Transparent Peer Review
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
- reviews
- authors' reply
- editorial decisions
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
How to create your own habit dashboard that motivates you to stick to any habit
Serra-Garcia, M., & Gneezy, U. (2021). Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones. Science Advances, 7(21), eabd1705. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd1705
Collective Intelligence. (2020, July 18). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/collective-intelligence/journal203713
This project is an initial prototype of an application for a minimalist journaling system as conceived by Michal Korzonek.
Mark Wagnon shared this site for personal growth, community development, and global connection when I was talking about an idea to build an app for a Minimalist Journal.
R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
Found on Wiley Journals Audience: Wiley Open Access journals are supported by a network of authoritative journals and societies as well as internationally renowned editorial board members. All research articles published in Wiley Open Access journals are immediately freely available to read, download and share. Wiley Open Access publishes a number of online journals across biological, chemical and health sciences.
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Gizmodo. “Journal Retracts Terrible Study That Claimed Widespread Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths.” Accessed August 16, 2021. https://gizmodo.com/journal-retracts-terrible-study-that-claimed-widespread-1847219596.
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Yesilada, M., Holford, D. L., Wulf, M., Hahn, U., Lewandowsky, S., Herzog, S., Radosevic, M., Stuchlý, E., Taylor, K., Ye, S., Saxena, G., & El-Halaby, G. (2021). Who, What, Where: Tracking the development of COVID-19 related PsyArXiv preprints. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/evmgs
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Prof Nichola Raihani on Twitter: “Submitted a paper reporting null results to a mid tier journal. Guess how it went. I literally don’t care at this point but I do feel bad for the first author (who I won’t name here). Https://t.co/sX5lTcEl29” / Twitter. (n.d.). Retrieved July 16, 2021, from https://twitter.com/nicholaraihani/status/1415308025179656194
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Persistent Identifiers (PIDs) beyond the DOI
Research other persistent identifiers besides DOI.
To get closer to attaining coveted “rich” metadata and ultimately contribute to a “richer” scholarly communication ecosystem, journals first need to have machine-readable metadata that is clean, consistent, and as interoperable as possible.
What WordPress plugins provide structured metadata functionality for OpenPhysio.
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Publisher costs usually include copyediting/formatting and organizing peer review. While these content transformations are fundamental and beneficial, they alone cannot justify the typical APC (Article Publication Charge), especially since peer reviewers are not paid.
But peer reviewers are largely responsible for generating the assertions you talk about in the next paragraph, and which apparently, justify the cost of publishing.
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
There was no public forum for incremental advances.
I've never thought of the academic paper as a format that enabled the documentation of incremental progress.
Network science is now a mature research field, whose growth was catalysed by the introduction of the ‘small world’ network model in 1998. Networks give mathematical descriptions of systems containing containing many interacting components, including power grids, neuronal networks and ecosystems. This collection brings together selected research, comments and review articles on how networks are structured (Layers & structure); how networks can describe healthy and disordered systems (Brain & disorders); how dynamics unfold on networks (Dynamics & spread); and community structures and resilience in networks (Community & resilience).
This is a great looking collection of articles on network science.
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Tiokhin, L. (2021, April 21). Why indirect contributions matter for science and scientists. Medium. https://leonidtiokhin.medium.com/why-indirect-contributions-matter-for-science-and-scientists-6c9bf827bc7d
Volume 52, issue 1, February 2021
French version of the ToC available https://doi.org/10.15454/LYQOEP
Apidologie
Translations :
activité locomotrice / division du travail / taille du corps / phototaxie / âge / Bombus
Bewegungsaktivität / Arbeitsteilung / Körpergrösse / Phototaxis / Alter / Bombus
Species turnover and low stability in a community of euglossine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) sampled within 28 years in an urban forest fragment
French translation (title and keywords):
Turnover d’espèces et faible stabilité dans une communauté d’abeilles euglossine (Hymenoptera : Apidae) échantillonnée dans un fragment de forêt urbaine, pendant 28 ans.
