这一声明暗示AI可能开启全新的科学发现范式，不仅提高效率，还能实现原本不可能的突破。这代表了对AI科学潜力的乐观愿景，但也引发了对'不可能突破'本质的哲学思考。

将AI描述为'编排层'而非简单工具，体现了AI在科学研究中角色的根本转变。这暗示未来科学家可能更像AI系统的指挥者，而非直接执行者，重塑科研工作流程。

这一观点挑战了传统认知，指出科学进步的主要瓶颈可能不是科学本身的难度，而是研究流程的复杂性。这暗示了优化工作流程可能比增加科学知识更能推动进步。

在长时间应用构建中实现10%的提升且没有常见回归问题，这表明AI在持续任务执行上的稳定性取得了重大突破，'pushes the ceiling on what our users can ship in a single session'暗示了AI对软件开发范式的根本性改变。

这一标题揭示了产品本质的转变——不仅是技术升级，更是定位的根本性转变。从单一的视频生成工具到全方位的导演工具套件，暗示着AI正在从'执行者'向'创造伙伴'进化，这代表了AI创作工具领域的一个重要范式转变。

这个比喻非常有力地揭示了传统安全信息与事件管理(SIEM)系统在面对AI驱动的攻击时的根本性脆弱性。传统系统就像木盾面对现代武器，这种对比暗示了安全架构需要根本性重构，而非渐进式改进。

这一断言标志着对AI发展范式的根本性认知转变。从'无限计算'到'资源受限'的转变将迫使整个行业重新思考技术发展路径，可能加速对更高效算法、模型压缩和边缘计算的需求，同时也可能引发对计算资源分配和获取公平性的社会讨论。

这一声明揭示了Google正在从简单的对话式AI转向真正的任务执行型智能体，标志着AI从聊天工具向工作助手的重大转变。这种多应用协同能力可能重塑用户与数字环境的交互方式，预示着AI助手将不再局限于单一应用内的功能。

这个惊人的实验表明，OpenAI已经能够完全自动化软件开发过程，从代码编写到产品发布，这挑战了传统软件工程的基本假设，暗示了人类程序员可能正在被边缘化。

这一现象揭示了AI技能分发模式的根本性转变，从传统的应用商店模式转向了内容驱动的社交平台分发，反映了用户行为和信任机制的深刻变化，暗示着未来软件分发可能不再依赖于传统应用商店模式。

这一描述揭示了神经计算机与传统计算机在交互本质上的根本差异。用户输入将变成安装能力的过程，这不仅是技术变革，更是人机关系的重新定义，暗示未来可能通过自然交互直接塑造AI能力。

这是一个极具洞察力的观点，它挑战了我们对AI和计算机关系的传统理解。如果模型能够承担部分机器运行职责，将从根本上改变计算范式，使AI从使用计算机转变为成为计算机本身，这可能是计算领域的下一个重大转变。

这是一个惊人的自进化系统，AI模型能够自主分析失败、修改代码并评估结果，实现了30%的性能提升而无需人工干预。这种自我迭代的模式代表了AI开发范式的重大转变，暗示未来AI可能能够自主优化和改进自身架构，减少对人类专家的依赖。

这一发现挑战了美国在AI领域的主导地位叙事，暗示全球AI权力格局正在发生根本性转变。这种转变可能对技术标准制定、数据治理和国际AI合作产生深远影响。

这一声明挑战了AI发展可能趋于平缓的普遍预期，表明技术进步实际上正在加速。这种加速不仅体现在性能指标上，还体现在采用率的惊人增长上，暗示AI正处于指数级增长阶段，可能带来前所未有的社会变革。

这个项目定义了一个新的'ADR'(Agent Detection & Response)层概念，这标志着AI安全领域的一个重要演进。从传统的端点保护转向专门针对AI代理的轻量级防护，反映了安全行业对AI特定威胁模式的适应和专业化。

作者提出了一个惊人的观点：AI技术的扩散已成事实，关键问题不再是是否开发，而是谁应该控制。这反映了从预防到管理的范式转变，暗示技术发展的不可逆性已经超越了传统的伦理讨论框架。

