Systems which display backlinks to a node permit a new behavior: you can define a new node extensionally (rather than intensionally) by simply linking to it from many other nodes—even before it has any content.

However, this construct is not completely equivalent to if ... fi in the general case.

For now, I'm still seeking a more satisfactory solution.

If the document is uncontroversial and agreement is reached quickly it might be committed directly with the "accepted" status. Likewise, if the proposal is rejected the status shall be "rejected". When a document is rejected a member of the core team should append a section describing the reasons for rejection.

I think it is indeed important that we get this right but I'd prefer to hold off on implementing such a system until we have grown contributors and until the project is successful. I expect that after the initial open source release and before the end of the year we'll want to move pretty quickly on this project and I recommend revisiting the RFC based model early next year. Does that sound like a good plan?

In Rust, we use the "No New Rationale" rule, which says that the decision to merge (or not merge) an RFC is based only on rationale that was presented and debated in public. This avoids accidents where the community feels blindsided by a decision.

I'd like to go with an RFC-based governance model (similar to Rust, Ember or Swift) that looks something like this: new features go through a public RFC that describes the motivation for the change, a detailed implementation description, a description on how to document or teach the change (for kpm, that would roughly be focused around how it affected the usual workflows), any drawbacks or alternatives, and any open questions that should be addressed before merging. the change is discussed until all of the relevant arguments have been debated and the arguments are starting to become repetitive (they "reach a steady state") the RFC goes into "final comment period", allowing people who weren't paying close attention to every proposal to have a chance to weigh in with new arguments. assuming no new arguments are presented, the RFC is merged by consensus of the core team and the feature is implemented. All changes, regardless of their source, go through this process, giving active community members who aren't on the core team an opportunity to participate directly in the future direction of the project. (both because of proposals they submit and ones from the core team that they contribute to)

In July 2010, Microsoft let go Jimmy Schementi, one of two remaining members of the IronRuby core team, and stopped funding the project.[19][20] In October 2010 Microsoft announced the Iron projects (IronRuby and IronPython) were being changed to "external" projects and enabling "community members to make contributions without Microsoft's involvement or sponsorship by a Microsoft employee".

by Irfan Skiljan

Coming from stuff like jQuery, a lot of devs who used React were like "wow", and coming from React, Svelte feels amazing too! People just need to try it, it's so incredibly simple too!

If you are working in a large enterprise application, we have to create small components. Small components are much more flexible in terms of reusability and maintainability.

How to Create a Messaging Application from Scratch

En dehors de la maison, la laïcité permet de respecter des règles communes, les enfants peuvent ainsi faire leurs propres choix, sans subir aucune pression.

I realise this is old, but as it isn’t a forum i see no problem in replying

There are a few intentional behavioral differences between Dart Sass and Ruby Sass. These are generally places where Ruby Sass has an undesired behavior, and it's substantially easier to implement the correct behavior than it would be to implement compatible behavior. These should all have tracking bugs against Ruby Sass to update the reference behavior.

Frontend frameworks are a positive sum game! Svelte has no monopoly on the compiler paradigm either. Just like I think React is worth learning for the mental model it imparts, where UI is a (pure) function of state, I think the frontend framework-as-compiler paradigm is worth understanding. We're going to see a lot more of it because the tradeoffs are fantastic, to where it'll be a boring talking point before we know it.

Prettier’s printWidth option does not work the same way. It is not the hard upper allowed line length limit. It is a way to say to Prettier roughly how long you’d like lines to be. Prettier will make both shorter and longer lines, but generally strive to meet the specified printWidth. Remember, computers are dumb. You need to explicitly tell them what to do, while humans can make their own (implicit) judgements, for example on when to break a line. In other words, don’t try to use printWidth as if it was ESLint’s max-len – they’re not the same. max-len just says what the maximum allowed line length is, but not what the generally preferred length is – which is what printWidth specifies.

Maybe it's also a bug because every warning should be ignorable? Not sure.

The RFC repo (where the reaction was strongly positive) is the place for discussion about what features to add; the decision has been made.

please direct questions like yours to the proper channels, i.e. the systemd mailing list. Random github issues are really not the place to ask such questions.

