502 Matching Annotations
- Mar 2021
-
-
I'm trying to get official time at work to dedicate to source maps, and haven't made much progress there.
-
Still broken, @cannikin. Nobody's on board to investigate, much less fix it. Please do dig in
-
-
docs.openfaas.com docs.openfaas.com
-
OpenFaaS is hosted by OpenFaaS Ltd (registration: 11076587), a company which also offers commercial services, homepage sponsorships, and support.
-
-
faastruby.io faastruby.io
-
On the “lows” side, I’d say the worst thing was the impact of not being present enough for my family. I was working a full-time job and doing faastRuby on nights and weekends. Here I want to give a big shout out to my wife. She supported me through this and didn’t cut my head off in the process.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
markdown-it is the result of the decision of the authors who contributed to 99% of the Remarkable code to move to a project with the same authorship but new leadership (Vitaly and Alex). It's not a fork.
-
-
-
release 0.0.1 after around 5 years.
-
-
trailblazer.to trailblazer.to
-
It almost feels unreal finishing up this release post. It’s been so long!
-
After around 3 years of silence, Trailblazer is back with its 2.1 release.
-
- Feb 2021
-
osf.io osf.io
-
Armeni, Kristijan, Loek Brinkman, Rickard Carlsson, Anita Eerland, Rianne Fijten, Robin Fondberg, Vera Ellen Heininga, et al. ‘Towards Wide-Scale Adoption of Open Science Practices: The Role of Open Science Communities’. MetaArXiv, 6 October 2020. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/7gct9.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Licensed under the LGPLv3 license. We also offer a commercial-friendly license.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
This project is provided by the LinkedIn Presentation Infrastructure team as open source software
-
-
travis-ci.org travis-ci.org
-
Testing your open source projects will always be free! Seriously. Always. We like to think of it as our way of giving back to a community that connects so many people.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
drylabs.io drylabs.io
-
Our mission is to allow people to make money via educational efforts and to dedicate the rest of their time to creating great open source products.
What does this mean exactly? "Our mission is to allow people to make money via educational efforts"
-
-
trailblazer.to trailblazer.to
-
We’re now relaunching PRO, but instead of a paid chat and (never existing) paid documentation, your team gets access to paid gems, our visual editor for workflows, and a commercial license.
-
And yes, at TRB GmbH, we do pay people to work on OSS
-
To tell you the truth, the new tracing feature was the original reason why I decided to write 2.1 and make you sit and wait in agony for years. Nevertheless, tracing is simply blowing my mind. I can’t count how many hours and angering rushs of adrenaline I’ve saved since the introduction of the wtf? method and its helpful higher-level stack trace.
-
-
2019.trailblazer.to 2019.trailblazer.to
-
note that TRB source code modifications are not proprietary
In other words, you can build on this software in your proprietary software but can't change the Trailblazer source unless you're willing to contribute it back.
loophole: I wonder if this will actually just push people to move their code -- which at the core is/would be a direction modification to the source code - out to a separate module. That's so easy to do with Ruby, so this restriction hardly seems like it would have any effect on encouraging contributions.
-
Trailblazer (TRB) is an Open-Source project. Since we want to keep it that way, we decided to raise awareness for the “cost” of our work - providing new versions and features is incredibly time-consuming for us, but we love what we do.
-
This creates a win-win situation, you as the user have your peace of mind, and we can continue working with your funds.
Tags
- good point
- building software is hard
- reminder
- loophole/escape hatch
- labor of love
- time-consuming
- annotation meta: may need new tag
- software licensing
- support: peace of mind for those that have it
- win-win
- proprietary software
- open-source software: funding
- LGPL
- wording designed to be more palatable/pleasing/inoffensive
- work: doing what you love
- building software is time-consuming / a lot of work
- open-source software: not contributing new code back to project
- neutral/dispassionate/impartial/objective wording
- well-written
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Take 3, Previously attempted in 2012 (#8189) and 2015 (#19709). This new version uses ActiveModel Attributes API.
-
Another recent attempt: #35246
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Sorry for the delay, life got in the way. I should have some time to pick this up again next week.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Great thanks to Blake Education for giving us the freedom and time to develop this project in 2013 while working on their project.
-
-
openrct2.org openrct2.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
aeplay.org aeplay.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.openttd.org www.openttd.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.simutrans.com www.simutrans.com
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
-
This gives them a slight edge but that’s nothing substantial because those fixes eventually reach Ubuntu.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
opensource.stackexchange.com opensource.stackexchange.com
-
-
But all of these attempts misunderstand why the Open Source ecosystem is successful as a whole. The ecosystem of fairly standard licenses provides a level playing field that allows collaboration with low friction, and produces massive value for everyone involved – both to those that contribute and to those that don't. It is not without problems (there are many essential but unsexy projects that are struggling with funding), but introducing more friction won't improve the success of this ecosystem – it will just lead to some parts of the ecosystem to break off.