令人惊讶的是：在快速原型设计和独立工作方面，AI模型已经超越了传统开发工具，成为最佳选择，这可能预示着软件开发工作流程的根本性变革。

这一反问揭示了AI时代的底层逻辑转换：算力/电力的消耗直接等同于生产力。过去的优化目标是“节能”，而现在和未来的核心命题是“转化率”——如何将廉价的电力通过AI模型转化为高价值的认知与执行工作。这是对能源-智力转换效率的极致追求。

这是早期互联网开放共享文化的基石假设。当“执行”作为护城河存在时，分享想法的风险为零。AI的出现彻底颠覆了这一前提：执行的边际成本趋近于零，导致公开分享从一种安全的多赢策略变成了致命的生存风险。

“复利资产”这个概念极其精妙。它揭示了知识库不应只是静态的存储，而应是随着新信息输入不断交叉引用、修正矛盾、自我进化的活体。这种从“查询工具”到“有机生命体”的范式转换，是整个架构的灵魂。

深刻揭示了当前AI编程代理带来的核心安全悖论：决策速度与监控能力的错配。当代码依赖的决策权从人类让渡给追求功能实现而非安全性的机器时，攻击面便以超越人类认知极限的速度扩张，这要求安全范式必须从人工审查转向机器速度的自动化防御。

大多数人认为供应链攻击需要数月甚至数年才能被发现，但作者展示了新型安全工具可以在几分钟内检测到攻击，比行业平均水平快63000倍。这表明安全检测范式正在从基于CVE的静态检查转向基于行为的实时分析。

精准概括了从对话式 AI 到代理式 AI 的范式跃迁。「说」与「做」之间存在巨大鸿沟：前者只需理解，后者需要执行力和可靠性。OpenClaw 从个人项目到 GitHub 第一，说明开发者对「真正能干活的 AI」有强烈渴求。2026 年可能是 AI 从「聪明聊天者」变为「可靠执行者」的关键转折年。

这一设计极具洞察力，它将记录的颗粒度从“全量行为”收束为“意图锚点”。Enter 键作为用户确认意图的通用符号，不仅大幅降低了无意义的数据噪音和算力成本，更解决了全量监控带来的隐私焦虑，是“少即是多”在 AI 交互设计中的典范。

「想法即执行」重构了创新流程的根本逻辑：当前的研究范式是「先筛选最优方案再执行」，未来将变成「并行执行多个方案再筛选」。这是从「精益决策」到「并行探索」的范式迁移——类似于从串行计算到并行计算的架构革命。代价是「组织复杂度爆炸」：同时管理十几个并行项目的结果，可能比串行执行三个更难，不是因为工作更多，而是因为理解和整合更难。

【启发】这句话提示了一种全新的 AI 研究范式：与其问「模型能做什么」，不如问「模型为什么这样做」。把情绪作为切入口去理解模型行为，本质上是把心理学方法论引入了 AI 可解释性研究。这对从业者的启发是：未来最有价值的 AI 研究，可能不在算法创新，而在「为已知现象寻找机制性解释」——就像这篇论文做的那样。

这篇论文的问题意识本身就极具洞察：大多数 AI 安全研究在追问「模型会不会说谎」，Anthropic 却在追问「模型为什么有情绪」。从「行为纠偏」转向「情绪机制」，意味着对齐研究的范式正在悄然转移——从控制外部输出，到理解内部动机结构，这是从行为主义到认知科学的跨越。

令人惊讶的是：仅仅一年时间内，Cursor已经从手动编辑文件转变为让代理编写大部分代码，这展示了AI编程助手发展的惊人速度，暗示软件开发正在经历前所未有的范式转变。

尽管当前AI领域由语言模型主导，但作者认为语言模型范式已经达到其极限，真正的AI进步需要超越这一范式。这与行业主流观点相悖，暗示我们可能正处于AI范式的转折点。

大多数人认为解决长时程LLM代理问题应该采用统一的方法同时处理全局进度和局部可行性，但作者认为这两种挑战本质上是不同的：一个依赖模糊语义规划，另一个需要严格逻辑约束和状态验证。这种分离的观点挑战了当前AI研究的主流范式。

