNA splicing regulators are detailed across this continuum. Using in vitro proliferation and differentiation assays, coupled with in vivo engraftment of some prospectively sorted subsets, the authors argue that a stage they define as immature neuroblasts (iNBs) retain proliferative and multilineage differentiation capacity that is not seen in the mature neuroblast population, and is unexpected based on prior models for lineage progression in this system. This iNB stage is accompanied by a change in RNA splicing regulator expression, which is of interest due to the emerging roles for RNA processing and preferential translation within this niche.

These data complement several additional sc-RNAseq studies of this stem cell niche, and use a different, but similar, sorting strategy to isolate and profile subpopulations of stem/progenitor cells and neuroblast progeny. The claim that immature neuroblasts retain multipotency - the ability to generate glia and neurons - is surprising and somewhat controversial given that this has largely not been reported before under homeostatic conditions. Some factors to consider when interpreting these data are that the "immature neuroblast" populations are studied in some experiments using a transcriptional signature and a functional assay, namely the timing of reappearance of these cells after use of agents that kill rapidly dividing cells (in this case, radiation), leading to reconstitution of the lineage by previously quiescent stem cells. In a separate set of experiments, a tamoxifen-inducible labeling system is used in combination with cell-surface markers to prospectively isolate and study the differentiation potential of neuroblast populations that are assumed to be equivalent to those found in transcriptional experiments. It would be of interest in future to confirm that the exact sorted populations (using CD24/EGFR/DCX-CreERT2::CAG) have the same transcriptional profile as those studied in earlier experiments within the paper, and to confirm the purity of the sorted populations. Finally, while elegant use is made of engraftment of the sorted populations to study the differentiation and lineage potential of these immature neuroblasts, a remaining question is the relative abundance of each lineage (neurons/astrocytes/oligodendrocytes) produced by the engrafted cells - is production of glia rare, or common? Could this be due to factors such as alteration of lineage potential due to culture conditions, a disconnect between transcript expression and protein expression, or an incompletely purified starter population?

Overall, this manuscript presents an intriguing possible refinement of models for SVZ neurogenesis, and highlights the role of RNA splicing at specific stages in the lineage. It will be of interest to see if additional groups confirm these findings and whether multiplexed immunostaining, highly multiplexed flow cytometry, or other approaches focused at the proteomic level confirm and extend these findings, particularly given recent data in the developing brain that suggest transcript and protein levels are relatively poorly correlated in stem/progenitor populations.

A final point on terminology: "iNB", "A cells", and "D1/D2 cells" are all used in the manuscript to denote different stages along the continuum from TAP/C cells to mature neuroblasts; however, historically "D cells" refers to neuroblasts in the dentate gyrus, not those derived from the SVZ. In this case, the authors are exclusively studying SVZ-derived neuroblasts.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This study by Park et al. describes an interesting approach to disentangle gene-environment pathways to cognitive development and psychotic-like experiences in children. They have used data from the ABCD study and have included PGS of EA and cognition, environmental exposure data, cognitive performance data and self-reported PLEs. Although the study has several strengths, including its large sample size, interesting approach and comprehensive statistical model, I have several concerns:

- The authors have included follow-up data from the ABCD Study. However, it is not very clear from the beginning that longitudinal paths are being explored. It would be very helpful if the authors would make their (analysis) approach clearer from the introduction. Now, they describe many different things, which makes the paper more difficult to read. It would be of great help to see the proposed path model in a Figure and refer to that in the Method.

- There is quite a lot of causal language in the paper, particularly in the Discussion. My advice would be to tone this down.

- It's a bit unclear to me why the authors chose the PEs phenotype as their outcome of interest. They mainly speak about child development and mental health in general in the Introduction, so why focus on PLE? Aren't genes and environments also relevant for other types of mental health problems? Relatedly, in the Discussion the authors seem to conflate PLEs with psychosis. There is a large body of literature highlighting the differences between PLEs and psychosis, and this should - in my opinion - be adjusted throughout the introduction and discussion.

- I feel that the limitation section is a bit brief, and can be developed further.

- I like that the assessment of CP and self-reports PEs is of good quality. However, I was wondering which 4 items from the parent-reported CBCL were used and how did they correlate with the child-reported PEs? And how was distress taken into account in the child self-reported PEs measurement? Which PEs measures were used?

- What was the correlation between CP and EA PGSs?

- Regarding the PGS: why focus on cognitive performance and EA? It should be made clearer from the introduction that EA is not only measuring cognitive ability, but is also a (genetic) marker of social factors/inequalities. I'm guessing this is one of the reasons why the EA PGS was so much more strongly correlated with PEs than the CP PGS. See the work bij Abdellaoui and the work by Nivard.

- Considering previous work on this topic, including analyses in the ABCD Study, I'm not surprised that the correlation was not very high. Therefore, I don't think it makes a whole of sense to adjust for the schizophrenia PGS in the sensitivity analyses, in other words, it's not really 'a more direct genetic predictor of PLEs'.

- How did the FDR correction for multiple testing affect the results?

Overall, I feel that this paper has the potential to present some very interesting findings. However, at the moment the paper misses direction and a clear focus. It would be a great improvement if the readers would be guided through the steps and approach, as I think the authors have undertaken important work and conducted relevant analyses.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Park et al demonstrate that cells on either side of a BM-BM linkage strengthen their adhesion to that matrix using a positive feedback mechanism involving a discoidin domain receptor (DDR-2) and integrin (INA-1 + PAT-3). In response to its extracellular ligand (Collagen IV/EMB-9), DDR-2 is endocytosed and initiates signaling that in turn stabilizes integrin at the membrane. DDR-2 signaling operates via Ras/LET-60. This work's strength lies in its excellent in vivo imaging, especially of endogenously tagged proteins. For example, tagged DDR-2:mNG could be seen relocating from seam cell membranes to endosomes. I also think a second strength of this system is the ability to chart the development of BM-BM linkage over time based on the stages of worm larval development. This allows the authors to show DDR signaling is needed to establish linkage, rather than maintain it. It likely is relevant to many types of cells that use integrin to adhere to BM and left me pondering a number of interesting questions. For example: (1) Does DDR-2 activation require integrin? Perhaps integrin gets the process started and DDR-2 positively reinforces that (conversely is DDR-2 at the top of a linear pathway)? (2) In ddr-2(qy64) mutants, projections seem to form from the central portion of the utse cell. Does this reveal a second function for DDR-2, regulating perhaps the cytoskeleton? And (3) can you use the forward genetic tools available in C. elegans to find new genes connecting DDR-2 and integrin? The authors discuss these ideas in their response to the reviews, and I look forward to hearing about their future work on these questions.

I do see two areas where the manuscript could be improved. First, the authors rely on imprecise genetic methods to reach their conclusions (i.e. systemic RNAi, or expression of dominant negative constructs.) I think their conclusion would be stronger if they used tissue specific degradation to block ddr-2 function specifically in the utse or seam cells. Methods to do this are now regularly used in C. elegans and the authors have already developed the necessary tissue-specific promoters. Second, the manuscript is presented in the introduction as a study on formation and function of BM-BM linkage. However, their results actually demonstrate a mechanism by which cells adhere to BM. Since ddr-2 appears to function equally in both utse + seam cells (based on their dominant negative data), there are likely three layers of adhesion (utse-BM, BM-BM, BM-seam) and if any of those break down, you get a partially penetrant rupture phenotype. I pointed this out in my initial review, and after reading the revised manuscript, I do still feel the authors' introduction presents the paper as dealing with how basement membranes link together. But, I wonder if this might this be a question of terminology/language use? Maybe I am operating on a strict definition of linkage, and the authors use it more inclusively. What term(s) should we use to differentiate two basement membranes that are linked together, versus tissues that are connected through a basement membrane linkage? This is something that could be clarified in future publications.

These concerns do not undercut the significance of this work, which identifies an interesting mechanism cells use to strengthen adhesion during BM linkage formation. In fact, I am excited to read future papers detailing the connection between DDR-2 and integrin. But before undertaking those experiments the authors should be certain which cells require DDR-2 activity, and that should not be determined based solely on mis expression of a dominant negative.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors examine signaling factors that differentiate parallel routes to activating phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma (PI3Kγ). Dissecting the convergent pathways that control PI3Kγ activity is critical because PI3Kγ is a therapeutic target for treating inflammatory disease and cancer. Here, the authors employ a multipronged approach to reveal new aspects for how p84 and p101 pair with p110γ to activate the PI3Kγ heterodimer. The key instigator to this study is a previously reported inhibitory Nanobody, NB7. The hypothesized mechanism for NB7 allosteric inhibition of p84- p110γ was previously proposed to involve blockage of the Ras-binding domain. The authors revise the allosteric inhibition model based on meticulous profiling of various PI3Kγ complex interactions with NB7. In parallel, a cryo-EM-derived model of NB7 bound to the p110γ subunit convincingly reveals a Nanobody interaction pocket involving the helical domain and regulatory motifs of the kinase domain. This revelation shifts the focus to the helical domain, a known target of PKC phosphorylation. While the connections between NB7 interactions and the effects of PKC phosphorylation are sometimes tenuous, it could be argued that the Nanobody served as a tool to reveal the importance of the helical domain to p110γ regulation.

The sites of PKC-mediated p110γ helical domain phosphorylation were unexpectedly inaccessible in the available structural models. Nevertheless, mass spectrometry (MS)-based phosphorylation profiling indicates that PKC can phosphorylate the helical domain of p110γ and p84/p110γ (but not p101/p110γ) in vitro. The authors hypothesize that helical domain dynamics dictate susceptibility to PKC phosphorylation. To explore this notion, carefully executed, rigorous H/D exchange MS (HDX-MS) experiments were performed comparing phosphorylated vs. unphosphorylated p110γ. Notably, this design reveals more about the consequences of p110γ phosphorylation, rather than the mechanisms of p84/p101 promoting/resisting phosphorylation. Nevertheless, HDX-MS is very well suited to exploring secondary structure dynamics, and helical domain phosphorylation strikingly increases dynamics consistent with increased regional accessibility. The increased dynamics also nicely map to the pocket enveloped by the inhibitory NB7 Nanobody.

Ultimately, this study reveals an unexpected p110γ pocket that allows an engineered Nanobody to allosterically inhibit PI3Kγ complexes. The cryo-EM characterization of the interaction inspired an HDX-MS investigation of known sites of phosphorylation in the region. These insights could be linked to differences/convergences of p84 and p101 complex formation and activation of PI3Kγ, and future work may clarify these mechanisms further. The data presented herein will also be useful for broadening the target surface for future therapeutic developments. New allosteric connections between effector binding sites and post-translational modifications are always welcome.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors sought to understand the neurocomputational mechanisms of how acute stress impacts human effortful prosocial behavior. Functional neuroimaging during an effort-based decision task and computational modeling were employed. Two major results are reported: 1) Compared to controls, participants who experienced acute stress were less willing to exert effort for others, with a more prominent effect for those who were more selfish; 2) More stressed participants exhibited an increase in activation in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula that are critical for self-benefiting behaviour. The authors conclude that their findings have important insights into how acute stress affects prosociality and its associated neural mechanisms.

Overall, there are several strengths in this well-written manuscript. The experimental design along with acute stress induction procedures were well controlled, the data analyses were reasonable and informative, and the results from the computational modeling provide important insights (e.g., subjective values). Despite these strengths, there were some weaknesses regarding potential confounding factors in both the experimental design and methodological approach, including selective reporting of only some aspects of this complex dataset, and the interpretation of the observations. These detract from from the overall impact of the manuscript. In particular, the stress manipulation and pro-social task are both effortful, raising the possibility that stressed participants were more fatigued. Other concerns include the opportunity for social dynamics or cues during task administration, the baseline social value orientation (SVO) in each group, and the possibility of a different SVO in individuals with selfish tendencies. Finally, Figure 4 should specify whether the depicted prosocial choices include all five levels of effort.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Wang et al., present a paper aiming to identify NALCN and TRPC6 channels as key mechanisms regulating VTA dopaminergic neuron spontaneous firing and investigating whether these mechanisms are disrupted in a chronic unpredictable stress model mouse.

Major strengths:

-This paper uses multiple approaches to investigate the role of NALCN and TRPC6 channels in VTA dopaminergic neurons.

Major weaknesses:

-The pharmacological tools used in this study are highly non-selective. Gd3+, used here to block NALCN is actually more commonly used to block TRP channels. 2-APB inhibits not only TRPC channels, but also TRPM and IP3 receptors while stimulating TRPV channels (Bon and Beech, 2013), while FFA actually stimulates TRPC6 channels while inhibiting other TRPCs (Foster et al., 2009).

Are the author's claims supported by the data?

-The multimodal approach including shRNA knockdown experiments alleviates much of the concern about the non-specific pharmacological agents. Therefore, the author's claim that NALCN is involved in VTA dopaminergic neuron pacemaking is well-supported.

-However, the claim that TRPC6 is the key TRPC channel in VTA spontaneous firing is somewhat, but not completely supported. As with NALCN above, the pharmacology alone is much too non-specific to support the claim that TRPC6 is the TRP channel responsible for pacemaking. However, unlike the NALCN condition, there is an issue with interpreting the shRNA knockdown experiments. The issue is that TRPC channels often form heteromers with TRPC channels of other types (Goel, Sinkins and Schilling, 2002; Strübing et al., 2003). Therefore, it is possible that knocking down TRPC6 is interfering with the normal function of another TRPC channel, such as TRPC7 or TRPC4.

-The claim that TRPC6 channels in the VTA are involved in the depressive-like symptoms of CMUS is supported.

- However, the connection between the mPFC-projecting VTA neurons, TRPC6 channels, and the chronic unpredictable stress model (CMUS) of depression is not well supported. In Figure 2, it appears that the mPFC-projecting VTA neurons have very low TRPC6 expression compared to VTA neurons projecting to other targets. However, in figure 6, the authors focus on the mPFC-projecting neurons in their CMUS model and show that it is these neurons that are no longer sensitive to pharmacological agents non-specifically blocking TRPC channels (2-APB, see above comment). Finally, in figure 7, the authors show that shRNA knockdown of TRPC6 channels (in all VTA dopaminergic neurons) results in depressive-like symptoms in CMUS mice. Due to the low expression of TRPC6 in mPFC-projecting VTA neurons, the author's claims of "broad and strong expression of TRPC6 channels across VTA DA neurons" is not fully supported. Because of the messy pharmacological tools used, it cannot be clamed that TRPC6 in the mPFC-projecting VTA neurons is altered after CMUS. And because the knockdown experiments are not specific to mPFC-projecting VTA neurons, it cannot be claimed that reducing TRPC6 in these specific neurons is causing depressive symptoms.

Impact:

It is valuable to compare pacemaking mechanisms in VTA and SNc neurons and this paper convincingly shows that NALCN contributes to VTA pacemaking, as it is known to contribute to SNc pacemaking. It also shows that TRPC6 channels in VTA dopamine neurons contribute to the depressive-like symptoms associated with CMUS.

It is important to note that the experiments presented in Figure 1 have all been previously performed in VTA dopaminergic neurons (Khaliq and Bean, 2010) including showing that low calcium increases VTA neuron spontaneous firing frequency and that replacement of sodium with NMDG hyperpolarizes the membrane potential.

Additional context:

-The authors explanation for the increase in firing frequency in 0 calcium conditions is that calcium-activated potassium channels would no longer be activated. However, there is a highly relevant finding that low calcium enhances the NALCN conductance through the calcium sensing receptor from Dejian Ren's lab (Lu et al., 2010) which is not cited in this paper. This increase in NALCN conductance with low calcium has been shown in SNc dopaminergic neurons (Philippart and Khaliq, 2018), and is likely a factor contributing to the low-calcium-mediated increase in spontaneous VTA neuron firing.

-One of the only demonstrations of the expression and physiological significance of TRPCs in VTA DA neurons was published by (Rasmus et al., 2011; Klipec et al., 2016) which are not cited in this paper. In their study, TRPC4 expression was detected in a uniformly distributed subset of VTA DA neurons, and TRPC4 KO rats showed decreased VTA DA neuron tonic firing and deficits in cocaine reward and social behaviors.

- Out of all seven TRPCs, TRPC5 is the only one reported to have basal/constitutive activity in heterologous expression systems (Schaefer et al., 2000; Jeon et al., 2012). Others TRPCs such as TRPC6 are typically activated by Gq-coupled GPCRs. Why would TRPC6 be spontaneously/constitutively active in VTA DA neurons?

-A new paper from the group of Myoung Kyu Park (Hahn et al., 2023) shows in great detail the interactions between NALCN and TRPC3 channels in pacemaking of SNc DA neurons.

References

Bon, R.S. and Beech, D.J. (2013) 'In pursuit of small molecule chemistry for calcium-permeable non-selective TRPC channels -- mirage or pot of gold?', British Journal of Pharmacology, 170(3), pp. 459-474. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.12274.

Foster, R.R. et al. (2009) 'Flufenamic acid is a tool for investigating TRPC6-mediated calcium signalling in human conditionally immortalised podocytes and HEK293 cells', Cell Calcium, 45(4), pp. 384-390. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2009.01.003.

Goel, M., Sinkins, W.G. and Schilling, W.P. (2002) 'Selective association of TRPC channel subunits in rat brain synaptosomes', The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277(50), pp. 48303-48310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M207882200.

Hahn, S. et al. (2023) 'Proximal dendritic localization of NALCN channels underlies tonic and burst firing in nigral dopaminergic neurons', The Journal of Physiology, 601(1), pp. 171-193. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1113/JP283716.

Jeon, J.-P. et al. (2012) 'Selective Gαi subunits as novel direct activators of transient receptor potential canonical (TRPC)4 and TRPC5 channels', The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287(21), pp. 17029-17039. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.326553.

Khaliq, Z.M. and Bean, B.P. (2010) 'Pacemaking in dopaminergic ventral tegmental area neurons: depolarizing drive from background and voltage-dependent sodium conductances', The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 30(21), pp. 7401-7413. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0143-10.2010.

Klipec, W.D. et al. (2016) 'Loss of the trpc4 gene is associated with a reduction in cocaine self-administration and reduced spontaneous ventral tegmental area dopamine neuronal activity, without deficits in learning for natural rewards', Behavioural Brain Research, 306, pp. 117-127. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.03.027.

Lu, B. et al. (2010) 'Extracellular calcium controls background current and neuronal excitability via an UNC79-UNC80-NALCN cation channel complex', Neuron, 68(3), pp. 488-499. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.014.

Philippart, F. and Khaliq, Z.M. (2018) 'Gi/o protein-coupled receptors in dopamine neurons inhibit the sodium leak channel NALCN', eLife, 7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40984.

Rasmus, K. et al. (2011) 'Sociability is decreased following deletion of the trpc4 gene', Nature Precedings, pp. 1-1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2011.6367.1.

Schaefer, M. et al. (2000) 'Receptor-mediated regulation of the nonselective cation channels TRPC4 and TRPC5', The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275(23), pp. 17517-17526. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.23.17517.

Strübing, C. et al. (2003) 'Formation of novel TRPC channels by complex subunit interactions in embryonic brain', The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(40), pp. 39014-39019. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M306705200.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Li et al report that upon traumatic brain injury (TBI), Pvr signalling in astrocytes activates the JNK pathway and up-regulates the expression of the well-known JNK target MMP1. The FACS sort astrocytes, and carry out RNAseq analysis, which identifies pvr as well as genes of the JNK pathway as particularly up-regulated after TBI. They use conventional genetics loss of function, gain of function and epistasis analysis with and without TBI to verify the involvement of the Pvr-JNK-MMP1 signalling pathway.

The strengths are that multiple experiments are used to demonstrate that TBI in their hands damaged the BBB, induced apoptosis and increased MMP1 levels. The RNAseq analysis on FACS sorted astrocytes is nice and will be valuable to scientists beyond the confines of this paper. The functional genetic analysis is conventional, yet sound, and supports claims of JNK and MMP1 functioning downstream of Pvr in the TBI context.

However, the weaknesses are that novelty and insight are both rather limited, some data are incomplete and other data do not support some claims. Some approaches used lacked resolution and some experiments lacked rigour. The authors may wish to improve some of their data as this would make their case more convincing. Alternatively, they should remove unsupported claims.

Novelty and insight:<br /> Others had previously published that both JNK signalling and MMP1 were activated upon injury, in multiple contexts (as well as the articles cited by the authors, they should also see Losada-Perez et al 2021). That Pvr can regulate JNK signalling was also known (Ishimaru et al 2004). And it was also known that astrocytes can respond to injury by proliferating, both in larval ventral nerve cords and adult brains (Kato et al 2011; Losada-Perez et al 2016; Harrison et al 2021; Simoes et al 2022). The authors argue that the novelty of the work is the investigation of the response of astrocytes to TBI. However, this is of somewhat limited scope. The authors mention that Mmp1 regulates tissue remodelling, the inflammatory process and cancer. Exploring these functions further would have been an interesting addition, but the authors do not investigate what consequences the up-regulation of Mmp1 after injury has in repair or regeneration processes.

Incomplete or unconvincing data:<br /> The authors failed to detect PCNA-GFP and pH3 in brains after TBI and conclude that that TBI does not induce astrocyte proliferation. However, this is a surprising claim, as it would be rather different from all previous prevalent observations of cell proliferation induced by injury. Cell proliferation can be notoriously difficult to detect (ie due to timing and sample size), thus instead this raises doubts on the experimental protocol or execution.<br /> Others have previously reported: cells in S- phase using PCNA-GFP and other reporters (eg BrdU, EdU, FUCCI) in the intact adult brain (Kato et al 2009; Foo et al 2017; Li et al 2020; Fernandez-Hernandez et al 2013; Simoes et al 2022); that injury to the adult brain and VNC induces cell proliferation that can be detected with cell proliferation markers like BrdU, Myc, FUCCI and the mitotic marker pH3 (Kato et al 2009; Fernandez-Hernandez et al 2013; Losada-Perez et al 2021; Simoes et al 2022); and that injury to the brain and CNS induces glial proliferation in adult and larval brains/CNS, specifically of astrocytes (Kato et al 2011; Losada-Perez et al 2016; Fernandez-Hernandez et al 2013; Simoes et al 2022). Thus, the fact that they did not observe PCNAGFP+ cells in control, intact adult brains nor after TBI could suggest that they had technical, experimental difficulties. Detecting mitotic cells with anti-pH3 is difficult because M phase is very brief, but others have succeeded (Simoes et al 2022). Given that in all previous reports mentioned above cells were seen to proliferate after injury in the CNS, it would be rather surprising if no cell proliferation occurred after TBI. Resolving this conflicting result is important, as it could imply that TBI induces very different cellular responses from various other lesions or injury types. It is conceivably not impossible, but the most parsimonious start point would be that multiple injury types could cause equivalent responses in cells. Thus, the authors ought to consider whether technical or experimental design problems affected their experimental outcome instead.

Other claims not supported by data:<br /> (1) astrocyte hypertrophy, as the tools used do not have the resolution to support this claim;

(2) localisation of anti-Pvr to specific cells, as the images show uniform signal or background instead;

(3) astrocytes do not engulf cell debris after TBI, as the tools and images do not have the resolution to make this claim.

The authors could improve these data with alternative experiments to maintain the claims; alternatively, these unsupported claims should be removed.

Statistical analysis:<br /> The statistical analysis needs revising as it is wrong in multiple places. Revising the statistics will also require revision of the validity of the claims and adjusting interpretations accordingly.