-
Part of me thinks that open source can be more rewarding to the creators/contributors. But maybe the real contribution is the permanent addition to the tools available to humanity, and if you have the wits, you can make a decent business out of it without tainting open source.
-
Selling proprietary software is difficult when there is so much gratis Open Source software around.
-
For a sufficiently successful and industry-relevant open source project, it's possible for the main developers to earn a living e.g. by selling related consulting services.
-
It turns out that creating and using Free Software is not just good to individuals, but for businesses as well, for example by building upon publicly available components and by collaborating shared software. The term Open Source is a business-friendly rebranding of the Free Software concept. This line of thought was also widely successful, e.g. Firefox/Mozilla was an open sourcing of Netscape software.
Tags
- level playing field
- open-source software
- software licensing
- open-source licenses
- consultancy
- ecosystem (software)
- fairness
- low-friction
- reasons for success
- economics
- proprietary software
- making money by developing open-source software
- fragmented community
- excellent technical writing
- business
- competition in open-source software
- motivation
- using open-source software in proprietary software
Annotators
URL
-
- Jan 2021
-
linuxmint-user-guide.readthedocs.io linuxmint-user-guide.readthedocs.io
-
This is a store we can’t audit, which contains software nobody can patch. If we can’t fix or modify software, open-source or not, it provides the same limitations as proprietary software.
-
Although it is open-source, Snap on the other hand, only works with the Ubuntu Store. Nobody knows how to make a Snap Store and nobody can. The Snap client is designed to work with only one source, following a protocol which isn’t open, and using only one authentication system. Snapd is nothing on its own, it can only work with the Ubuntu Store.
Tags
- use of proprietary hosted services
- Snap
- proprietary software
- software freedom: ability to inspect/audit source code
- proprietary protocol
- proprietary software/service seeking broad support/integration/acceptance in/by other software/platforms/vendors
- software freedom
- proprietary hosted services as a competitive advantage
- monopoly
- importance of open-source
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com0ad/0ad1
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
-
Lemmy is a great open source federated and privacy respecting alternative to Reddit. Nodes can be self-hosted and posts will sync between them.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
-
Unfortunately, this probably means a death knoll for this gem, at least I predict it will contribute to its slow trajectory towards insignificance/unknownness/lack-of-users.
Why? Because it is already the less popular option in this comparison: https://ruby.libhunt.com/compare-premailer-rails-vs-roadie-rails
and being actively maintained is an important factor in evaluating competing options.
So of course people will see that the premailer option is the option that is still actively maintained, is still continuing to be improved, and they'll see that this one has been relegated to dormancy/stagnancy/neglect/staleness, which will only amplify the degree/sense of abandonment it already has from its maintainer (only now it will be its users that start to abandon it, as I now have).
-
At work, I cannot maintain this project. At home, I'd rather spend time with my children and on projects that I'm currently passionate about.
-
-
-
unlike a traditional computer, a blockchain computer can offer strong trust guarantees, rooted in the mathematical and game-theoretic properties of the system. A user or developer can trust that a piece of code running on a blockchain computer will continue to behave as designed, even if individual participants in the network change their motivations or try to subvert the system. This means that the control of a blockchain computer can be placed in the hands of a community
-
-
augmentedsteam.com augmentedsteam.com
-
Augmented Steam is an open source project. You can verify the code for yourself, help us improve it or create your very own version.
-
-
material-ui.com material-ui.com
-
👍 Upvote issue #204 if you want to see it land faster.
-
-
stackoverflow.blog stackoverflow.blog
-
Would you work for free? It is a simple but loaded question that requires additional context. Is it working to help a friend do something? Is it work that you would enjoy? Does the act of working for free give you some level of satisfaction? Your gut reaction to the question may have been a hearty, “No,” but many people volunteer for a variety of things all the time, so people will work for free when there is something in it they enjoy.
-
Open source is fundamentally good with the transparency and flexibility it brings; however, as our reliance on it goes up, the overall investment back into the ecosystem has not. It can be easy to take for granted the time and effort many developers put into open source projects. Yet it is with their time and effort that we often save our own.