I'm not sure what's the best solution, but it could be a good idea to print the full path only at the end of the line, since it takes a lot of space, or to move it to a separate line.

Docker Swarm has lost. Kubernetes has won. My advice? use docker-compose.yml was development only, stick to version: 2.4 and forget 3 exists :+1

También creemos que estas técnicas y maneras de hacer reflejan un espíritu de la época donde está transi-ción está ocurriendo y muestran al libro como proceso colectivo, en lugar de como producto individual.

Over 4 million people trust CloudApp

OMGWTFSSL - Self Signed SSL Certificate Generator Self Signed SSL Certificate Generator

Please don't copy answers to multiple questions; this is the same as your answer to a similar question

If you have a better/simpler/"more official" solution, I'd still love to see it!

I'd be happy to take on this issue, if no one else has up to this point!

Industrialization: You can easily chop your form validations into smaller independent pieces that can be developed by separate teams in paralell with no dependencies.

On the other hand, handling form validation on your own can be tempting, but you have to cover scenarios like:

If you want to implement a form with a superb User Experience, you have to take care of many variables:

Doing a HOC properly, as a library should, with hoisted statics and displayName and ref, etc., is a hassle and would add unnecessary bulk.

If you define a variable outside of your form, you can then set the value of that variable to the handleSubmit function that 🏁 React Final Form gives you, and then you can call that function from outside of the form.

If that one somehow ends up being deemed an intended behavior rather than a bug, then it should definitely get explained in the docs too.

I'm not sure yet how much of this is a bug.

This isn't a bug. Svelte's reactivity is triggered by assignment, so it won't re-render on mutations like array pushing.

We want arr.push(foo); arr = arr; to work, and this is a bug.

“"

ToléranceL’école ou le médecin finissent parfois par accepter l’intervention du beau-parent.Sauf délégation d’autorité parentale, le beau-parent n’a aucun droit sur les enfants de son partenaire. La vie commune, l’affection ou, tout simplement, les contraintes du quotidien ne font rien à l’affaire. Pas question de donner un coup de main en allant chercher un petit à l’école ou en l’emmenant chez le médecin. L’instituteur ou le praticien seraient d’ailleurs dans leur droit en fermant la porte au nez de l’intrus. Et ils auraient raison, du moins théoriquement, car leur responsabilité est en jeu (pourtant, une nounou ou une fille au pair, sortes d’aides familiales, est souvent acceptée).>> A lire aussi - Après une séparation, comment bénéficier des aides et allocations de l’EtatFaute d’existence juridique, le beau-parent ne peut donc compter que sur une reconnaissance de fait. Ainsi, le médecin ou la maîtresse d’école qui feint de vous ignorer finira sans doute par vous accepter si vous avez été vu à plusieurs reprises auprès du vrai parent ou, mieux encore, si vous êtes inscrit sur une liste vous autorisant à accompagner l’enfant (liste n’ayant d’ailleurs aucune valeur légale).

But for big projects it should work out to just apply this techniques to certain sub-folders in your project where this problems occurs, as-if they are stand alone libraries.

These are fine and do not cause any issues.

Every URL is a URI; Every URN is a URI; URI and URL are NOT interchangeable – a URL is a URI, but a URI is not always a URL; URLs always contain an access mechanism.

Handling all these requests costs us considerably: servers, bandwidth and human time spent analyzing traffic patterns and devising methods to limit or block excessive new request patterns. We would much rather use these assets elsewhere, for example improving the software and services needed by W3C and the Web Community.

Identify your user agents When deploying software that makes requests to other sites, you should set a custom User-Agent header to identify the software and provide a means to contact its maintainers. Many of the automated requests we receive have generic user-agent headers such as Java/1.6.0 or Python-urllib/2.1 which provide no information on the actual software responsible for making the requests.

Subgroups of the computer underground with different attitudes and motives use different terms to demarcate themselves from each other. These classifications are also used to exclude specific groups with whom they do not agree.