Euglossa cordata / Eulaema nigrita / abeille à orchidées / espèce résiliente.
German translation (title and keywords):
Artenwechsel und geringe Stabilität in einer Gemeinschaft von Euglossinen (Hymenoptera: Apidae), die über einen Zeitraum von 28 Jahren in einem urbanen Waldfragment gesammelt wurden.
Euglossa cordata / Eulaema nigrita / Prachtbienen/ resiliente Arten.
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Schiavone, S. R., Bottesini, J. G., & Vazire, S. (2021). The Crisis from Above: Gatekeepers Need Better Standards. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mby5u
PRINCIPIA - Decentralized peer review. (n.d.). Retrieved 5 March 2021, from http://www.principia.network/
Anne Urai. (2020, November 15). All-inclusive authorship on large scientific papers can a be dangerous practice Alert: Potential unpopular opinion Thread 👇1/n [Tweet]. @AnneEUrai. https://twitter.com/AnneEUrai/status/1327934091929464832
CHILD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES
The article is found in this scholarly journal.
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
The submitted manuscript is a privileged communication; reviewers must treat it as confidential. It should not be retained or copied. Also, reviewers must not share the manuscript with any colleagues without the explicit permission of the editor. Reviewers and editors must not make any personal or professional use of the data, arguments, or interpretations (other than those directly involved in its peer review) prior to publication unless they have the authors' specific permission or are writing an editorial or commentary to accompany the article.
Etika untuk Mitra Bestari
The reviewer should have identified and commented on major strengths and weaknesses of study design and methodology The reviewer should comment accurately and constructively upon the quality of the author's interpretation of the data, including acknowledgment of its limitations. The reviewer should comment on major strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript as a written communication, independent of the design, methodology, results, and interpretation of the study. The reviewer should comment on any ethical concerns raised by the study, or any possible evidence of low standards of scientific conduct. The reviewer should provide the author with useful suggestions for improvement of the manuscript. The reviewer's comments to the author should be constructive and professional The review should provide the editor the proper context and perspective to make a decision on acceptance (and/or revision) of the manuscript.
Poin-poin yang mejadi tolok ukur mitra bestari dalam melakukan review
to provide written assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of written research, with the aim of improving the reporting of research and identifying the most appropriate and highest quality material for the journal
Tujuan dari peninjauan sejawat (peer-review) adalah mengetahui kekuatan dan kelemahan naskah sehingga dapat dilakukan peningkatan mutu.
Authorship
semua orang yang berkontribusi secara substansial terhadap proses perencanaan, pengumpulan data, interpretasi hasil maupun penulisan dan merevisi naskah secara kritis dan menyetujui manuskrip versi akhir dan setuju untuk bertanggung jawab atas semua aspek pekerjaan. Setiap orang yang memenuhi kriteria pertama harus diizinkan berpartisipasi dalam penyusunan dan persetujuan manuskrip versi final (ICMJE 2017). Penulis pertama haruslah seseorang yang berkontribusi paling banyak.
https://www.ease.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/doi.10.20316.ESE_.2018.44.e1.in_.pdf
Animal experiments should require full compliance with local, national, ethical, and regulatory principles, and local licensing arrangements
Demikian juga dengan penggunaan hewan sebayak objek kajian, harus mengikuti standar etika yang berlaku (Helsinki).
Journals should have explicit policies as to whether these review board approvals must be documented by the authors, or simply attested to in their cover letter, and how they should be described in the manuscript itself
Seminimal mungkin, penulis harus menyampaikan keputusan etik dari komisi etik dan lebih ideal lagi jika menyertakan surat keputusan bebas etiknya.
For those investigators who do not have access to formal ethics review committees, the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki should be followed
Jika tidak memungkinkan untuk diperoleh hasil review etik, penulis seharusnya secara explisit menjelaskan apakah pelaksanaan kajian sesuai dengan Deklarasi Helsinki atau mereka memiliki pandangan lain.