-
These developers are not greedy or selfish for wanting funding for their projects. To the contrary, they want funding to keep the project alive. A person has to eat, after all. Funding the project is a means of changing the maintainer’s timeshare—allowing themselves to put time into the project that otherwise would be used for other employment. There is only so much time in a day that a person can otherwise give.
-
Funding should not be a struggle for open source projects. We embrace open source into our codebases frequently but have yet to fully embrace the idea that funding it actually helps us too. The bug fixes and feature requests need to be implemented, tested, and reviewed by someone who themselves can only put so much time into the project.
-
-
snapcraft.io snapcraft.io
-
Chromium is a very popular web browser, the fully open source counterpart to Google Chrome.
-
-
discourse.ubuntu.com discourse.ubuntu.com
-
I don’t think he implies that, he didn’t mentioned FOSS or non-FOSS. Third party doesn’t refer to licensing, only to who provides it.
-
wouldn’t that « lesser » the FOSS effort towards desktop app’s ?
-
Snap gets rid of dependency mess. Good. Snap offers in one place FOSS and proprietary app’s. Here I am suspicious. It may be an advantage for a commercial app-store and for some users. But this advantage may lead to loss of comfort and flexibility for the many users that rely first on FOSS.
-
-
violentmonkey.github.io violentmonkey.github.io
-
www.gnu.org www.gnu.orggnu.org1
-
If it is powerful and reliable, that means it serves them better.
software is often oriented towards performance as primary (if not only) criterium, it is developed through a performance-centric lens.
other cultural, social, ethical factors are ignored or not taken into account
-
- Dec 2020
-
opensource.com opensource.com
-
You can also purchase a Nextcould hosting service, which on one hand may not seem any different from giving your photos over to Google or Apple, but there's a significant difference: Nextcloud storage is demonstrably encrypted, with source code to prove it.
-
-
hybridpedagogy.org hybridpedagogy.org
-
Following the model of open-source software, we can enter our ideas and expressions into public discourse
This also isn't a well-aligned argument. Articles published in a for-profit journal are entered into the public discourse (although obviously not into the public domain). Unless public means "without cost", which I don't think it does.
We might want to broaden this to include open-access, which is specific to publication models.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Our team is building open source community tools and Svelte fits our identity as an independent labor of love with an organic community.
-
With some frameworks, you may find your needs at odds with the enterprise-level goals of a megacorp owner, and you may both benefit and sometimes suffer from their web-scale engineering. Svelte’s future does not depend on the continued delivery of business value to one company, and its direction is shaped in public by volunteers.
Tags
- community (for a project or product)
- open source community
- at odds with
- future of project depending on continued delivery of business value to one company
- labor of love
- co-op (organization/governance)
- identity
- business interests/needs overriding interests/needs of users
- more interested in their own interests
- organic community
- organic
- conflict of interest
- open-source projects: allowing community (who are not on core team) to influence/affect/steer the direction of the project
- balance of power
- fits nicely
Annotators
URL
-
-
hacks.mozilla.org hacks.mozilla.org
-
Better community building: At the moment, MDN content edits are published instantly, and then reverted if they are not suitable. This is really bad for community relations. With a PR model, we can review edits and provide feedback, actually having conversations with contributors, building relationships with them, and helping them learn.
Tags
- wiki model
- helping others
- community relations
- reverting a previous decision/change/commit
- receiving feedback
- pull request workflow
- online community
- open source community
- community (for a project or product)
- helping others to learn
- reverting: creates negative experience
- encouraging feedback
- opportunity
- relationship (people)
- community building
- opportunity to improve/fix something
Annotators
URL
-
- Nov 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
There are actually 3 other libraries that implements material in svelte, i hope this to become the community favorite because using MDC underneath it implements correctly Material guidelines.
-
-
www.vassalengine.org www.vassalengine.orgVASSAL1
-
github.com github.com
-
If you are a developer and would like to fork, modify and/or contribute to this extesion, then this section is for you.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
It is open to the community to help set its direction.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
In Rust, we use the "No New Rationale" rule, which says that the decision to merge (or not merge) an RFC is based only on rationale that was presented and debated in public. This avoids accidents where the community feels blindsided by a decision.
-
I'd like to go with an RFC-based governance model (similar to Rust, Ember or Swift) that looks something like this: new features go through a public RFC that describes the motivation for the change, a detailed implementation description, a description on how to document or teach the change (for kpm, that would roughly be focused around how it affected the usual workflows), any drawbacks or alternatives, and any open questions that should be addressed before merging. the change is discussed until all of the relevant arguments have been debated and the arguments are starting to become repetitive (they "reach a steady state") the RFC goes into "final comment period", allowing people who weren't paying close attention to every proposal to have a chance to weigh in with new arguments. assuming no new arguments are presented, the RFC is merged by consensus of the core team and the feature is implemented. All changes, regardless of their source, go through this process, giving active community members who aren't on the core team an opportunity to participate directly in the future direction of the project. (both because of proposals they submit and ones from the core team that they contribute to)
-
So I propose having the repo in place, and using it for targeted proposals where we really want feedback from early users, and hold off formalising anything more until early next year, as you said.
