- May 2020
-
www.thelancet.com www.thelancet.com
-
Lee, J. (2020). Mental health effects of school closures during COVID-19. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, S2352464220301097. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30109-7
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Lengersdorff, L., Wagner, I., & Lamm, C. (2020, April 20). When implicit prosociality trumps selfishness: the neural valuation system underpins more optimal choices when learning to avoid harm to others than to oneself. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q6psx
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Pearson, H., & Balas, B. (2020, May 5). Can naive observers detect suicidality in face images? A replication and extension of Kleiman and Rule (2013). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/prfm3
-
-
misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu
-
Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Klofstad, C., Seelig, M., Funchion, J., Everett, C., Wuchty, S., Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. (2020). Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories? Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(COVID-19 and Misinformation). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-015
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Orben, A. (2020, April 30). The Sisyphean Cycle of Technology Panics. Retrieved from psyarxiv.com/dqmju
-
- Apr 2020
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Johnson, S. G. B., Bilovich, A., & Tuckett, D. (2020, April 30). Conviction Narrative Theory: A Theory of Choice Under Radical Uncertainty. Retrieved from psyarxiv.com/urc96
-
-
www.bps.org.uk www.bps.org.uk
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Shook, N., Sevi, B., Lee, J., Fitzgerald, H. N., & Oosterhoff, B. (2020, April 16). Who’s Listening? Predictors of Concern about COVID-19 and Preventative Health Behaviors. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/c9rfg
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Ennis, E. G. (2020, April 16). A Novel Solution to Academic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gqxmu
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Hallford, D. J., & D'Argembeau, A. (2020, April 15). Why We Imagine Our Future: Introducing the Functions of Future Thinking Scale (FoFTS). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bez4u
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Stefani, S., Ricci, E., Prati, G., TZANKOVA, I., Albanesi, C., & Cicognani, E. (2020, April 24). Gender Differences in Political Engagement and Participation among Italian Young People. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ps9ea
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Rosen, Z., Weinberger-Litman, S. L., Rosenzweig, C., Rosmarin, D. H., Muennig, P., Carmody, E. R., … Litman, L. (2020, April 14). Anxiety and distress among the first community quarantined in the U.S due to COVID-19: Psychological implications for the unfolding crisis. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7eq8c
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Rosenfeld, D. L., Rothgerber, H., & Wilson, T. (2020, April 22). Politicizing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Ideological Differences in Adherence to Social Distancing. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k23cv
-
-
-
Lades, L., Laffan, K., Daly, M., & Delaney, L. (2020, April 22). Daily emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pg6bw
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Wolf, M. G. (2020, April 26). Survey Uses May Influence Survey Responses. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/c4hd6
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Fried, E. I. (2020, April 24). Mental Health and Social Contact During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/36xkp https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/36xkp
-
-
-
Okruszek, Ł., Aniszewska-Stańczuk, A., Piejka, A., Wiśniewska, M., & Żurek, K. (2020, April 10). Safe but lonely? Loneliness, mental health symptoms and COVID-19. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9njps
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Colombo, R., Wallace, M., & Taylor, R. S. (2020, April 11). An Essential Service Decision Model for Applied Behavior Analytic Providers During Crisis. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/te8ha
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Abu-Akel, A., Spitz, A., & West, R. (2020, April 9). Who is listening? Spokesperson Effect on Communicating Social and Physical Distancing Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bmzve
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Ammerman, B. A., Burke, T. A., Jacobucci, R., & McClure, K. (2020, April 6). Preliminary Investigation of the Association Between COVID-19 and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors in the U.S. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/68djp
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Kirkegaard, E., Taji, W., & Gerritsen, A. (2020, April 5). Predicting a Pandemic: testing crowd wisdom and expert forecasting amidst the novel COVID-19 outbreak. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2d75g
-
-
www.apa.org www.apa.org
-
Resource List for pandemic and COVID-19 related topics.