Altogether, this is an interesting and valuable addition to the repertoire of articles investigating neuron-glia communication and glial responses to injury in the Drosophila central nervous system (CNS). It is good and important to see this research area in Drosophila grow. This community together is building a compelling case for using Drosophila and its unparalleled powerful genetics to investigate nervous system injury, regeneration and repair, with important implications. Thus, this paper will be of interest to scientists investigating injury responses in the CNS using Drosophila, other model organisms (eg mice, fish) and humans.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Jackson and Giacomassi et al. investigated the impact of repeated topical application of the TLR-7/8 agonist R848, mimicking single-stranded RNA viral infection, on circulating monocytes. Interestingly in this murine model of skin inflammation, they find that there is a striking increase in vascular patrolling (Ly6Clow) monocytes in the blood. In the majority of inflammatory settings so far described, it is the classical (Ly6Chi) monocyte population that is augmented. They found that this Ly6Clow monocyte expansion occurred in response to stimulation by R848 at epithelial barrier surfaces (skin and gut) and not following systemic administration of R848. Of note, the Ly6Clow increase was not dependent on type I or type II IFNs or CCR2, all factors that are important for Ly6Chi monocyte expansion in response to life-threatening infections, such as Toxoplasma gondii. Positive factors driving Ly6Clow augmentation are not identified. Alterations to circulating monocytes may have implications for secondary infection as R848-treated animals were less susceptible to flu infection. This research furthers our understanding of how tissues and organs have distinct mechanisms of communication in response to inflammatory and infectious stimuli and the implications this can have on circulating immune populations.

The conclusions of this paper are generally well supported by the data presented, however, some aspects of the study need to be clarified or extended. Additionally, some of the findings could be better discussed in the context of the current literature.

1) CSF-1 availability is described, initially by Yona et al. (DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.12.001), as an important factor extending the half-life of Ly6Clow monocytes in circulation. Given the expansion of Ly6Clow monocytes and their upregulation of CD115 in circulation, it would have been relevant to measure CSF-1 to assess whether this may be a candidate factor for the phenotype observed.

2) The conclusion that the altered monocyte compartment enhances protection against secondary infection is underdeveloped. The key experiment presented involves treating animals with R848 and demonstrating that they have an altered response to flu infection. This approach does not specifically assess the importance of monocytes. From these studies, it is only possible to conclude there is an association between monocyte alterations and secondary infection.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This study examines the effects of Ca2+ and NHE1 peptide binding on the conformation of CHP3, one of three related calcineurin-homologous proteins. One question that is addressed is whether Ca2+ binding triggers membrane association of the myristoyl group, a so-called "Ca2+-myristoyl switch". This is convincingly demonstrated to not be the case by the experiment in Figure 6B: unlike myristoylated recoverin, mCHP3 does not show enhanced association with liposomes. In the presence of a target peptide, however, myristoylation enhances membrane association. Curiously, this interaction is not Ca2+ dependent, but the membrane association of the non-myristoylated CHP3 is Ca2+-dependent.

My concerns with this study relate to physiological relevance. First, it is unclear if Ca2+ binding has a regulatory function in any of the CHP proteins. The authors state that CHP1 and CHP2 have Ca2+ binding affinities <100 nM, so these proteins are likely saturated with Ca2+ under all physiological conditions. On the other hand, CHP3 binds Ca2+ with a Kd of 8 micromolar (in the presence of physiological concentrations of Mg2+) so it will be largely unbound under most normal cellular concentrations of Ca2+ which are in the submicromolar range. Free Ca2+ rarely reaches 1 micromolar under non-pathological concentrations, and if it does, the fraction of CHP3 bound to Ca2+ should be estimated for context. Given these caveats, I am not convinced that experiments done with millimolar concentrations of Ca2+ (e.g., Figures 2, 3, 6) are physiologically informative.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This is the most complete genomic overview of the epidemiology of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi including close to 13,000 genmoes from multiple countries, clearly demonstrating the geographical differences in molecular epidemiology and antibiotic resistance traits. This database could serve as the global reference for the future with constant addition of new information.

This is a descriptive study, not providing fundamentally new mechanistic insights of the disease, but providing an overview of the global epidemiology of this bacterium.<br /> Open-ended questions remain the generalizability of the findings, which is linked to the completeness of the surveillance systems, as well as the linkage of genotypes to clinical disease presentation (severity) and of linkage of local antibiotic use and the prevalence of the different resistance traits.

Publication of these data will be very helpful for all those interested in the molecular epidemiology of Salmonella and may stimulate not-yet participating institutes to add information for future analyses. It may also stimulate investigators to use the data for deriving more insights in clinical disease presentations, associations with antibiotic use and input for mathematical modelling.

The (lenghty) introduction is textbook epidemiology of the emergence of antimicrobial resistance in Typhi.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The manuscript by Mau et al. describes a sophisticated method to follow enhancer activity in both live embryos and fixed embryos in Tribolium. The authors identified putative enhancers via comparative ATAC-seq of embryos divided into different regions and at different developmental time points. As an experimental piece of work, this is excellent. However, the framing and presentation in this manuscript would need to be improved to avoid misrepresentation of existing ideas and over-interpretation of results. The manuscript would require significant re-writing. This can be done without additional data or analyses, but simply more careful writing.

The Introduction starts by setting up a straw-man argument, claiming that the assumption is that gene expression is set up as stable expression domains that undergo little or no subsequent change. I don't think that any current developmental biologist thinks this is true. The references used to support this claim are from the 1990s up to the early 2000s. There are numerous examples since then that show that developmental gene expression is dynamic as a rule.

The Introduction then continues as a rather detailed review of enhancers, Tribolium methodology, tools for identifying enhancers, and more. The Introduction cites 99 references, which seems excessive for what is essentially an experimental paper. Significant parts of the Introduction can be trimmed or removed. There is no need to mention all the tools available for Tribolium if they are not used in the described experiments. A thorough analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of different modes of ATAC-seq is also beyond the scope of the Introduction. The authors should explain why they chose the tools they chose without excessive background. Having said that, the Introduction actually overlooks a lot of significant work that is relevant to the subject of the paper. Specifically, the authors completely ignore all of the work on development in hemimetabolous insects such as Oncopeltus and Gryllus - the omission is glaring. There has been a lot of relevant work on dynamic gene expression patterns coming out of these species.

The experimental setup involves cutting embryos into three sections at two time points. The results then discuss differences in "space" and "time" but there is no discussion of the embryological meaning of these terms. What is happening at the two time points from a developmental perspective? What is the difference between the three sections? There is a lot of relevant development going on at these stages and important regional differences, which have been well-studied in Tribolium and in other insects but are not even mentioned.

In the preliminary results of the ATAC-seq analysis, it is clear that there are significant differences between the sections, which should come as no surprise, but fairly minor differences between the same section at the two time points. This could be because the two time points are pretty close together at a stage when there is a lot of repetitive patterning going on. A possible interpretation, which the authors don't mention because it goes against their main thesis, is that maybe most of the processes that are taking place at this stage are not dynamic enough to show up at the temporal resolution they have applied. This is worth at least a mention.

The authors link each accessible site to the nearest gene when looking at putative enhancer function. This is a risky assumption since there are many examples of enhancer sites that are far upstream or downstream of the target gene and often closer to an unrelated gene than to the target gene. The authors should at least acknowledge this problem with their functional annotation.

In the Discussion, the authors claim that contrary to how it may seem, the question they are addressing is not a "fringe problem". Once again, I think this is a straw man. No active researcher thinks that the question of dynamic regulation of gene expression during development is a fringe problem. On the contrary, most researchers will accept that this is one of the most interesting and important questions in current developmental biology.<br /> Perhaps the most significant problem with the manuscript is that it is all built around the premise of enhancer switching between dynamic enhancers and static enhancers. The authors find one site that is consistent with their prediction for a dynamic enhancer and one site - regulating a different gene - that is consistent with their prediction for a static enhancer and claim that they have provided support for their model. I think this claim is grossly exaggerated. They present data that can be seen as consistent with their model but are a long way from providing evidence for it.<br /> Like the Introduction, the Discussion includes long paragraphs (lines 450-480) that are more suitable for a review/hypothesis paper. The data presented in this manuscript has little relevance to the question of kinematic vs. trigger waves, and therefore there is no real reason for the question to be discussed here.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This is a very interesting and timely manuscript investigating the roles of root-emitted secondary metabolites in mediating plant-soil feedback in a realistic and agricultural context (maize - wheat rotation). I find this article to be an important contribution to the field as the roles played by soil chemical legacies in mediating plant-soil feedbacks have been largely overlooked so far, particularly in the field. I found this manuscript to be extremely well-written and clear. I was impressed by the number of response variables measured by the authors to characterise how wheat plants responded to the soil legacies created by different maize genotypes.<br /> The article presents the results of a plant-soil feedback experiment in which two maize genotypes (wild type or benzoxazinoid-deficient bx1 mutant plant) conditioned field soil for one growing season. Monocultures of each genotype occupied alternate strips in the field. At the end of this conditioning phase, the authors analysed benzoxazinoids in the soil and found that the soil conditioned by WT maize was characterized by greater concentrations of several benzoxazinoids. In fact, most benzoxazinoids were below the detection limit for soil conditioned by bx1 mutant plants. These differences in soil chemical legacies were associated with differences in bacterial and fungal communities in the roots and rhizosphere of maize. Soon after the maize harvest, monocultures of three wheat varieties were grown in soil that was conditioned by either WT or bx1 maize plants. This factorial design allowed the authors to study the response of different wheat varieties to soil legacies created by maize genotypes that differ in their ability to produce and release benzoxazinoids into the soil. Although root and rhizosphere microbial communities were mainly driven by wheat genotype (and not by maize soil conditioning), soil conditioning effects on benzoxazinoid concentrations were still visible at the end of the feedback phase, but only for specific compounds (e.g. AMPO). In comparison to wheat grown on bx1-conditioned soil, the authors found that wheat plants grown on benzoxazinoid-conditioned soil had better emergence and were taller and more productive. In addition, benzoxazinoid soil conditioning reduced infestation by the cereal leaf beetle Oulema melanopus (particularly in one wheat variety) but did not affect weed pressure. The authors also found that wheat grown on benzoxazinoid-conditioned soil had more reproductive tillers, which led to greater grain yield (+4-5%). Grain quality, however, was not affected by maize soil conditioning.

I appreciated that the authors carefully interpreted the results of their experiment, although data analysis could be improved to take repeated measures within a plot into account. Overall, this is a compelling study, with rigorous and numerous measurements and state-of-the-art methods in plant/soil ecology. This study is unique in that it demonstrates the important role that soil chemical legacies can play in mediating plant-soil interactions and influencing the fitness of the following crop in a realistic agricultural setting. Therefore, I believe that this work will be of broad interest to plant and soil ecologists, as well as to agronomists.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this work Indurthy and Auerbach investigate the fundamental concept of how the energy of agonist binding is converted into the energy of the conformational change that opens the pore of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR). The conclusions are based on a very large pool of experimental data that are interpreted with great mechanistic insight.

Specifically, the authors define "efficacy" (eta) of a ligand as the fractional change in binding free energy between the open and the closed states of the channel. They construct a log-log scatter plot of efficacy vs. affinity which represents 23 different agonists acting on the WT receptor, plus a subset of the same agonists acting on various nAChR mutants. They go on to show that these largely scattered dots can be partitioned into 5 distinct clusters ("eta-classes") within which the dots are linearly arranged. They interpret these clusters in terms of a mechanistic gating model (the "catch&hold LFER model"), and suggest that a different model accounts for each different eta-class. Put in simple terms, the interpretation is that 5 different subtypes of gating isomerization exist for the nAChR, the choice among which depends on the agonist used.

These types of study are necessary to advance conceptual understanding in biophysics. I have some reservations regarding the mechanistic interpretation of the data set and the uniqueness of the proposed model.

1. One concern regards the clustering of the data sets in Fig. 5 into exactly 5 eta-classes. First, two clusters contain only two data points each. Second, the proposed "catch&hold LFER model" (Fig. 2) does not predict the existence of a discrete number of such eta-classes. How strong is the evidence that there are exactly 5 classes as opposed to a continuum of possible eta values.

2. The authors do not discuss the uniqueness of the proposed model. In fact, it seems to me that the existence of eta-classes might be explained just as well by an alternative model which assumes a single gating mechanism for the receptor, but distinct patterns of ligand-protein interactions for the different agonists. The pore opening-associated increase in agonist affinity is typically caused by a tightening of the substrate binding site (often called clamshell closure) which brings further protein side chains into the vicinity of the ligand, thereby allowing further ligand-protein interactions to form (or further strengthening interactions that exist also in the closed-pore state). Thus, at a first approximation, the ratio between binding free energies in the open- and closed-pore states reflects the ratio of the numbers (and strengths) of ligand-protein bonds in those two states.

As an illustration, consider the following simplified model for a channel and a given ligand. In the open-pore state the number of ligand-protein interactions is n(o), and all those interactions are comparably strong. Out of those interactions only a subset is formed in the closed-pore state, their number is n(c) (where n(c)<br /> The maximal possible values of n(c) and n(o) are determined by the number and spatial arrangement of protein chemical groups that surround the substrate binding site. On the other hand, depending on the number and arrangement of matching chemical groups on the ligand, different ligands will be able to "exploit" different subsets of these possible ligand-protein interactions, resulting in different values of eta. Furthermore, ligands for which the absolute values of n(o) are different, but the ratio n(c)/n(o) is similar, will form apparent "eta-classes", i.e., will be arranged on a "eta-plot" along a straight line. (See attached image file for a graphical representation of the model.)

This model would suggest that there is a single gating mechanism (i.e., the actual protein conformational change is similar regardless of which agonist is bound), but the relative stabilities of the ligand-bound closed and open states are agonist-dependent. Wouldn't such a mechanism equally well explain all the data shown? The authors should either acknowledge this possibility or discuss available structural or functional evidence to exclude it.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This manuscript will interest cognitive scientists, neuroimaging researchers, and neuroscientists interested in the systems-level organization of brain activity. The authors describe four brain states that are present across a wide range of cognitive tasks and determine that the relative distribution of the brain states shows both commonalities and differences across task conditions.

The authors characterized the low-dimensional latent space that has been shown to capture the major features of intrinsic brain activity using four states obtained with a Hidden Markov Model. They related the four states to previously-described functional gradients in the brain and examined the relative contribution of each state under different cognitive conditions. They showed that states related to the measured behavior for each condition differed, but that a common state appears to reflect disengagement across conditions. The authors bring together a state-of-the-art analysis of systems-level brain dynamics and cognitive neuroscience, bridging a gap that has long needed to be bridged.

The strongest aspect of the study is its rigor. The authors use appropriate null models and examine multiple datasets (not used in the original analysis) to demonstrate that their findings replicate. Their thorough analysis convincingly supports their assertion that common states are present across a variety of conditions, but that different states may predict behavioural measures for different conditions. However, the authors could have better situated their work within the existing literature. It is not that a more exhaustive literature review is needed-it is that some of their results are unsurprising given the work reported in other manuscripts; some of their work reinforces or is reinforced by prior studies; and some of their work is not compared to similar findings obtained with other analysis approaches. While space is not unlimited, some of these gaps are important enough that they are worth addressing:

1. The authors' own prior work on functional connectivity signatures of attention is not discussed in comparison to the latest work. Neither is work from other groups showing signatures of arousal that change over time, particularly in resting state scans. Attention and arousal are not the same things, but they are intertwined, and both have been linked to large-scale changes in brain activity that should be captured in the HMM latent states. The authors should discuss how the current work fits with existing studies.<br /> 2. The 'base state' has been described in a number of prior papers (for one early example, see https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27008543). The idea that it might serve as a hub or intermediary for other states has been raised in other studies, and discussion of the similarity or differences between those studies and this one would provide better context for the interpretation of the current work. One of the intriguing findings of the current study is that the incidence of this base state increases during sitcom watching, the strongest evidence to date is that it has a cognitive role and is not merely a configuration of activity that the brain must pass through when making a transition.<br /> 3. The link between latent states and functional connectivity gradients should be considered in the context of prior work showing that the spatiotemporal patterns of intrinsic activity that account for most of the structure in resting state fMRI also sweep across functional connectivity gradients (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33549755/ ). In fact, the spatiotemporal dynamics may give rise to the functional connectivity gradients (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35902649/ ). HMM states bear a marked resemblance to the high-activity phases of these patterns and are likely to be closely linked to them. The spatiotemporal patterns are typically obtained during rest, but they have been reported during task performance (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30753928/ ) which further suggests a link to the current work. Similar patterns have been observed in anesthetized animals, which also reinforces the conclusion of the current work that the states are fundamental aspects of the brain's functional organization.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The goal of this study is to identify transcription factors that mediate stem cell transitions during differentiation. To achieve this, the authors examine the type II Drosophila neuroblast lineage, using single-cell RNA sequencing to examine all cell types in the type II lineage. There are known patterns of expression for neurons in this lineage, so they can identify clusters in their data set that are in the developmental state of transitioning from neuroblast to immature intermediate neuronal progenitor. They have outlined a set of expression criteria for transcription factors that are candidates for fine-tuning stem cell fate. They find that an isoform of Fruitless, called FruC, is a candidate transcription factor. Using microscopy and several genetic perturbation conditions the authors find that FruC is expressed in neuroblasts and can alter the number of cells in the lineage. To determine the mechanism that FruC uses to influence stemness the authors examine genomic occupancy of FruC, changes in histone modifications in FruC loss-of-function studies, and examination of DNA occupancy of proteins that function in chromatin modification. The authors argue that FruC functions to promote low-level H3K27me3 enrichment to maintain stemness based on comparisons across these data sets. The identification of transcription factors and the mechanisms used to maintain or differentiate stem cells is an important goal and is still a fundamental question in biology. The Drosophila model is poised for this type of analysis, given the knowledge of gene expression across cell fate that the authors use in this study.

Comments the authors should address:<br /> This is a valuable study that relies on several state-of-the-art genomic data sets to examine the mechanism that drives stemness. However, the authors should be using statical approaches to support their major conclusion regarding FruC and the role of H3K27me3. The study presents peak data in genome browser tracks of a handful of loci in the Notch pathway that show the pattern of reduced HK3K27me3 and not the other modifications they examine. However, it is not clear if the majority of FruC target genes in the genomic analyses have this pattern, though they argue they do. The major conclusion that FruC promotes a stem cell fate is based on the overlap between the list of genes they identify bound by FruC and the lists of genes that have changes in histone modifications (H3K27ac, H3K4me3, and H3K27me3). The limited use of statistical approaches to draw these conclusions is a weakness of the study. The authors do not use statistics to find changes in chromatin modification at loci, instead relying on 2-fold change calculations. Furthermore, the authors don't indicate if the genes with altered histone modification/binding peaks are significantly enriched (or not) with FruC targets, with no quantitative assessments of these data. The data in Figures 5,6 and S4 should have statistics/quantification to support the major conclusions of their study that FruC targets differ in H3K27me3, but not H3K27ac, and H3K4me3.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This study optimized a protocol for analyzing microplastics (MPs) in bovine and human follicular fluid. The authors identified the most common plastic polymers in the follicular fluid and assessed the impact of polystyrene beads on bovine oocyte maturation based on the concentration of MPs in follicular fluid. The authors found a decrease in maturation rate in the presence of polystyrene beads and conducted proteomic analysis of oocytes treated with and without MPs, revealing protein alterations.

Strengths:<br /> • The optimization of the protocol for analyzing MPs in follicular fluid, which is important for future research in this area.<br /> • Investigating the effects of MPs on oocyte maturation and proteomic profiles is significant.

Weaknesses:<br /> • The effects of polystyrene beads on oocyte maturation and proteomic profiles are not directly demonstrated, and insufficient analysis is performed to support the claims made in the manuscript.<br /> • The use of polystyrene beads does not fully mimic the concentration and interaction of MPs in follicular fluid, which warrants careful interpretation and discussion.<br /> • A major weakness is the lack of mechanism. Determining the cause of meiotic arrest (decreased maturation rate) would be needed to strengthen the paper. Are spindle morphology, chromosome morphology/alignment and/or spindle assembly checkpoint mechanism perturbed in MPs-treated oocytes?<br /> • Functional assays to validate one or more of the pathways suggested by the proteomic analysis would be necessary to strengthen the paper.<br /> • The analysis of broken zona pellucida is not sufficiently convincing. Definitely the breakage of zona pellucida is most likely a result of oocyte denudation. However, this may indicate increased fragility of polystyrene beads-treated oocytes. Investigating cytoskeletal components in oocytes treated with or without polystyrene beads would strengthen this paper.<br /> • The percentage of degenerated oocytes in control group is abnormally high which raises concern that the oocytes are not healthy.<br /> • The small font size of the figures (such as Fig. 1C) affects the quality of the manuscript.<br /> • Finally, the authors should cite previous publications on the effects of MPs on female reproduction, as this is not a novel area of research, despite the use of different concentrations. For example, "Polystyrene microplastics lead to pyroptosis and apoptosis of ovarian granulosa cells via NLRP3/Caspase-1 signaling pathway in rats (DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112012)".

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors performed a meta-analysis of GC concentrations and metabolic rates in birds and mammals. They found close associations for all studies showing a positive association between these two traits. As GCs have been viewed with close links to "stress," authors suggest that this overlooks the importance of metabolism and perhaps GC variation does not relate to "stress" per se but an increase in metabolism instead.

This is an important meta-analysis, as most researchers acknowledge the link between GCs and metabolism, metabolism is often overlooked in studies. The field of conservation physiology is especially focused on GCs being a "stress" hormone, which overlooks the importance of GCs in mediating energy balance, i.e., an animal that has high GC concentrations may not be doing that poorly compared to an animal with low GC concentrations, it might just be expending more energy, e.g., caring for young. The results, with overwhelming directionality and strong effect sizes, support the link for a positive association with these two variables.

My main concern lies in that most of the studies come from a few labs, therefore there may be limited data to test this relationship. I would include lab as a random effect to see how strong this effect might be. Furthermore, I would like to see a test of the directionality of the two variables. Authors suggest that changes in metabolism affect GC levels but likely changes in GC levels would affect metabolism. Why not look into studies that have altered GC levels experimentally and see the effect on metabolism? Based on the close link, authors suggest that GCs may not play a role outside of "stress" beyond the stressor's effect on metabolic rate. However, if they were to investigate manipulations of GCs on metabolic rate, the link may or may not be there, which would be interesting to look at. I firmly believe that GCs are tightly linked to metabolism; however, I also think that GCs have a range of effects outside of metabolism as well, depending on the course and strength of the stressor.

This work helps in the thinking that GCs are not the same as a "stress" hormone or labelling hormones with only one function. As hormones are naturally pleiotropic, the view of any one hormone being X is overly simplistic.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The paper titled 'A dual function of the IDA peptide in regulating cell separation and modulating plant immunity at the molecular level' by Olsson Lalun et al., 2023 aims to understand how IDA-HAE/HSL2 signalling modulates immunity, a pathway that has previously been implicated in development. This is a timely question to address as conflicting reports exist within the field. IDL6/7 have previously been shown to negatively regulate immune signalling, disease resistance and stress responses in leaf tissue, however IDA has been shown to positively regulate immunity through the shedding of infected tissues. Moreover, recently the related receptor NUT/HSL3 has been shown to positively regulate immune signalling and disease resistance. This work has the potential to bring clarity to this field, however the manuscript requires some additional work to address these questions. This is especially the case as it contracts some previous work with IDL peptides which are perceived by the same receptor complexes.

Can IDA induce pathogen resistance? Does the infiltration of IDA into leaf tissue enhance or reduce pathogen growth? Previously it has been shown that IDL6 makes plants more susceptible. Is this also true for IDA? Currently cytoplasmic calcium influx and apoplastic ROS as overinterpreted as immune responses - these can also be induced by many developmental cue e.g. CLE40 induced calcium transients. Whilst gene expression is more specific is also true that treatment with synthetic peptides, which are recognised by LRR-RKs, can induce immune gene expression, especially in the short term, even when that is not there in vivo function e.g. doi.org/10.15252/embj.2019103894.

This paper shows that receptors other than hae/hsl2 are genetically required to induce defense gene expression, it would have been interesting to see what phenotype would be associated with higher order mutants of closely related haesa/haesa-like receptors. Indeed recently HSL1 has been shown to function as a receptor for IDA/IDL peptides. Could the triple mutant suppress all response? Could the different receptors have distinct outputs? For example for FRK1 gene expression the hae hsl2 mutant has an enhanced response. Could defence gene expression be primarily mediated by HSL1 with subfunctionalisation within this clade?

One striking finding of the study is the strong additive interaction between IDA and flg22 treatment on gene expression. Do the authors also see this for co-treatment of different peptides with flg22, or is this unique function of IDA? Is this receptor dependent (HAE/HSL1/HSL2)?