-
Tags
- allowing sufficient time for discussion/feedback/debate before a final decision is made
- attracting contributors
- yarn
- soliciting feedback
- welcoming feedback
- software projects: governance
- change proposal workflow: RFCs
- phased-in/gradual change (working towards some end goal)
- too much ceremony/bureaucracy
- open-source projects: allowing community (who are not on core team) to influence/affect/steer the direction of the project
- open-source projects: process
- build concensus
- feeling blindsided
- have discussion/feedback/debate in public (transparency)
- governance
Annotators
URL
-
-
madewithsvelte.com madewithsvelte.com
-
Express - 19 $ 🏃♀️ Skip the Review Queue 🕒 Published in 3 days 💌 Full Customer Support 💚 Support the team
Wow, after seeing how this site works, I don't like much like it anymore.
Esp. this below:
Choose your preferred publish date - 9 $ Feature your project on top for 14 days and get an additional tweet - 19 $
I hope there is/will be soon a more open/free alternative (like the "awesome" lists that use GitHub PRs instead of an opaque/proprietary submisison form).
-
-
tunnelgram.com tunnelgram.com
-
Tunnelgram is fully open source (server and client) and uses the Tunnelwire Encryption Scheme, so you can see all of the code it's built on.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
docs.npmjs.com docs.npmjs.com
- Oct 2020
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Open Science Community Tilburg on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved October 28, 2020, from https://twitter.com/OpenTilburg/status/1318518990000607234
-
-
formnerd.co formnerd.co
-
react-final-form: README.md:1:
You build great forms, but do you know HOW users use your forms? Find out with Form Nerd! Professional analytics from the creator of React Final Form.
-
-
www.darktable.org www.darktable.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com
-
Science as Amateur Software Development. (2020, September 26). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwRdO9_GGhY&feature=youtu.be
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
As a result, it is no longer open source.
-
-
opencontent.org opencontent.org
-
Free to accessFree to reuseFree to reviseFree to remixFree to redistributeThe question becomes, then, what is the relationship between these additional capabilities and what we know about effective teaching and learning? How can we extend, revise, and remix our pedagogy based on these additional capabilities?
I look at this and think immediatly about the Git model of allowing people to not only fork and reuse/redistribute pieces, but what about the ability to do pull requests to take improvements and push them back up the the source so that everyone potentially benefits?
-
-
-
Over time Adam, Surplus' creator, had less and less time to spend on the project and I decided to take my own shot.
-
-
-
But maybe this PR should still be merged until he finds time for that?
-
Sorry this sat for so long!
Tags
- iterative process
- not a blocker (issue dependency)
- open-source software: progress seems slow
- waiting for maintainers to review / merge pull request / give feedback
- big change/rewrite vs. continuous improvements / smaller refactorings
- pull request stalled
- don't let big plans/goals get in the way of integrating/releasing smaller changes/improvements
Annotators
URL
-
- Sep 2020
-
scolaire.loupbrun.ca scolaire.loupbrun.ca
-
The initials fa in the class refer to Font Awesome, an open- source set of icons created by Dave Gandy,23 which further links this project to the open- source community and its ethos of collaboration. Font Awesome gives the community icons for making professional- grade web apps, rendering artifacts and objects legible in the contemporary web design ecology
Font Awesome est une police d'écriture et un outil d'icônes qui se base sur CSS, LESS et SASS (Wikipédia, « Font Awesome », consulté le 22 septembre 2020).
-
- Aug 2020
-
elifesciences.org elifesciences.org
-
Welcome to a new ERA of reproducible publishing. (2020, August 24). ELife; eLife Sciences Publications Limited. https://elifesciences.org/labs/dc5acbde/welcome-to-a-new-era-of-reproducible-publishing
-
-
openreview.net openreview.net
-
About | OpenReview. (n.d.). Retrieved May 30, 2020, from https://openreview.net/about
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.comYouTube1
-
Supporting Open Science Data Curation, Preservation, and Access by Libraries. (n.d.). Retrieved 24 August 2020, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SbmGWHpzAHs
-
-
www.flutterstory.com www.flutterstory.com
-
Open Source flutter Apps permits you to make lovely native apps on iOS and Android from one codebase. The most goal of this repository is to seek out free open supply apps and begin contributive. Be at liberty to contribute to the list, any suggestions square measure welcome!
