Moss, A. J., Rosenzweig, C., Jaffe, S. N., Gautam, R., Robinson, J., & Litman, L. (2021). Bots or inattentive humans? Identifying sources of low-quality data in online platforms [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wr8ds

Burton, J. W., Cruz, N., & Hahn, U. (2021). Reconsidering evidence of moral contagion in online social networks. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01133-5

Pleskac, T. J., Kyung, E., Chapman, G. B., & Urminsky, O. (2021, April 23). Single- or double-blind review? A field study of system preference, reliability, bias, and validity. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q2tkw

Schiavone, S. R., Bottesini, J. G., & Vazire, S. (2021). The Crisis from Above: Gatekeepers Need Better Standards. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mby5u

Peyton, Kyle, Gregory A. Huber, and Alexander Coppock. “The Generalizability of Online Experiments Conducted During The COVID-19 Pandemic.” SocArXiv, November 28, 2020. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/s45yg.

Pulido, E. G., & JIMENEZ, L. (2020, November 24). Validation to Spanish version of the COVID-19 Stress Scale. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rcqx3

Gaitán-Rossi, P., Pérez Hernández, V. H., Vilar-Compte, M., & Belismelis, G. T. (2020). Monthly prevalence of generalized anxiety disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t9n7k

In research they call anything used to measure an instrument.

Schindler, S., Reinhardt, N., & Reinhard, M.-A. (2020). Defending one’s worldviews under mortality salience – Testing the validity of an established idea. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7bxcs

Gupta, R. K., Marks, M., Samuels, T. H. A., Luintel, A., Rampling, T., Chowdhury, H., Quartagno, M., Nair, A., Lipman, M., Abubakar, I., Smeden, M. van, Wong, W. K., Williams, B., & Noursadeghi, M. (2020). Systematic evaluation and external validation of 22 prognostic models among hospitalised adults with COVID-19: An observational cohort study. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.03498-2020

EWB Hub x GRiPS Student Workshop—Introduction to Experience Sampling Methods. (2020, June 29). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcEfuSkiR8I

Kasy, M. (2020). How to run an adaptive field experiment. Retrieved from https://maxkasy.github.io/home/files/slides/adaptive_field_slides_kasy.pdf

Fell, M. J., Pagel, L., Chen, C., Goldberg, M. H., Herberz, M., Huebner, G., Sareen, S., & Hahnel, U. J. J. (2020). Validity of energy social research during and after COVID-19: Challenges, considerations, and responses [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/pe6cd

Frias‐Navarro, D., Pascual‐Llobell, J., Pascual‐Soler, M., Perezgonzalez, J., & Berrios‐Riquelme, J. (n.d.). Replication crisis or an opportunity to improve scientific production? European Journal of Education, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12417

Fife, D., Lung, M., Sullivan, N., & Young, C. (2020). When Values Collide: Why Scientists Argue About Open Science and How to Move Forward [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q9d28

Gruijters, Stefan L.K. ‘The Fallacy of Manipulation “Checks” in Psychological Experiments’. Preprint. PsyArXiv, 20 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fkzv5.

Speelman, C., & McGann, M. (2020). Statements about the Pervasiveness of Behaviour Require Data about the Pervasiveness of Behaviour [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bxzm4

Wise, Toby, Giorgia Michelini, Tomislav Damir Zbozinek, Cindy C. Hagan, and Dean Mobbs. ‘Development and Validation of the Avoidance of Respiratory Viral Infection Scale (ARVIS)’, 17 July 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dkc7m.

Forscher, P., Vazire, S., & Anvari, F. (2020, May 19). To create social good, psychology needs credible evidence. Psychonomic Society Featured Content. https://featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/to-create-social-good-psychology-needs-credible-evidence/

Shane, Matthew S. ‘The Motivation to Empathize Scale - Indexing Virtuous and Nonvirtuous Motives to Empathize’, 9 June 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/e7gxu.

Answers the question I had above: https://hyp.is/tpgdQo_4EeqPcm-PI0G2jA/www.iubenda.com/en/help/5640-email-newsletter-compliance-guide

An example of survey validation using Crombach's alpha.

Again arguing for more theoretical weight to disaster research to provide a framework for critical inquiry (validity, reliability, etc.) and generalizability.

The survey data is robust, but perhaps of a bit small sample size to be statistically sound. This is however helped by the fact that the survey was run over two consequent years.

The paper makes several unfounded claims using words like "guarantees" - I believe this is more of an English language/grammar issue than actual claims. See detailed comments in-line.

Hdt. 1.5 Herodotus admits that these things are hearsay and does not take a side, only tells both sides of the story.