It is interesting how tissue specific calcium responses are in response to IDA and flg22, suggesting the cellular distribution of their cognate receptors. However, one striking observation made by the authors as well, is that the expression of promoter seems to be broader than the calcium response. Indicating that additional factors are required for the observed calcium response. Could diffusion of the peptide be a contributing factor, or are only some cells competent to induce a calcium response?<br /> It is interesting that the authors look for floral abscission phenotypes in cngc and rbohd/f mutants to conclude for genetic requirement of these in floral abscission. Do the authors have a hypothesis for why they failed to see a phenotype for the rbohd/f mutant as was published previously? Do you think there might be additional players redundantly mediating these processes?

Can you observe callose deposition in the cotyledons of the 35S::HAE line? Are the receptors expressed in native cotyledons? This is the only phenotype tested in the cotyledons.

Are flg22-induced calcium responses affected in hae hsl2?

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study, Le Moigne and coworkers shed light on the structural details of the Sedoheptulose-1,7-Bisphosphatase (SBPase) from the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The SBPase is part of the Calvin cycle and catalyzes the dephosphorylation of sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphate (SBP), which is a crucial step in the regeneration of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP), the substrate for Rubisco. The authors determine the crystal structure of the CrSBPase in an oxidized state. Based on this structure, potential active site residues and sites of post-translational modifications are identified. Furthermore, the authors determine the CrSBPase structure in a reduced state revealing the disruption of a disulfide bond in close proximity to the dimer interface. The authors then use molecular dynamics (MD) to gain insights into the redox-controlled dynamics of the CrSBPase and investigate the oligomerization of the protein using small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and size-exclusion chromatography. Despite the difference in oligomerization, disruption of this disulfide bond did not impact the activity of CrSBPase, suggesting additional thiol-dependent regulatory mechanisms modulating the activity of the CrSBPase.

The authors provide interesting new findings on a redox-mechanism that modulates the oligomeric behavior of the SBPase, however without investigating this potential mechanism in more detail. The conclusions of this manuscript are mostly supported by the data, but they should be more carefully evaluated in respect to what is known from other systems as e.g. the moss Physcomitrella patens. This is especially of interest, as SBPase was previously reported to be dimeric, whereas for FBPase a dimer/tetramer equilibrium has been observed.

1.) Given that PpSBPase has been already characterized in detail, the authors should provide a more rigorous comparison to the existing data on SBPases. This includes a more conclusive structural comparison but also the enzymatic assays should be compared to the findings from P. patens. Do the authors observe differences between the moss and the chlorophyte systems, maybe even in regard to the oligomerization of the SBPase?

2.) The authors should include the control experiments (untreated SBPase) and the assays performed with mutant versions of the SBPase, which are currently only mentioned in the text or not shown at all.

3.) The representation of the structure in figures (especially Figures 1 and 3) should be adjusted to match the author's statements. In Figure 1, the angle from which the structure is displayed changes over the entire figure making it difficult to follow especially as a non-structural biologist. Furthermore, important aspects of the structure mentioned in the text are not labeled and should be highlighted, by e.g. a close-up. Same holds true for Figure 3 that currently mostly shows redundant information.

4.) The authors state that mutation of C115 and C120 to serine destabilize the dimer formation, while more tetramer and monomer is formed. As the tetramer is essentially a dimer of dimers, the authors should elaborate how this might work mechanistically. In my opinion, dimer formation is a prerequisite for tetramer formation and the two mutations rather stabilize the tetramer instead of destabilizing the dimer.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors used mathematical models to explore the mechanism(s) underlying the process of polar tube extrusion and the transport of the sporoplasm and nucleus through this structure. They combined this with experimental observations of the structure of the tube during extrusion using serial block face EM providing 3 dimensional data on this process. They also examined the effect of hyperosmolar media on this process to evaluate which model fit the predicted observed behavior of the polar tube in these various media solutions. Overall, this work resulted in the authors arriving at a model of this process that fit the data (model 5, E-OE-PTPV-ExP). This model is consistent with other data in the literature and provides support for the concept that the polar tube functions by eversion (unfolding like a finger of a glove) and that the expanding polar vacuole is part of this process. Finally, the authors provide important new insights into the bucking of the spore wall (and possible cavitation) as providing force for the nucleus to be transported via the polar tube. This is an important observation that has not been in previous models of this process.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The goal of the authors is to use whole-exome sequencing to identify genomic factors contributing to asthenoteratozoospermia and male infertility. Using whole-exome sequencing, they discovered homozygous ZMYND12 variants in four unrelated patients. They examined the localization of key sperm tail components in sperm from the patients. To validate the findings, they knocked down the ortholog in Trypanosoma brucei. They further dissected the complex using co-immunoprecipitation and comparative proteomics with samples from Trypanosoma and Ttc29 KO mice. They concluded that ZMYND12 is a new asthenoteratozoospermia-associated gene, bi-allelic variants of which cause severe flagellum malformations and primary male infertility.

The major strengths are that the authors used the cutting-edge technique, whole-exome sequencing, to identify genes associated with male infertility, and used a new model organism, Trypanosoma brucei to validate the findings; together with other high-throughput tools, including comparative proteomics to dissect the protein complex essential for normal sperm formation/function. The major weakness is that limited samples could be collected from the patients for further characterization by other approaches, including western blotting and TEM.

In general, the authors achieved their goal and the conclusion is supported by their results. The findings not only provide another genetic marker for the diagnosis of asthenoteratozoospermia but also enrich the knowledge in cilia/flagella.

Joint Public Review:

In this study, Porter et al report on outcomes from a small, open-label, pilot randomized clinical trial comparing dornase-alfa to the best available care in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. As the number of randomized participants is small, investigators describe also a contemporary cohort of controls and the study concludes about a decrease of inflammation (reflected by CRP levels) after 7 days of treatment but no other statistically significant clinical benefit.

Suggestions to the authors:<br /> • The RCT does not follow CONSORT statement and reporting guidelines<br /> • The authors have chosen a primary outcome that cannot be at least considered as clinically relevant or interesting. After 3 years of the pandemic with so much research, why investigate if a drug reduces CRP levels as we already have marketed drugs that provide beneficial clinical outcomes such as dexamethasone, anakinra, tocilizumab and baricitinib.<br /> • Please provide in Methods the timeframe for the investigation of the primary endpoint<br /> • Why day 35 was chosen for the read-out of the endpoint?<br /> • The authors performed an RCT but in parallel chose to compare also controls. They should explain their rationale as this is not usual. I am not very enthusiastic to see mixed results like Figures 2c and 2d.<br /> • Analysis is performed in mITT; this is a major limitation. The authors should provide at least ITT results. And they should describe in the main manuscript why they chose mITT analysis.<br /> • It is also not usual to exclude patients from analysis because investigators just do not have serial measurements. This is lost to follow up and investigators should have pre-decided what to do with lost-to-follow-up.<br /> • In Table 1 I would like to see all randomized patients (n=39), which is missing. There are also baseline characteristics that are missing, like which other treatments as BAT received by those patients except for dexamethasone.<br /> • In the first paragraph of clinical outcomes, the authors refer to a cohort that is not previously introduced in the manuscript. This is confusing. And I do not understand why this analysis is performed in the context of this RCT although I understand its pilot nature.<br /> • Propensity-score selected contemporary controls may introduce bias in favor of the primary study analysis, since controls are already adjusted for age, sex and comorbidities.<br /> • The authors do not clearly present numerically survivors and non-survivors at day 34, even though this is one of the main secondary outcomes.<br /> • It is unclear why another cohort (Berlin) was used to associate CRP with mortality. CRP association with mortality should (also) be performed within the current study.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Levy and Hasselmo investigated the representational codes of dorsal hippocampus neurons in episodic memory and spatial navigation. Specifically, how new learning affects previously acquired spatial memory. They asked if the hippocampal representational codes evolve in a different manner when two tasks governed by different rules are learnt in a single environment vs. when each rule is learnt in a separate environment. The two rules they used were based on the classical Packard & McGaugh (1996) experiment. In the original 1996 experiment there was a striatal-dependent response-based task vs. a hippocampal-dependent map-based task. In the current paper they either trained the two types of rules (response vs. map based) in two different contexts (Two-Maze), or in a single context (One-Maze). They found that the remapping of the second time in the response-based rule task was greater in the One-Maze variant of the experiment than in the Two-Maze variant, and they interpreted this by suggesting that in the One-Maze variant, the different intermediate map-based task interfered with the representation in the second response-based task, while in the Two-Maze variant no such interference occurred, and thus the hippocampal map remained more stable.

The results of this paper are well supported by data; however, we believe the conclusion of paper should be different than the conclusion the authors have arrived at.

Major issue:<br /> 1. The main claim is that a new behavioral rule in a familiar environment leads to an increase in the level of remapping of hippocampal activity when returning to the original rule in the same environment. However, we are worried that the result is not due to the interference by a different task in the same environment, but rather by the fact that the mouse spent more time in the environment, causing a larger representational drift. Consider, for example, the change in correlation in Figure 4E over days. In all cases, there is a maze-dependent reduction in correlation from day to day. This reduction continues in the One-maze case also when changing the rule, suggesting that what determined the larger reduction is the time spent in each context, and not the actual change of rule or behavior. Thus it is probable that the fact that the mouse was longer in the first maze in the one-maze variant was enough to create a difference in correlation. See also Khatib et al., bioRxiv, 2022 on the issue of context-dependent drift. To actually control for that, we suggest that the mouse spends twice the time in the first maze during the first Turn-Right session, in the Two-maze variant, and then the comparison will be more valid, by equating the amount of time spent in the first maze in-between comparisons, in the two types of experiments.

Additional points:<br /> 2. Figure 1.d: While behaving differently, is there a difference in the representation? (e.g. mouse 2 on 7th day showed in the beginning very bad behavior). What is the relation between the reduction in performance and the change in representation?<br /> 3. Figure 3.c: We suggest to get a better estimate of the significance of the effect here using shuffling. Specifically, it could be a good idea to distinguish between signal correlations (derived from the overlapping spatial fields) vs. noise correlations. To what extent are the correlations dependent on spatial overlap? It could be worthwhile to determine the type of correlation: Is it due to the fact that the maps are similar for overlapping place cells, or is there noise correlations between these cells?<br /> 4. Figure 4.a: What is the explanation for the reduction in correlation between days 5 and 6?<br /> 5. Supplementary Figure 2: Higher correlations in all arms - note the higher correlation in all arms in the Two-Maze vs. the One-Maze, suggesting again that the effect is related to the longer time in the context, and not so much to the rule-change.<br /> 6. Methods: the researchers note that the animals were previously used in a different study. This should be stated clearly also in the results.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In their manuscript, Brischigliaro et al. show that the disruption of respiratory complex assembly results in Drosophila melanogaster results in the accumulation of respiratory supercomplexes. Further, they show that the change in the supercomplex abundance does not impact respiratory function suggesting that the main role of supercomplex formation is structural. Overall, the manuscript is well written and the results and conclusion are supported. The D. melanogaster system, in which the abundance of supercomplexes can be altered through the genetic disruption of the assembly of the individual complexes, will be important for the field to discover the role of the supercomplexes. This manuscript will be of broad interest to the field of mitochondrial bioenergetics. The findings are valuable and the evidence is convincing.

Strengths:

The system developed in which the relative levels of SCs can be varied will be extremely useful for studying SC physiology.

The experiments are clearly described and interpreted.

Weaknesses:

The statement in the abstract regarding low amounts of SCs in "insect tissues" needs further support or should be narrowed. I am only aware of detailed characterization of the mitochondrial SC composition from D. melanogaster, which is insufficient to make a broad statement about the large and diverse category of insects. This should be rewritten.

In the introduction (line 76) and discussion (line 283), the authors reference the CoQ binding sites in CI and CIII2 being "too far apart" to allow for substrate channeling. The distance between the active sites, though significant, is insufficient to rule out substrate channeling. A stronger argument arises from the fact that the CoQ sites of both CI and CIII2 are open to the membrane and that there are no clear barriers for the free exchange of CoQ with the membrane pool.

Line 195, the slight elevation in CI amounts referred to here, does not appear to be statistically significant and therefore should not be discussed a being altered relative to the control.

Figure 4H, the assignments of the observed larger bands seem incorrect. The largest band (currently assigned as SC I1+III2+IV1) represents too large of a shift for only the addition of CIV and the band currently assigned at SC I1+III2 appears to also contain CIV. The identity of these bands should be reevaluated and additional experiments are needed to definitively prove their identity. This uncertainty should be addressed experimentally or made more explicit in the text.

Line 302, the authors state that the structural basis for less SC in D. melanogaster is "due to a more stable association of the NDUFA11 subunit..." However, this would not result is a less stable SC association and only explains why NDUFA11 is more stably associated with CI in the absence of CIII2. The more likely structural reason for the observation of less SC in D. melanogaster is the N-terminal truncation of Dm-NDUFB4 relative to mammalian NDUFB4. This truncation results in the loss of a major SC interaction site between CI and CIII2 in the matrix.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This article describes the development and refinement of an open-source software framework that is used to track how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted healthcare use in England over a range of key healthcare use indicators.

Important strengths of this study include the high coverage of 99% of practices in England, the development of health care indicators with the input of a clinical advisory group, extensive online documentation, and rigorous safeguards for the protection of patient confidentiality.

Perhaps the largest limitation is that only high-level descriptive data on the monthly volume of health outcomes are presented. It is not clear whether the system could be used to generate more fine-grained or stratified information, ex. weekly or daily data, or data stratified by important characteristics of practices or of patient characteristics. As such, the utility of the system for answering new scientific questions is unclear, and also what the utility and long-term potential uses of this system will be past the COVID-19 pandemic.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study, Fang H et al. describe a potential pathway, ITGB4-TNFAIP2-IQGAP1-Rac1, that may involve in the drug resistance in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Mechanistically, it was demonstrated that TNFAIP2 bind with IQGAP1 and ITGB4 activating Rac1 and the following drug resistance. The present study focused on breast cancer cell lines with supporting data from mouse model and patient breast cancer tissues. The study is interesting. The experiments were well controlled and carefully carried out. The conclusion is supported by strong evidence provided in the manuscript. The authors may want to discuss the link between ITGB4 and Rac 1, between IQGAP1 and Rac1, and between TNFAIP2 and Rac1 as compared with the current results obtained. This is important considering some recent publications in this area (Cancer Sci 2021, J Biol Chem 2008, Cancer Res 2023).

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Current experimental work reveals that brain areas implicated in episodic and spatial memory have a dynamic code, in which activity representing familiar events/locations changes over time. This paper shows that such reconfiguration is consistent with underlying changes in the excitability of cells in the population, which ties these observations to a physiological mechanism.

Delamare et al. use a recurrent network model to consider the hypothesis that slow fluctuations in intrinsic excitability, together with spontaneous reactivations of ensembles, may cause the structure of the ensemble to change, consistent with the phenomenon of representational drift. The paper focuses on three main findings from their model: (1) fluctuations in intrinsic excitability lead to drift, (2) this drift has a temporal structure, and (3) a readout neuron can track the drift and continue to decode the memory. This paper is relevant and timely, and the work addresses questions of both a potential mechanism (fluctuations in intrinsic excitability) and purpose (time-stamping memories) of drift.

The model used in this study consists of a pool of 50 all-to-all recurrently connected excitatory neurons with weights changing according to a Hebbian rule. All neurons receive the same input during stimulation, as well as global inhibition. The population has heterogeneous excitability, and each neuron's excitability is constant over time apart from a transient increase on a single day. The neurons are divided into ensembles of 10 neurons each, and on each day, a different ensemble receives a transient increase in the excitability of each of its neurons, with each neuron experiencing the same amplitude of increase. Each day for four days, repetitions of a binary stimulus pulse are applied to every neuron.

The modeling choices focus in on the parameter of interest-the excitability-and other details are generally kept as straightforward as possible. That said, I wonder if certain aspects may be overly simple. The extent of the work already performed, however, does serve the intended purpose, and so I think it would be sufficient for the authors to comment on these choices rather than to take more space in this paper to actually implement these choices. What might happen were more complex modeling choices made? What is the justification for the choices that are made in the present work?

The two specific modeling choices I question are (1) the excitability dynamics and (2) the input stimulus. The ensemble-wide synchronous and constant-amplitude excitability increase, followed by a return to baseline, seems to be a very simplified picture of the dynamics of intrinsic excitability. At the very least, justification for this simplified picture would benefit the reader, and I would be interested in the authors' speculation about how a more complex and biologically realistic dynamics model might impact the drift in their network model. Similarly, the input stimulus being binary means that, on the single-neuron level, the only type of drift that can occur is a sort of drop-in/drop-out drift; this choice excludes the possibility of a neuron maintaining significant tuning to a stimulus but changing its preferred value. How would the use of a continuous input variable influence the results.

Result (1): Fluctuations in intrinsic excitability induce drift<br /> The two choices highlighted above appear to lead to representations that never recruit the neurons in the population with the lowest baseline excitability (Figure 1b: it appears that only 10 neurons ever show high firing rates) and produce networks with very strong bidirectional coupling between this subset of neurons and weak coupling elsewhere (Figure 1d). This low recruitment rate need may not necessarily be problematic, but it stands out as a point that should at least be commented on. The fact that only 10 neurons (20% of the population) are ever recruited in a representation also raises the question of what would happen if the model were scaled up to include more neurons.

Result (2): The observed drift has a temporal structure<br /> The authors then demonstrate that the drift has a temporal structure (i.e., that activity is informative about the day on which it occurs), with methods inspired by Rubin et al. (2015). Rubin et al. (2015) compare single-trial activity patterns on a given session with full-session activity patterns from each session. In contrast, Delamare et al. here compare full-session patterns with baseline excitability (E = 0) patterns. This point of difference should be motivated. What does a comparison to this baseline excitability activity pattern tell us? The ordinal decoder, which decodes the session order, gives very interesting results: that an intermediate amplitude E of excitability increase maximizes this decoder's performance. This point is also discussed well by the authors. As a potential point of further exploration, the use of baseline excitability patterns in the day decoder had me wondering how the ordinal decoder would perform with these baseline patterns.

Result (3): A readout neuron can track drift<br /> The authors conclude their work by connecting a readout neuron to the population with plastic weights evolving via a Hebbian rule. They show that this neuron can track the drifting ensemble by adjusting its weights. These results are shown very neatly and effectively and corroborate existing work that they cite very clearly.

Overall, this paper is well-organized, offers a straightforward model of dynamic intrinsic excitability, and provides relevant results with appropriate interpretations. The methods could benefit from more justification of certain modeling choices, and/or an exploration (either speculative or via implementation) of what would happen with more complex choices. This modeling work paves the way for further explorations of how intrinsic excitability fluctuations influence drifting representations.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Qin et al. set out to investigate the role of mechanosensory feedback during swallowing and identify neural circuits that generate ingestion rhythms. They use Drosophila melanogaster swallowing as a model system, focusing their study on the neural mechanisms that control cibarium filling and emptying in vivo. They find that pump frequency is decreased in mutants of three mechanotransduction genes (nompC, piezo, and Tmc), and conclude that mechanosensation mainly contributes to the emptying phase of swallowing. Furthermore, they find that double mutants of nompC and Tmc have more pronounced cibarium pumping defects than either single mutants or Tmc/piezo double mutants. They discover that the expression patterns of nompC and Tmc overlap in two classes of neurons, md-C and md-L neurons. The dendrites of md-C neurons warp the cibarium and project their axons to the subesophageal zone of the brain. Silencing neurons that express both nompC and Tmc leads to severe ingestion defects, with decreased cibarium emptying. Optogenetic activation of the same population of neurons inhibited filling of the cibarium and accelerated cibarium emptying. In the brain, the axons of nompC∩Tmc cell types respond during ingestion of sugar but do not respond when the entire fly head is passively exposed to sucrose. Finally, the authors show that nompC∩Tmc cell types arborize close to the dendrites of motor neurons that are required for swallowing, and that swallowing motor neurons respond to the activation of the entire Tmc-GAL4 pattern.

Strengths:<br /> -The authors rigorously quantify ingestion behavior to convincingly demonstrate the importance of mechanosensory genes in the control of swallowing rhythms and cibarium filling and emptying<br /> -The authors demonstrate that a small population of neurons that express both nompC and Tmc oppositely regulate cibarium emptying and filling when inhibited or activated, respectively<br /> -They provide evidence that the action of multiple mechanotransduction genes may converge in common cell types

Weaknesses:<br /> -A major weakness of the paper is that the authors use reagents that are expressed in both md-C and md-L but describe the results as though only md-C is manipulated<br /> -Severing the labellum will not prevent optogenetic activation of md-L from triggering neural responses downstream of md-L. Optogenetic activation is strong enough to trigger action potentials in the remaining axons. Therefore, Qin et al. do not present convincing evidence that the defects they see in pumping can be specifically attributed to md-C.<br /> -GRASP is known to be non-specific and prone to false positives when neurons are in close proximity but not synaptically connected. A positive GRASP signal supports but does not confirm direct synaptic connectivity between md-C/md-L axons and MN11/MN12.<br /> -As seen in Figure Supplement 2, the expression pattern of Tmc-GAL4 is broader than md-C alone. Therefore, the functional connectivity the authors observe between Tmc expressing neurons and MN11 and 12 cannot be traced to md-C alone

Overall, this work convincingly shows that swallowing and swallowing rhythms are dependent on several mechanosensory genes. Qin et al. also characterize a candidate neuron, md-C, that is likely to provide mechanosensory feedback to pumping motor neurons, but the results they present here are not sufficient to assign this function to md-C alone. This work will have a positive impact on the field by demonstrating the importance of mechanosensory feedback to swallowing rhythms and providing a potential entry point for future investigation of the identity and mechanisms of swallowing central pattern generators.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this preprint, Zhang et al. describe a new tool for mapping the connectivity of mouse neurons. Essentially, the tool leverages the known peculiar infection capabilities of Rabies virus: once injected into a specific site in the brain, this virus has the capability to "walk upstream" the neural circuits, both within cells and across cells: on one hand, the virus can enter from a nerve terminal and infect retrogradely the cell body of the same cell (retrograde transport). On the other hand, the virus can also spread to the presynaptic partners of the initial target cells, via retrograde viral transmission.

Similarly to previously published approaches with other viruses, the authors engineer a complex library of viral variants, each carrying a unique sequence ('barcode'), so they can uniquely label and distinguish independent infection events and their specific presynaptic connections, and show that it is possible to read these barcodes in-situ, producing spatial connectivity maps. They also show that it is possible to read these barcodes together with endogenous mRNAs, and that this allows spatial mapping of cell types together with anatomical connectivity.

The main novelty of this work lies in the combined use of rabies virus for retrograde labeling together with barcoding and in-situ readout. Previous studies had used rabies virus for retrograde labeling, albeit with low multiplexing capabilities, so only a handful of circuits could be traced at the same time. Other studies had instead used barcoded viral libraries for connectivity mapping, but mostly focused on the use of different viruses for labeling individual projections (anterograde tracing) and never used a retrograde-infective virus.

The authors creatively merge these two bits of technology into a powerful genetic tool, and extensively and convincingly validate its performance against known anatomical knowledge. The authors also do a very good job at highlighting and discussing potential points of failure in the methods.

Unresolved questions, which more broadly affect also other viral-labeling methods, are for example how to deal with uneven tropism (ie. if the virus is unable or inefficient in infecting some specific parts of the brain), or how to prevent the cytotoxicity induced by the high levels of viral replication and expression, which will tend to produce "no source networks", neural circuits whose initial cell can't be identified because it's dead. This last point is particularly relevant for in-situ based approaches: while high expression levels are desirable for the particular barcode detection chemistry the authors chose to use (gap-filling), they are also potentially detrimental for cell survival, and risk producing extensive cell death (which indeed the authors single out as a detectable pitfall in their analysis). This is likely to be one of the major optimisation challenges for future implementations of these types of barcoding approaches.

Overall the paper is well balanced, the data are well presented and the conclusions are strongly supported by the data. Impact-wise, the method is definitely going to be useful for the neurobiology research community.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The manuscript describes an interesting experiment in which an animal had to judge a duration of an interval and press one of two levers depending on the duration. The Authors recorded activity of neurons in key areas of the basal ganglia (SNr and striatum), and noticed that they can be divided into 4 types.