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
JASP Statistics on Twitter: “How to copy tables directly into your word processor using JASP. #stats #openSource https://t.co/slson1Hxlh” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved August 18, 2020, from https://twitter.com/JASPStats/status/1295057741216485376
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
Stallman has also stated that considering the practical advantages of free software is like considering the practical advantages of not being handcuffed, in that it is not necessary for an individual to consider practical reasons in order to realize that being handcuffed is undesirable in itself.
-
-
-
GitLab is moving all development for both GitLab Community Edition and Enterprise Edition into a single codebase. The current gitlab-ce repository will become a read-only mirror, without any proprietary code. All development is moved to the current gitlab-ee repository, which we will rename to just gitlab in the coming weeks. As part of this migration, issues will be moved to the current gitlab-ee project.
-
How does the licensing work in this new setup? Everything in the ee/ directory is proprietary. Everything else is free and open source software. If your merge request does not change anything in the ee/ directory, the process of contributing changes is the same as when using the gitlab-ce repository.
-
-
-
Simchon, A., Brady, W. J., & Bavel, J. J. V. (2020). Troll and Divide: The Language of Online Polarization. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xjd64
-
- Jul 2020
-
www.theregister.com www.theregister.com
-
"Other office suites are focusing on the 'power user' which is a valuable market, for sure, but the real power and range for an open-source office suite alternative is the vast majority which is the 'rest of us. Sometimes we all forget how empowering open source is to the entire world."
-
-
lwn.net lwn.net
-
This is very irresponsible of them, with respect to the number of downloads. They should finally realize this and just redirect people to LO. Continuing like this hurts the Apache Foundation credibility as well as the open source community as a whole.
-
-
datamationcom.api.oneall.com datamationcom.api.oneall.com
-
Please give up the ghost - The Apache Foundation is one of the stalwart defenders of the FOSS community, but this dichotomy is destructive for everyone.
-
-
www.howtogeek.com www.howtogeek.com
-
This isn’t an accident. OpenOffice’s sidebar code was copied and incorporated into LibreOffice. The Apache OpenOffice project uses the Apache License, while the LibreOffice uses a dual LGPLv3 / MPL license. The practical result is LibreOffice can take OpenOffice’s code and incorporate it into LibreOffice — the licenses are compatible. On the other hand, LibreOffice has some features — like font embedding — that don’t appear in OpenOffice. This is because the two different licenses only allow a one-way transfer of code. LibreOffice can incorporate OpenOffice’s code, but OpenOffice can’t incorporate LibreOffice’s code. This is the result of the different licenses the projects chose.
What part of LGPLv3 / MPL prevents LibreOffice code from being incorporated back into OpenOffice's Apache Licensed code??
-
-
www.graphitedocs.com www.graphitedocs.comGraphite1
-
amp.dev amp.dev
-
A growing number of platforms, vendors, and partners support the AMP Project by providing custom components or offering integration with AMP pages within their platforms.
I guess AMP is actually open-source software, but it still feels like it's something non-standard. I guess it's just an alternative open standard to the "main" web open standards.
-
-
-
Stathoulopoulos, K. (2020, March 17). Orion: An open-source tool for the science of science. Medium. https://medium.com/@kstathou/orion-an-open-source-tool-for-the-science-of-science-4259935f91d4
-
-
choosealicense.com choosealicense.com
-
bugs.ruby-lang.org bugs.ruby-lang.org
-
All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers).
-
The date, time and place are scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Problem is, everyone's busy, so it can be days or even weeks before even a small PR is merged. So I'm stashing my stuff here as I write it. I'll still try to keep the PRs in motion, to gradually get some of this merged.
-
- Jun 2020
-
doi.org doi.org
-
Willem, L., Hoang, T. V., Funk, S., Coletti, P., Beutels, P., & Hens, N. (2020). SOCRATES: An online tool leveraging a social contact data sharing initiative to assess mitigation strategies for COVID-19 [Preprint]. Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.03.20030627
-
-
wprn.org wprn.org
-
World Pandemic Research Network
-
-
www.nesta.org.uk www.nesta.org.uk
-
Young, N., Saperia, E. (2020 April 14). Crowdsourcing ideas to combat COVID-19. Nesta. https://www.nesta.org.uk/blog/crowdsourcing-ideas-combat-covid-19/
-
-
rviews.rstudio.com rviews.rstudio.com
-
Views, R. (2020, June 3). More Select COVID-19 Resources. /2020/06/03/more-select-covid-19-resources/
-
-
github.com github.comDP^3T1
-
"You wanted open source privacy-preserving Bluetooth contact tracing code? #DP3T software development kits/calibration apps for iOS and Android, and backend server, now on GitHub. iOS/Android apps with nice interface to follow." Michael Veale on Twitter (see context)
-
-
telegra.ph telegra.ph
-
Unlike Telegram, WhatsApp is not open source, so there’s no way for security researchers to easily check whether there are backdoors in its code. Not only does WhatsApp not publish its code, they do the exact opposite: WhatsApp deliberately obfuscates their apps’ binaries to make sure no one is able to study them thoroughly.