Wondering how to get field state from multiple fields at once? People coming from Redux-Form might be wondering where the equivalent of Redux Form's Fields component is, as a way to get state from several fields at once. The answer is that it's not included in the library because it's so easy to write one recursively composing Field components together.

For all systems of structural incentive, the incentive of any actor (individual or group), must be rigorously aligned with the well-being of all other agents in the system and of the commons writ large. Ie, all externalities must be internalized – all the consequences of activity within the system must be included in the system’s accounting.

La privation pour un enfant, notamment s’il souffre d’un handicap, de toute possibilité de bénéficier d’une scolarisation ou d’une formation scolaire adaptée, selon les modalités que le législateur a définies afin d’assurer le respect de l’exigence constitutionnelle d’égal accès à l’instruction, est susceptible de constituer une atteinte grave et manifestement illégale à une liberté fondamentale.

Si l’on considère que l’œuvre exposée dans le musée n’est pas le sujet principal de la photographie réalisée par Alexandre, il semble alors possible de se prévaloir de la théorie dite de « l’accessoire » décrite en introduction de cet article. Ainsi, si Alexandre photographie un groupe de visiteurs contemplant des œuvres, on peut considérer que l’œuvre photographiée en cause ne constitue qu’un accessoire d’un plan plus large, et qu’il sera par conséquence permis de reproduire cette œuvre sans autorisation. Là encore, les règles juridiques pourront donc avoir un impact sur l’approche artistique qu’Alexandre retiendra, ce qui pourra au final être une force pour lui, en l’incitant à être créatif pour bénéficier de la règle de l’accessoire !

Les tendances qui se dessinentL’évolution du droit européen en la matière semble entrevoir un cadre plus libéral, c’est notamment en ce sens que l’on appelle la liberté de panorama

Qu’il s’agisse finalement d’images représentant l’intérieur ou l’extérieur, les pratiques actuelles devraient évoluer vers plus de liberté sous la pression du droit européen.

En cas de conflitSi un conflit apparaît, il est utile d’encourager la famille à venir rencontrer ou prendre directement contact avec le directeur d’école, le professeur principal, le chef d’établissement, ou le parent délégué, afin de donner toutes les chances au dialogue. Le dialogue entre les familles et les équipes permettra en effet de rechercher l’origine d’une difficulté et de trouver des solutions pédagogiques ou éducatives.

L’accompagnement individualisé n’est pas remis en cause : si l’élève a une notification d’aide humaine individualisée, il sera accompagné par un AESH individualisé pour le volume horaire indiqué et pour les domaines d’activités précisés dans la notification CDAPH

outiller les parents pour l’accompagnement de leur enfant

Le rôle du directeur ou du chef d’établissement au moment de l’arrivée d’un élève en situation de handicap est essentiel afin de préparer et de mettre en place les conditions nécessaires à sa scolarisation

Of all the compile-to-languages, the one that strikes me as having the least merit is JSX. It's basically a ton of added complexity for the sake of what boils down to syntax. There are no real gains in terms of language semantics in JSX.

Without elegant ways of expressing loops/iterators (like angular does with directives), the primary way to keep JSX readable thus becomes copying and pasting.

The react community has become a big cargo cult. There are some good ideas in the community and many Bad Ideas™. Paving the bad idea cowpaths lends a sense of legitimacy to these bad technical ideas that is not merited.

I agree that "it feels gross" is a bad reason. "not paving a bad cowpath" is a much better reason.

The only "issue" it has is that its unfamiliar. People have been working with HTML for years and are comfortable with it. That's basically the only reason that people find it more readable. If you make an effort to spend sometime with hyperscript, it becomes as familiar and readable as jsx.

Create HyperText with JavaScript

My proposal is that we solve this by treating a static key prop as different from one provided through spread. I think that as a second step we might want to even give separate syntax such as:

However, in function components there really isn't much need for this pattern since you can just use JS default arguments

I recommend folks use https://github.com/shama/bel instead of this package; we've been working hard on it for the past two years to make sure it has all the features you could want to write inline HTML. Hope it's good; closing for now!

Escaping is a subset of encoding, where not all characters need to be encoded. Only some characters are encoded (by using an escape character).