The data presented in the manuscript is very rich and interesting, however, I am not convinced by the interpretation of these data proposed in the paper. The Authors focus on neurons of types 1 & 2 and propose that their difference encodes the choice the animal makes. However, I would like to offer an alternative interpretation of the data. Looking at the description of task and animal movements seen in Figure 1, it seems to me that there are 4 main "actions" the animals may do in the task: press right lever, press left lever, move left, and move right. It seems to me that the 4 neurons authors observed may correspond to these actions, i.e. Figure 1 shows that Type 1 neurons decrease when right level becomes more likely to be correct, so their decrease may correspond to preparation of pressing right lever - they may be releasing this action from inhibition (analogously Type 2 neurons may be related to pressing left lever). Furthermore, comparing animal movements and timing of activity of neurons of type 3 and 4, it seems to me that type 3 neurons decrease when the animal moves left, while type 4 when the animal moves right.

I suggest Authors analyse if this interpretation is valid, and if so, revise the interpretation in the paper and the model accordingly.

Joint Public Review:

In this work, Jain and colleagues have created two libraries of the AAV2 rep gene - either expressed separately from a strong heterologous promoter or embedded in the viral wild-type context - containing all possible single codon mutations. The libraries were cleverly made through a cloning process that ensured each mutant was attached to an exactly known 20-nt barcode included in each mutagenic oligo. This allowed the authors to confidently observe nearly all rep variants in their experiments, resulting in a comprehensive map between Rep protein variants and AAV production. Interrogation of these libraries identified several variants that improved AAV production, including mutations not observed in natural AAV isolates thus far, as independently verified through a conventional AAV vector production protocol. These benefits were also conserved across multiple natural AAV capsid variants including the heterologous AAV5 serotype.

While many other groups have previously created and interrogated individual point mutants of the AAV rep gene/protein or domain swapping mutants, this study is distinguished and excels by its degree of comprehensiveness and the complexity of the two complementary libraries. This reflects the next step in the field's efforts to better understand the natural biology of AAV and, as a result, to improve the production of recombinant AAV gene transfer vectors. Considering the rapidly increasing momentum of these vectors in the clinics and as approved drugs on the gene therapy market, and considering that the individual validation experiments reported in this work support the conclusions, this work including the reported resources and technologies is likely to have a critical impact on current and future research on AAV biology and vector development.

However, there are a few areas in which the study could be expanded for even greater impact. For instance, the authors may consider testing the selected rep variants in the context of a self-complementary AAV genome, which has different biology compared to the single-stranded genomes used in this study, and which is widely used granted its compatibility with the transgene of choice (which should be <2.5 kb). Likewise, it would be important to study the functionality of the selected rep variants with at least one AAV genome of regular size, considering that the two tested here seem rather unusual in length (2.9 kb, which is very small, or 5.0 kb, which is borderline large). Last but not least, despite the fact that the AAV2 ITRs are by far most commonly used in the field, it will also be interesting to test these rep variants in combination with ITRs derived from other AAV serotypes, considering that numerous groups have previously cloned and analyzed them, and that they can provide several benefits over the AAV2 ITRs.

Furthermore, in interpreting the results of this study, the reader should bear in mind that what has been measured and validated in this work is the production of intact genome-containing AAVs. Production is a precondition to functional AAVs that can transduce cells but is not equivalent to it. While the two are likely well correlated, further studies are needed to determine how well the effects of Rep protein variants on AAV production translate to their ability to then transduce cells. The more relevant property for gene therapy is the efficiency by which an AAV preparation transduces cells. For example, might production-enhancing Rep protein variants change the ratio of empty capsids to genome-containing capsids in a way that influences transduction efficiency of the corresponding AAV preparations? Does this influence reduce or enhance the production benefit? This particular scenario of empty capsid ratios influencing transduction represents a population effect that is not possible to capture in the multiplex assay, but it seems like a good idea to at least test transduction of some individual variants because transduction is the important function of AAV for gene therapy.

One additional aspect that may warrant further consideration is the assumption, as mentioned in Figure 2's legend, that synonymous mutations are neutral and can serve as controls for normalizing the production rate. However, Figures S5-6 and Figures S11-12 suggest that synonymous mutations are not necessarily neutral, as their distribution is similar to that of nonsynonymous mutations. Thus, a deeper examination of the impacts of synonymous mutations on the genotype-phenotype landscape could provide more nuanced insights into AAV2 rep gene function.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study, the authors identify an insect salivary protein participating viral initiate infection in plant host. They found a salivary LssaCA promoting RSV infection by interacting with OsTLP that could degrade callose in plants. Furthermore, RSV NP bond to LssaCA in salivary glands to form a complex, which then bond to OsTLP to promote degradation of callose.

The story focus on tripartite virus-insect vector-plant interaction, and is interesting. However, the study is too simple and poor-conducted. The conclusion is also overstated due to unsolid findings.

Major comments:<br /> 1. The key problem is that how long the LssCA functioned for in rice plant. Author declared that LssCA had no effect on viral initial infection, but on infection after viral inoculation. It is unreasonable to conclude that LssCA promoted viral infection based on the data that insect inoculated plant just for 2 days, but viral titer could be increased at 14 day post-feeding. How could saliva proteins, which reached phloem 12-14 days before, induce enough TLP to degrade callose to promote virus infection? It was unbelievable.

2. Lines 110-116 and Fig. 1, the results of viruliferous insect feeding and microinjection with purified virus could not conclude the saliva factor necessary of RSV infection, because these two tests are not in parallel and comparable. Microinjection with salivary proteins combined with purified virus is comparable with microinjection with purified virus.

The second problem is how many days post viruliferous insect feeding and microinjection with purified virus did author detect viral titers? in Method section, authors declared that viral titers was detected at 7-14 days post microinjection. Please demonstrate the days exactly.

The last problem is that how author made sure that the viral titers in salivary glands of insects between two experiments was equal, causing different phenotype of rice plant. If not, different viral titers in salivary glands of insects between two experiments of course caused different phenotype of rice plant.

3. The callose deposition in phloem can be induced by insect feeding. In Fig. 5H, why was the callose deposition increased in the whole vascular bundle, but not phloem? Could the transgenic rice plant directional express protein in the phloem? In Fig.5, why was callose deposition detected at 24 h after insect feeding? In Fig. 6A, why was callose deposition decreased in the phloem, but not all the cells of the of TLP OE plant? Also in Fig.6A and B, expression of callose synthase genes was required.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Bacteria can adapt to extremely diverse environments via extensive gene reprogramming at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Small RNAs are key regulators of gene expression that participate in this adaptive response in bacteria, and often act as post-transcriptional regulators via pairing to multiple mRNA-targets.

In this study, Melamed et al. identify four E. coli small RNAs whose expression is dependent on sigma 28 (FliA), involved in the regulation of flagellar gene expression. Even though they are all under the control of FliA, expression of these 4 sRNAs peaks under slightly different growth conditions and each has different effects on flagella synthesis/number and motility. Combining RILseq data, structural probing, northern-blots and reporter assays, the authors show that 3 of these sRNAs control fliC expression (negatively for FliX, positively for MotR and UhpU) and two of them regulate r-protein genes from the S10 operon (again positively for MotR, and negatively for FliX). UhpU also directly represses synthesis of the LrhA transcriptional regulator, that in turn regulates flhDC (at the top of flagella regulation cascade). Based on RILseq data, the fourth sRNA (FlgO) has very few targets and may act via a mechanism other than base-pairing.

As r-protein S10 is also implicated in anti-termination via the NusB-S10 complex, the authors further hypothesize that the up-regulation of S10 gene expression by MotR promotes expression of the long flagellar operons through anti-termination. Consistent with this possible connection between ribosome and flagella synthesis, they show that MotR overexpression leads to an increase in flagella number and in the mRNA levels of two long flagellar operons, and that both effects are dependent on the NusB protein. Lastly, they provide data supporting a more general activating and repressing role for MotR and FliX, respectively, in flagellar genes expression and motility.

This study brings a lot of new information on the regulation of flagellar genes, from the identification of novel sigma 28-dependent sRNAs to their effects on flagella production and motility. It represents a considerable amount of work; the experimental data are clear and solid and support the conclusions of the paper. Even though mechanistic details underlying the observed regulations by MotR or FliX sRNAs are lacking, the effect of these sRNAs on fliC, several rps/rpl genes, and flagellar genes and motility is convincing.<br /> The connection between r-protein genes regulation and flagellar operons is exciting and raises a few questions. First, from the RILseq data, chimeric reads with mRNA for r-proteins (including rpsJ) are not restricted to the sigma 28-dependent sRNAs (e.g. rpsJ-sucD3'UTR, rpsF-DicF, rplN-DicF, rplK-ChiX, rplU-CyaR, rpsT-CyaR, rpsK-CyaR, rpsF-MicA...), suggesting that regulation of r-protein synthesis by sRNAs is not necessarily related to flagella/motility. Second, it would be interesting to know if the flagellar operons are more sensitive than other long operons to antitermination following MotR overexpression? In other words, does pMotR similarly affect antitermination in rrn or other long operons?

The general effect of pMotR or pFliX on the expression of multiple middle and late flagellar genes is also interesting even though the mechanism is not clear. While it may be difficult to fully address it, testing whether some of these regulatory events depend on the control of fliC and/or the S10 operon could be relevant (by analyzing the effects in strains deleted for fliC or nusB for instance).

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Cytotoxic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors are the most commonly used and efficacious treatments for lung cancers. However their use brings two significant pulmonary side-effects; namely Pneumocystis jirovecii infection and resultant pneumonia (PCP), and interstitial lung disease (ILD). To observe the potential immunological drivers of these adverse events, Yanagihara et al. analysed and compared cells present in the bronchoalveolar lavage of three patient groups (PCP, cytotoxic drug-induced ILD [DI-ILD], and ICI-associated ILD [ICI-ILD]) using mass cytometry (64 markers). In PCP, they observed an expansion of the CD16+ T cell population, with the highest CD16+ T proportion (97.5%) in a fatal case, whilst in ICI-ILD, they found an increase in CD57+ CD8+ T cells expressing immune checkpoints (TIGIT+ LAG3+ TIM-3+ PD-1+), FCRL5+ B cells, and CCR2+ CCR5+ CD14+ monocytes. Given the fatal case, the authors also assessed for, and found, a correlation between CD16+ T cells and disease severity in PCP, postulating that this may be owing to endothelial destruction. Although n numbers are relatively small (n=7-9 in each cohort; common numbers for CyTOF papers), the authors use a wide panel (n=65) and two clustering methodologies giving greater strength to the conclusions. The differential populations discovered using one or two of the analytical methods are robust: whole population shifts with clear and significant clustering. These data are an excellent resource for clinical disease specialists and pan-disease immunologists, with a broad and engaging contextual discussion about what they could mean.

Strengths:<br /> • The differences in immune cells in BAL in these specific patient subgroups is relatively unexplored.<br /> • This is an observational study, with no starting hypothesis being tested.<br /> • Two analytical methods are used to cluster the data.<br /> • A relatively wide panel was used (64 markers), with particular strength in the alpha beta T cells and B cells.<br /> • Relevant biomarkers, beta-D-glucan and KL-6 were also analysed<br /> • Appropriate statistics were used throughout.<br /> • Numbers are low (7 cases of PCP, 9 of DI-ILD, and 9 of ICI-ILD) but these are difficult samples to collect and so in relative terms, and considering the use of CyTOF, these are good numbers.<br /> • Beta-D-glucan shows potential as a biomarker for PCP (as previously reported) whilst KL-6 shows potential as a biomarker for ICI-ILD (not reported before). Interestingly, KL-6 was not seen to be increased in DI-ILD patients.<br /> • Despite the relatively low n numbers and lack of matching there are some clear differentials. The CD4/CD8+CD16+HLA-DR+CXCR3+CD14- T cell result is striking - up in PCP (with EM CD4s significantly down) - whilst the CD8 EMRA population is clear in ICI-ILD and 'non-exhausted' CD4s, with lower numbers of EMRA CD8s in DI-ILD.<br /> • The authors identify 17/31 significantly differentiated clusters of myeloid cells, eg CD11bhi CD11chi CD64+ CD206+ alveolar macrophages with HLA-DRhi in PCP.<br /> • With respect to B cells, the authors found that FCRL5+ B cells were more abundant in patients with ICI-ILD compared to those with PCP and DI-ILD, suggesting these FCRL5+ B cells may have a role in irAE.<br /> • One patient's extreme CD16+ T cell (97.5% positive) and death, led the authors to consider CD16+ T cells as an indicator of disease severity in PCP. This was then tested and found to be correct.<br /> • Authors discuss results in context of literature leading them to suggest that CD16+ T cells may target endothelial cells and wonder if anti-complement therapy may be efficacious in PCP.<br /> • Great discussion on auto-reactive T cell clones where the authors suggest that in ICI-ILD CD8s may react against healthy lung, driving ILD.<br /> • An observation of CXCR3 in different CD8 populations in ICI-ILD and PCP lead the authors to hypothesise on the chemoattractants in the microenvironment.<br /> • Excellent point suggesting CD57 may not always be a marker of senescence on T cells - reflective of growing change within the community.<br /> • Well considered suggestion that FCRL5+ B cells may be involved in ICI-ILD driven autoimmunity.<br /> • The authors discuss the main weaknesses in the discussion and stress that the findings detailed in the paper "demonstrate a correlation rather than proof of causation".<br /> • Figures and legends are clear and pleasing to the eye.

Weaknesses:<br /> • This is an observational study, with no starting hypothesis being tested.<br /> • Only patients who were able to have a lavage taken have been recruited.<br /> • One set of analysis wasn't carried out for one subgroup (ICI-ILD) as PD1 expression was negative owing to the use of nivolumab.<br /> • Some immune cell subsets wouldn't be picked up with the markers and gating strategies used; e.g. NK cells.<br /> • Some immune cells would be disproportionately damaged by the storage, thawing and preparation of the samples; e.g. granulocytes.<br /> • Numbers are low (7 cases of PCP, 9 of DI-ILD, and 9 of ICI-ILD), sex, age and adverse event matching wasn't performed, and treatment regimen are varied and 'suspected' (suggesting incomplete clinical data) - but these are difficult samples to collect. These numbers drop further for some analyses e.g. T cell clustering owing to factors such as low cell number.<br /> • The disease comparisons are with each other, there is no healthy control.<br /> • Samples are taken at one time point.<br /> • The discussion on probably the stand out result - the CD16+ T cells in PCP - relies on two papers - leading to a slightly skewed emphasis on one paper on CD16+ cells in COVID. There are other papers out there that have observed CD16+ T cells in other conditions. It is also worth being in mind that given the markers used, these CD16+ T cell may be gamma deltas.<br /> • The discussion on ICI patient consistently showing increased PD1, could have been greater, as given the ICI is targeting PD1, one would expect the opposite as commented on, and observed, in the methods section.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors took advantage of a large dataset of transcriptomic information obtained from parasites recovered from 35 patients. In addition, parasites from 13 of these patients were reared for 1 generation in vivo, 10 for 2 generations, and 1 for a third generation. This provided the authors with a remarkable resource for monitoring how parasites initially adapt to the environmental change of being grown in culture. They focused initially on var gene expression due to the importance of this gene family for parasite virulence, then subsequently assessed changes in the entire transcriptome. Their goal was to develop a more accurate and informative computational pipeline for assessing var gene expression and secondly, to document the adaptation process at the whole transcriptome level.

Overall, the authors were largely successful in their aims. They provide convincing evidence that their new computational pipeline is better able to assemble var transcripts and assess the structure of the encoded PfEMP1s. They can also assess var gene switching as a tool for examining antigenic variation. They also documented potentially important changes in the overall transcriptome that will be important for researchers who employ ex vivo samples for assessing things like drug sensitivity profiles or metabolic states. These are likely to be important tools and insights for researchers working on field samples.

One concern is that the abstract highlights "Unpredictable var gene switching....." and states that "Our results cast doubt on the validity of the common practice of using short-term cultured parasites......". This seems somewhat overly pessimistic with regard to var gene expression profiling and does not reflect the data described in the paper. In contrast, the main text of the paper repeatedly refers to "modest changes in var gene expression repertoire upon culture" or "relatively small changes in var expression from ex vivo to culture", and many additional similar assessments. On balance, it seems that transition to culture conditions causes relatively minor changes in var gene expression, at least in the initial generations. The authors do highlight that a few individuals in their analysis showed more pronounced and unpredictable changes, which certainly warrants caution for future studies but should not obscure the interesting observation that var gene expression remained relatively stable during transition to culture.

Consensus Public Review:

Ottenheimer et al., present an interesting study looking at the neural representation of value in mice performing a pavlovian association task. The task is repeated in the same animals using two odor sets, allowing a distinction between odor identity coding and value coding. The authors use state-of-the-art electrophysiological techniques to record thousands of neurons from 11 frontal cortical regions to conclude that 1) licking is represented more strongly in dorsal frontal regions, 2) odor cues are represented more strongly in ventral frontal regions, 3) cue values are evenly distributed across regions. They separately perform a calcium imaging study to track coding across days and conclude that the representation of task features increments with learning and remains stable thereafter.Overall, these conclusions are interesting and well supported by the data.

The authors use reduced-rank kernel regression to characterize the 5332 recorded neurons on a cell-by-cell basis in terms of their responses to cues, licks, and reward, with a cell characterized as encoding one of these parameters if it accounts for at least 2% of the observed variance (while at first this seemed overly lenient, the authors present analyses demonstrating low false-positives at this threshold and that the results are robust to different cutoffs).

Having identified lick, reward, and cue cells, the authors next select the 24% of "cue-only" neurons and look for cells that specifically encode cue value. Because the animal's perception of stimulus value can't be measured directly, the authors created a linear model that predicts the amount of anticipatory licking in the interval between odor cue and reward presentations. The session-average-predicted lick rate by this model is used as an estimate of cue value and is used in the regression analysis that identified value cells. (Hence, the authors' definition of value is dependent on the average amount of anticipatory behavior ahead of a reward, which indicates that compared to the CS+, mice licked around 70% as much to the CS50 and 10% as much to the CS-.) The claim that this is an encoding of value is strengthened by the fact that cells show similar scaling of responses to two odor sets tested. Whereas the authors found more "lick" cells in motor regions and more "cue" cells in sensory regions, they find a consistent percentage of "value" cells (that is, cells found to be cue-only in the initial round of analysis that is subsequently found to encode anticipatory lick rate) across all 11 recorded regions, leading to their claim of a distributed code of value.

In subsequent sections, the authors expand their model of anticipatory-licking-as-value by incorporating trial and stimulus history terms into the model, allowing them to predict the anticipatory lick rate on individual trials within a session. They also use 2-photon imaging in PFC to demonstrate that neural coding of cue and lick are stable across three days of imaging, supported by two lines of evidence. First, they show that the correlation between cell responses on all periods except for the start of day 1 is more correlated with day 3 responses than expected by chance (although the correlation is low, the authors attribute this to inherent limitations of the data), and that response for a given neuron is substantially better correlated with its own activity across time than random neurons. Second, they show that cue identity is able to capture the highest unique fraction of variance (around 8%) in day 3 cue cells across three days of imaging, and similarly for lick behavior in lick cells and cue+lick in cue+lick cells. Nonetheless, their sample rasters for all imaged cells also indicate that representations are not perfectly stable, and it will be interesting to see what *does* change across the three days of imaging.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This work describes a novel high-throughput approach to diverse transgenesis which the authors have named TARDIS for Transgenic Arrays Resulting in Diversity of Integrated Sequences. The authors describe the general approach: the generation of a synthetic 'landing pad' for transgene insertion (as previously reported by this group) that has a split selection hygromycin resistance gene, meaning that only perfect integration with the insert confers resistance to the otherwise lethal hygromycin drug. The authors then demonstrate two possible applications of the technology: individually barcoded lineages for lineage tracing and transcriptional reporter lines generated by inserting multiple promoters. In both cases, the authors did a limited 'proof of concept' study including many important controls, showcasing the potential of the method. The conclusions for applications of this method in C. elegans are supported by the data and the authors discuss important observations and considerations. In the discussion, the discuss the potential application of the method beyond C. elegans, although this remains speculative at this point given that a nontrivial aspect of the success of the method in worms is the self-assembly of DNA into heritable extrachromosomal arrays (a feature that is absent in most other systems).

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors investigated state-dependent changes in evoked brain activity, using electrical stimulation combined with multisite neural activity across wakefulness and anesthesia. The approach is novel, and the results are compelling. The study benefits from in depth sophisticated analysis of neural signals. The effects of behavioral state on brain responses to stimulation are generally convincing.

It is possible that the authors' use of "an average reference montage that removed signals common to all EEG electrodes" could also remove useful components of the signal, which are common across EEG electrodes, especially during deep anesthesia. For example, it is possible (in fact from my experience I would be surprised if it is not the case) that under isoflurane anesthesia, electrical stimulation induces a generalized slow wave or a burst of activity across the brain. Subtracting the average signal will simply remove that from all channels. This does not only result in signals under anesthesia being affected more by the referencing procedure than during waking, but also will have different effects on different channels, e.g. depending on how strong the response is in a specific channel.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The manuscript, "A versatile high-throughput assay based on 3D ring-shaped cardiac tissues generated from human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes" developed a unique culture platform with PEG hydrogel that facilitates the in-situ measurement of contractile dynamics of the engineered cardiac rings. The authors optimized the tissue seeding conditions, demonstrated tissue morphology with expressions of cardiac and fibroblast markers, mathematically modeled the equation to derive contractile forces and other parameters based on imaging analysis, and ended by testing several compounds with known cardiac responses.

To strengthen the paper, the following comments should be considered:

1. This paper provided an intriguing platform that creates miniature cardiac rings with merely thousands of CMs per tissue in a 96-well plate format. The shape of the ring and the squeezing motion can recapitulate the contraction of the cardiac chamber to a certain degree. However, Thavandiran et al (PNAS 2013) created a larger version of the cardiac ring and found the electrical propagation revealed spontaneous infinite loop-like cycles of activation propagation traversing the ring. This model was used to mimic a reentrant wave during arrhythmia. Therefore, it presents great concerns if a large number of cardiac tissues experience arrhythmia by geometry-induced re-entry current and cannot be used as a healthy tissue model. It would be interesting to see the impulse propagation/calcium transient on these miniature cardiac rings and evaluate the % of arrhythmia occurrence.

2. The platform can produce 21 cardiac rings per well in 96-well plates. The throughput has been the highest among competing platforms. The resulting tissues have good sarcomere striation due to the strain from the pillars. Now the emerging questions are culture longevity and reproducibility among tissues. According to Figure 1E, there was uneven ring formation around the pillar, which leads to the tissue thinning and breaking off. There is only 50% survival after 20 days of culture in the optimized seeding group. Is there any way to improve it? The tissues had two compartments, cardiac and fibroblast-rich regions, where fibroblasts are responsible for maintaining the attachment to the glass slides. Do the cardiac rings detach from the glass slides and roll up? The SD of the force measurement is a quarter of the value, which is not ideal with such a high replicate number. As the platform utilizes imaging analysis to derive contractile dynamics, calibration should be done based on the angle and the distance of the camera lens to the individual tissues to reduce the error. On the other hand, how reproducible of the pillars? It is highly recommended to mechanically evaluate the consistency of the hydrogel-based pillars across different wells and within the wells to understand the variance.

3. Does the platform allow the observation of non-synchronized beating when testing with compounds? This can be extremely important as the intended applications of this platform are drug testing and cardiac disease modeling. The author should elaborate on the method in the manuscript and explain the obtained results in detail.

4. The results of drug testing are interesting. Isoproterenol is typically causing positive chronotropic and positive inotropic responses, where inotropic responses are difficult to obtain due to low tissue maturity. It is inconsistent with other reported results that cardiac rings do not exhibit increased beating frequency, but slightly increased forces only. Zhao et al were using electrical pacing at a defined rate during force measurement, whereas the ring constructs are not.

