a number of possible ways

Keep the details flexible

“You have to be very honest with yourself about what you’re solving for. If you get that wrong, you might make it hard for other people to understand why you’re doing what you’re doing,” said Fischbach. “So, ask yourself: What is your motivation? What are you aiming for? It’s easier for you to understand what you’re trying to do if you can articulate your goal.”

Getting other people on board is easier that way too. If you develop a keen awareness of the risks involved with your process, you have better odds of convincing others that the risks are worth it.

Sometimes you feel like you need to find something that is sure to succeed. But nothing worth doing has that profile – nothing in life.

conversation is an important part of the problem picking process because others may spot traps

His framework cautions people against choosing problems just because they’re easy, specializing so much that the problem is no longer useful, joining a trend too late, blaming external factors for issues you come across, and only copying the process of people you observe, rather than developing the actual process yourself.

Spark your inspiration

“It almost doesn’t matter which you use, as long as it gets you thinking.”

Use structure as a resource

Spend more time

What perhaps not everyone’s aware of is that we were working on making this team permanent and tried to apply for followup funding from different sources. None of this materialized due to the ban and the events surrounding it, and the team has since been disbanded.

Der Streit um den Kanon gehört zu einer pluralen liberalen Gesellschaft. Im besten Fall ist dieser Streit erkenntnisfördernd: Ein breiter Kanon ermöglicht einen differenzierten politischen Diskurs, weil er die ideologische Vereinseitigung und Verkürzung politischer Begriffe sichtbar macht. Immer wieder ist zum Beispiel in jüngeren Texten politischer Theorie darauf hingewiesen worden, dass der positive Freiheitsbegriff in antiken Quellen es uns ermöglicht, den Freiheitsbegriff der Gegenwart als negativen Freiheitsbegriff zu begreifen und in dieser Verkürzung zu kritisieren.

„Use it or lose it“

Man muss das alles nicht mehr können. Zumindest in der Theorie.

Lesen, Schreiben und Rechnen sind keine Kulturtechniken mehr.

Dem Smartphone fehlt die Tastatur schon seit vielen Jahren, aber selbst digitale Tasten könnten vielleicht bald verschwinden.

„Wir sind von begrenzten Webseiten zu unbegrenzten, ständig aktualisierten Feeds und einer ständigen Flut von Benachrichtigungen übergegangen. Wir verbringen nicht mehr so viel Zeit damit, aktiv im Internet zu surfen und mit Menschen zu interagieren, sondern werden mit einer Flut von Inhalten konfrontiert. Es ist eine Abkehr vom selbstbestimmten Handeln hin zu passivem Konsum.“

Although open-source Linux has a global impact in servers, cloud environments, and the internet’s core infrastructure, its adoption in consumer-facing systems remains limited. Efforts to develop Linux-based national operating systems have struggled to achieve scale, yet Linux’s flexibility, security, and alignment with European values make it a critical asset for enhancing digital strategic autonomy.

9781098108304

The mainline is an active branch, with regular drops of new and modified code. Keeping it healthy is important so that when people start new work, they are starting off a stable base. If it's healthy enough, you can also release code directly from mainline into production.

In many of these cases a tag is sufficient most of the time, and branch only opened if there's some essential change required to the source.

this pattern becomes essential when teams need to manage multiple versions in production.

Despite the value of release branches, most of the best teams don't use this pattern for single-production products, because they don't need to. If the mainline is kept sufficiently healthy, then any commit to mainline can be released directly. In that case releases should be tagged with a publicly visible version and build number.

Release branches are a valuable tool when a team isn't able to keep their mainline in a healthy state.

Many customers are reluctant to upgrade unless they have compelling new features, having been burned by upgrades that fail.

Teams that only have one version in production at a time will only need a single release branch, but some products will have many releases present in production use.

A typical release branch will copy from the current mainline, but not allow any new features to added to it.

Often team trust is the most important factor in the Feature Branch versus Continuous Integration argument.

Feature Branching also discourages developers from making changes that aren't seen as part of the feature being built, which undermines the ability of refactoring to steadily improve a code base.

This prerequisite does mean that Feature Branching is better for teams that don't force a Healthy Branch and require release branches to stabilize code before release.

higher frequency of integration leads to less involved integration and less fear of integration. This is often a difficult thing to communicate. If you've lived in a world of integrating every few weeks or months, integration is likely to be a very fraught activity.

