- Jun 2021
-
asaobinoue.blogspot.com asaobinoue.blogspot.com
-
We just cannot know all that life will throw at us, and if we want our grading contract to be fair and equitable for everyone, we need to reexamine it, reflect on how it has been working for each of us, and perhaps adjust it.
This idea of re-evaluating at regular time points can be a very useful and powerful tool in more areas than just writing.
Society as a whole needs to look carefully at where it is do do this same sort of readjustment as well.
It's the same sort of negative feedback mechanism which is at work in the scientific method and constantly improving the state-of-the art.
-
your goal cannot be to follow orders in order to get a higher grade, instead you are free to listen, consider things, ignore ideas, or ask more honest questions of your readers. You are now free to make your own decisions on your writing.
Labor-based grading in writing allows students to listen and adjust to comments which gives them greater freedom and autonomy in both their learning process as well as their writing.
Ideally, in a system like this, a shorter feedback loop of commentary and readjustment may also help to more carefully hone their skills versus potentially hitting a plateau after which it's more difficult to improve.
-
-
notes.knowledgefutures.org notes.knowledgefutures.org
-
He notes that authors of such projects should consider the return on investment. It take time to go through community feedback, so one needs to determine whether the pay off will be worthwhile. Nevertheless, if his next work is suitable for community review, he’d like to do it again.
This is an apropos question. It is also somewhat contingent on what sort of platform the author "owns" to be able to do outreach and drive readers and participation.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Why does test suite performance matter? First of all, testing is a part of a developer's feedback loop (see @searls talk) and, secondly, it is a part of a deployment cycle.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Ask questions about the proposal, how the syntax works, what the semantics mean, etc.
-
-
-
Kuepper-Tetzel, C. E., & Nordmann, E. (2021). Watch Party Lectures: Synchronous Delivery of Asynchronous Material [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ys4jn
-
-
www.dbrnd.com www.dbrnd.com
-
This article is half-done without your Comment! *** Please share your thoughts via Comment ***
-
-
docdrop.org docdrop.org
-
@dwhly bug? cannot annotate this video which has caption but in Greek?
-
- May 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
No it doesn't. I've simply told SvelteKit to ignore the type error from credentials missing. If there's some other issue or missing feature it's not blocked by this. That being said, I wouldn't mind getting this change in
-
-
-
An easy access dashboard now provides links to scientific discussion and evaluation of bioRxiv preprints. (n.d.). Retrieved 30 May 2021, from https://connect.biorxiv.org/news/2021/05/14/dashboard .
-
-
www.edutopia.org www.edutopia.org
-
სარგებელი
- დროის ეკონომია — უფრო მარტივია და სწრაფია ჩანაწერის გაკეთება, ვიდრე უკუკავშირის დაწერა;
- თვალსაჩინო — ვიდეო-უკუკავშირში შეგიძლიათ მარტივად მიუთითოთ მოსწავლეს დავალების კონკრეტულ მონაკვეთზე, დაწერილი უკუკავშირი მოსწავლემ შეიძლება არასწორად გაიგოს/ ვერ გაიგოს;
- დემონსტრაცია — შეგიძლიათ თავიდან აუხსნათ თემის ნაწილი, რომელიც მოსწავლემ ვერ გაიგო;
- გამეორება — პირისპირ, ზეპირ უკუკავშირთან შედარებით, ვიდეო-უკუკავშირს მოსმენა მოსწავლეს რამდენჯერმა შეუძლია, როცა უნდა და რამდენ ჯერაც უნდა, არა მარტო გაკვეთილზე;
- კომფორტული — სავარაუდოდ, მეტი შანსია მოსწავლეებმა უყურონ ვიდეო-უკავშირს, ვიდრე დაწერილ უკუკავშირს;
-
- Apr 2021
-
docs.rangelandsgateway.org docs.rangelandsgateway.org
-
This idea that plants become desirable or aversive depending on their digestive consequences is simple. But, how do grazing animals figure out exactly which plants made them fee l good or ill? One way herbivores apparently accomplish this task is by regarding unfamiliar plants with caution. Animals associate positive or negative effects of nutrients or toxins with novel foods when offered meals that contain novel and familiar foods. When foraging bouts include several novel plants, plants that dominate the diet are probably 'weighted' more than less-consumed plants, even if the minor foods were primarily responsible for the positive or negative feedback. Furthermore, digestive feedback begins within 10 to 15 minutes of consumption which could help animals attribute digestive benefits or liabilities to specific plants. Finally, livestock grazing on rangelands usually become familiar with the forage resource and may seldom encounter truly novel plants. This allows greater opportunity to 'sort out' feedback from individual or similar groups of plants