作者暗示，从文本生成扩展到持久性工具使用是AI安全范式的一个根本转变，这一转变带来的安全挑战被当前研究低估。这挑战了将语言模型安全方法直接应用于代理系统的主流做法，提出了需要专门针对代理行为的安全评估框架。

主流观点认为文本语言模型和计算机使用代理的安全挑战本质上是相同的，只需将文本安全措施扩展即可。但作者指出，计算机使用代理引入了持久状态、工具使用和执行环境等全新维度，创造了与纯文本系统完全不同的安全挑战，这挑战了简单的安全扩展假设。

for - book - Hierarchy in the Forest - The Evolution of Egaliterian Behavior - author - Christopher Boehm - from - youtube - The Anthropocene Paradigm Shift

for - book - Goliath's curse - author - Luke Kemp - SRG comment - a naughty social superorganism! - from - youtube - The Anthropocene Paradigm Shift - https://hyp.is/a1E9ZtQ4EfCEQs_6Hskbmw/www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ggpzwSI1qY

for - economic paradigm - beyond growth Julia Steinberger - beyond economic growth

for - museum - science - display - planetary health - from - youtube - The Anthropocene Paradigm Shift - Nov 2025 - https://hyp.is/Ot-UntOhEfCX__eQaqeb2Q/www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ggpzwSI1qY

for - paradigm shift - outdated framework - Michael Levin

for - paradigm shift - anomalies reaching threshold - John Vervaeke

i think this is why it's so important to heal our childhood wounds (how we see ourselves) because when we heal ourselves through this way, we heal the world

for - adjacency - scientific paradigm shift - confirmation bias - universal behavior - liberal / conservative dynamics - progress

adjacency - scientific paradigm shift - confirmation bias - universal behavior - liberal / conservative dynamics - progress - It is a natural for humans to be both conservative and liberal - If we weren't liberal, there would be no progress - At the same time, we recognize the value of existing traditions - they worked and helped us to survive - Confirmation bias is conservative - why tamper with something that isn't broke? - Yet novelty is a behavior that even the staunchest conservative displays - It is nonsensible to think we have only one but not the other aspect, we have both

for - comparison - consciousness shift (Jean Gebser) vs Paradigm shift (Thomas Kuhn)

for - multi-scale competency architecture - groups of individuals coalesce into an individual at a higher level - SOURCE - Youtube - Bioelectric fields: A Paradigm Shift in Biology - Michael Levin - 2025, Jan

for - paradigm shift - we need a new story quote - a time between stories

quote - a time between stories - Despite this panoply of stories, we are in fact living in a time between stories, because - the dominant narrative remains the same: - progressing within the modern paradigm is the best way to create and maintain a good quality of life, and the only way societies can do this is through - Western-style industrial development, - corporate capitalism, and - representative democracy. - While many people recognise that this narrative needs to be replaced, - we haven’t yet found a new narrative that’s powerful enough to replace it.

for - paradigm shift - we need a new story

article details - title - Finding our place in the human story - author - Paddy Le Flufy - date - 14 July, 2024 - publication - substack - self link - https://paddyleflufy.substack.com/p/finding-our-place-in-the-human-story

for - adjacency - scientific revolution in action - paradigm shift - ignored by scientific community - critique of gene centricity

adjacency - between - scientific revolution - paradigm shift - critique of gene centricity - ignored by scientific community - adjacency relationship - Ray and Denis Noble's work advocating for an alternative to gene centricity demonstrates scientific revolution in realtime. - They are at the stage of being ignored by the peers for scientifically invalid reasons. That's a good indicator of the early stages of a paradigm shift. - As they point out, this refusal to openly debate has realworld consequences. - The entire medical community is oriented towards the wrong direction, looking for medical interventions in gene therapies which aren't going to happen because the science does not allow it.