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Han, H., & Dawson, K. J. (2020). JASP (Software) [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/67dcb
-
-
koha-community.org koha-community.org
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- May 2020
-
covid.deepset.ai covid.deepset.ai
-
Corona Scholar: Scientific COVID-19 Knowledge
-
-
touchpoints-demo.app.cloud.gov touchpoints-demo.app.cloud.gov
-
Open source and in the public domain
-
-
loomio.coop loomio.coop
-
organisation is open source too
-
-
www.digitalocean.com www.digitalocean.com
-
We believe in the power of open source software. That’s why we participate in, contribute to, and support the open source community so strongly.
-
-
about.gitlab.com about.gitlab.com
-
Organized by Output
-
-
www.netlifycms.org www.netlifycms.org
-
The folks at Netlify created Netlify CMS to fill a gap in the static site generation pipeline. There were some great proprietary headless CMS options, but no real contenders that were open source and extensible—that could turn into a community-built ecosystem like WordPress or Drupal. For that reason, Netlify CMS is made to be community-driven, and has never been locked to the Netlify platform (despite the name).
Kind of an unfortunate name...
-
-
www.civicuk.com www.civicuk.com
-
open source
So open-source that there is no link to the source code and a web search for this product did not reveal where the source code is hosted.
They're obviously using this term merely as a marketing term without respect for the actual meaning/principles of open source.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
-
I have seen that, but there is no cheaper alternative? Or even better an open source altenative?
-
-
-
the commented Python scripts optFromSmiles.py, optLigandInProtein.py and torsionalScan.py which serve as examplesof simple and constrained MMFF minimizations
I will learn these scripts
-
-
blindsidenetworks.com blindsidenetworks.com
-
www.sciencedirect.com www.sciencedirect.com
-
this is done by Tshinghua Univ
-
- Apr 2020
-
bitwarden.com bitwarden.com
-
-
We believe that being open source is one of the most important features of Bitwarden. Source code transparency is an absolute requirement for security solutions like Bitwarden.
-
-
www.benjaminfleischer.com www.benjaminfleischer.com
-
github.com github.com
-
Becouse of CanCan, StateMachine and others I deside to create OpenSource organization to maintain gems. People disappear, lose their passion about coding, get new interests, families, children. But if us many we can support gems much longer. I dont pretend to be an expierenced ruby developer, but I can do administarative work: managing teams, members, approve simple pool-requests. If you think it good idea and want to support some inactive gems, not life time, maybe just a little - welcome to organization.
-
There's actually discussion among the rubygems team about a process for putting gems "up for adoption" that you might be interested in: http://www.benjaminfleischer.com/2014/08/17/rubygems-adoption-center/
-
-
github.com github.com
-
-
Our hope is that once a formal specification for these extensions is settled, this patchset can be used as a base to upstream the changes in the original project.
What does "can be used as a base to upstream the changes in the original project" mean here?
-
-
github.com github.com
-
This repository contains the parts of the RubyMotion product that are opensource. It does not contain the full product, which can be purchased at www.rubymotion.com.
-
-
image.chongbuluo.com image.chongbuluo.com
-
http://undraw.co/illustrations
Undraw 是 一个完全免费的开源插画库，您可以完全免费使用这些插画，并且无需归属，你可以在商业或个人项目中免费使用。
它提供的每一张插画都是非常精美，质量非常高，网站也提供每张插画对应的内容，让你轻松找到自己需要的插画。
它不仅支持以 SVG 格式下载，也支持 PNG 格式下载；如果你下载的是 SVG 格式，你可以通过修改代码的方式进一步修改制作属于自己的精美插画，如果你下载的是 PNG 格式，你可以直接用于博客文章和社交媒体。
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
forums.tomsguide.com forums.tomsguide.com
-
And most important: No proprietary encryption software can be fully trusted
-
If you are concerned about privacy and looking for a bullet-proof solution then the only way to go is open-source software. For example, there was another incident with a proprietary file "encrypter" for Android/iOS which used the simplest possible "encryption" on earth: XORing of data that is as easy to crack a monkey could do that. Would not happen to an open-source software. If you're worried about the mobile app not being as reliable (backdoors etc.) as the desktop app: compile it yourself from sources. https/github.com/MiniKeePass/MiniKeePass You can also compile the desktop version yourself. Honestly, I doubt most people, including you and me, will bother.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
keepass.info keepass.info
-
Open Source prevents backdoors. You can have a look at its source code and compile it yourself.