-
When a grazing animal smells and tastes a plant, the flavor is either pleasing or distasteful depending on the animal's previous grazing experiences. When a plant is eaten, it provides feedback during digestion. If consumption of a plant improves the nutrient or energy status of the animal, the plant flavor becomes more desirable or pleasing. If eating of the plant yields illness, the flavor becomes aversive and distasteful (Fig. 2). These flavor-consequence relationships form the basis for dietary likes and dislikes, and the animal then seeks highly palatable foods and avoids aversive foods. The resulting behavior patterns generally lead to increased consump- tion of nutritious foods and limited consumption of toxic or low quality plants.
-
The digestive consequences of forage consumption are determined by plant forage quality and animal digestive and detoxification abilities. This interaction, in turn, affects the nutrients and energy available for animal growth and maintenance.
-
-
docs.rangelandsgateway.org docs.rangelandsgateway.org
-
When an animal eats a plant, it receives digestive feedback in the form of energy, nutrients, illness, or toxicosis. If the feedback is positive, preferences are formed to the plant and if the feedback is negative, aversions are formed. The strength of the preference or aversion is determined by the magnitude, nature, and timing of digestive feedback
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Please do not directly email any Sidekiq committers with questions or problems. A community is best served when discussions are held in public.
-
-
kurs.bibel-fuer-alle.net kurs.bibel-fuer-alle.net
-
Ich finde die Absicht des Autors für Chronik hier etwas unvollständig. Die beschriebene Absichts ist mE die Absicht Gottes. Für die Absicht des menschlichen Autors dieses Buches müsste man noch etwas mehr Hintergrundinformationen sammeln: Wann und Wer verfasst die Chroniken? An welche Zuhörerschaft? Ich weiß nicht, ob das das Potential hat, in die (zu) textkritische Betrachtung einzusteigen oder ob es für den Einstieg zu viel wird, aber sind meine spontanten Gedanken dazu. Bei einem Brief im NT ist es oft klarer bzgl. Autor und Absicht.
-
-
medium.com medium.com
-
To improve the usability of text fields and to determine which text field variables to alter, our researchers and designers conducted two studies between November 2016 and February 2017, with actual users.
-
You might not always notice, but Material Design is constantly evolving and iterating based on research.
-
- Mar 2021
-
hypothes.is hypothes.is
-
Use the button to get a sharable link to the page with annotations.
so super dope that you can toggle highlights & annotations to be private or public, and then can share a hypothesis link for a page, and then people can see your highlights on the page that are public, and dont see the ones you set as private, oh wow!!!
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.freecodecamp.org www.freecodecamp.org
-
arxiv.org arxiv.org
-
Hota, Ashish R., Tanya Sneh, and Kavish Gupta. ‘Impacts of Game-Theoretic Activation on Epidemic Spread over Dynamical Networks’. ArXiv:2011.00445 [Physics], 1 November 2020. http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.00445.
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Pinilla, A., Garcia, J., Raffe, W., Voigt-Antons, J.-N., & Möller, S. (2021). Visual representation of emotions in Virtual Reality. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9jguh
-
-
-
Feedback
I'm giving you these comments because I have very high expectations and I know that you can reach them.
A fascinating research result.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
I don't even know how to tell if they're working 100%, I'm getting mixed signals ..
-
Should it only contain link* calls?