for - paradigm shift - evolutionary biology - epigenetic's critical role in inheritance - experimental proof - C. Elegan - Oded Rechavi

for - molecular biology - paradigm shift - living system - 4 common misunderstandings - book - Understanding Living Systems - 4 common misunderstandings

4 common misunderstandings of living systems - 1. The central dogma of molecular biology - one way causation - Genes (DNA) to - proteins to - organism - 2. The Weismann Barrier - 3. DNA as self-replicator - 4. Separation of Replicator (DNA) and Vehicle (Living cell) are completely separate

for - Joseph Campbell - outdated mythology - adjacency - Joseph campbell - myth - paradigm shift - gestalt switch - symbolosphere

adjacency - between - Joseph Campbell - myths - symbolosphere - gestalt switch - paradigm shift - adjacency statement - The grand myths that invisibly guide our collective, - and therefore individual - behavior remains invisible as long as there is no crisis sufficiently powerful to portend a paradigm shift - At that point, the existential crisis forces us to recognize the invisible narratives that have led to our demise - and forces us into take emergency measures to stabilize the situation - This transition period also makes us aware that we spend the majority of our lives inhabiting the space of the symbolosphere

for - definition - hypernormalisation - definition - epic times - paradigm shift - eco-anxiety - Deep Humanity articulation - hypernormalization - epic times - Rapid whole system change - emptiness - epic times - gestalt switch - epic times - adjacency - hypernormalization - epic times - Deep Humanity - Alexi Yurchak - hypernormalization

definition - hypernormalization - the making normal of a state of affairs which is dysfunctional or absurd. - a term coined by the Russian scholar Alexi Yurchak

adjacency - between - hypernormalization - rapid whole system change - Deep Humanity - adjacency statement - Hypernormalization characterizes the poly-meta-perma-crisis of the anthropocene. - We can articulate the open source Deep Humanity praxis currently under development in the terminology of hypernormalization and epic times: - One way to understand the open source Deep Humanity praxis currently under development is that - Deep Humanity offers a framework to become aware of the Hypernormalization within modernity - Employing an epic times perspective can help provide the necessary GESTALT SWITCH ( a term introduced by Gyuri Lajos) that shifts the current growing eco-anxiety-laden affective landscape from - fear - hopelessness - inaction - confusion - to a broader context which can inspire awe, wonder and resilient meaning

for - outsider advantage - fresh eyes - outsider advantage - autodidactic - Whitehead - philosophy - paradigm shift

• He would teach at harvard from 1924 until 1937
• This is when most of his major philosophical books were written
• He reports in 1924 in the fall when he began teaching his first philosophy course to these students at harvard that
  • it was also his first philosophy course
• Of course he'd been studying philosophy but he'd never had formal education in it
• So as is often the case with major paradigm changes
  • someone from outside the discipline within which they provide some new paradigmatic understanding
  • is looking at the old problems with fresh eyes
  • They don't have the disciplinary training that would tend to leave one stuck in the existing concepts and categories
• Whitehead is coming into philosophy with fresh eyes

• paradigm shift - ontological - from material to experiential

• for: paradigm shift - scientific ontology

• comment

  • the paradigm shift from a scientific worldview from a material to an experiential one of the profound shift alluded to in the previous annotation

• for: what is the world made of, paradigm shift - scientific ontology

• question

  • what off the world made of?
• answer ( Phenomenological)
  • experience!

• for: epoche - examples - science, quote - epoche - paradigm shift

• quote

  • All major breakthroughs in science stem from a form of epoche.

• example: epoche scientific paradigm shift

  • Galileo, when looking at how the Sun seems to revolve around the Earth, bracketed the common belief that the Earth itself is immovable.
  • Newton, when interpreting gravity as action at a distance, bracketed the belief that any form of action should occur through material contact.
  • Einstein explored the consequences of Maxwell's equations, while bracketing all the presuppositions that had been used to derive those equations in the first place, including the absolute character of space and time. From purely phenomenological thought experiments, he thus derived the relativity of space and time, together with the precise rules according to which they can be transformed into each other.
  • Bohr bracketed the notion that a particle must have a definite state before one makes a measurement, when he developed his Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.