Overall, the manuscript is well written and the designed platform presented the unique advantages of high throughput cardiac tissue culture. Besides the contractile dynamics and IHC images, the paper lacks other cardiac functional evaluations, such as calcium handling, impulse propagation, and/or electrophysiology. The culture reproducibility (high SD) and longevity (<20 days) still remain unsolved.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Kou and Kang et al. investigated the role of Notch-RBP-J signaling in regulating monocyte homeostasis. Specifically, they examined how a conditional knockout of Rbpj expression in monocytes through a Rbpjfl/fl Lyz2cre/cre mouse affects the homeostasis of Ly6Chi versus Ly6Clo monocytes. They discovered that Rbpj deficiency did not affect the percentage of Ly6Chi monocytes but instead, led to an accumulation of Ly6Clo monocytes in the peripheral blood. Using a comprehensive number of in vivo techniques to investigate the origin of this increase, the authors revealed that the accumulation of Rbpj deficient Ly6Clo monocytes was not due to an increase in bone marrow egress and that this defect was cell intrinsic. However, EdU-labelling and apoptosis assays revealed that this defect was not due to an increase in proliferation nor conversion of Ly6Chi to Ly6Clo monocytes. Interestingly, it was revealed that Rbpj deficient Ly6Clo monocytes had increased expression of CCR2 and ablation of CCR2 expression reversed the accumulation of these cells in the periphery. Lastly, they discovered that Rbpj deficiency also led to downstream effects such as an accumulation of Ly6Clo monocytes in the lung tissue and increased CD16.2+ interstitial macrophages, presumably due to dysregulated monocyte differentiation and function.

Their findings are interesting and highlight a previously unexplored mechanistic link between Notch-RBP-J signaling and CCR2 expression in monocyte homeostasis, providing further insight into the distinct pathways that regulate Ly6Chi vs Ly6Clo monocyte subsets individually.

The conclusions of this paper are mostly well substantiated from the experimental data. The strengths of this paper include the use of multiple conditional genetic knock out mouse models to explore their hypothesis and the use of sophisticated in vivo techniques to study the major mechanisms involved in monocyte homeostasis.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The manuscript entitled, "Loss of PTPMT1 limits mitochondrial utilization of carbohydrates and leads to muscle atrophy and heart failure," by Zheng, et al., is focused on assessing the role of deletion of PTPMT1, a mitochondria-based phosphatase, in mitochondrial fuel selection. Authors show that the utilization of pyruvate, a key mitochondrial substrate derived from glucose, is inhibited, whereas fatty acid utilization is enhanced. Importantly, while the deletion of PTPMT1 does not impact development of skeletal muscle or heart, the metabolic inflexibility leads to muscular atrophy, heart failure, and sudden death. Mechanistically, authors claim that the prolonged substrate shift from carbohydrates to lipids causes oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to accumulation of lipids and muscle cell and CM damage in the KO. Interestingly, PTPMT1 deletion from the liver or adipose tissue does not generate any local or systemic defects. Authors conclude that PTPMT1 plays an important role in maintaining mitochondrial flexibility and that the balanced utilization of carbohydrates and lipids is essential for skeletal muscle and heart. While interesting and authors did a ton of experiments for this project, several major concerns exist. First, because both the CKMM- and the MYHC-Cre express early, during development , it seems the effects of the deletion of PTPMT1 are more likely be specific to defects in muscle and cardiac development rather than postnatal, especially since loss of PTPMT1 affects mTOR activity; indeed, previous reports have shown that selective deletion of mTOR or raptor in skeletal muscle during embryonic development leads to a reduction in postnatal growth and the development of late-onset myopathy and premature death around 6 to 8 months of age. The effects of the deletion in muscle seem eerily similar and therefore likely mechanistically function the same -embryonically, as has been previously suggested. This is also true for cardiac abnormalities, where developmental defects can manifest in mice as they age after at least 3-4 months and decreased mTOR activity can lead to significant cardiac dysfunction and failure (similarly to the effects observed here by the authors). To prove one way or another, authors should show developmental data providing evidence that the effects are not occurring at this stage. It is a lot of work, but the right way to differentiate pre- vs post- development functions of PTPMT1 in the muscle and heart, otherwise cannot verify mechanistically what the precise cause for the phenotype may be. Authors could consider generating mice that have inducible Cre drivers. In addition, how is it that the effects of loss of PTPMT1 are similar between muscle and heart given the differences in energy usage and utilization between these two tissues? Increases in AMPK are usually associated with better metabolic outcomes, particularly in the heart. Increased AMPK activation has also been shown to help reduce fat storage, increase insulin sensitivity, reduce cholesterol/triglyceride production, and suppress chronic inflammation. In addition, increases in carnitines are associated with enhanced metabolic function. Carnitines facilitate transport of long-chain fatty acids into the mitochondrial matrix, triggering cardioprotective effects through reduced oxidative stress, inflammation and necrosis of cardiac myocytes. All of these factors are positive, so how do authors explain this discrepancy in their findings which suggest opposing outcomes- as above, I suggest the explanation is that it is due to developmental effects of deletion of PTPMT1.

Authors attribute much of the pathology in the muscle and heart due to increased lipid accumulation in these tissues; but how do authors explain how hearts and muscle have more fat when the mice are smaller than wt? Is there a difference in energy expenditure in the mice? What about changes in white fat, core temperature or browning of fat? Authors do not mechanistically prove that lipid accumulation is the cause of death in these animals. Rescue experiments should be considered.

Public Review:

In this manuscript, Karl et al. explore mechanisms underlying the activation of the receptor tyrosine kinase FGFR1 and stimulation of intracellular signaling pathways in response to FGF4, FGF8, or FGF9 binding to the extracellular domain of FGFR1. Quantitative binding experiments presented in the manuscript demonstrate that FGF4, FGF8, and FGF9 exhibit distinct binding affinities towards FGFRs. It is also proposed that FGF8 exhibits "biased ligand" characteristics that is manifested via binding and activation FGFR1 mediated by "structural differences in the FGF- FGFR1 dimers, which impact the interactions of the FGFR1 trans membrane helices, leading to differential recruitment and activation of the downstream signaling adapter FRS2".

Major points:

1. Previous studies have demonstrated that the variability of signal transduction stimulated by different FGF family members originates from their preferential activation of different members of the FGFR family (Ornitz et al., 1996). For example, it was previously shown that members of the FGF8 subfamily preferentially activate FGFR3c, whereas members of the FGF4 subfamily activate FGFR1c more potently than other FGFs. Moreover, it was shown that FGF18, a member of the FGF8 subfamily, preferentially binds to and activates the FGFR3c isoform. Indeed, this can be seen in the data shown in Figure 3 in this manuscript, where maximum levels of FGFR1 pY653/4 and pFRS2 are reached at different concentrations when stimulated with increasing concentrations of each ligand in HEK293T cells. In order to be sure that the 'biased agonist' described in this manuscript for FGF8 binding is not caused by binding preference towards different FGFR members, the authors should present data comparing cell signaling via FGFR3c stimulated by FGF4, FGF8, and FGF9.

2. It is well-established that FGFR signaling by canonical FGF family members including FGF4, FGF8, and FGF9 is dependent on interactions of heparin or heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG) to the ligand the receptors. Differential contributions of heparin to cell signaling mediated by FGF4, FGF8, and FGF9 binding and activation of different FGFRs expressed in RCS cells as this cell express endogenous HSPG molecules. This question should be addressed by comparing cell signaling via FGFRs ectopically expressed in BAF/3 cells (which do not possess endogenous FGFRs and HSPG) stimulated by FGF4, FGF8, and FGF9 in the absence or presence of different heparin concentrations. This approach has been applied many times in the past to explore and establish the role of heparin in control of ligand induced FGFR activation. It is impossible to interpret the FGFR binding characteristics and cellular activates of FGF4, FGF8, and FGF9 in the absence of information about the role of heparin in their binding and activation.

3. It is not clear how some of the experimental data were analyzed. Blots in Figures 3A and 3B should include controls (total FGFR1 for pY653/4 and total FRS for pFRS2). How are the data shown in Figure 3C normalized? It does look like the level of phosphorylation was all normalized against the strongest signals irrespective of which ligand was used. Each data representing each ligand should be separately normalized.

4. In page 6, authors used the plot shown in Figure 3 for 'FGFR downregulation' to conclude that "the effect of FGF4 on FGFR1 downregulation is smaller when compared to the effects of FGF8 and FGF9. However, it is unclear how the data shown in the plot was normalized - none of the data seem to reach "1.0". Moreover, the plot seems to suggest that FGF4 can strongly downregulate FGFR as it can downregulate FGFR with higher potency.

5. The structural basis of FGFR1 ligand bias and the different dimeric configurations and interactions between the kinase domain of FGFR1 dimers are not warranted (Figure 6). In the absence of any structural experimental data of different forms of FGFR dimers stimulated by FGF ligands the model presents in the manuscript is speculative and misleading.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

I feel that this study has potentially high public health significance and should be made known to the public, especially the usefulness of a natural chemical product, oligomeric proanthocyanidins, in preventing SARS-CoV2 infection. The studies are very well designed, using the first 5 figures to compare carefully the effects of tannic acid, punicalagin, and oligomeric proanthocyanidins in disrupting the interaction of the virus with host cells and in inhibiting the enzymatic activity of transmembrane serine protease 2 required for viral entry. I am especially impressed by the work done in Figures 6 and 7 in which the investigators put their efforts into quantitating the amounts of oligomeric proanthocyanidins, tannic acid, and punicalagin present in the grape seed, peel, flesh as well as juice. I also appreciate the translational application in which the investigators prepared grape seed extract capsules (200 mg and 400 mg), recruited healthy human subjects to take these capsules once or twice, and showed that the sera from randomized human subjects taking grape seed extract capsules indeed exert does-dependent and time-dependent activities in suppressing the infection rate of various SARS-CoV2 variants using in vitro studies. The study in Figure 7 is indeed very well-designed and quite elegant. The manuscript is also well-written.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors of this manuscript are interested in identifying the molecular mechanisms underlying antidepressant action. Though most antidepressants target the serotonin system, regulation of glutamate neurotransmission has been associated with rapid treatment response. Here the authors find that monoaminergic targeted antidepressants are associated in some patients with expression of a small nucleolar RNA that they go on to show results in alterations to glutamate neurotransmission in a mouse model. These data offer a molecular mechanism that can link traditional monoaminergic targeted antidepressants with glutamatergic regulation and could offer a new way to estimate the efficacy of these drugs.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors generated detailed anatomical descriptions and images of the coronary vasculature of mice, quails, zebrafish, Japanese tree frogs, Japanese fire belly newt, African clawed frogs, salmon sharks, Japanese sleeper rays and bird-beak dogfish. Using this data, they are able to show anatomical similarities in the origination points of evolutionary distant vertebrates from the third to fourth brachial arch. Additionally, the authors highlight the additional presence of a coronary vascular plexuses as a unique amniote trait, since it is seen in quail and mice but not xenopus frogs. Based on the presence of the possible homologies, the authors propose that the early developmental amniotic coronary artery is a derived from the ancestral hypobrachial artery. The methods for labeling and imaging the cardiac vessels are robust and congruent with previous studies describing these structures in mice and zebrafish. The study also presents an intriguing hypothesis; however, it could benefit from a more expansive survey of vertebrate coronary diversity using an increased number of species and developmental time points. A more exhaustive surveying of vertebrate diversity is required to demonstrate that the coronary vasculature anatomy observed is from common ancestral states or novel adaptations. The author's claim that a primitive vascular plexus represents a novel amniote phenotype, is reasonable, but could benefit from further confirmation using additional species.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):<br /> <br /> Lobanov et al. investigated the effects of spatial structure in microbial communities that interact via secreted metabolites. The work builds up on a previous theoretical model by the authors that considered well-mixed populations in which different bacterial species secrete and consume different sets of metabolites, and metabolites in turn modify the growth rates of species. The model considers communities that are periodically exposed to dilutions, and the authors focus on the regime in which bacterial densities do not reach saturation before the next dilution. Analyzing the stable outcome of these dynamics through comparison with well-mixed scenarios, the authors found that space can favor species richness, especially in the case of communities with prevalent facilitative interactions. This positive effect on species coexistence is also more pronounced in situations in which species produce more kinds of metabolites than they consume. On the other hand, the positive effects on coexistence can be reversed when bacterial dispersal becomes relevant over the timescale of the simulations, as well as in cases in which the diffusion of metabolites is too slow - which could even result in less coexistence than in well-mixed scenarios. These results add to an ongoing discussion on the different ways in which spatial effects can impact microbial community dynamics and species richness.

The conclusions of this paper are mostly well supported by the data, but some aspects of the methodology and analysis need to be clarified and extended.

1) This is a model with many parameters and the manuscript should be clearer about how these parameters were used in different scenarios. It is probably a matter of rewriting the text, but I found it hard to understand which parameter values remained the same in scenarios with or without space, as well as how the strength of interactions was assigned, among a few other examples. In other cases, additional analysis (e.g. on how the spatial impact on coexistence depends on the average strength of interactions) would make the work more comprehensive.<br /> 2) To assess stable coexistence and richness, the authors use a criterium in which species have to be almost equally abundant (above 90% of the abundance of the fastest-growing species). It is not clear if the results would change significantly if potentially less abundant species would be classified as coexisting ones.<br /> 3) The majority of the results consider scenarios in which bacteria cannot disperse very effectively so bacterial dynamics is mostly driven by the growth of the initial populations at each region. Expanding on the analysis of higher dispersal rates would be valuable in order to analyze additional realistic scenarios of how bacteria grow and disperse in space.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this manuscript, Castrillon et al. analyze the heterogeneity of B cells exiting spontaneous germinal center reactions by scRNA-seq in a new mouse model of autoimmunity. In this model, they track the fate of wild-type Aid-Cre ERT2-EYFP B cells in the presence of 564 lgi B cells harboring a BCR specific for RNP. Throughout the manuscript, the authors compared the results obtained in the autoimmune model with those obtained after acute immunization with NP/OVA in Alum. They found extensive clonal overlap among dark/light zone germinal centers, memory B cells, and antibody-secreting cells (ASC). Within the ASC compartment, they found seven clusters. Through pseudotime analysis, they conclude the presence of two early ASC clusters, three intermediate ASC clusters, and two terminal ASC clusters. The two late ASCs have different patterns of gene expression (CD28, Itga4 among them), isotype expression (ASC_Late_1 mostly class-switched while ASC_Late_2 mostly IgM), and potentially different antibody-secreting capacity and metabolic program based on Ig counts and OXPHOS signature. Regarding memory B cells, they found four clusters of memory B cells with similar isotype expression (except for MemB2 which expresses more IgM) but different gene expression patterns (CD83, Fcrl5, Vim, Fcer2a). Finally, the authors found that FCRL5+ and CD23+ memory B cells are located in different areas of the spleen based on confocal microscopy analysis and their accessibility to blood after anti-CD45 iv administration. The data provided by the authors are very attractive and interesting. Yet, I found that the manuscript over relies on scRNA-seq. It will be important that authors back up some of their conclusions made from the scRNA-seq analysis with functional experiments, like measuring the differential antibody-secreting capacity of both terminal ASC subsets or profiling their metabolic status through one of the many metabolic techniques available.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This manuscript reports new findings about the role of the glutamate transporter EAAC1 in controlling neural activity in the striatum. The significance is two-fold - it addresses gaps in knowledge about the functional significance of EAAC1, as well as provides a potential explanation for how EAAC1 mutations contribute to striatal hyperexcitability and OCD-associated behaviors. The manuscript is clearly presented, and the well-designed experiments are rigorously performed and analyzed. The main results showing that EAAC1 deletion increases the dendritic arbor of MSN D1 neurons and increases excitatory synaptic connectivity, as well as reduces D1-to-D1 mediated IPSCs are convincing. These results clearly demonstrate that EAAC1 deletion can alter excitatory and inhibitory synaptic function. Modelling the potential consequences for these changes on D1 MSN neural activity, and the behavior changes are interesting. Minor weaknesses include incomplete support for the conclusions about how EAAC1 regulates GABAergic transmission.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This manuscript made use of a biologically realistic neuronal network model of cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic (CBGT) circuits and a cognitive drift-diffusion model (DDM) to account for both behavioural and functional neuroimaging (fMRI) data and to understand how change in reward contingency in the environment can affect different decision dynamics. They found that the rate of evidence accumulation was most affected, allowing explorative behaviour with a lower drift rate during likely contingency change and exploitative behaviour with a higher drift rate when contingency was likely similar. The multi-pronged approach presented in the manuscript is commendable. The biophysical model was sufficiently realistic with varying ramping firing rates of spiny projection neurons linked to the varying drift rates in the DDM. However, there are a few concerns regarding this work.

The model's cortical neurons had no contralateral encoding, unlike their neuroimaging data. Another concern with this work is that it was unclear why the spiking neuronal network model with so many model parameters was used to account for coarse-scale fMRI data - a simple firing-rate neural population model would perhaps do the work. Moreover, the activity dynamics of the fMRI were not shown. It would have been more rigorous to show the fMRI (BOLD) signals in different (particularly CBGT) brain regions and compare that with the CBGT model simulations.

The association between classier uncertainty and drift rate (by participants) was an order of magnitude difference between the simulated and actual participants (compare Figure 2E with Figure 4B). There was also a weak effect on human reaction times (Supp. Fig. 2).

There were only 4 human participants that performed the experiment - the results would perhaps be better with more human participants.

For such a complex biophysical computational model, there could perhaps have been more model predictions provided.

Overall, this work is interesting and could potentially be a good contribution in the area of computational modelling and neuroscience of adaptive choice behaviour.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this manuscript, Modi et al present a novel method to analyze brain oscillations. Traditional approaches are typically based on analyzing spectral features on individual oscillations (univariate methods) or the power and phase relationship between two oscillations (bivariate methods). The authors take a different, multivariate, approach to simultaneously analyze interactions between multiple oscillations. This is a better way to study dynamics interactions in a complex system than the more traditional 'reductionist' approach and, so far, few methods exist that allow such multivariate analysis of neural oscillations. The method is well demonstrated in the paper, including several application cases. Several aspects of the results need to be better characterized, a clear discussion of the caveats and limitations of the method is lacking and the advantages over existing methods need to be outlined more clearly. Provided these issues are corrected I believe this would be an important contribution to the field that may have multiple applications.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This manuscript by Bohannon et al. continues a line of work from the Larsson laboratory with fundamental contributions describing the effects of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) on the cardiac delayed rectifier potassium channel (IKs) formed by Kv7.1 and KCNE1 heteromers. Although the activating effect of PUFAs on these specific channels has been previously described, the authors now present a novel finding related to PUFAs containing large aromatic tyrosine head groups, showing significant activation effects on IKs, larger than other PUFAs previously studied. A combination of site-directed mutagenesis, electrophysiological and pharmacological approaches are used to dissect the different molecular mechanisms and sites involved in the functional interactions. The main conclusions are: 1) PUFA analogues with Tyr head groups are strong activators of the cardiac IKs channel by action on two previously described mechanisms: left-shift of the voltage-activation curve (by interaction with the voltage-sensor region of Kv7.1); and increased Gmax (by interacting with the pore region). 2) the underlying molecular interactions between PUFA and Kv7.1 are not cation-pi, as shown by the lack of effect of different chemical variations that disrupt the electrostatic surface potential. 3) the presence of electronegative groups on the aromatic ring favors increases in the maximal conductance. 4) the generation of a hydrogen bond with the -OH on the Tyr group seems to selectively impact on IKs voltage dependence of activation. 4) Kv7.1 sites involved in interactions with aromatic PUFAs are similar to the ones previously described for non-aromatic PUFAS, that is: R231 in S4 and K326 in S6. 5) residue T224 is newly identified as a potential site forming a hydrogen bond between the Tyr in the aromatic PUFA and Kv7.1.

The manuscript is very well written and structured. The experiments are solid and lead to mostly well-grounded conclusions. There are some aspects that would benefit from some clarification, which are mainly related to the different effects of the aromatic PUFA variants on IKs voltage dependence and/or conductance.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study the authors investigate whether a presumably allosteric P2RX7 activating compound that they previously discovered reduces fibrosis in a bleomycin mouse model. They chose this particular model as publicly available mRNA data indicate that the P2XR7 pathway is downregulated in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients compared to control individuals. The authors first demonstrate that two proxies of lung damage, Ashcroft score and collagen fibers, are significantly reduced in the bleomycin model on HEI3090 treatment. Additional data implicate specific immune cell infiltrates and cytokines, namely inflammatory macrophages and damped release of IL-17A, as potential mechanistic links between their compound and reduced fibrosis. Finally, the researchers transplant splenocytes from WT, NLRP3-KO, and IL-18-KO mice into animals lacking the P2XR7 receptor to specifically ascertain how the transplanted splenocytes, which are WT for P2XR7 receptor, respond to HEI3090 (a P2XR7 agonist). Based on these results, the authors conclude that HEI3090 enhanced IL-18 production through the P2XR7-NLRP3 inflammasome axis to dampen fibrosis.

These findings could be interesting to the field, as there are conflicting results as to whether NLRP3 activation contributes to fibrosis and if so, at what stage(s) (e.g., acute damage phase versus progression). However, major weaknesses of the study include inconsistent and small effect sizes in key outcomes used to measure fibrosis, small animal cohorts that do not empower results, and lack of key experimental controls. For example, damage indicators for the vehicle-treated mice transplanted with splenocytes of various genetic background are markedly different, and there are no statistical tests of these effects because the data are presented as separate graphs. Moreover, the fundamental assumption that HEI3090 acts specifically through the P2XR7 pathway in this model is questionable, as P2XR7 knockout mice are not included in the initial key experiments. These issues must be addressed as stimulating an inflammasome response might lead to pathogenic inflammation, which could counterproductively exacerbate fibrosis in the clinic and harm people.

Experimental concerns:

1. Ashcroft method quantification throughout is outdated and prone to bias. The methods describing quantification are lacking, and only include a citation: there should be mention of researcher blinding, etc. In general, please re-quantify using an automated classifier, and consider staining for additional markers of lung damage that are appropriate in the field.

2. For Figure 2, P2XR7 knockout mice, and an additional P2XR7 activator, should be included (e.g, A74003, AZ10606120, others), to support the hypothesis that HEI3090 acts through this pathway to alleviate fibrosis. Moreover, these data are especially important as the author's conclusions are directly opposed to a previous study demonstrating that the P2XR7 receptor is required for inflammation/fibrosis in this model system (PMID: 20522787). Two-way ANOVA or similar statistical tests on all groups should be examined to see whether genetic knockout of this DAMP receptor alone is protective or exacerbates fibrosis (e.g., comparing the vehicle-alone groups), and whether compounds exert a specific effect through this receptor.

3. Fig. 3A: Please show the individual IFN/IL-17A plots in the supplement, as a ratiometric result might mask variance. Moreover, please conduct a statistical test for the outlier in the HEI3090 condition (to potentially remove it), as this sole data point might skew the entire mean, causing the observed statistical difference between means despite a very modest change. If the results are still significant, please comment on effect size.

4. Fig. 3: How is IL-17A measured and what is the abbreviation GMFI?

5. Fig. 3E: It's unclear how the left and right figures align-it looks like the gates are 45.8 % and 25 %, respectively, but the means on the right are between 2-3%. Also, is this effect size (2 versus 3 %) significant biologically?

6. For Figure 4B-G, the Ashcroft scores for the vehicle mice treated with HEI3090 are at entirely different starting points following adoptive transfer of cells with different genetic background. In Fig. 1, WT mice have starting scores of around 3 following the induction of fibrosis, with a modest decrease of about 0.8 following HEI3090 treatment. Here, there is a much greater effect of the genetic background itself rather than the treatment, with the IL-18 knockout mice having a much lower baseline "vehicle" score (~1) compared to Fig. 1F (both of which are 14 day treatments). In fact, adoptive transfer of WT splenocytes start at a baseline of 1.8 here, which is much lower than Fig. 1F, and NLRP3-KO splenocytes score nearly the same as Fig. 1F following BLM treatment, with a modest reduction following treatment with HEI3090. Please analyze all of these groups together with appropriate multiple hypothesis testing to examine the effect of the genetic background, and please comment on why IL-18-knockout splenocytes might be protective at vehicle baseline while NLRP3-knockout splenocytes might exacerbate the phenotype at vehicle baseline.