Documented review and approval from a formally constituted review board (Institutional Review Board or Ethics committee) should be required for all studies involving people, medical records, and human tissues
Penulis harus menyertakan keterangan bebas review yang diterbitkan oleh komisi etik penelitian kesehatan.
Fabrication, falsification, concealment, deceptive reporting, or misrepresentation of data constitute scientific misconduct
Untuk mencapai kualitas terbaik pada ilmu pengetahuan yang diterbitkan, kajian harus terbebas dari permasalahan etika tersebut
Following the model of open-source software, we can enter our ideas and expressions into public discourse
This also isn't a well-aligned argument. Articles published in a for-profit journal are entered into the public discourse (although obviously not into the public domain). Unless public means "without cost", which I don't think it does.
We might want to broaden this to include open-access, which is specific to publication models.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
European Society of Cardiology
micrositio
Holcombe, A. (2020, September 30). Conventional journal rankings—Fight them! Medium. https://medium.com/@ceptional/conventional-journal-rankings-fight-them-9c6db600b0dd
unidad_COVID2019
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Kojaku, S., Livan, G., & Masuda, N. (2020). Detecting citation cartels in journal networks. ArXiv:2009.09097 [Physics]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.09097
Kwon, D. (2020). More than 100 scientific journals have disappeared from the Internet. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02610-z
Rapid Reviews COVID-19. (n.d.). Rapid Reviews COVID-19. Retrieved September 11, 2020, from https://rapidreviewscovid19.mitpress.mit.edu/
r/BehSciMeta - Comment by u/dawnlxh on ”A completely re-imagined approach to peer review and publishing: PRINCIPIA”. (n.d.). Reddit. Retrieved September 10, 2020, from https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciMeta/comments/if03sk/a_completely_reimagined_approach_to_peer_review/g4nnuc5
Science, C. for O. (n.d.). TOP Guidelines. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://www.cos.io/our-services/top-guidelines
Lab to field. (n.d.). Behaviourally Informed Organizations. Retrieved June 21, 2020, from https://www.biorgpartnership.com/lab-to-field
On Sentence Fragments
Sentence Fragments
Passive Voice Article
Em Dash
Good examples of Em Dash use
We use the em dash to create a strong break in the structure of a sentence. We can use these dashes in pairs, as we would use parentheses—that is, to enclose a word, or a phrase, or a clause (as we’ve done here)—or they can be used alone to detach one end of a sentence from its main body.
on Hyphen, em dashes and en dashes.
hyphen, em dash, en dash
Hyphen
e.g., well-being advanced-level school-aged 16-year-old
Em Dash
Em is a typographical unit of measure.
En Dash means as "through", often used to describe a range of numbers 2–27, 30–35 years old.
In the associated press style there is advice to use a space in between the dashes.
When to use em dashes versus comma vs. em dashes.
Parentheses, can sometimes be interpreted to downplay importance of information.
Commas, okay to use unless you have more commas in the sentence, and doesn't draw particular attention to info — doesn't emphasize it enough.
Em Dashes, indicate that information is important or are useful when commas don't work.
BMJ Open Science
Marcus, A. A. (2020, August 16). Hydroxychloroquine, push-scooters, and COVID-19: A journal gets stung, and swiftly retracts. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/2020/08/16/hydroxychloroquine-push-scooters-and-covid-19-a-journal-gets-stung-and-swiftly-retracts/
Paris, Marseille named as high-risk COVID zones, making curbs likelier. (2020, August 14). Reuters. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-health-coronavirus-france-idUKKCN25A0LC
It will find there is "very little evidence that the virus is transmitted in schools",
The reporter interviewed Professor Russel Viner, president of Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health. Apparently, a study was conducted through April to June which collected information of 20,000 students and 100 teachers yet there is no link to this study, did not get peer reviewed or published. It is all just claims at this point. We have no knowledge if these are private schools or public, if there were any safety measures in place, if this included online classes vs in class.
However, according to CDC and the respected studies it cited, there seems to be lower transmission rates among children and transmission from child to family, but this remains inconclusive. There still needs to be more evidence to be gathered.
