13 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2019
  2. Feb 2019
    1. And the screens are almost horizontal

      It took quite a long time to get to more tactile interfaces, yet still, predominantly (as I am using a laptop right now) interfacing more of a vertical interface.

  3. Dec 2017
  4. Nov 2017
    1. CRISPR screening has emerged as a powerful method for identifying critical functional dependencies in vitro (Koike-Yusa et al., 2014xGenome-wide recessive genetic screening in mammalian cells with a lentiviral CRISPR-guide RNA library. Koike-Yusa, H., Li, Y., Tan, E.-P., Velasco-Herrera, Mdel.C., and Yusa, K. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014; 32: 267–273Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (285)See all References, Shalem et al., 2014xGenome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Shalem, O., Sanjana, N.E., Hartenian, E., Shi, X., Scott, D.A., Mikkelson, T., Heckl, D., Ebert, B.L., Root, D.E., Doench, J.G., and Zhang, F. Science. 2014; 343: 84–87Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (936)See all References)
  5. May 2017
    1. You carry some gadget, a phone or a watch or a pendant or an implant in your palm, and use it to animate any screen or surface you encounter.

      This would be useful in some situations, but maybe not when you don't want others to see what you are looking at.

  6. Jun 2016
    1. owever, it isimportant to distinguish between generic job categories andthe specification of tasks performed; the contributorshipmodel is designed to record each individual’s actual input(e.g., experimental design, data collection, statistical analy-sis, final article revision), not job title (e.g., coprincipalinvestigator, technician, systems analyst), since the lattermay on occasion mask or inflate the former (Stern, 2000).

      Great point about movie credits: they are about job title, not contribution.

  7. May 2016
  8. Jun 2015
    1. Before 1992 most studies concluded that people read slower, less accurately and less comprehensively on screens than on paper. Studies published since the early 1990s, however, have produced more inconsistent results: a slight majority has confirmed earlier conclusions, but almost as many have found few significant differences in reading speed or comprehension between paper and screens.