22 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2021
    1. If folks want to get together and create a snap-free remix, you are welcome to do so. Ubuntu thrives on such contribution and leadership by community members. Do be aware that you will be retreading territory that Ubuntu developers trod in 2010-14, and that you will encounter some of the same issues that led them to embrace snap-based solutions. Perhaps your solutions will be different. .debs are not perfect, snaps are not perfect. Each have advantages and disadvantages. Ubuntu tries to use the strengths of both.
    2. The “no-snaps” ship already sailed years ago
you folks missed that boat. It’s too late to wish for a return to the past. Snaps in Ubuntu have been happening for years already, and will continue regardless of any opinions expressed here.
    1. If you’re not a huge fan of Snap packages, but love using Ubuntu, this guide is for you. In it, we’ll go over how you can remove Snap from your Ubuntu system and make it so that your system will no longer have access to the Snap store or anything like that.
  2. Dec 2020
    1. Le rĂŽle du directeur d'Ă©cole ou du chef d'Ă©tablissement : mise en place et suivi du PAP Le PAP est Ă©laborĂ© - comme le PAI - sous la responsabilitĂ© du directeur de l’école ou du chef d’établissement. Il comporte deux modalitĂ©s qui sont aussi celles du PPS : - premiĂšrement, celle du partenariat : le PAP exige la participation des parents mais aussi le concours des professionnels qui suivent l’enfant et qui sont invitĂ©s aux rĂ©unions d’élaboration et de suivi ; - et deuxiĂšmement celle de l’évaluation et du suivi. Le responsable de la mise en oeuvre du PAP – le directeur d’école ou, dans le second degrĂ©, le professeur principal – doit procĂ©der chaque annĂ©e Ă  une Ă©valuation des progrĂšs rĂ©alisĂ©s par l'Ă©lĂšve ; il doit veiller aussi Ă  la bonne transmission du dossier du PAP lors d’un changement d’établissement. Circulaire n°2015-016 du 22-1-2015 2. La procĂ©dure de mise en place
  3. Nov 2020
    1. In Rust, we use the "No New Rationale" rule, which says that the decision to merge (or not merge) an RFC is based only on rationale that was presented and debated in public. This avoids accidents where the community feels blindsided by a decision.
    2. I'd like to go with an RFC-based governance model (similar to Rust, Ember or Swift) that looks something like this: new features go through a public RFC that describes the motivation for the change, a detailed implementation description, a description on how to document or teach the change (for kpm, that would roughly be focused around how it affected the usual workflows), any drawbacks or alternatives, and any open questions that should be addressed before merging. the change is discussed until all of the relevant arguments have been debated and the arguments are starting to become repetitive (they "reach a steady state") the RFC goes into "final comment period", allowing people who weren't paying close attention to every proposal to have a chance to weigh in with new arguments. assuming no new arguments are presented, the RFC is merged by consensus of the core team and the feature is implemented. All changes, regardless of their source, go through this process, giving active community members who aren't on the core team an opportunity to participate directly in the future direction of the project. (both because of proposals they submit and ones from the core team that they contribute to)
  4. Oct 2020
    1. Incurring high-cost changes isn't evolutionary design-it's oscillation caused by poor planning and requirements specification on a high cost-of-change component-it tips the anticipation/adaptation balance too far towards adaptation.
  5. Sep 2020
  6. Jul 2020
    1. The surprising truth about what motivates us

      MIT Study Mechanical skills: larger reward leads to better performance Cognitive skills: larger reward leads to poorer performance

      Pay people enough to not think about money, it is no longer a factor

      Autonomy/Mastery/Self-Actualization If want engagement, self-direction is better Atlassian, work on whatever you want for 24 hours Allow learners to guide their own learning

      Mastery--we want to get better at stuff because it's satisfying; people have jobs, and for free people do lots of hard work; challenge, mastery and making a contribution: purpose motive

      We are purpose motivated and want to be self-directed

  7. Apr 2020
  8. May 2019
  9. Apr 2019
    1. Nobody can “treat” a war, or abuse, rape, molestation, or any other horrendous event, for that matter; what has happened cannot be undone. But what can be dealt with are the imprints of the trauma on body, mind, and soul: the crushing sensations in your chest that you may label as anxiety or depression; the fear of losing control; always being on alert for danger or rejection; the self-loathing; the nightmares and flashbacks; the fog that keeps you from staying on task and from engaging fully in what you are doing; being unable to fully open your heart to another human being.
  10. Sep 2017
    1. symmetrically while the expertnetwork data were treated asymmetrically.

      Symmetrically = no direction Asymmetrically = direction of the ties

    2. find out something they did not understandabout the marine environment.

      Indicates directionality of the tie and strength.

  11. Aug 2015
    1. What we should aim at producing is men who possess both culture and expert knowledge in some special direction.

      It's that "special direction" that becomes the key to organizing a curriculum. How do we help students to attach their interests to a direction in their lives? Or am I wrong to think that Whitehead, here, is pointing to a learning experience that connects interest with being of use in society, with political activism.