The data of the past is congruent with the current psychological trends that face the education system of today. Developmentalists have charted how children construct and revise intuitive theories. In turn, a variety of theories have developed because of the greater use of statistical information that supports probabilistic contingencies that help to better inform us of causal models and their distinctive cognitive functions. These studies investigate the physical, psychological, and social domains. In the case of intuitive psychology, or "theory of mind," developmentalism has traced a progression from an early understanding of emotion and action to an understanding of intentions and simple aspects of perception, to an understanding of knowledge vs. ignorance, and finally to a representational and then an interpretive theory of mind.

The mechanisms by which life evolved—from chemical beginnings to cognizing human beings—are central to understanding the psychological basis of learning. We are the product of an evolutionary process and it is the mechanisms inherent in this process that offer the most probable explanations to how we think and learn.

Bada, & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory : A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning.

As a result of Kuhn's scientific revolutions perspective, historians of science will need to uncover the frameworks and lenses by which prior generations saw the world to be able to see the world the same way. This will allow them to better piece together histories

How is this related to the ways that experts don't appreciate their own knowledge when trying to teach newcomers their subjects? What is the word/phrase for this effect?

Lego theory of science.

Individual bricks are facts which can be assembled in a variety of ways, each of which is a particular paradigm. Ultimately, the optimal structure is one which dovetails with the neighborhoods of structures around them while each having the best minimized structure of it's own.

With only handfuls of individual facts, it can be difficult to build them up into an interesting or useful structure to start. Doing this may help to discover other facts. As these are added, one may reshape the overall structure of the theory as the puzzle begins to reveal itself and allow the theorist the ability to best structure an overall theory which minimizes itself and allows dovetailing with other external theories. All the theories then eventually form their own pieces which can then be pieced together for the next structural level up.

See also Simon Singh, Thomas Kuhn, topology.

This feels like the sort of flavor of historical method of Ernst Bernheim mixed with Gerald Weinberg's Fieldstone Method.

Thomas Kuhn's book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions was directed to scientific thought over time, but he was aware of it potentially being applied, potentially improperly, to other areas. As a result, he narrowed down his definitions and made his assumptions more explicit.

This sort of misapplication can be seen in Social Darwinism, the uncertainty principle, relativity, and memes.

It also happened with Claude Shannon's information theory which resulted in his publication of The Bandwagon (IEEE, 1956).

• for: climate clock
• comment
  • We are already, in fact a highly interdependent species.
  • We are so specialized that if the precarious system were to fail,
    • few have the breadth of knowledge to survive, much less thrive on their own.
  • The key shift that is required is therefore not from a siloed to an interdependent one as it is from
    • an unhealthy and exploitative interdependence to
    • a healthy one based on holistic wellbeing

• for: system change, institutional change, paradigm shift
• quote
  • "Human institutions are purely human creations.
  • Their only legitimate purpose is to serve the people on whom their existence ultimately depends.
  • If institutions fail to serve us, then it is our right to eliminate or transform them."
• Author
  • David Korten

Notes can be used for different purposes.

• productivity
• Knowledge
  • basic sense-making
  • knowledge construction and dispersion

The broad distinction is between productivity goals and knowledge. (Is there a broad range I'm missing here within the traditions?) You can take notes about projects that need to be taken care of, lists of things to do, reminders of what needs to be done. These all fall within productivity and doing and checking them off a list will help one get to a different place or location and this can be an excellent thing, particularly when the project was consciously decided upon and is a worthy goal.

Notes for knowledge sake can be far more elusive for people. The value here generally comes with far more planning and foresight towards a particular goal. Are you writing a newsletter, article, book, or making a video or performance of some sort (play, movie, music, etc.)? Collecting small pieces of these things on a pathway is then important as you build your ideas and a structure toward some finished product.