-
-
www.today.com www.today.com
-
Spector, N. (2020 March 30). Working from home? Here's how to set boundaries for a better work-life balance. Today. https://www.today.com/health/working-home-amid-coronavirus-here-s-how-set-boundaries-better-t177077#annotations:fi0TFHmaEeqeMb8qy1cFvg
-
-
-
Call for Papers: Commentaries on the Coronavirus Pandemic Deadline: April 30, 2020
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Plohl, N., & Musil, B. (2020, April 6). Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: The critical role of trust in science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6a2cx
-
-
www.bps.org.uk www.bps.org.uk
-
British Psychological Society. Responding to Coronavirus: Resources and support. https://www.bps.org.uk/responding-coronavirus
-
-
thepsychologist.bps.org.uk thepsychologist.bps.org.uk
-
Symonds, J.E. (2020 April 16). Positive pandemic?. The British Psychological Society, the Psychologist. https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/positive-pandemic
-
-
www.thelancet.com www.thelancet.com
-
Holmes, E. A., O’Connor, R. C., Perry, V. H., Tracey, I., Wessely, S., Arseneault, L., Ballard, C., Christensen, H., Cohen Silver, R., Everall, I., Ford, T., John, A., Kabir, T., King, K., Madan, I., Michie, S., Przybylski, A. K., Shafran, R., Sweeney, A., … Bullmore, E. (2020). Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for action for mental health science. The Lancet Psychiatry, S2215036620301681. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Bailey, A., Knobe, J., & Newman, G. (2020). Value-based Essentialism: Essentialist Beliefs About Non-biological Social Groups [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m2eby
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Kraft-Todd, G., Kleiman-Weiner, M., & Young, L. (2020, March 25). Differential virtue discounting: Public generosity is seen as more selfish than public impartiality. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zqpv7
-
- Oct 2018
-
wiobyrne.com wiobyrne.com
-
The Online Disinhibition Effect (John Suler, 2004) - the lack of restraint shown by some people when communicating online rather than in person. (It can be good as well as bad. How can we reduce the bad behavior?)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_disinhibition_effect http://truecenterpublishing.com/psycyber/disinhibit.html
-
- Nov 2017
-
engagements2017-18.as.virginia.edu engagements2017-18.as.virginia.edu
-
The best mode of government for youth in large collections, is certainly a desideratum not yet attained with us. It may well be questioned whether fear, after a certain age, is the motive to which we should have ordinary recourse. The human character is susceptible of other incitements to correct conduct, more worthy of employ, and of better effect.
This idea that fear cannot effectively regulate behavior after a certain time is founded on basic social psychological principles. There is a concept of internal versus external justification. With an external justification, such as fear, one does something only because they know they have to, which leads to only a temporary change. Internal justifications, such as belief in a system of governance or code of ethics, leads to a permanent change because one does it because they believe it is right.
-
- Oct 2017
-
tinyletter.com tinyletter.com
-
The Bystander Effect - Crowds sometimes fail to help someone in trouble: everyone assumes someone else will do it.
Similarly, people in groups often fail to check facts as carefully as they would if they were alone. They assume someone else has already checked.
Careless people, and bots, tend to share news quickly, without bothering to fact check. Once something has been shared thousands of times, even fairly careful people are likely to assume it must be true.
Again, if social media was to think a bit bigger, there are ways to apply this insight to deprivilege the influence of the quickest, and privilege the influence of those making informed decisions.
-
- Jun 2017
-
noahpinionblog.blogspot.com noahpinionblog.blogspot.com
-
The Shouting Class -- people who criticize things as a way of life.
-
- Jul 2016
-
hybridpedagogy.org hybridpedagogy.org
-
the results remain compelling nonetheless
At least, they’ve become unavoidable in class discussions even tangentially related to social psychology. In intro sociology, they lead to some interesting thoughts about lab vs. field experiments.
-
- Jan 2016
-
status451.com status451.com
-
Alice Maz on communication failures due to different cultures of conversation and values.
Most people value feelings, shared perspectives, and social status. They see correction as an attempt to knock them down a peg. Nerds value facts, logic, and the sharing of information. A genuine nerd shares information with no intention of knocking anyone down, and prefers being corrected to remaining misinformed.
-
- Jan 2015
-
www.cbcd.bbk.ac.uk www.cbcd.bbk.ac.uk
-
Sobel, D. M. & Kirkham, N.Z. (2012). The influence of social information on children’s statistical and causal inferences. In F.Xu (Ed.). Rational constructivism in cognitive development.
-