-
-
support.1password.com support.1password.com
-
1Password wasn’t built in a vacuum. It was developed on top of open standards that anyone with the right skills can investigate, implement, and improve. Open tools are trusted, proven, and constantly getting better. Here’s how 1Password respects the principles behind the open tools on which it relies:
I found it ironic that this proprietary software that I have avoided using because it is proprietary software is touting the importance of open tools.
-
-
datagubbe.se datagubbe.se
-
Changing things doesn't necessarily imply improving them and it's improvement we should strive for, otherwise change is pointless.
I'd even go further and argue why change things at all in first place ? And that's why Open Source Software is better in this debate too. Don't change your software just for the sake of change.
-
-
blog.plataformatec.com.br blog.plataformatec.com.br
-
So what will happen with these projects from now on? All of the projects above have one thing in common: they were created and maintained by passionate individuals who wanted to make positive contributions to their communities. Without these individuals and their efforts, these projects would not have become what they are today. Therefore, it is only fair that Plataformatec gives these individuals control of these projects moving forward.
-
-
wordpress.org wordpress.org
-
Automattic uses WordPress to power WordPress.com, and it contributes back code and time to the WordPress project. It is a symbiotic relationship. It isn’t accurate to say that WordPress is Automattic’s product, or that WordPress came from Automattic. Indeed, the opposite is true — Automattic came from WordPress, and Automattic (through WordPress.com) exists as part of the vast WordPress community and ecosystem.
That's probably a common misconception. I'm glad they clarified that because I might have assumed that as well:
It isn’t accurate to say that WordPress is Automattic’s product, or that WordPress came from Automattic. Indeed, the opposite is true — Automattic came from WordPress, and Automattic (through WordPress.com) exists as part of the vast WordPress community and ecosystem.
-
- Mar 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
-
Piwik PRO uses a fork of Piwik open-source software (similarly to RedHat using the Linux kernel and multiple open source tools), however we currently seamlessly integrate a part of open source Piwik in our proprietary platform via APIs. Moreover, Piwik PRO controls all the changes to the code used in its Analytics Suite and since 2016 has been maintaining and developing its own fork of “Piwik” alongside the proprietary modules of Analytics Suite.
-
-
-
We are independently developing each of our products and don’t require permission from any other organization to improve them or create new functionalities.
-
-
matomo.org matomo.org
-
Source at: https://github.com/matomo-org/matomo
-
-
github.com github.com
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
foundation.mozilla.org foundation.mozilla.org
-
We code. We host debates. We create art. And all in service of building a healthier online world.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
github.com github.com
-
Unless you specifically need the open source tool, most website owners will be better served by the hosted version
-
- Feb 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
compared the speed of DeviceDetector with the two most popular user agent parsers in the Ruby community, Browser and UserAgent.
-
-
loadimpact.com loadimpact.com
-
We commit to build the load testing tool with the best developer experience, k6, and developing it in the open with the community, read our document on stewardship of the OSS k6 project. We believe this is key and the necessary foundation to build great developer tooling.
-
we believe that developer tools should be open source to allow for a community to form and drive the project forward through discussions and contributions. Hence why we built k6, the load testing tool we’ve always wanted ourselves!
-
-
k6.io k6.io
-
To never block or remove features from k6 in order to make them exclusive to Load Impact’s SaaS productStrive not to delay introduction of new features in the k6 OSS tool, if the feature was planned to appear both there and in Load Impact’s SaaS productTo never introduce into the k6 OSS tool any artificial limits designed to promote conversion to Load Impact’s SaaS productTo work with the community, participating in and prioritize building the functionality the k6 community wants, making it the prefered tool for load testing
-
With k6, our goal has always been to create the best load testing tool for the modern working developer and that we do this in collaboration with the k6 community. Our revenue will not come from k6 directly, but from premium value creating offers based on k6. These offers will be made available at https://loadimpact.com. Load Impact premium offers will have focus on providing further simplicity, productivity and ease to use functionality.