Often times, before getting to this construction phase, one needs to take notes to be able to scaffold their understanding of a particular topic. Once basically understood some of these notes may be useless and not need to be reviewed, or if they are reviewed, it is for the purpose of ensconcing ideas into long term memory. Once this is finished, then the notes may be broadly useless. (This is why it's simple to "hide them with one's references/literature notes.) Other notes are more seminal towards scaffolding ideas towards larger projects for summarization and dissemination to other audiences. If you're researching a topic, a fair number of your notes will be used to help you understand the basics while others will help you to compare/contrast and analyze. Notes you make built on these will help you shape new structures and new, original thoughts. (note taking for paradigm shifts). These then can be used (re-used) when you write your article, book, or other creative project.

!- Title: A new economic paradigm for people and planet !- Date: Jan 30, 2023 !- Organizer: RSA !- Speakers: David Sloan Wilson, evolutionary biologist & Dennis Snower, economist

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLuJbg6eLC7Y3M9cFmc6QkDmP6z9FMIi_i

I made it through the first four and a bit, but wasn't quite sure what was going on at all to be interested to continue on... Still not sure what the point was...

https://medium.com/@ben_fry/tracing-the-origin-65011dc20877

Could be interesting to apply this sort of process to a variety of texts over time. A draft of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein comes to mind.

How to view this through the lens of Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions? particularly as this was the evolution of an idea by the same author over time...

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/03/us/nyu-organic-chemistry-petition.html

The paradigm stayed constant for the professor while it changed for the students coming into the program. Chaos ensued.

There will be longer term effects of this in 10-20 years when these students are physicians.

Hans Blumenberg felt that Georg Christoph Lichtenberg had a more sophisticated conceptualization of the idea of "paradigm" than the one which Thomas Kuhn delineated in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.

Cross reference the original mention of this:

9 Borck, “Begriffene Geschichte: Canguilhem, Blumenberg und die Wissenschaften,” in Borck, Blumenberg beobachtet, 168–95, 179, outlines Blumenberg’s criticism of Kuhn’s model of paradigm change as too schematic. On the notion of paradigm, Blumenberg, “Paradigma, grammatisch,” in Wirklichkeiten in denen wir leben (Stuttgart: Reclam, 1981), 157–62.

Weiss, D. J., & Shanteau, J. (2021). The futility of decision making research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 90, 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.08.018

Are these the groans of a movement from a clockwork world perspective to a complexity based one?

Or maybe you were interested in color the way former British Prime Minister William Gladstone was? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studies_on_Homer_and_the_Homeric_Age

Or you noticed a lot of epithets (rosy fingered dawn, wine dark sea, etc.) and began tallying them all up the way Milman Parry did? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milman_Parry

How might your notes dramatically change how we view the world?

Aside: In the Guy Ritchie film Sherlock Holmes (2009), Watson's dog's name was Gladstone, likely a cheeky nod to William Gladstone who was active during the setting of the movie's timeline.

Cumulative cultural learning seems to be stuck in its own recursive loop- the developers of the old paradigm become the old "guard", resistant to any change that will disrupt their change. Paradigm shifts are resisted tooth and nail.

The Stop Reset Go WEALTH2WELLTH program and sister city programs between wealthier and adjacent poorer communities can be an instantiation of OP NewNet. As the latest IPCC report shows, the wealthy play an outsized role in contributing to the hyperthreat so have a greater burden of responsiblity to reduce their footprint. One way to do this is transferring their excessive wealth to less fortunate so that they can have a viable safety net

Combined with open access Deep Humanity education, worldviews and value systems can shift and financial wealth can be seen as a tool for system change in which their ROI is an even greater satisfaction in playing a critical role in the transition.

An Open Access Deep Humanity education program whose core principles are continuously improved through crowdsourcing, can teach the constructed nature of reality, especially using compelling BEing Journeys. This inner transformation can rapidly create the nonlinear paradigm, worldview and value shifts that Donella Meadows identified as the greatest leverage points in system change.

Lehnen, N., Glasauer, S., Schröder, L., Regnath, F., Biersack, K., Bergh, O. V. den, & Werder, D. von. (2022). Post-COVID symptoms in the absence of organic deficit—Lessons from diseases we know. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yqar2

Uittenhove, K., Jeanneret, S., & Vergauwe, E. (2022). From lab-based to web-based behavioural research: Who you test is more important than how you test. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uy4kb

1. How do you get to the edge quickly?

I think this is where literature mapping tools come in handy. With such a tool, you can see how the literature is connected and which papers are closer to the edge of understanding. Some tools on this point include Connected Papers, Inciteful, Scite, Litmaps, and Open Knowledge Maps.