We're less like individuals hacking away independently and more like a team working together.

What a lot of people don't realize is that a source control system is a communication tool.

If so increasing the frequency can make you more effective and remove a source of stress.

separate 1080p SDR and 4K HDR libraries

10.1109/MC.2003.1204375

978-3-8353-1658-4

9780262029575

Ein besonders wichtiges Ziel von Datensicherheit ist der Datenschutz, also der Schutz personenbezogener Daten wie E-Mail-Adressen, Sozialversicherungs-nummern oder Standortdaten. Verankert ist dieser im Recht auf informationelle Selbstbestimmung, nach dem jede Person selbst über die Preisgabe und Ver-wendung ihrer eigenen Daten bestimmen darf. Mögliche negative Konsequen-zen einer Offenlegung von personenbezogen Daten reichen vom Verkauf für Werbezwecke über Identitätsdiebstahl bis hin zu politischer Verfolgung. Aber auch der Schutz nicht-personenbezogener Daten kann im Interesse der All-gemeinheit liegen. Das gilt insbesondere, wenn von ihnen der Betrieb kritischer Infrastrukturen abhängt, deren Ausfall zu Versorgungsengpässen oder sogar zur Gefährdung für die öffentliche Sicherheit führen kann.

Wir werden kollektive Maßnahmen zur Beschleunigung des Übergangs zur Offenheit von Forschungsinformationen zu beschleunigen.

Is today's network more like 'a disparate collection of services that share common referential mechanisms using a common namespace?

“Le virtuel, c’est le savoir”

“Le virtuel, c’est le savoir”

Sommer, Felicitas (2023) Verwaltungsordnungen als Weltordnungen Sonstige Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsethik und Unternehmensethik (zfwu), Nomos Verlag

Heute benutzen die meisten Sekretärinnen flache, kurzhubige, mechanisch leichtgängige Tastaturen und Handballen-Kissen, selten auch mal eine knickbare Tastatur. Langhubige, steile Tastaturen oder mechanisch schwergängige Tastaturen wie sie vor 20 Jahren noch weit verbreitet waren, und exotische Layouts ala Dvorak findet man bei ihnen nicht.Was die Berufskrankheiten betrifft: Waren früher Sehnenscheidenentzündungen häufig, sind heute Rückenprobleme und "Geierhals" häufig anzutreffen (Beides wird auf falsche Sitzhaltung zurückgeführt).

Aufmerksamkeit für Prävention

doi.org/10.5771/9783748942399

the “salt of life.”

hollow answers

Emotionen

ISBN

Sie produzieren

Werkstoff

Medienmacht

Wenn von vornherein klar ist, dass nachher viele oder gar alle gemeinsam regieren, lassen sich kaum glaubwürdig “Schicksalswahlen” beschwören.

entwickeln

Formulierungen

Verwaltungsdeutsch

Geschichte

Aufmerksamkeit

Zeit

Redesituation

Gesten

Kleidung

kommunizieren

Performativität

gesprochene Sprache

Schrift

Dialog

Bild

Text

Wort

Medium

"This suggests that life may be flourishing on Earth-like biospheres elsewhere in the universe," Donoghue said.

By doing away with deliberation, a cornerstone of liberal democratic politics, right wing populism seems to have found the key to success in our fast paced society. For an increasingly large number of voters, time to think or reflect seems to be nothing more than a hindrance to effective decision making, and it is this line of thought that is swelling the ranks of the far right.

Technology has made impatience the norm.

In the meantime, we're all missing out on the benefits of (a) capturing images in wider gamuts today so we can view them in years to come, and (b) having systems and displays today that can be somewhere on the journey between the very limited sRGB/Rec709 standards of the previous century, and the inevitable landing spot of achieving full Rec2100 style displays everywhere into the future. Rejecting HDR now because we can only make it half way between the current spec and that goal misses the entire point of gradual improvement, and especially the benefit of capturing content today to view it on better displays in years to come.

For approximate reference, sRGB/Rec709 cover roughly 35% of visible colour. DCI-P3/Display-P3/AdobeRGB cover roughly 50%, and Rec2020/2100 covers roughly 75%. So even "HDR" standards don't cover everything a human being is capable of seeing.

team management