-
We believe the key to Load Impact’s long-term success as a Company is to foster an active community of users around k6 as an open source project. To achieve this long-term goal, it is vital that we do not withhold new features from k6 based on whether or not they compete with our SaaS offering.
-
Load Impact is a for profit organization, and recognizes that there is a need to balance this requirement with the needs of the k6 open source project. In the longer run, we strongly believe that those two needs will rarely be in conflict.
-
-
Load Impact is the initiator of, and an active participant in, the k6 open-source project, trying to serve its needs and lead by example
-
-
github.com github.com
-
We Open Source and actively participate in various OSS programs such as Google Summer of Code(GSoC), Rails Girls Summer of Code (RGSoC), Outreachy and Google Code-In (GCI).
-
-
-
that big disclaimer that it's unmaintained is a put-off.
If a project becomes unmaintained, people will stop using it.
-
-
gsantner.net gsantner.net
-
Open Source is one of my passions -- I am a developer and maintainer of many open projects and regularly start contributing to additional ones.
-
I do develop Open-Source Software during leisure time, for free and whenever I have enough time, energy and motivation for it.
-
I prefer to play Open Source or DRM free games, e.g. from Humble Bundle and alikes.
-
-
-
github.com github.com
-
This project is maintained for free by these people using both their free time and their company work time.
-
-
en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
-
With version 6.1.4, the Foxit installer was bundled with potentially unwanted programs like OpenCandy which installed the browser-hijacking malware Conduit.[11][12] Following complaints from users, it was removed after version 6.2.1.[13] In July 2014, the Internet Storm Center reported that the mobile version for iPhone was transmitting unencrypted telemetry and other data to remote servers located in China despite users attempting to opt out of such data collection.[14]
-
-
www.mprnews.org www.mprnews.org
-
"We are at a time where some people doubt the validity of science," he says. "And if people feel that they are part of this great adventure that is science, I think they're more inclined to trust it. And that's really great."
These citizen scientists in Finland helped identify a new type of "northern light". Basically, 2 people were able to take a shot of the same display at the same second, 60 miles apart, allowing for depth resolution.
-
- Jan 2020
-
drewdevault.com drewdevault.com
-
ambrevar.xyz ambrevar.xyz
-
github.com github.com
-
anno.fund anno.fund
-
In many cases, the projects exist, and the developers are eager to do the work, but schedules and the demands of producing sustainable income prohibits focus on the effort. What's needed is a relatively small amount of funding to facilitate that focus.
True that! I'd love to work on open-source projects like this if only I could feed my family while working on them...
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
gitlab.com gitlab.com
-
www.digitalocean.com www.digitalocean.com
-
First sighting of Jupyter Notebook (that I recall).
-
-
-
More broadly, we hope that others, especially the hundreds of new startups in synthetic biology, consider sharing pre-competitive ideas, methods, tools, etc. We think the community will be stronger as a result.
This is a great initiative. Hat's off to this company - Octant-bio for encouraging open sourcing of their hard work and optimization.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Dec 2019
-
onivim.github.io onivim.github.io
-
We're developing Onivim 2 in the open, but it is licensed under a commercial EULA.
-
-
-
We use http://asana.com at work. priorietary stuff but it works. Someone should make a similar open source solution one day.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
play.google.com play.google.com
-
Source at: https://github.com/xuhcc/mindstream
Apparent limitation:
- can only choose priority from A-C. I want A-Z.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
tus.io tus.io
-
tus is brought to you by the people behind Transloadit but the source code to all of our implementations, this website and even the protocol itself is accessible to everyone under MIT license
-
-
github.com github.com
-
If you need a tool to backup your documents and files please take a look at the excellent BackInTime application which is more configurable and provides options for saving user files.
-
Timeshift for Linux is an application that provides functionality similar to the System Restore feature in Windows and the Time Machine tool in Mac OS.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
For: the app represented by https://padloc.app/
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
-
Choose Your Plan
-
Transparently Secure. We believe that transparency and openness are the best foundation for trust so we are building Padloc completely out in the open. Our source code is developed under an open source licence so anyone can review it, provide feedback and even offer contributions at any time!
-
-
justread.link justread.link
-
www.synfig.org www.synfig.orgSynfig1
-
Source code at: https://github.com/synfig/synfig/
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
opentoonz.github.io opentoonz.github.io
-
Source code at: https://github.com/opentoonz/opentoonz
-
-
newpipe.schabi.org newpipe.schabi.org
-
Why NewPipe is free
-
Our goal is to make the internet a more free (libre) place and open it for everyone
-
- Nov 2019
-
github.com github.com