Encoding is transforming data from one format into another format.

Why not just use that instead of inventing a syntax that's not part of ECMAScript?

Because the code in question predates the introduction of the guideline and there is no other reason to be modifying that code.

Then at some moment I just stumbled upon limitations and inexpressiveness of templates and started to use JSX everywhere — and because JSX was not a typical thing for Vue I switched to React over time. I don’t want to make a step back.

Discussion is not necessary, but could be useful for critiquing a pattern. This would be useful for people who are proposing a pattern to the community or for people who want to gather feedback on an experiment.

Don’t indent code blocks.

When I say that my experience is that it means it's time to split up your components, I guess I mean that there tends to be a logical grouping between all the things that care about (for example) sqr_n, and in Svelte, logical groupings are expressed as components.

Les parents élus portent la voix et les préoccupations de chaque parent.

joue un rôle de relais et de médiateur ; donne son avis et émet des suggestions sur le fonctionnement de l’établissement ; fait partie des instances de représentations

Horaires des réunions Les heures de réunion des conseils d'école, des conseils d'administration, des conseils de classe et des conseils de discipline sont fixées de manière à permettre la représentation des parents.

favoriser les échanges entre les professionnels et les parents en développant des partenariats, en particulier avec les associations, de manière à favoriser le croisement des regards et des savoirs

It is named "Mustache" because of heavy use of braces, { }, that resemble a sideways moustache.

I believe this feature is overrated in RFC.

Since re-rendering in Svelte happens at a more granular level than the component, there is no artificial pressure to create smaller components than would be naturally desirable

This library takes inspiration from Tailwind and utilizes Otion to provide means of efficiently generating atomic styles from shorthand syntax and appending them to the DOM at runtime.

I’d still be interested in Svelte making things easier so I’ve opened a feature request for Reactive statement cleanup functions.

Disclaimer: I’m new to Svelte so this isn’t so much a recommendation as it is a “I guess this is a way to do it 🤷‍♂️”

I'm suggesting this is a problem generally. Users will not think of being out of sync with props

Svelte doesn't re-render, so you need to respond to component mount/dismount and prop changes separately as they are distinct concepts and never tied together, unlike in React.

Sometimes, you may be tempted to write that wrapper. Because all your (React or Vue or insert your reactive framework here) instincts tell you so.Resist the temptation. There is a better way. A svelter way. Introducing: the use-directive (a.k.a. “actions”).

However, especially when starting out, it’s very easy to fall into the “this is how I did things in my previous framework” trap.

It can feel like a breeze of fresh summer air.

élaborer des projets éducatifs avec les parents et les partenaires

Journée de la laïcité dans l’École de la République du 9 décembre

Il est essentiel d’associer les parents aux restitutions de ces productions afin de consolider les connaissances communes de ce principe fondateur de l’École républicaine

‪if you’re ever feeling down, just remember that the greatest talents of our time were all once consistently fooled by peek-a-boo ‬

Why struggle with custom Syntax DSLs when you can use one so widely supported?

helped me carve a niche for what would become SolidJS. I still see that space today, so I'm glad that I did.

It was clear no one was interested in what I was working towards.

Over time Adam, Surplus' creator, had less and less time to spend on the project and I decided to take my own shot.

difference in our trajectories

I started Solid years ago before I thought anyone would be interested in using it. I only started promoting it because it had already achieved the goals I had set out for it.

Leverages hash-based routing, which is optimal for SPAs and doesn't require any server-side processing

It's really useful if your PR relates to an outstanding issue, so please reference it in your PR, or create an explanatory one for discussion. In many cases, features are absent for a reason.

(Note sure if this is a feature request or a bug...)

Because I haven't worked with React Native, and so I'm not a specialist in it, and developing a React Native version of this package would better be done by someone being an expert in React Native.

There’s an entire category of products commonly known as Platform as a Service (PaaS) that endeavors to make this possible. But, so far, these services have largely fallen short of what developers need. Many of our customers have come to DigitalOcean after their PaaS became too expensive, or after hitting various limitations.