7. The variance on Supplemental Figure 5C is quite large. These data have a decrease in mean Ashcroft score between untreated and HEI3090 treatment of around 0.8, which is similar to the WT mice in Figure 1. This is very concerning, as the underlying assumption is that KO of the protein required for HEI3090's on-target effect would completely ablate response, and this would be required for the subsequent adoptive transfer experiments in Figure 4. Please conduct power analysis, comment, and provide additional evidence (other than Ashcroft score).

8. Figure 4: Should quantify collagen fibers or have an additional quantitative metric for lung damage, as in Fig. 2C/J.

9. Figure 4: Should group the quantification of C/E/G and perform a 2-way Anova to assess effects of genetic background versus treatment.

10. Fig. 4H, Supplemental Fig. 6D: Is it reasonable to expect differences in IL-1beta and IL-18 in sera compared to in lung tissue itself?

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study, Satake and colleagues endeavored to explore the rates and patterns of somatic mutations in wild plants, with a focus on their relationship to longevity. The researchers examined slow- and fast-growing tropical tree species, demonstrating that slow-growing species exhibited five times more mutations than their fast-growing counterparts. The number of somatic mutations was found to increase linearly with branch length. Interestingly, the somatic mutation rate per meter was higher in slow-growing species, but the rate per year remained consistent across both species. A closer inspection revealed a prevalence of clock-like spontaneous mutations, specifically cytosine-to-thymine substitutions at CpG sites. The author suggested that somatic mutations were identified as neutral within an individual, but subject to purifying selection when transmitted to subsequent generations. The authors developed a model to assess the influence of cell division on mutational processes, suggesting that cell-division independent mutagenesis is the primary mechanism.

The authors have gathered valuable data on somatic mutations, particularly regarding differences in growth rates among trees. Their meticulous computational analysis led to fascinating conclusions, primarily that most somatic mutations accumulate in a cell-division independent manner. The discovery of a molecular clock in somatic mutations significantly advances our comprehension of mutational processes that may generate genetic diversity in tropical ecosystems. The interpretation of the data appears to be based on the assumption that somatic mutations can be effectively transmitted to the next generation unless negative selection intervenes. However, accumulating evidence suggests that plants may also possess "effective germlines," which could render the somatic mutations detected in this study non-transmittable to progeny. Incorporating additional analyses/discussion in the context of plant developmental biology, particularly recent studies on cell lineage, could further enhance this study.

Specifically, several recent studies address the topics of effective germline in plants. For instance, Robert Lanfear published an article in PLoS Biology exploring the fundamental question, "Do plants have a segregated germline?" A study in PNAS posited that "germline replications and somatic mutation accumulation are independent of vegetative life span in Arabidopsis." A phylogenetic-based analysis titled "Rates of Molecular Evolution Are Linked to Life History in Flowering Plants" discovered that "rates of molecular evolution are consistently low in trees and shrubs, with relatively long generation times, as compared with related herbaceous plants, which generally have shorter generation times." Another compelling study, "The architecture of intra-organism mutation rate variation in plants," published in PLoS Biology, detected somatic mutations in peach trees and strawberries. Although some of these studies are cited in the current work, a deeper examination of the findings in relation to the existing literature would strengthen the interpretation of the data.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The manuscript by Hayes et al. explored the potential of combining chromosomal instability with macrophage phagocytosis to enhance tumor clearance of B16-F10 melanoma. However, the manuscript suffers from substandard experimental design, some contradictory conclusions, and a lack of viable therapeutic effects.

The authors suggest that early-stage chromosomal instability (CIN) is a vulnerability for tumorigenesis, CD47-SIRPa interactions prevent effective phagocytosis, and opsonization combined with inhibition of the CD47-SIRPa axis can amplify tumor clearance. While these interactions are important, the experimental methodology used to address them is lacking.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The study by Ding et al demonstrated that microbial metabolite I3A reduced western diet induced steatosis and inflammation mice. They showed that I3A mediates its anti-inflammatory activities through AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-dependent manner in macrophages. Translationally, they proposed that I3A could be a potential therapeutic molecule in preventing the progression of steatosis to NASH.

Major strengths<br /> • Authors clearly demonstrated that the Western Diet (WD)-induced steatosis and I3A treatment reduced steatosis and inflammation in pre-clinical models. Data clearly supports these statements.<br /> • I3A treatment rescued WD-altered bile acids as well partially rescued the metabolome, proteome in the liver.<br /> • I3A treatment reduced the levels of enzymes in fatty acid transport, de novo lipogenesis and β-oxidation<br /> • I3A mediates its anti-inflammatory activities through AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-dependent manner in macrophages.

Minor Weakness<br /> Although data strongly support the notion that I3A reduced WD-induced steatosis and I3A treatment reduced steatosis and inflammation, the following concerns need to be addressed.<br /> • Authors suggested that I3A anti-inflammatory activities do not require AhR by using AhR-inhibitor in RAW cell lines. In the literature, studies do show that RAW cells do respond to AhR ligands such as TCDD and FICZ.<br /> • AhR-dependency needs to be confirmed by bone marrow derived macrophages isolated from AhR+/+ and AhR-/- or siRNA/ShRNA knockdown experiments.<br /> • Utilization of known AhR ligands as controls will strengthen the interpretation of the conclusions.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This is an interesting study by Pinos and colleagues that examines the effect of beta carotene on atherosclerosis regression. The authors have previously shown that beta carotene reduces atherosclerosis progress and hepatic lipid metabolism, and now they seek to extend these findings by feeding mice a diet with excess beta carotene in a model of atherosclerosis regression (LDLR antisense oligo plus Western diet followed by LDLR sense oligo and chow diet). They show some metrics of lesion regression are increased upon beta carotene feeding (collagen content) while others remain equal to normal chow diet (macrophage content and lesion size). These effects are lost when beta carotene oxidase (BCO) is deleted. The study adds to the existing literature that beta carotene protects from atherosclerosis in general, and adds new information regarding regulatory T-cells. However, the study does not present significant evidence about how beta-carotene is affecting T-cells in atherosclerosis. For the most part, the conclusions are supported by the data presented, and the work is completed in multiple models, supporting its robustness. However there are a few areas that require additional information or evidence to support their conclusions and/or to align with the previously published work.

Specific additional areas of focus for the authors:<br /> The premise of the story is that b-carotene is converted into retinoic acid, which acts as a ligand of the RAR transcription factor in T-regs. The authors measure hepatic markers of retinoic acid signaling (retinyl esters, Cyp26a1 expression) but none of these are measured in the lesion, which calls into question the conclusion that Tregs in the lesion are responsible for the regression observed with b-carotene supplementation.

There does not appear to be a strong effect of Tregs on the b-carotene induced pro-regression phenotype presented in Figure 5. The only major CD25+ cell dependent b-carotene effect is on collagen content, which matches with the findings in Figure 1 +2. This mechanistically might be very interesting and novel, yet the authors do not investigate this further or add any additional detail regarding this observation. This would greatly strengthen the study and the novelty of the findings overall as it relates to b-carotene and atherosclerosis.

The title indicates that beta-carotene induces Treg 'expansion' in the lesion, but this is not measured in the study.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study, Kim et al. investigated the mechanism by which uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate (IS) induces trained immunity, resulting in augmented pro-inflammatory cytokine production such as TNF and IL-6. The authors claim that IS treatment induced epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming, and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)-mediated arachidonic acid pathway is required for establishing trained immunity in human monocytes. They also demonstrated that uremic sera from end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients can generate trained immunity in healthy control-derived monocytes.

These are interesting results that introduce the important new concept of trained immunity and its importance in showing endogenous inflammatory stimuli-induced innate immune memory. Additional evidence proposing that IS plays a critical role in the initiation of inflammatory immune responses in patients with CKD is also interesting and a potential advance of the field. This study is in large part well done, but some components of the study are still incomplete and additional efforts are required to nail down the main conclusions.

Specific comments:<br /> 1) Of greatest concern, there are concerns about the rigor of these experiments, whether the interpretation and conclusions are fully supported by the data. 1) Although many experiments have been sporadically conducted in many fields such as epigenetic, metabolic regulation, and AhR signaling, the causal relationship between each mechanism is not clear. 2) Throughout the manuscript, no distinction was made between the group treated with IS for 6 days and the group treated with the second LPS (addressed below). 3) Besides experiments using non-specific inhibitors, genetic experiments including siRNA or KO mice should be examined to strengthen and justify central suggestions.<br /> 2) The authors showed that IS-trained monocytes showed no change in TNF or IL-6, but increased the expression levels of TNF and IL-6 in response to the second LPS (Fig. 1B). This suggests that the different LPS responsiveness in IS-trained monocytes caused altered gene expression of TNF and IL-6. However, the authors also showed that IS-trained monocytes without LPS stimulation showed increased levels of H3K4me3 at the TNF and IL-6 loci, as well as highly elevated ECAR and OCR, leading to no changes in TNF and IL-6. Therefore, it is unclear why or how the epigenetic and metabolic states of IS-trained monocytes induce different LPS responses. For example, increased H3K4me3 in HK2 and PFKP is important for metabolic rewiring, but why increased H3K4me3 in TNF and IL6 does not affect gene expression needs to be explained.<br /> 3) The authors used human monocytes cultured in human serum without growth factors such as MCSF for 5-6 days. When we consider the short lifespan of monocytes (1-3 days), the authors need to explain the validity of the experimental model.<br /> 4) The authors' ELISA results clearly showed increased levels of TNF and IL-6 proteins, but it is well established that LPS-induced gene expression of TNF and IL-6 in monocytes peaked within 1-4 hours and returned to baseline by 24 hours. Therefore, authors need to investigate gene expression at appropriate time points.<br /> 5) It is a highly interesting finding that IS induces trained immunity via the AhR pathway. The authors also showed that the pretreatment of FICZ, an AhR agonist, was good enough to induce trained immunity in terms of the expression of TNF and IL-6. However, from this point of view, the authors need to discuss why trained immunity was not affected by kynurenic acid (KA), which is a well-known AhR ligand accumulated in CKD and has been reported to be involved in innate immune memory mechanisms (Fig. S1A).<br /> 6) The authors need to clarify the role of IL-10 in IS-trained monocytes. IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine that can be modulated by AhR, whose expression (Fig. 1E, Fig. 4D) may explain the inflammatory cytokine expression of IS-trained monocytes.<br /> 7) The authors need to show H3K4me3 levels in TNF and IL6 genes in all conditions in one figure. (Fig. 2B). Comparing Fig. 2B and Fig. S2B, H3K4me3 does not appear to be increased at all by LPS in the IL6 region.<br /> 8) The authors need to address the changes of H3K4me3 in the presence of MTA.<br /> 9) Interpretation of ChIP-seq results is not entirely convincing due to doubts about the quality of sequencing results. First, authors need to provide information on the quality of ChIP-seq data in reliable criteria such as Encode Pipeline. It should also provide representative tracks of H3K4me3 in the TNF and IL-6 genes (Fig. 2F). And in Fig. 2F, the author showed the H3K4me3 track of replicates, but the results between replicates were very different, so there are concerns about reproducibility. Finally, the authors need to show the correlation between ChIP-seq (Fig. 2) and RNA-seq (Fig. 5).<br /> 10) AhR changes in the cell nucleus should be provided (Fig. 4A).<br /> 11) Do other protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs), such as PCS, HA, IAA, and KA, change the mRNA expression of ALOX5, ALOX5AP, and LTB4R1? In the absence of genetic studies, it is difficult to be certain of the ALOX5-related mechanism claimed by the authors.<br /> 12) Fig.6 is based on the correlated expression of inflammatory genes or AA pathway genes. It does not clarify any mechanisms the authors claimed in the previous figures.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The manuscript by Park et. al. examines the interaction of macrophages with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and subsequent inflammatory reactions. The authors demonstrate that following intranasal delivery of spike it rapidly accumulates in alveolar macrophages. Inflammation associated with internalized spike recruits neutrophils to the lung, where they undergo a cell death process consistent with NETosis. The authors demonstrate that modifications spike to contain high mannose reduces uptake of spike protein and limits the inflammation induced. This finding could have implications on vaccine development, as vaccines containing modified spike could be safer and better tolerated.

The authors use a number of different techniques, including in vivo modeling, imaging, human and murine systems to interrogate their hypotheses. These systems provide robust supporting information for their conclusions. There are two key aspects from the current manuscript which would add key evidence. The authors suggest that neutrophils exposed to spike protein undergo a process of NETosis. To confirm this hypothesis inhibitors of NETosis should be used to demonstrate that the cell death is prevented. Additionally, vaccination of a murine model with the modified spike protein would add additional support to the conclusion that modified spike protein would be less inflammatory while maintaining its utility as a vaccine antigen.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In the present work the authors explore the molecular driving events involved in the establishment of constitutive heterochromatin during embryo development. The experiments have been carried out in a very accurate manner and clearly fulfill the proposed hypotheses.

Regarding the methodology, the use of: i) an efficient system for conversion of ESCs to 2C-like cells by Dux overexpression; ii) a global approach through IPOTD that reveals the chromatome at each stage of development and iii) the STORM technology that allows visualization of DNA decompaction at high resolution, helps to provide clear and comprehensive answers to the conclusion raised.

The contribution of the present work to the field is very important as it provides valuable information on chromatin-bound proteins at key stages of embryonic development that may help to understand other relevant processes beyond heterochromatin maintenance.

The study could be improved through a more mechanistic approach that focuses on how SMARCAD1 and TOPBP1 cooperate and how they functionally connect with H3K9me3, HP1b and heterochromatin regulation during embryonic development. For example, addressing why topoisomerase activity is required or whether it connects (or not) to SWI/SNF function and the latter to heterochromatin establishment, are questions that would help to understand more deeply how SMARCAD1 and TOPBP1 operate in embryonic development.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The paper from Hsu and co-workers describes a new automated method for analyzing the cell wall peptidoglycan composition of bacteria using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LC/MS) combined with newly developed analysis software. The work has great potential for determining the composition of bacterial cell walls from diverse bacteria in high-throughput, allowing new connections between cell wall structure and other important biological functions like cell morphology or host-microbe interactions to be discovered. In general, I find the paper to be well written and the methodology described to be useful for the field. However, there are areas where the details of the workflow could be clarified. I also think the claims connecting cell wall structure and stiffness of the cell surface are relatively weak. The text for this topic would benefit from a more thorough discussion of the weak points of the argument and a toning down of the conclusions drawn to make them more realistic.

Specific points:

1) It was unclear to me from reading the paper whether or not prior knowledge of the peptidoglycan structure of an organism is required to build the "DBuilder" database for muropeptides. Based on the text as written, I was left wondering whether bacterial samples of unknown cell wall composition could be analyzed with the methods described, or whether some preliminary characterization of the composition is needed before the high-throughput analysis can be performed. The paper would be significantly improved if this point were explicitly addressed in the main text.

2) The potential connection between the structure of different cell walls from bifidobacteria and cell stiffness is pretty weak. The cells analyzed are from different strains such that there are many possible reasons for the change in physical measurements made by AFM. I think this point needs to be explicitly addressed in the main text. Given the many possible explanations for the observed measurement differences (lines 445-448, for example), the authors could remove this portion of the paper entirely. Conclusions relating cell wall composition to stiffness would be best drawn from a single strain of bacteria genetically modified to have an altered content of 3-3 crosslinks.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this manuscript, "Diminishing neuronal acidification by channelrhodopsins with low proton conduction" by Hayward and colleagues, the authors report on the properties of novel optogenetic tools, PsCatCh2.0 and ChR2-3M, that minimize photo-induced acidification. The authors point out that acidification is an undesirable side-effect of many optogenetic approaches that could be minimized using the new tools. ChRs are known to acidify cells, while Arch are known to alkalize cells. This becomes particularly important when optical stimulation is prolonged and pH changes can become significant. pH is known to affect neuronal excitability, vesicular release, and more. To develop novel optogenetic tools with minimal proton conductances, the authors combined channelrhodopsin stimulation with a red-shifted pH sensor to measure pH during optogenetic stimulation. The authors report that optogenetic activation of CheRiff caused slow cellular acidification. 150 seconds of illumination caused a 3-fold increase in protons or approximately a 0.6 unit pH change that returned to baseline very slowly. They also found that pH changes occurred more rapidly, and recovered more rapidly, in dendrites. The authors go on to robustly characterize PsCatCh2.0 and ChR2-3M in terms of their proton conductances, photocurrent, kinetics, and more. They convincingly show that these constructs induced reduced acidification while maintaining robust photocurrents. In sum, this manuscript shows important findings that convincingly characterizes 2 optogenetic tools that have reduced pH artifacts that may be of broad interest to the field of neuroscience research and optogenetic therapies.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The blood-brain barrier separates neural tissue from blood-borne factors and is important for maintaining central nervous system health and function. Endothelial cells are the site of the barrier. These cells exhibit unique features relative to peripheral endothelium and a unique pattern of gene expression. There remains much to be learned about how the transcriptome of brain endothelial cells is established in development and maintained throughout life.

The manuscript by Sadanandan, Thomas et al. investigates this question by examining transcriptional and epigenetic changes in brain endothelial cells in embryonic and adult mice. Changes in transcript levels and histone marks for various BBB-relevant transcripts, including Cldn5, Mfsd2a and Zic3 were observed between E13.5 and adult mice. To perform these experiments, endothelial cells were isolated from E13.5 and adult mice, then cultured in vitro, then sequenced. This approach is problematic. It is well-established that brain endothelial cells rapidly lose their organotypic features in culture (https://elifesciences.org/articles/51276). Indeed, one of the primary genes investigated in this study, Cldn1, exhibits very low expression at the transcript level in vivo but is strongly upregulated in cultured ECs.

(https://elifesciences.org/articles/36187 ; https://markfsabbagh.shinyapps.io/vectrdb/)

This undermines the conclusions of the study.

An additional concern is that for many experiments, siRNA knockdowns are performed without validation of the efficacy of the knockdown.

Some experiments in the paper are promising, however. For example, the knockout of HDAC2 in endothelial cells resulting in BBB leakage was striking. Investigating the mechanisms underlying this phenotype in vivo could yield important insights.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01358/full

The Pastoral Origin of Semiotically Functional Tonal Organization of Music Nikolsky, A. 2020

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The paper describes a robotic system that can be used for prolonged recording of forced activity in crawling Drosophila larvae. This is mostly intended to be a proof of principle description of a tool potentially useful for the community. The system - whose value lies completely in its reproducibility and adoption - is only superficially described in the paper, but a more detailed description is made available through Github, along with the software used for the collection and analysis of data.

There is good, convincing evidence this can work as some sort of "larval conveyor belt", used to artificially prolong food crawling behaviour in the animals. More could be said about the ecological implications of the assay (for instance: how relevant is it to an animal's natural behaviour? Does the system introduce artifactual distortions in the analysis, driven by the fact that animals crawl greater distances than they would normally crawl in nature? Will this extensive activity affect their development to pupation or adulthood?).

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This manuscript provides a structural analysis of bushy cells in the mouse cochlear nucleus. The analysis uses volume electron microscopy techniques to describe bushy cell-auditory nerve synapses and bushy cell dendrites. The analysis takes a morphological analysis of bushy cells to a new level, and the computational modeling is well done. The models are used to predict busy cell behavior, which leads to a major concern. The authors make reasonable assertions, but all of these need to be validated by electrophysiological studies before they can be treated as fact. Instead, they should be treated as predictions. For example, in the conclusions from the model section, that endbulb size does not strictly predict synaptic efficacy should be modified from an assertion to a prediction.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Ichinose et al., utilize a mixture of cultured hippocampal neurons and non-neuronal cells to identify the role of the transmembrane protein teneurin-2 (TEN-2) in the formation of inhibitory synapses along the dendritic shaft. First, they identify distinct clusters of gephyrin that are either actin-rich, microtubule-rich or contain neither actin nor microtubules and find that TEN-2 is enriched in microtubule-rich gephyrin clusters. This leads the authors to hypothesize that TEN-2 recruits microtubules (MTs) through the plus end binding protein EB1 when successfully matched with a pre-synaptic partner, and perform a variety of experiments to test this hypothesis. The authors then extend this finding to state quite strongly throughout the paper, including in the title, that TEN-2 acts as a signpost for the unloading of cargo from motor proteins without providing any supporting evidence. They use previous work to justify this conclusion, but without actual experiments to back up the claim, it seems like a reach.

The strength of the paper lies in the various lines of evidence that the authors employ to assess the role of TEN-2 in MT recruitment and synaptogenesis. They have also been very thorough in validating the expression and functionality of various knock-in constructs, knock-down vectors and antibodies that were generated during the study. However, there are some discrepancies in the findings that have not been addressed satisfactorily, as well as some instances where the data presented is not of sufficient quality to support the conclusions derived from them.<br /> 1. The emphasis placed on the clustering analysis presented in figure 1 and the two associated supplementary figures is puzzling, since the conclusion derived from the results presented would be that Neuroligin 2 (NLGN2) is the strongest candidate to test for a relationship to MT recruitment at inhibitory post synapses. Instead, the authors cite prior evidence to exclude NLGN2 from subsequent analysis and choose to focus on TEN2 instead.<br /> 2. It is difficult to reach the same conclusion as the authors from the images and intensity plot shown on Figure 2 E and F. While there seems to be an obvious reduction in expression levels between the TEN2N-L and TEN2TM constructs, neither seem to co-localize with EB1.<br /> 3. The authors mimic the activity of TEN-2 at the inhibitory post synapse in non-neuronal cells by immobilizing HA- tagged TEN constructs in COS-7 cells as a proxy for synaptic partner matching. Using this model, they find that by immobilizing TEN2N-L, which contains EB1 binding motifs, MTs are excluded from the cell periphery (Figure 3D). This contradicts their conclusion that MTs are recruited through EB1 by TEN-2 on synaptic partner matching. Later in the paper, when they use the same TEN2N-L construct as a dominant negative in neuronal cells, they find that MTs are recruited the membrane, even if TEN2N-L is not immobilized by synaptic partner matching (Figure 6C). Taken together, these findings call into question the sequence of events driven by TEN-2 during synaptogenesis.<br /> 4. It is unclear how the authors could conclude that TEN-2 is at the semi-periphery (?) of inhibitory post synapses from the STORM data that is presented in the paper. Figure 4D and 4F show comparisons of Bassoon and TEN-2 localization vs TEN-2 and gephyrin, but the image quality is not sufficient to adequately portray a strong distinction in the distance of center of mass, which is also only depicted for the TEN2-Gephyrin pair and not the TEN2-Bassoon pair in Figure 4J.<br /> 5. The authors do not satisfactorily explain why gephyrin appears to have completely disappeared in the TEN2N-L condition (Figure 6A), instead of appearing uniformly distributed as one would expect if MTs are indiscriminately recruited to the membrane by the dominant negative construct that remains unanchored.<br /> 6. In a similar critique to that of Figure 2E and F, the distinction that the authors wish to portray between the effect of TEN2TM and TEN2N-L constructs on EGFP-TEN-2 and MAP2 colocalization (Figure 6 E and F) appear to be driven by a difference in overall expression levels of EGFP-TEN2 rather that a true difference in localization of TEN-2 and MTs.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Wu et al. sought to investigate the biological role of GPR110 in modulating hepatic lipid metabolism. The authors demonstrate a pathological role of GPR110 in promoting hepatic steatosis and generalized metabolic syndrome in a mouse model of diet-induced obesity. Furthermore, the authors identify enhanced SCD1 expression as an underlying mechanism promoting GPR110-induced metabolic dysfunction. Finally, the authors provide clinically relevant human data demonstrating a positive correlation between GPR110 expression and degree of hepatic steatosis. The strengths of this study include the rigorous design and execution of experiments, the utilization of gain and loss of function as well as pharmacological and genetic approaches, and the clinically relevant human data presented. The claims are supported by robust data. These findings have the potential to impact the field of metabolism in general, given their findings indicate targeting GPR110 can reverse diet induced obesity and metabolic syndrome. Only minor weaknesses were noted in regard to further interpretation of the data.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The first defined that FAM76B inhibited the NF-κB-mediated inflammation by modulating translocation of hnRNPA2B1 to cytosol, where hnRNPA2B1 bound to IKK and released active NFkB that translocated into nuclear and initiated inflammation.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors have investigated the effect of aerobic exercise on the decline in cerebral blood flow and cognitive function in old mice. Using appropriately two-photon microscopy and optical coherence tomography they found that aerobic exercise restored capillary blood flow and oxygenation in the white matter more than in the grey matter in old female mice. Interestingly, this aerobic exercise also ameliorated cognitive performance in these mice. The data obtained strongly supports the hypothesis and supports the conclusion of the study. Nevertheless, it would be important to compare the effects of aerobic exercise in old mice to its effects in young animals. It will be also interesting to know if the protective effect of exercise is similar in male mice.