1. How do you do that across multiple fields?

I think this requires taking an X-disciplinary approach that teeters on multiple disciplines.

1. What do you do if the field seems misdirected, like much of psychology?

Good question. It is hard to re-orient a field unless you can find a good reason (e.g., a crisis) for a paradigm shift. I think Kuhn's writing on [The Structure of Scientific Revolutions(https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/Kuhn.html) may be relevant here.

Bago, Bence, David Rand, and Gordon Pennycook. ‘Does Deliberation Decrease Belief in Conspiracies?’ PsyArXiv, 8 March 2022. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/86jhw.

Deep Humanity, as an open praxis available to any human being to both use and contribute to is a leverage point that, by awakening us to our own sacredness as living and dying human interbeing, can shift our self-perspective from scarcity and poverty mentality, to hsving super powers that emerge from the lived experience of our own sacredness as living and dying human interbeings. The Stop Reset Go linkage between human inner transformation (HIT) and social outer transformation (SOT) are criticsl to recognizing our social transformative potential.

https://icds.uoregon.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Clark-and-Chalmers-The-Extended-Mind.pdf

Where does the mind stop and the rest of the world begin?

There seems to be a parallel between this question and that between the gene and the body. Evolution is working at the level of the gene, but the body and the environment are part of the extended system as well. Link these to Richard Dawkins idea of the extended gene and ideas of group selection.

Are there effects to be seen on the evolutionary scale of group selection ideas with respect to the same sorts of group dynamics like the minimal group paradigm? Can the sorts of unconscious bias that occur in groups be the result of individual genes? This seems a bit crazy, but potentially worth exploring if there are interlinked effects based on this analogy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimal_group_paradigm

Worth looking up the relationship of this to the creation of institutional racism and potential means of dismantling it.

Kevin Marks talks about the bridging of new people into one's in-group by Twitter's retweet functionality from a positive perspective.

He doesn't foresee the deleterious effects of algorithms for engagement doing just the opposite of increasing the volume of noise based on one's in-group hating and interacting with "bad" content in the other direction. Some of these effects may also be bad from a slow brainwashing perspective if not protected for.

https://youtu.be/qYsMtroVLeA?t=287

The big thing that I want to talk about here is out groups. This is a phenomenon that we that we see, which is that it's very very easy for people to decide that someone else is not like them they're different and they should be shunned and talked about.

This is the minimal group paradigm. Thanks to Rashmi for giving that term. [It] says the smallest possible difference will be magnified into in group and an outgroup. Kevin Marks, Web 2.0 Expo NY 09: "...New Words You Need to Know to Understand the Web"

Perhaps we can decrease the levels of fear and racism in our society by tummelling? By bringing in outsiders, treating them with dignity and respect within your own group of friends, you can help to normalize their presence by decreasing the irrational fears that others have built up and carry with them about these supposed outsiders.

‘Trust the science’ is the mantra of the Covid crisis – but what about human fallibility? | Margaret Simons | The Guardian. (n.d.). Retrieved July 27, 2021, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jul/24/trust-the-science-is-the-mantra-of-the-covid-crisis-but-what-about-human-fallibility?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Kata, A. (2012). Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm – An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine, 30(25), 3778–3789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112

Radulescu, A., Holmes, K., & Niv, Y. (2020). On the convergent validity of risk sensitivity measures [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qdhx4

Key quote. Correct. Individual action is not enough. We need a collective change of behaviour.

Gruszczynski, L. (2020). The Covid-19 Pandemic and International Trade: Temporary Turbulences or Paradigm Shift? European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1-6. doi:10.1017/err.2020.29

How does interpretation of the natural order differ depending on one's paradigm?

Elm architecture in plain JavaScript

definition of the Heisenberg (observer) Effect in research