-
When should I use link, vs dir, vs. tree?
-
but I still have no idea if I'm writing this new file correctly.
-
-
css-tricks.com css-tricks.com
-
Positively indicate valid input values Let users know a field has been entered correctly. The browser can give us this information through the :valid CSS selector:
-
-
bilge.world bilge.world
-
See this post's corresponding GitHub Issue for related media, aggregated links, and other minutia.
It didn't occur to me until just this moment that GitHub might also make for the ideal commenting integration. And the... second-most ideal annotation integration, naturally.
Basically, leave comments there!
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
- Feb 2021
-
github.com github.com
-
Here's the last issue where source maps were discussed before the beta release.
-
-
github.com github.com
-
Any idea @AaronLasseigne if this is mergeable?
-
-
www.google.com www.google.com
-
and let us know how you are putting Hypothesis Help to good use
-
-
oer.pressbooks.pub oer.pressbooks.pub
-
It is important to acknowledge that education is essentially a political activity.
Re-reading this week's chapter, I keep getting hung-up on this line. While I agree that education is affected by political views, I don't know that it is necessarily appropriate to state that education is a political activity. By design (or perhaps, by hope), education should be decidedly non-political. The reality of education, perhaps, is very politically driven, but something about the wording of calling education itself a political activity doesn't feel truly accurate.
-
-
-
Unfollow, στο τεύχος 14
Δεν δουλευουν τα λινκσ στο unfollow!
-
- Jan 2021
-
-
Apparently this will be fixed in Firefox 69.
Yeap, it works just fine for public URLs!
-
-
chrome.google.com chrome.google.com
-
Outdated (last updated 2014)
-
-
www.digitalocean.com www.digitalocean.com
-
While this tutorial has content that we believe is of great benefit to our community, we have not yet tested or edited it to ensure you have an error-free learning experience. It's on our list, and we're working on it! You can help us out by using the "report an issue" button at the bottom of the tutorial.
-
- Dec 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
Can this be merged please, this fixes a problem I have
-
-
github.com github.com
-
please feel free to open an issue here on GitHub with questions/comments/improvements/etc
-
Discuss this post on the web:
-
These are valid comments. I think it is worth noting that svelte didn’t choose a non-javascript method for fun or because we think we should redesign the language. The additional constructs, for the most part, are there to allow svelte to more clearly work out exactly what is going on in the code in order to optimise. In short svelte needs a certain amount of information to do what it does and pure javascript is often difficult to analyse in this way. But I appreciate your concerns and comments and we try to take all feedback on board where we can. So thank you!
-
-
andrewspittle.com andrewspittle.com
-
hacks.mozilla.org hacks.mozilla.org
-
The exact form of the platform is yet to be finalized, and we want to involve you, the community, in helping to provide ideas and test the new contribution workflow!
-
Better community building: At the moment, MDN content edits are published instantly, and then reverted if they are not suitable. This is really bad for community relations. With a PR model, we can review edits and provide feedback, actually having conversations with contributors, building relationships with them, and helping them learn.
Tags
- relationship (people)
- pull request workflow
- reverting a previous decision/change/commit
- helping others
- soliciting feedback
- helping others to learn
- receiving feedback
- open source community
- community building
- community (for a project or product)
- have discussion/feedback/debate in public (transparency
- community relations
- opportunity
- opportunity to improve/fix something
- online community
- reverting: creates negative experience
- encouraging feedback
- wiki model
Annotators
URL
-
- Nov 2020
-
cryptocurrencyresearch.org cryptocurrencyresearch.org
-
indipendently
typo pointed out by David Butler (https://github.com/nimisis)
-
-
github.com github.com
-
I open this issue to announce that i'm actively working on a rewrite of this library to accomplish these goals:
-
-
hackernoon.com hackernoon.com
-
It is hard to appreciate how important really fast (and reliable) hot reload can be during development, unless you have experienced it yourself. Developers report that it changes the way they create their apps, describing it as being like painting their app to life.