This work brings new insights into the comprehension of the age-associated changes in cerebral microcirculation and in the protective effects of aerobic exercise.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The manuscript by Huang, Li, et al. describes the identification of variants in the gene coding for p31 comet, a protein required for silencing the spindle assembly checkpoint or SAC, in women with recurrent pregnancy loss upon IVF. In three families mutations affecting splicing or expression of full-length protein were identified. The authors show that oocytes of the patients arrest in meiosis I, are most likely to fail to inactivate the SAC without a fully functional p31 comet. Indeed, the metaphase I arrest occurring in mouse oocytes upon overexpression of Mad2 can be rescued by overexpression of wild-type p31 comet, but not a truncated version. Injection of wt p31 comet into 6 human oocytes from one patient rescued the meiosis I arrest.

Main points:

The fact that inactivation of the SAC is required for anaphase I onset in human oocytes is not novel. Biallelic mutations of TRIP13 were shown to lead to the same phenotype (Zhang et al. Am J. Hum Gen., 2020).

No new mechanistic insights are obtained.

The authors propose a role for female fertility, however, also a male patient with a p31 comet variant is sterile.

The fact that the C-terminus of p31 comet is required for interaction with Mad2 and hence, turning off the SAC, is already known.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This work reports an important demonstration of how to predict the mutational pathways to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) emergence, particularly in the enzyme DHFR (dihydrofolate reductase). Epistasis, or non-additive effects of mutations due to their background dependence, is a major confounding factor in the predictability of protein evolution, including proteins that confer antimicrobial resistance. In the first approach, they used the Rosetta to predict the mutant DHFR-drug binding affinity and the resulting selection coefficient, which then became inputs to a population genetics model. In the second approach, they use the observed clinical/environmental frequency of the variants to estimate the selection coefficient. Overall, this work is a compelling demonstration that a mechanistic model of the fitness landscape could recapitulate AMR evolution; however, considering that the number of mutations and pathways is small, a more compelling description of the robustness of the results and/or limitations of the model is needed.

Major strengths:<br /> 1. This is a compelling multi-disciplinary work that combines a mechanistic fitness landscape of DHFR (previously articulated in literature and cited by the authors), Rosetta to determine the biophysical effects of mutations, and a population genetics model.<br /> 2. The study takes advantage of extensive data on the clinical/environmental prevalence of DHFR mutations.<br /> 3. Provides a careful review of the surrounding literature.

Major weakness:<br /> 1. Considering that the number of mutations and pathways being recapitulated is rather small, I would suggest a more detailed description of the robustness of the results. For example:<br /> a. Please report the P-value for the correlation of the predicted DDG_{binding, theory} and DDG_{binding, experimental}. If interested in showing the correct assignment of mutational effects, perhaps use a contingency matrix to derive a P-value.<br /> b. Although the DDG_binding calculation in Rosetta seems to converge (Appendix figures 3 and 4), I do not think the DDG values before equilibration should be included in the final DDG estimate. In practice, there is a "burn in" number of runs where the force field optimizes the calculation to account for potential clashes in the structure, etc. This is particularly important since the starting structures are modeled from homology. Consequently, the distributions of DDG that include the equilibration runs are multimodal (Appendix figure 2), which means that calculating an average may be inappropriate.<br /> 2. The geographical areas over which the mutational pathways are independently estimated are not isolated, allowing for the potential that an AMR variant in one region arose due to "migration" from another area. For example, the S58R-S117N is the most frequent double mutant of PvDHFR in geographically proximate Southern/Southeastern Asia (Fig. 4). To a certain extent, similar mutational patterns occur for PfDHFR in Southern/Southeastern Asia (Fig. 3). Although accounting for mutant migration in the model may be beyond the scope of the study, a clear argument for the validity of the "isolated island" assumption is needed.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This work develops new and improved methods for tracking and quantifying yeast cells in time-lapse microscopy. Overall, the manuscript presents exceedingly clever solutions to many practical data analysis problems that arise in microfluidics, some of which may be useful in other image analysis settings.

I find the manuscript is at times very dense and technical and is missing context for a general audience. Hard to know what are the most important contributions, and the authors assume the reader is familiar with many details of their previous work/field. Claims are made with little explanation, context or scientific logic.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are emerging as important mediators of cell-to-cell signaling. In this paper the authors aim to demonstrate that Stranded at second (Sas), a Drosophila cell surface protein, binds to dArc1 and Ptp10D to mediate intercellular transport of dArc1 via EVs. dArc1 protein has been shown to form virus-like capsids that carry dArc1 mRNA from neurons to muscle, but little is known about this new intercellular communication pathway. Similarly, not much is known generally about how EVs are targeted to specific cell types, or how specific EV cargo can be delivered. Thus, this work is of interest to cell biologists and neuroscientists. However, the jumbled description of the results and general lack of rigor of experiments diminish the impact and interpretability of the conclusions. Moreover, almost all experiments rely on gain-of-function and over-expression of Sas, thus the relevance to normal physiological signaling is unclear.

Major strengths:<br /> 1. The data showing that Sas is released into EVs and delivered to cells is strong.<br /> 2. The EM data showing Sas localization to EVs is clear.

Major weaknesses:<br /> The description of the results omits some data in the figures and is not in a logical order. This made it hard to read and follow. There is also a lack of rigor and quantification in some experiments. Specifically:

1. Figure 2: Description of dArc1 putative capsids is absent from the results section (2f,g) until describing fig 4 data (line 362). Given that there is no immuno-EM labeling of dArc1 protein, it is not clear if Sas and dArc1 are localized to the same EVs. Nor is it clear if the double membrane EVs are actually EVs that contain capsids. Overall, the EM data lacks quantification. How many EVs on average show Sas labeling? How many EVs have double membranes? The dense protein staining surrounding EVs seems unusual, is this due to artifact of the purification? EV kits are generally non-specific and isolate non-EV membranes, corroboration using ultracentrifugation or size exclusion chromatography methods would be beneficial. SAS-FL overexpression results in more EVs, which confounds subsequent experiments suggesting that Sas targets EVs to specific cell types/regions.

2. Figure 3: There are no data showing the expression of Sas in SG cells using the GAL4 lines. Is this expression restricted to just SG cells? The results jump from a-b to f-g. c-e are out of order. The quantification in g should be broken into two and paired with the actual data (c-e, and f). It is not clear how the quantification in g was performed. How many WBs were analyzed? There seems to be a bubble in the first lane of f, which would preclude quantification. Why is d not quantified and there seems to be an overall increase in background staining in e that is not specific to discs. The source data files are not labelled and these data should be incorporated into annotated supplemental figures. Is transfer in a-b due to Ptp10D? How many WBs were quantified in g?

3. Figure 4: C and d, IP data has no inputs for IPs, no sizing markers, and no IgG controls for antibody specificity. These data would also be more convincing if done with FL Sas and included co-Ips from cell lysates.

4. In general, the WBs in the figures show very white backgrounds with high contrast, which suggests the images may have been manipulated. Total protein controls are also missing.

5. Figure 5: Ashley et al (Cell 2018) showed that dArc1 mRNA transfer required the 3'UTR so it is puzzling that the authors used heterologous UTRs. The results using FISH on endogenous dArc1 mRNA are dramatic. The authors should show definitively that their probe does not pick up over-expressed dArc1.

6. Many of the conclusions would be strengthened by the loss of function experiments, especially showing a requirement for Sas in dArc1 transfer.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors of this manuscript address the question of whether vagal and sacral neural crest make distinct contributions to the enteric nervous system (ENS). The ENS regulates intestinal motility and many intestinal homeostatic functions; mutations in genes involved in ENS development lead to defects that can range from mild to catastrophic. The best studied of the ENS neuropathies is Hirschsprung disease, which is thought to result from failure of vagal neural crest cells to migrate properly into the distal intestine to differentiate into ENS neurons and glia. However, sacral neural crest cells are known to contribute to the distal ENS and have to migrate a considerably shorter distance. Thus, understanding whether there are distinct vagal and sacral contributions to the ENS provides insights into basic ENS biology as well as the basis of human disease. Previous transplantation and ablation studies have already revealed that vagal and sacral neural crest have differing ENS developmental potentials, although this has not been directly correlated with discrete cell types. Here the authors combine single cell RNA sequencing and a viral lineage tracing technique that is new to avians to gain insight into the different ENS cell types generated by vagal and sacral neural crest along the length of the intestine. They find that vagal and sacral neural crest exhibit distinct transcriptional profiles and contribute both similar and different progeny to the ENS. For example, both vagal and sacral crest contribute to progenitor cells, connective tissue and neurons, but most secretomotor neurons are vagal crest-derived whereas most adrenergic neurons and melanocytes in the distal intestine are sacral-crest derived. The authors also suggest a role of the local environment in determining the fate of vagal and sacral derivatives. The data presented in this manuscript provide a multitude of hypotheses about similarities and differences between vagal and sacral derived ENS cells. However, a shortcoming of the manuscript is that all of these hypotheses remain untested.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this project, the authors used a single-cell RNA sequencing technique, created a cell atlas of normal and diseased human anterior cruciate ligaments of 49,356 cells from 8 patients, explored the variations of the cell subtypes' spatial distributions, and found their associations with ligamental degeneration. Using the single-cell RNA sequencing data, the authors identified fibroblast subsets unique to normal and diseased tissues, revealed two processes of acute and chronic disease outcome in ligamental degeneration and found immune cell and stromal cell subclusters changed the extracellular matrix in ligament and contributed to the disease. Combined with spatial transcriptome sequencing, they found the spatial distribution of immune and stromal cells associated with the disease and demonstrated cell-cell communications among endothelial cells, macrophages, and fibroblasts.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

It has been previously shown that defective autophagy and disorganized microtubule network contribute to the pathogenesis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The authors previously reported that nitrite oxide synthase 2 (NOX2) regulates these alterations. It was also shown that acetylated tubulin facilitates autophagosome-lysosome fusion and thus autophagy. In the present study, the authors showed that autophagy is differentially regulated by redox and acetylation modifications in dystrophic mdx mice. The ablation of Nox2 in mdx mice activated the autophagosome maturation but not its fusion with the lysosome. On the other hand, the inhibition of histone acetylase 6 (HDAC6) restored microtubule acetylation, promoted autophagosome-lysosome fusion, and improved muscle function in mdx mice. The strength of this paper is the combination of different approaches to decipher the mechanism, including the evaluation of the level and interaction of several proteins involved in the maturation of autophagosomes and in the fusion between autophagosomes and lysosomes.

This study reveals an important molecular mechanism by which increasing microtubule acetylation improves autophagy and muscle function in dystrophic mice. This has a translational impact on several diseases in which autophagy is impaired. The improvement of autophagosome-lysosome fusion with HDAC6 inhibitor is supported by several data, but some parts merit further analysis:

1) To add appropriate controls (e.g. without antibodies) to support protein-protein interaction for all co-immunoprecipitation assays.<br /> 2) The simple evaluation of the protein levels of p62 and LC3-II is not sufficient to claim autophagy improvement after HDAC6 inhibition. It would be good to evaluate the autophagic flux in vivo in all groups of mice (to treat the mice with or without autophagy inhibitor and evaluate whether the difference in the level of LC3-II between the two conditions is higher with HDAC6 inhibitor than without in the mdx mice).

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The purpose of this study was to investigate within the diverse Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) study on how COVID-19 impacted access to cancer screenings and treatment through a cross-sectional survey in this study population.

Major strengths were leveraging existing participants in a cohort study that contained a diverse population. The MEC cohort participants have been studied since the 90's. The investigators used a well-designed survey and performed analysis on responses focused on cancer screening attendance. Weaknesses of this study are low response rates that make the results not generalizable to other populations, especially younger populations, and possible bias of specific types of individuals responding.

This study found associations with racial/ethnic, age, comorbidities, and education to be key factors associated with cancer-related screening and healthcare seeking during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Whether the associations observed by the investigators would remain over time is unknown, as health care seeking changed as the pandemic evolved and prevention tools (including mass testing and vaccination) became available. It is important to note that this is a snapshot in time, so while it is informative, it will be important to monitor whether certain groups/populations that may be at high risk for cancer may need to be targeted for early diagnosis and screening.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This study provided evidence to interpret and understand the aging and developmental processes in children. The main strength of the study is it measures a set of biological age measures and a set of developmental measures, thus providing multi-faceted evidence to explain the associations between aging and development in children. The main weakness of this study is that how to measure and test the aging hypothesis of "a buildup of biological capital model" and "wear and tear" is not well-explained. Why the observed associations between biological age measures and developmental measures could support the aforementioned aging theories?

1. Abstract - conclusion: The aging hypothesis of "a buildup of biological capital model" and "wear and tear" were mentioned in the conclusion without an explanation of these theories in the previous section. Readers who are not experts in the field may not understand the logic.<br /> 2. Result - Biological age marker performance: the correlation between transcriptome age and chronological age is very strong (r =0.94). I am afraid that very little age-independent information could be captured by the transcriptome age. Is it possible to down-regulate the age dependency of the transcriptome age in the training process?<br /> 3. The study population comes from several cohorts, which might influence the results. How the cohort effects were controlled for in the analyses?<br /> 4. Figure 3 only showed the number of p values. Can the author also provide the number of point estimates and 95% confidence intervals, perhaps in the supplemental table?

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In the manuscript, titled "Comparative single-cell profiling reveals distinct cardiac resident macrophages essential for zebrafish heart regeneration," Wei et al. perform bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing on uninjured and injured zebrafish hearts with or without prior macrophage depletion by clodronate. For the single-cell RNA sequencing, the authors sort macrophages and neutrophils prior to sequencing by using fluorescent reporters for each of the two lineages. The authors characterize the differential gene expression between injured and uninjured hearts with and without prior macrophage depletion. The single-cell analyses allow the characterization of nine discrete subpopulations of macrophages and two distinct neutrophil types. The manuscript is largely descriptive with lots of discussion of specific differentially expressed genes. The authors conclude that tissue-resident macrophages are important for heart regeneration through the remodeling of the microenvironment and by promoting revascularization. Circulating monocyte-derived macrophages cannot adequately replace the resident macrophages even after recovery from clodronate depletion.

The manuscript presents a very large catalog of useful gene expression data and further characterizes the diversity of macrophages and neutrophils in the heart following injury. Although the conclusions that resident macrophages are important for regeneration and that circulating macrophages cannot adequately substitute for them are not particularly novel, this manuscript provides additional support for those ideas and extends that work by providing a wealth of gene expression data from the different macrophage sub-populations in the zebrafish and how they respond to and promote regeneration. The authors also present a nice analysis supporting the interactions of macrophages with neutrophils via comparing receptors and ligands (from gene expression data) on the two populations - this should be a useful resource.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In the current work, the authors aimed to investigate the genetic and non-genetic factors that impact structural asymmetry.

A major strength is the number of data samples included in the study to assess brain structural asymmetry. A consequence of the inclusion of many samples is then also the sample size. Given that the authors also work with longitudinal data, it would be nice to be able to appreciate the individual effects across time points, this is now a little unclear. A possible less well-developed approach is the genetic basis, as this was stated as the main question, here the investigations are not that deep and may only touch upon the question. Moreover, the association with cognition, handedness, sex, and ICV is somewhat interesting yet seems also a bit minimal to fully grasp its implications.

To some extent, the aim of the study could still be written with more clarity. However, the authors have in part achieved their aims - assuming it is found a consensus on the brain asymmetry patterns in humans as is stated in the abstract. Overall the results support the conclusions, yet the strong interpretation of early life factors in particular is not empirically investigated as far as I gather.

Overall this is a nice and thorough work on asymmetry that may inform further work on brain asymmetry, its genetic basis, development, environmentally induced change, and link to behavioural variation.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

This manuscript puts forward the concept that there is a specific time window during which YAP/TAZ driven transcription provides feedback for optimal endothelial cell adhesion, cytoskeletal organization and migration. The study follows up on previous elegant findings from this group and others which established the importance of YAP/TAZ-mediated transcription for persistent endothelial cell migration. The data presented here extends the concept at two levels: first, the data may explain why there are differences between experimental setups where YAP/TAZ activity are inhibited for prolonged times (e.g. cultures of YAP knockdown cells), versus experiments in which the transient inhibition of YAP/TAZ and (global) transcription affects endothelial cell dynamics prior to their equilibrium.

All experiments are convincing, clearly visualized and quantified. I have some questions that the authors may address to strengthen this exciting new concept:

• Point for more elaborate discussion: Apparently the timescale of negative feedback signals is conserved between endothelial cell migration in vitro (with human cells) and endothelial migration during the formation of ISVs in zebrafish. What do you think might be an explanation for such conserved timescales? Are there certain processes within cytoskeletal tension build up that require this quantity of time to establish? Or does it relate to the time that is needed to begin to express the YAP/TAZ target genes that mediate feedback?<br /> • Do you expect different timescales for slower endothelial migratory processes (e.g. for instance during fin vascular regeneration which takes days) ?<br /> • Is the ~4hrs and 8hrs feedback time window a general property or does it differ between specific endothelial cell types? In the veins the endothelial cells generate less stress fibers and adhesions compared to in the arteries. Does this mean that there might be a difference in the feedback time window, or does that mean that certain endothelial cell types may not have such YAP/TAZ-controlled feedback system?<br /> • The experiments are based on perturbations to prove that transcriptional feedback is needed for endothelial migration. What would happen if the feedback systems is always switched on? An experiment to add might be to analyse the responsiveness of endothelial cells expressing constitutively active YAP/TAZ.<br /> • To investigate the role of YAP-mediated transcription in an accurate time-dependent manner the authors may consider using the recently developed optogenetic YAP translocation tool: https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202154401

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The authors set out to develop an organoid model of the junction between early telencephalic and ocular tissues to model RGC development and pathfinding in a human model. The authors have succeeded in developing a robust model of optic stalk(OS) and optic disc(OD) tissue with innervating retinal ganglion cells. The OS and OD have a robust pattern with distinct developmental and functional borders that allow for a distinct pathway for pathfinding RGC neurites.

This study falls short on a thorough analysis of their single cell transcriptomics (scRNAseq). From the scRNAseq it is unclear the quality and quantity of the targeted cell types that exist in the model. A comparative analysis of the scRNAseq profiles of their cell-types with existing organoid protocols, to determine a technical improvement, or with fetal tissue, to determine fidelity to target cells, would greatly improve the description of this model and determine its utility. This is especially necessary for the RGCs developed in this protocol as they recommend this as an improved model to study RGCs.

Future work targeting RGC neurite outgrowth mechanisms will be exciting.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this article, the authors found a distinct fibroblast subpopulation named AG fibroblasts, which are capable of regulating myeloid cells, T cells and ILCs, and proposed that AG fibroblasts function as a previously unrecognized surveillant to orchestrate chronic gingival inflammation in periodontitis. Generally speaking, this article is innovative and interesting, however, there are some problems that need to be addressed to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Results:

1) It is recommended to add HE staining and immunohistochemistry staining to observe the inflammation, tissue damage, and repair status from 0 to 7 days, so that readers can understand cell phenotype changes corresponding to the periodontitis stage. The observation index can include inflammation and vascular related indicators.

2) Figure 1A-1D can be placed in the supplementary figure.

3) I suggest the authors to put the detection of the existence of AG fibroblasts before exploring its relationship with other types of cells.

4) The layout of the picture should be closely related to the topic of the article. It is recommended to readjust the layout of the picture. Figure 1 should be the detection of AG cells and their proportion changes from 0 to 7 days. In other figures, the authors can separately describe the proportion changes of myeloid cells, T cells and ILCs, and explored the association between AG fibroblasts and these cell types.

Methods:

It is recommended to separately list the statistical methods section. The statistical method used in the article should be one-way ANOVA.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Overall, I find the work performed by the authors very interesting. However, the authors have not always included literature that seems relevant to their study. For instance, I do not understand why two papers Dunican et al 2013 and Dunican et al 2015, which provide important insight into Lsh/HELLS function in mouse, frog and fish were not cited. It is also important that the authors are specific about what is known and in particular about what is not known about CDCA7 function in DNA methylation regulation. Unless I am mistaken, there is currently only one study (Velasco et al 2018) investigating the effect of CDCA7 disruption on DNA methylation levels (in ICF3 patient lymphoblastoid cell lines) on a genome-wide scale (Illumina 450K arrays). Unoki et al 2019 report that CDCA7 and HELLS gene knockout in human HEK293T cells moderately and extremely reduces DNA methylation levels at pericentromeric satellite-2 and centromeric alpha-satellite repeats, respectively. No other loci were investigated, and it is therefore not known whether a CDCA7-associated maintenance methylation phenotype extends beyond (peri)centromeric satellites. Thijssen et al performed siRNA-mediated knockdown experiments in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (differentiated cells) and showed that lower levels of Zbtb24, Cdca7 and Hells protein correlate with reduced minor satellite repeat methylation, thereby implicating these factors in mouse minor satellite repeat DNA methylation maintenance. Furthermore, studies that demonstrate a HELLS-CDCA7 interaction are currently limited to Xenopus egg extract (Jenness et al 2018) and the human HEK293 cell line (Unoki et al 2019). Whether such an interaction exists in any other organism and is of relevance to DNA methylation mechanisms remains to be determined. Therefore, in my opinion, the conclusion that "Our co-evolution analysis suggests that DNA methylation-related functionalities of CDCA7 and HELLS are inherited from LECA" should be softened, as the evidence for this scenario is not very compelling and seems premature in the absence of molecular data from more species.

The authors used BLAST searches to characterize the evolutionary conservation of CDCA7 family proteins in vertebrates. From Figure 2A, it seems that they identify a LEDGF binding motif in CDCA7/JPO1. Is this correct and if yes, could you please elaborate and show this result? This is interesting and important to clarify because previous literature (Tesina et al 2015) reports a LEDGF binding motif only in CDCA7L/JPO2.

To provide evidence for a potential evolutionary co-selection of CDCA7, HELLS and the DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) the authors performed CoPAP analysis. Throughout the manuscript, it is unclear to me what the authors mean when referring to "DNMT3". In the Material and Methods section, the authors mention that human DNMT3A was used in BLAST searches to identify proteins with DNA methyltransferase domains. Does this mean that "DNMT3" should be DNMT3A? And if yes, should "DNMT3" be corrected to "DNMT3A"? Is there a reason that "DNMT3A" was chosen for the BLAST searches?

CoPAP analysis revealed that CDCA7 and HELLS are dynamically lost in the Hymenoptera clade and either co-occurs with DNMT3 or DNMT1/UHRF1 loss, which seems important. Unfortunately, the authors do not provide sufficient information in their figures or supplementary data about what is already known regarding DNA methylation levels in the different Hymenoptera species to further consider a potential impact of this observation. What is "the DNA methylation status" of all these organisms? This information cannot be easily retrieved from Table S2. A clearer presentation of what is actually known already would improve this paragraph.

Furthermore, A. thaliana DDM1, and mouse and human Lsh/Hells are known to preferably promote DNA methylation at satellite repeats, transposable elements and repetitive regions of the genome. On the other hand, DNA methylation in insects and other invertebrates occurs in genic rather than intergenic regions and transposable elements (e.g. Bewick et al 2017; Werren JH PlosGenetics 2013). It would be helpful to elaborate on these differences.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The manuscript focused on roles of a key fatty-acid synthesis enzyme, acetyl-coA-carboxylase 1 (ACC1), in the metabolism, gene regulation and homeostasis of invariant natural killer T (NKT_ cells and impact on these T cells' roles during asthma pathogenesis. The authors presented data showing that the acetyl-coA-carboxylase 1 enzyme regulates the expression of PPARg then the function of NKT cells including the secretion of Th2-type cytokines to impact on asthma pathogenesis. The results are clearcut and data were logically presented.