Michael Eisen on Twitter: “A core problem in science publishing today is that we have a system where the complex, multidimensional assessment of the rigor, validity, utility, audience and impact of a work that emerges from peer review gets reduced to a single overvalued ‘accept/reject’ decision.” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved August 10, 2020, from https://twitter.com/mbeisen/status/1291752487448276992
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
COVID-19: Relevant Calls for Papers from APA Journals. (n.d.). Https://Www.Apa.Org. Retrieved July 1, 2020, from https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/resources/covid-19-calls-for-papers
Yamada, Y. (2020). Micropublishing during and after the COVID-19 era [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8fum4
Welcome! You are invited to join a webinar: COVID-19 Series: Medical journals - Episode 24. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email about joining the webinar. (n.d.). Zoom Video. Retrieved June 20, 2020, from https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_4_dGVRvDQEWi_d7ll7kMtQ
RSM COVID-19 Series | Episode 24: Medical Journals. (2020, June 24). YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=et-kl5ypx8Q
Horbach, S. P. J. M. (2020). Pandemic Publishing: Medical journals drastically speed up their publication process for Covid-19. BioRxiv, 2020.04.18.045963. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.18.045963
Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., & Jacquart, P. (2020). In praise of the impact factor [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h4p9e
Holcombe, A. (2020, May 25). As new venues for peer review flower, will journals catch up? Psychonomic Society Featured Content. https://featuredcontent.psychonomic.org/as-new-venues-for-peer-review-flower-will-journals-catch-up/
Ofosu, G. K., & Posner, D. N. (2020). Do Pre-analysis Plans Hamper Publication? AEA Papers and Proceedings, 110, 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20201079
Science, C. for O. (2020 May 5). TOP Factor to appear in Master Journal List. https://www.cos.io/about/news/cos-and-the-web-of-science-collaborate-to-bring-top-factor-to-master-journal-list
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Download the complete Review Process [PDF] including:
Aspesi, C., & Brand, A. (2020). In pursuit of open science, open access is not enough. Science, 368(6491), 574–577. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba3763
The Tree of Life: Stop deifying “peer review” of journal publications: (2012, February 4). The Tree of Life. https://phylogenomics.blogspot.com/2012/02/stop-deifying-peer-review-of-journal.html
American Psychological Association. *COVID-19: Free articles from APA journals. Apa.org. https://www.apa.org/pubs/highlights/covid-19-articles
Hadavand, A., Hamermesh, D.S., & Wilson, W.W. (2020). Is scholarly refereeing productive (at the margin)? The National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w26614
Munafo, M. (n.d.). What you need to know about how coronavirus is changing science. The Conversation. Retrieved May 6, 2020, from http://theconversation.com/what-you-need-to-know-about-how-coronavirus-is-changing-science-137641
Chambers, C. (2020 March 16). CALLING ALL SCIENTISTS: Rapid evaluation of COVID19-related Registered Reports at Royal Society Open Science
10 Updates*
Ennis, E. G. (2020, April 16). A Novel Solution to Academic Publishing. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gqxmu
Alex Holcombe en Twitter: “Finally journal editors are losing their lock on scholarship- COVID19 is speeding this up. @elife will ‘make the posting of preprints to bioRxiv or medRxiv the default for all eLife submissions’ @eLife ahead of the pack; the leaders are @Meta_Psy and other small journals. @SciBeh” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved April 17, 2020, from https://twitter.com/ceptional/status/1248353897195769857
LISTSERV 16.0—SOCNET Archives. (n.d.). Retrieved April 20, 2020, from https://lists.ufl.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind2004&L=SOCNET&P=9667
unidad_COVID2019
unidad_COVID2019
unidad_COVID2019
unidad_COVID2019
unidad_COVID2019
unidad_COVID2019
unidad_COVID2019
unidad_COVID2019
unidad_COVID2019
unidad_COVID2019
unidad_COVID2019