-
-
www.teachthought.com www.teachthought.com
-
In fact, it’s at the core of the learning process and how the human brain learns.
-
In everyday life, feedback loops for each of us occur naturally–usually in the form, ‘When I do X, Y happens.’ That’s a kind of feedback loop in the learning process.
-
A feedback loop in learning is a cause-effect sequence where data (often in the form of an ‘event’) is responded to based on recognition of an outcome and that data is used to inform future decisions in similar or analogous situations.
-
-
opinionatedgamers.com opinionatedgamers.com
-
What vaults this well past SNCF for me (setup time aside), is the limited company choice; it prevents a feedback loop of sorts where a game devolves into running each company in the ground.
-
-
-
Second, you have more frequent opportunities to get feedback. Instead of spending weeks hammering away in isolation, only to discover that you made some mistaken assumptions, you can get feedback at each intermediate stage. You become more adaptable and more accountable, because you are performing your work in public.
Intermediate Packets give you more opportunities to get feedback
-
-
github.com github.com
-
If you have further thoughts here, please participate in the discussion on the issue tracker: #256.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
In Rust, we use the "No New Rationale" rule, which says that the decision to merge (or not merge) an RFC is based only on rationale that was presented and debated in public. This avoids accidents where the community feels blindsided by a decision.
-
I'd like to go with an RFC-based governance model (similar to Rust, Ember or Swift) that looks something like this: new features go through a public RFC that describes the motivation for the change, a detailed implementation description, a description on how to document or teach the change (for kpm, that would roughly be focused around how it affected the usual workflows), any drawbacks or alternatives, and any open questions that should be addressed before merging. the change is discussed until all of the relevant arguments have been debated and the arguments are starting to become repetitive (they "reach a steady state") the RFC goes into "final comment period", allowing people who weren't paying close attention to every proposal to have a chance to weigh in with new arguments. assuming no new arguments are presented, the RFC is merged by consensus of the core team and the feature is implemented. All changes, regardless of their source, go through this process, giving active community members who aren't on the core team an opportunity to participate directly in the future direction of the project. (both because of proposals they submit and ones from the core team that they contribute to)
Tags
- soliciting feedback
- allowing sufficient time for discussion/feedback/debate before a final decision is made
- change proposal workflow: RFCs
- open-source projects: allowing community (who are not on core team) to influence/affect/steer the direction of the project
- attracting contributors
- welcoming feedback
- feeling blindsided
- build concensus
- have discussion/feedback/debate in public (transparency)
Annotators
URL
-
-
madewithsvelte.com madewithsvelte.com
-
Please don’t be shy to submit your project if you’re just starting out!
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
-
I am new to the ecosystem and really looking forward to feedback
-
- Oct 2020
-
-
The authors noted that instructive or process feedback types were rarely observed in the instructors’ messages to students.
Why?
- time-consuming
- the sense-making of students' learning
- the ways to provide formative feedback
- the sense-making of feedback by students What kind of feedback would be most useful to students? How can we make sure that students interpret the feedback correctly?
-
-
-
When giving negative feedback, teachers can use the positive sandwich approach—starting and ending with a positive comment
Compare and contrast to what Claude Steele calls the "Tom Ostrom strategy" - framing feedback in terms of "I have high standards; here is my feedback; I believe you can reach my high standards by taking this feedback."
-
-
covid-19.iza.org covid-19.iza.org
-
IZA – Institute of Labor Economics. ‘COVID-19 and the Labor Market’. Accessed 6 October 2020. https://covid-19.iza.org/publications/dp13664/.
-
-
www.cos.io www.cos.io
-
PREreview, Daniela Saderi, Ph D. , Co-Founder and Director of. ‘Crowdsourcing Preprint Reviews: PREreview and COS Call for Feedback on Infrastructure Integration’. Accessed 2 October 2020. https://www.cos.io/blog/prereview-and-cos-call-for-feedback-on-infrastructure-integration.
-
-
-
But maybe this PR should still be merged until he finds time for that?
-
Sorry this sat for so long!