Major concerns:

1. This study heavily relied on the CD4-CreACC1fl/fl mice. While using of a-GalCer stimulation and Ja18KO mice mitigated the concern, it is still a major concern that at least some of the phenotype were due to the effect on conventional CD4 T cells. For example, the deletion of ACC1 gene seems also decreased the numbers of conventional CD4 T cells (Fig. 2D, Fig. S1D). Previously there were reports showing ACC1 gene in conventional CD4 T cells also plays a role in lung inflammation (Nakajima et al., J. Exp. Med. 218, 2021). If the authors believe the phenotype observed was mainly due to iNKT cells, rather than conventional CD4 T cells, a compare/contrast of the two studies should be discussed to explain or reconcile the results.

2. The overall significance of the manuscript is related to the potential clinical suppression of ACC1 in human asthma patients. However, the authors only showed the elevated ACC1 genes in these patients, not even in vitro data demonstrating that suppression of ACC1 genes in the iNKT cells from patients could have potential therapeutic effect or suppression of the relevant cytokines.

3. The authors report that a-GalCer administration can induce the AHR, however, in the cited paper (Hachem et al., Eur J. Immunol. 35, 2793, 2005), iNKT cell activation seems to have the opposite effect to inhibit AHR. Did the authors mean to cite different papers?

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In the study by Venkat et al. the authors expand the current knowledge of allosteric diversity in the human kinome by c-terminal splicing variants using as a paradigm DCLK1. In this work, the authors provide evolutionary and some mechanistic evidence about how c-terminal isoform specific variants generated by alternative splicing can regulate catalytic activity by means of coupling specific phosphorylation sites to dynamical and conformational changes controlling active site and substrate pocket occupancy, as well as interfering with protein-protein interacting interfaces that altogether provides evidence of c-terminal isoform specific regulation of the catalytic activity in protein kinases.

The paper is overall well written, the rationale and the fundamental questions are clear and well explained, the evolutionary and MD analyses are very detailed and well explained. The methodology applied in terms of the biochemical and biophysical tools falls a bit short in some places and some comments and suggestions are given in this respect. If the authors could monitor somehow protein auto-phosphorylation as a functional readout would be very useful by means of using phospho-specific antibodies to monitor activity. Overall I think this is a study that brings some new aspects and concepts that are important for the protein kinase field, in particular the allosteric regulation of the catalytic core by c-terminal segments, and how evolutionary cues generate more sophisticated mechanisms of allosteric control in protein kinases. However a revision would be recommended.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Original review:

This manuscript by Walker et. al. explores the interplay between the global regulators HapR (the QS master high cell density (HDC) regulator) and CRP. Using ChIP-Seq, the authors find that at several sites, the HapR and CRP binding sites overlap. A detailed exploration of the murPQ promoter finds that CRP binding promotes HapR binding, which leads to repression of murPQ. The authors have a comprehensive set of experiments that paints a nice story providing a mechanistic explanation for converging global regulation. I did feel there are some weak points though, in particular the lack of integration of previously identified transcription start sites, the lack of replication (at least replication presented in the manuscript) for many figures, some oddities in the growth curve, and not reexamining their HapR/CRP cooperative binding model in vivo using ChIP-Seq.

Review of revised version:

This revised manuscript by Walker et. al. addresses some of the editorial points and conceptual discussion, but in general, most of my suggestions (as the previous reviewer #1) for additional experimentation or addition were not addressed as discussed below. Therefore, my overall review has not changed.

1) For example, in point 1, the suggested analysis was not performed because it is not trivial. My reason for making this suggestion is that the original manuscript was limited to Vibrio cholerae, and the impact of the manuscript would increase if the findings here were demonstrated to be more broadly applicable. I expect papers published in eLife to have such broad applicability. But no changes were made to the manuscript in this regard. The revised version is still limited to only Vibrio cholerae.

2) For point 2, the activity of FLAG-tag luxO could have been simply validated in a complementation assay. Yes, they demonstrated DNA binding, but that is not the only activity of LuxO.

3) For point 7, the transcriptional fusions were not explored at different times or different media, which is also something that was hinted at by other reviewers. In regard to exploring expression at different time points, this seems particularly relevant for QS regulated genes.

4) For point 13, the authors express that doing an additional CHIP-Seq is outside of the scope of this manuscript. Perhaps that is the case, but the point of the comment is to validate the in vitro binding results with an in vivo binding assay. A targeted CHIP-Seq approach specifically analyzing the promoters where cooperative binding was observed in vitro could have addressed this point.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

The manuscript describes that cultured mammalian cells adapt to chronic stress by increasing their size and protein translation through Hsp90. The authors extensively use Hsp90 knockout cells and mass spectrometry to provide solid evidence that chronic heat shock response is accompanied by cell size changes and stress resistance in large cells. The major strength of the work is the authors ability to document the heat shock response in detail, while the main weakness is that the cell size changes appear not to be quantitative making it difficult to assess how much the cell density is changed in chronic stress. Nevertheless, the increased stress resistance of large cells is conceptually important and provides one potential explanation why cells need to control their size. This work adds to our understanding of how cellular stress is managed, and while stress responses have been observed previously in relation to cell size, this work provides evidence for increased stress resistance in larger cells.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

"MAGIC" was introduced by the Rong Li lab in a Nature letters article in 2017. This manuscript is an extension of this original work and uses a genome wide screen the Baker's yeast to decipher which cellular pathways influence MAGIC. Overall, this manuscript is a logical extension of the 2017 study, however the manuscript is challenging to follow, complicated by the data often being discussed out of sequence. Although the manuscripts makes claims of a mechanism being pinpointed, there are many gaps and the true mechanisms of how the factors identified in the screen influence MAGIC is not clear. A key issue is that there are many assumptions drawn on previous literature, but central aspects of the mechanisms being proposed are not adequately shown.

Key comments:

[1] Reasoning and pipelines presented in the first two sections of the results are disordered and do not follow figure order. In some instances, the background to experimental analyses such as detailing the generation of spGFP constructs in the YKO mutant library, or validation of Snf1 activation are mentioned after respective results are discussed. This needs to be fixed.<br /> [2] In general there is a lack of data to support microscopy data and supporting quantification analysis. The validity of this data could be significantly strengthened with accompanying western blots showing accumulation of a given constructs in mitochondrial sub compartments (as was the case in the labs original paper in 2017).<br /> [3] Much of the mechanisms proposed relies on the Snf1 activation. This is however not shown, but assumed to be taking place. Given that this activation is central to the mechanism proposed this should be explicitly shown here - for example survey the phosophorylation status of the protein.

Joint Public Review:

Smirnova et al. present a cryo-EM structure of human SIRT6 bound to a nucleosome as well as the results from molecular dynamics simulations. The results show that the combined conformational flexibilities of SIRT6 and the N-terminal tail of histone H3 limit the residues with access to the active site, partially explaining the substrate specificity of this sirtuin-class histone deacetylase. The cryo-EM analysis in its current form is incomplete, lacking aspects of validation such as angular distribution information and other standard measurements of the quality of the reconstruction. Biochemical validation of the structural findings is inadequate, relying primarily on previous publications. Importantly, two other groups have recently published cryo-EM structures of SIRT6:nucleosome complexes. This manuscript by Smirnova et al., therefore, confirms and complements these previous findings, with the addition of some novel insights into the role of structural flexibility in substrate selection.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Gehr and colleagues used an elegant method, using neuropixels probes, to study retinal input integration by mouse superior collicular cells in vivo. Compared to a previous report of the same group, they opto-tagged inhibitory neurons and defined the differential integration onto each group. Through these experiments, the author concluded that overall, there is no clear difference between the retina connectivity to excitatory and inhibitory superior colliculus neurons. The exception to that rule is that excitatory neurons might be driven slightly stronger than inhibitory ones. Technically, this work is performed at a high level, and the plots are beautifully conceived, but I have doubts if the interpretation given by the authors is solid. I will elaborate below.

Some thoughts about the interpretation of the results.

My main concern is the "survivor bias" of this work, which can lead to skewed conclusions. From the data set acquired, 305 connections were measured, 1/3 inhibitory and 2/3 excitatory. These connections arise from 83 RGC onto 124 RGC (I'm interpreting the axis of Fig.2 C). Here it is worth mentioning that different RGC types have different axonal diameters (Perge et al., 2009). Here the diameter is also related to the way cells relay information (max frequencies, for example). It is possible that thicker axons are easier to measure, given the larger potential changes would likely occur, and thus, selectively being picked up by the neuropixels probe. If this is the case, we would have a clear case of "survival bias", which should be tested and discussed. One way to determine if the response properties of axonal termini are from an unbiased sample is to make a rough functional characterization as generally performed (see Baden et al. 2006). This is fundamental since all other conclusions are based on unbiased sampling.

One aspect that is not clear to me is to measure of connectivity strength in Figure 2. Here it seems that connectivity strength is directly correlated with the baseline firing rate of the SC neuron (see example plots). If this is a general case, the synaptic strength can be assumed but would only differ in strength due to the excitability of the postsynaptic cell. This should be tested by plotting the correlation coefficient analysis against the baseline firing rate.

My third concern is the assessment of functional similarity in Fig. 3. It is not clear to me why the similarity value was taken by the arithmetic mean. For example, even if the responses are identical for one connected pair that exclusively responds either to the ON or OFF sparse noise, the maximal value can only be 0.67. Perhaps I misunderstood something. Secondly, correlations in natural(istic) movies can differ dramatically depending on the frame rate that the movie was acquired and the way it is displayed to the animal. What looks natural to us will elicit several artifacts at a retinal level, e.g., due to big jumps between frames (no direction-selective response) or overall little modulation (large spatial correlations). I would rather opt for uniform stimuli, as suggested previously. Of course, these are also approximations but can be easily reproduced by different labs and are not subjected to the intricacies of the detailed naturalistic stimulus used.

Fourth. It is important to control the proportion of inhibitory cells activated optogenetically across the recording probe. Currently, it is not possible to assess if there are false negatives. One way of controlling for this would be to show that the number of inhibitory interneurons doesn't vary across the probe.

Fifth. In Fig. 4, the ISI had a minimal bound of 5 ms. Why? This would cap the firing rate at 200Hz, but we know that RGC in explants can fire at higher frequencies for evoked responses. I would set a lower bound since it should come naturally from the after-depolarization block. Another aspect that remains unclear is to what extent the paired-spike ratio depends on the baseline firing rate. This would change the interpretation from the particular synaptic connection to the intrinsic properties of the cell and is plausible since the bassline firing rate varies tremendously. One related analysis would be to plot the change of PSR depending on the ISI. It would be intuitive to make a scatter plot for all paired spikes of all recorded neurons (separated into inhibitory and excitatory) of ISI vs. PSR.

Panel 4E is confusing to me. Here what is plotted is efficacy 1st against PSR (which is efficacy 2nd/efficacy 1st). Given that you have a linear relation between efficacy 1st and efficacy 2nd (panel 4C), you are essentially re-plotting the same information, which should necessarily have a hyperbolic relationship: [ f(x) = y/x ]. Thus, fitting this with a linear function makes no sense and it has to be decaying if efficacy 2nd > efficacy1st as shown in 4C.

Finally, in Figure 5, the perspective is inverted, and the spike correlations are seen from the perspective of SC neurons. Here it would also be good to plot the cumulative histograms and not look at the averages. Regarding the similarity index and use of natural stats, please see my previous comments. Also, would it be possible to plot the contribution v/s the firing rate with the baseline firing rate with no stimulation or full-field stimulation? This is important since naturalistic movies have too many correlations and dependencies that make this plot difficult to interpret.

Overall, the paper only speaks from excitatory and inhibitory differences in the introduction and results. However, it is known that there are three clear morphologically distinct classes of excitatory neurons (wide-field, narrow-field, and stellate). This topic is touched in the discussion but not directly in the context of these results. Smaller cells might likely be driven much stronger. Wide-field cells would likely not be driven by one RGC input only and will probably integrate from many more cells than 6.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Segas et al. present a novel solution to an upper-limb control problem which is often neglected by academia. The problem the authors are trying to solve is how to control the multiple degrees of freedom of the lower arm to enable grasp in people with transhumeral limb loss. The proposed solution is a neural network based approach which uses information from the position of the arm along with contextual information which defines the position and orientation of the target in space. Experimental work is presented, based on virtual simulations and a telerobotic proof of concept.

The strength of this paper is that it proposes a method of control for people with transhumeral limb loss which does not rely upon additional surgical intervention to enable grasping objects in the local environment. A challenge the work faces is that it can be argued that a great many problems in upper limb prosthesis control can be solved given precise knowledge of the object to be grasped, its relative position in 3D space and its orientation. It is difficult to know how directly results obtained in a virtual environment will translate to real world impact. Some of the comparisons made in the paper are to physical systems which attempt to solve the same problem. It is important to note that real world prosthesis control introduces numerous challenges which do not exist in virtual spaces or in teleoperation robotics.

The authors claim that the movement times obtained using their virtual system, and a teleoperation proof of concept demonstration, are comparable to natural movement times. The speed of movements obtained and presented are easier to understand by viewing the supplementary materials prior to reading the paper. The position of the upper arm and a given target are used as input to a classifier, which determines the positions of the lower arm, wrist and the end effector. The state of the virtual shoulder in the pick and place task is quite dynamic and includes humeral rotations which would be challenging to engineer in a real physical prosthesis above the elbow. Another question related to the pick and place task used is whether or not there are cases where both the pick position and the place position can be reached via the same, or very similar, shoulder positions? i.e. with the shoulder flexion-extension and abduction-adduction remaining fixed, can the ANN use the remaining five joint angles to solve the movement problem with little to no participant input, simply based on the new target position? If this was the case, movements times in the virtual space would present a very different distribution to natural movements, while the mean values could be similar. The arguments made in the paper could be supported by including individual participant data showing distributions of movement times and the distances travelled by the end effector where real movements are compared to those made by an ANN.

In the proposed approach users control where the hand is in space via the shoulder. The position of the upper arm and a given target are used as input to a classifier, which determines the positions of the lower arm, wrist and the effector. The supplementary materials suggest the output of the classifier occurs instantaneously, in that from the start of the trial the user can explore the 3D space associated with the shoulder in order to reach the object. When the object is reached a visual indicator appears. In a virtual space this feedback will allow rapid exploration of different end effector positions which may contribute to the movement times presented. In a real world application, movement of a distal end-effector via the shoulder is not to be as graceful and a speed accuracy trade off would be necessary to ensure objects are grasped, rather than knocked or moved.

Another aspect of the movement times presented which is of note, although it is not necessarily incorrect, is that the virtual prosthesis performance is close too perfect. In that, at the start of each trial period, either pick or place, the ANN appears to have already selected the position of the five joints it controls, leaving the user to position the upper arm such that the end effector reaches the target. This type of classification is achievable given a single object type to grasp and a limited number of orientations, however scaling this approach to work robustly in a real world environment will necessitate solving a number of challenges in machine learning and in particular computer vision which are not trivial in nature. On this topic, it is also important to note that, while very elegant, the teleoperation proof of concept of movement based control does not seem to feature a similar range of object distance from the user as the virtual environment. This would have been interesting to see and I look forward to seeing further real world demonstrations in the authors future work.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this study, Drougard et al. examined the consequences of an acute high fat diet (HFD) on microglia in mice. 3-day HFD influenced the regulation of systemic glucose homeostasis in a microglia-dependent and independent manner, as determined using microglial depletion with PLX5622. 3-day HFD increased microglial membrane potential and the levels of palmitate and stearate in cerebrospinal fluid in vivo. Using confocal imaging, respirometry and stable isotope-assisted tracing in primary microglial cultures, the authors suggest an increase in mitochondrial fission and metabolic remodelling occurs when exposed to palmitate, which increases the release of glutamate, succinate and itaconate that may alter neuronal metabolism. This acute microglial metabolic response following acute HFD is subsequently linked to improved higher cognitive function (learning and memory) in a microglia and DRP1-dependent manner.

Strengths:<br /> Overall, this study is interesting and novel in linking acute high fat diet to changes in microglia and improved learning and memory in mice. The role for microglia and DRP1 in regulating glucose homeostasis and memory in vivo appears to be supported by the data.

Weaknesses:<br /> The authors suggest that utilisation of palmitate by microglia following HFD is the driver of the acute metabolic changes and that the release of microglial-derived lactate, succinate, glutamate and itaconate are causally linked to improvements in learning and memory.<br /> A major weakness is that the authors provide no mechanistic link between beta-oxidation of palmitate (or other fatty acids) in microglia and the observed systemic metabolic and memory phenotypes in vivo. Pharmacological inhibition of CPT1a could be considered or CPT1a-deficient microglia.

Another major weakness is that the authors also suggest that 3-day HFD microglial response (increase membrane potential) is likely driven by palmitate-induced increases in itaconate feedforward inhibition of complex II/SDH. Whilst this is an interesting hypothesis, the in vitro metabolic characterisation is not entirely convincing. The authors suggest that acute palmitate appears to rapidly compromise or saturate complex II activity. Succinate is a membrane impermeable dicarboxylate. It can enter cells via MCT transporters at acidic pH. It is not clear that I) Succinate is taken up into microglia, II) If the succinate used was pH neutral sodium succinate or succinic acid, and III) If the observed changes are due to succinate oxidation, changes in pH or activation of the succinate receptor SUCNR1 on microglia. In the absence of these succinate treatments, there are no alterations in mitochondrial respiration or membrane potential following palmitate treatment, which does not support this hypothesis. Intracellular itaconate measurements and quantification are lacking and IRG1 expression is not assessed. There also appears to be more labelled itaconate in neuronal cultures from control (BSA) microglia conditioned media, which is not discussed. What is the total level of itaconate in neurons from these conditioned media experiments? No evidence is provided that the in vivo response is dependent on IRG1, the mitochondrial enzyme responsible for itaconate synthesis, or itaconate. To causally link IRG1/itaconate, IRG1-deficient mice could be used in future work.

While microglial DRP1 is causally implicated the role of palmitate is not convincing. Mitochondrial morphology changes are subtle including TOMM20 and DRP1 staining and co-localization - additional supporting data should be provided. Electron microscopy of mitochondrial structure would provide more detailed insight to morphology changes. Western blot of fission-associated proteins Drp1, phospho-Drp1 (S616), MFF and MiD49/51. Higher magnification and quality confocal imaging of DRP1/TOMM20. Drp1 recruitment to mitochondrial membranes can be assessed using subcellular fractionation. No characterisation of primary microglia from DRP1-knockout mice is performed with palmitate treatment. Authors demonstrate an increase in both stearate and palmitate in CSF following 3-day HFD. Only palmitate was tested in the regulation of microglial responses, but it may be more informative to test stearate and palmitate combined.

https://www.ionos.com/help/index.php?id=144

https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126#authentication

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this manuscript by Douglas et al, the investigative team seeks to identify Staphylococcus aureus genes (and associated polymorphisms) that confer altered susceptibility to human serum, with the hypothesis that such genes might contribute to the propensity of a strain to cause bacteremia, invasive disease, and/or death. Using an innovative GWAS-like approach applied to a bank of over 300 well-characterized clinical S. aureus isolates, the authors discover SNPs in seven different staphylococcal genes that confer increased survival in the setting of serum exposure. The authors then mainly focus on one gene, tcaA, and illustrate a potential mechanism whereby modification of peptidoglycan structure and WTA display leads to altered susceptibility to serum, serum-derived antimicrobial compounds, and antibiotics. One particularly significant finding is that the identified tcaA SNP is significantly associated with patient mortality, in that patients infected with the SNP bearing isolate are less likely to die from infection. It is therefore hypothesized that this SNP represents an adaptive mutation that promotes serum survival while decreasing virulence and host mortality. In a murine model of infection, the strain bearing the WT allele of tcaA is significantly more virulent than the tcaA mutant, suggesting that the role of tcaA in bacteremia is infection-phase dependent.

This manuscript has many strengths. The triangulation of genomic analysis, patient outcomes data, and in vitro and in vivo mechanistic testing adds to the significance of the findings in terms of human disease. Testing the impact of mutating tcaA in multiple staphylococcal lineages and backgrounds also increases the rigor of the study. The identification of bacterial loci that impact susceptibility to both host antimicrobial compounds and commonly used antibiotics is also a strength of this work, given the evolutionary and treatment implications for such genes.

One moderate weakness is that the impact of the identified SNP in tcaA is only tested in some of the assays, whereas the majority of the testing is performed with a whole gene knockout. In some cases this results in more speculative conclusions that will require further testing to validate. All in all, this is an exciting manuscript that will be of interest to the broader research communities focused on staphylococcal pathogenesis, bacterial evolution, and host-pathogen interactions, as well as to clinicians who care for patients with invasive staphylococcal infection.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Using an immobilised metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)-based assay coupled with Western blot immunodetection analysis, SbtB, the regulatory protein for SbtA activity, is shown in itself to be regulated by the local adenylate energy charge (AEC), with inhibitory binding of SbtB to SbtA disfavoured at high ATP:ADP ratios. Such conditions are expected to be encountered during steady-state photosynthesis with the associated cellular demand for Ci and SbtA activity.

By homology with ATP-binding PII proteins, ATP is proposed to interact with a loop region of SbtB, changing its conformation on binding and inhibiting the formation of the (inactive) SbtA:SbtB complex. On the basis of this, the authors propose that SbtB acts an AEC-sensing 'curfew' protein for SbtA activity, tuning bicarbonate import by this protein for situations when carbon fixation would be physiologically (and energetically) advantageous. As SbtA is a HCO3-/Na+ symporter, Na+ homeostasis would also be controlled by regulation of this transporter.

The IMAC assay used to monitor SbtA:SbtB complex stability as a function of AEC seems robust, is relatively straightforward and may be of interest to other researchers investigating adenylate-sensing protein reaction partners (with the usual caveats on extrapolating in vitro results to living systems, as noted by the authors).

In this study, SbtA regulation was also investigated in vivo in a Synechococcus HCO3- transporter knockout mutant via measurement of labelled HCO3- uptake and overall photosynthetic performance (MIMS-monitored O2 evolution as a function of PAR). Here, SbtB was inferred to regulate SbtA activity during the induction of photosynthesis (i.e. at low ATP:ADP) and not when photosynthesis was fully activated and in a steady-state condition. SbtA inactivation on a light-dark transition was also demonstrated in vivo irrespective of the presence SbtB, indicative of additional regulatory pathways affecting the activity of this transporter. These conclusions seem to be well-supported by the presented data.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Here, Ensinck et al. investigated the composition of the yeast mRNA m6A methyltransferase complex required for meiosis. This complex was known to contain three proteins but is much more complex in mammals, insects, and plants. Through IP-MS analysis, they identified three more proteins Kar4, Ygl036w, and Dyn2. Of these, Kar4 and Ygl036w are homologous to Mettl14 and Virma, respectively, and, like the previously described factors, are essential for m6A deposition, mating, and binding of the reader Pho92 to mRNA during meiosis by evidence acquired with appropriate methodology. Dyn2 is a novel factor not described for any m6A complex and is not essential for m6A deposition, mating, and binding of the reader Pho92 to mRNA during meiosis.

In addition, detailed analysis of the Slz1 revealed homology to the mammalian factor m6A complex member ZC3H13 to comprise a conserved complex of five proteins, Mettl3, Mettl14, Mum2/WTAP, Virma, and Slz/ZC3H13. When co-expressed in insect cells, they co-purify stoichiometrically, and the presence of Mum2 as a dimer is also indicated, as shown for WTAP.

Complementary to these data, they show that the stability of the individual complex members is affected in mutants supporting that they are stabilized through complex formation.<br /> Furthermore, the authors then show that kar4 has additional roles in mating that are separable from its role through the m6A complex in meiosis.<br /> The authors employ appropriate methodology throughout to address their aims and present convincing evidence for their claims. The evidence presented here reinforces that the m6A complex is evolutionary and highly conserved, with a broad scope for its functional analysis in humans and model organisms.