Tags
- don't let big plans/goals get in the way of integrating/releasing smaller changes/improvements
- pull request stalled
- iterative process
- big change/rewrite vs. continuous improvements / smaller refactorings
- open-source software: progress seems slow
- not a blocker (issue dependency)
- waiting for maintainers to review / merge pull request / give feedback
Annotators
URL
-
-
stackoverflow.blog stackoverflow.blog
-
There is this black hole syndrome where you spend hours working on something and get no feedback.
-
- Sep 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. In many cases, features are absent for a reason. For large changes, please create an RFC: https://github.com/sveltejs/rfcs
-
-
elemental.medium.com elemental.medium.com
-
Austin S. (2020) This Lawyer Ran Errands for His High-Risk Wife. Then an Epidemiologist Rated His Every Move.https://elemental.medium.com/this-lawyer-ran-errands-for-his-high-risk-wife-then-an-epidemiologist-rated-his-every-move-f9a926ad96ec
-
-
codechips.me codechips.me
-
I like bundlers. Correction, I like fast bundlers. Bundlers that help me tighten the feedback loop and help me focus on the code. Not bundlers that make me doze off, waiting for the recompilation to finish, while my CPU fan sounds like an old hair dryer.
-
-
journals.sagepub.com journals.sagepub.com
-
The present study demonstrated that there are differences between the quantity and quality of handwritten and electronic feedback
The takeaway messages are the first with experimental evidence for the benefits of electronic feedback for coursework, electronic feedback is an adequate way to provide feedback, and the courses in COVID-19 will be an example of whether electronic feedback is adequate for strong academic performance.
-
Course and Students
This study has a robust sample size that will be adequate for the statistical analyses. The experimental design is clear, with the manipulation of the independent variable as the grading format as handwritten or electronic.
-
-
epjdatascience.springeropen.com epjdatascience.springeropen.com
-
Adelani, D. I., Kobayashi, R., Weber, I., & Grabowicz, P. A. (2020). Estimating community feedback effect on topic choice in social media with predictive modeling. EPJ Data Science, 9(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00243-w
-
- Aug 2020
-
www.sciencedirect.com www.sciencedirect.com
-
Naikoba, S., & Hayward, A. (2001). The effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing handwashing in healthcare workers—A systematic review. Journal of Hospital Infection, 47(3), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhin.2000.0882
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Moshontz, Hannah, Grace Elizabeth Binion, Benjamin T. Brown, and Haley Walton. ‘A Guide to Self-Archiving Preprints’. Preprint. PsyArXiv, 21 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dp4x9.
-
-
meta.stackexchange.com meta.stackexchange.com
-
FWIW, I would have raised it earlier if I thought it would have made a difference.
This is different from apathy; it's more like powerlessness.
-
-
www.fastcompany.com www.fastcompany.com
-
Taraborelli, D., Taraborelli, D., & Taraborelli, D. (2020, August 5). How the COVID-19 crisis has prompted a revolution in scientific publishing. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/90537072/how-the-covid-19-crisis-has-prompted-a-revolution-in-scientific-publishing
-
-
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
-
This means that while groups can generate high levels of solidarity, which can in principle be put to powerful political effect, it also becomes harder to express disagreement within the group. If, for example, an outspoken and popular member of a neighbourhood WhatsApp group begins to circulate misinformation about health risks, the general urge to maintain solidarity means that their messages are likely to be met with approval and thanks. When a claim or piece of content shows up in a group, there may be many members who view it as dubious; the question is whether they have the confidence to say as much. Meanwhile, the less sceptical can simply forward it on. It’s not hard, then, to understand why WhatsApp is a powerful distributor of “fake news” and conspiracy theories.
Instead of positive feedback like this, is there a way to create negative feedback loops in these social media apps?
-
-
unix.meta.stackexchange.com unix.meta.stackexchange.com
-
I honestly don't know what you find unclear about this question. I think you initially misread. I edited out your title change because it wasn't what I'd intended and it misled others. I edited in two more sections to clarify. The last section makes it as clear as I can: A single question provokes 1 of 3 responses (not necessarily answers). To chose between them I need to understand acceptable scope of both question and answers. Yes this topic is a muddy one, that's why I'm asking! I want others to help me clarify the unclear!
-
- Jul 2020
-
translationproject.org translationproject.org
-
Your comments are welcome.
-
-
osf.io osf.io
-
Mikolai, J., Keenan, K., & Kulu, H. (2020). Household level health and socio-economic vulnerabilities and the COVID-19 crisis: An analysis from the UK [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4wtz8
-
-
evilmartians.com evilmartians.com
-
But even that “minute” affects my feedback loop (see Justin Searls talk) and wastes my time.
-
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Dan Quintana on Twitter: “Tomorrow at 1pm CEST I’ll be doing a virtual talk for the Rotterdam R.I.O.T. Science Club (@rdam_riots) on using Twitter for science 🧬 I’ll be covering both the why and the how + I’ll be leaving plenty of time for a Q&A session. Watch here: https://t.co/nXHry9Inyi https://t.co/T6u7lvgAhO” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved June 17, 2020, from https://twitter.com/dsquintana/status/1264623289814659072
-
-
osf.io osf.io
-
Haven, T. L., Errington, T. M., Gleditsch, K., van Grootel, L., Jacobs, A. M., Kern, F., Piñeiro, R., Rosenblatt, F., & Mokkink, L. (2020). Preregistering Qualitative Research: A Delphi Study [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/pz9jr
-
-
www.youtube.com www.youtube.comYouTube1
-
Dr Daniel Quintana | Using Twitter for Science | R.I.O.T. Science Club—YouTube. (2020, May 26). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pA5Y4cO934I
-
- Jun 2020
-
podcastnotes.org podcastnotes.org
-
Just as journalists should be able to write about anything they want, comedians should be able to do the same and tell jokes about anything they please
where's the line though? every output generates a feedback loop with the hivemind, turning into input to ourselves with our cracking, overwhelmed, filters
it's unrealistic to wish everyone to see jokes are jokes, to rely on journalists to generate unbiased facts, and politicians as self serving leeches, err that's my bias speaking
-
-
numinous.productions numinous.productions
-
Note that we are not making the common argument that making new tools can lead to new subject matter insights for the toolmaker, and vice versa. This is correct, but is much weaker than what we are saying. Rather: making new tools can lead to new subject matter insights for humanity as a whole (i.e., significant original research insights), and vice versa, and this would ideally be a rapidly-turning loop to develop the most transformative tools.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
www.indiehackers.com www.indiehackers.com
-
Most people think you build the product then you market it. Thinking in loops means you build the marketing into the product. The product doesn't precede the marketing. The product is the marketing.
By thinking in loops Harry Dry refers to a way of thinking about your acquisition strategy as being part of your product.
This reminds me of Brian Balfour's idea of product-channel fit and how stresses that the product gets shaped by its acquisition channel.
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Moore, D. A., & Schatz, D. (2020). Overprecision increases subsequent surprise [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wfcbv
-
- May 2020
-
docs.gitlab.com docs.gitlab.com
-
Future keyword improvements are being discussed in our epic for improving rules, where anyone can add suggestions or requests.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
docs.docker.com docs.docker.com
-
Edit this page Request docs changes
-
-
iubenda.typeform.com iubenda.typeform.com
-
qph.fs.quoracdn.net qph.fs.quoracdn.net
-
-
about.gitlab.com about.gitlab.com
-
docs.gitlab.com docs.gitlab.com
-
Help & feedback Docs Edit this page to fix an error or add an improvement in a merge request Create an issue to suggest an improvement to this doc Show and post comments to review and give feedback on this doc
-
-
psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
-
Leary, A., Dvorak, R., De Leon, A., Peterson, R., & Troop-Gordon, W. (2020). COVID-19 Social Distancing [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mszw2
-
-
notes.andymatuschak.org notes.andymatuschak.org
-
One huge advantage to scaling up is that you’ll get far more feedback for your Insight through making process. It’s true that Effective system design requires insights drawn from serious contexts of use, but it’s possible to create small-scale serious contexts of use which will allow you to answer many core questions about your system.
Even though a larger user base will increase your odds of getting more feedback, you can still get valuable contextual feedback with less users.
-
-
notes.andymatuschak.org notes.andymatuschak.org
-
Ericsson claims (2016, p. 98) that there is no deliberate practice possible for knowledge work because there are no objective criteria (so, poor feedback), because the skills aren’t clearly defined, and because techniques for focused skill improvement in these domains aren’t known.
According to Ericsson deliberate practice for knowledge work is not possible because the criteria are not objective (you don't know if you're doing well).
This collides with Dr. Sönke Ahrens' contention that note taking, specifically elaboration, instantiates two feedback loop. One feedback loop in that you can see whether you're capturing the essence of what you're trying to make a note on and a second feedback loop in that you can see whether your note is not only an accurate description of the original idea, but also a complete one.
Put differently, note taking instantiates two feedback loops. One for precision and one for recall.
-
-
journals.plos.org journals.plos.org
-
Rivkind, A., Schreier, H., Brenner, N., & Barak, O. (2020). Scale free topology as an effective feedback system. PLOS Computational Biology, 16(5), e1007825. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007825
-
-
arxiv.org arxiv.org
-
Müller, M., Derlet, P. M., Mudry, C., & Aeppli, G. (2020). Using random testing to manage a safe exit from the COVID-19 lockdown. ArXiv:2004.04614 [Cond-Mat, Physics:Physics, q-Bio]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04614
-
- Apr 2020
-
twitter.com twitter.com
-
Patrick S. Forscher en Twitter: “.@ThreeLittleMigs and I are polishing a health behavior for @PsySciAcc’s COVID project. We expect to reach thousands of participants all over the world. We want our survey to be useful to epidemiologists. Would any epidemiologists be willing to give us feedback? DM me if so!” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved April 17, 2020, from https://twitter.com/psforscher/status/1245923025221849091
-
-
www.troyhunt.com www.troyhunt.com
-
There are many other factors that also aren't obvious so as much as suggestions for improvements are very welcomed, please keep in mind that they may not work in the broader sense of what's required to run this project.
-
I'll get a gazillion suggestions of how I could do this differently. Every single time I talk about the mechanics of how I've built something I always do
-
- Mar 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
Don't be discouraged when you get feedback about a method that isn't all sunshine and roses. Facets has been around long enough now that it needs to maintain a certain degree of quality control, and that means serious discernment about what goes into the library. That includes having in depth discussions the merits of methods, even about the best name for a method --even if the functionality has been accepted the name may not.
about: merits
-
-
ttu.blackboard.com ttu.blackboard.com
-
Thisprovidesthestudentwithanexperienceakintosittingnexttotheinstructorinhisorherofficewhilegoingthroughtheassignment
Equivalent but not identical
-
Anumberofstudieshavedemonstratedthebenefitsofvoicefeedbackforstudents.Butfacultyneednotstopthere.Theproliferationofinexpensivescreencastingsoftwaremakesiteasyforfacultytodeliverscreencastedfeedbacktostudents
so there is evidence of the benefits of voice feedback and now that it is more readily available, instructors should use it more often.
-
-
www.pmcarpenter.com www.pmcarpenter.com
-
I especially welcome, and enjoy, intelligent disagreement.
-
-
crowdin.com crowdin.com
-
Cool idea how they show which ideas they are considering, planning, and have already launched.
-
-
-
Request features
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
intercom.help intercom.help
-
As part of the beta program, if you or someone on your team can give us quick feedback every 1-2 weeks, we'll keep extending your free trial (normally 2 weeks) indefinitely!
-
- Feb 2020
-
about.gitlab.com about.gitlab.com
-
Collaboration is not consensus When collaborating it is always important to stay above radar and work transparently, but collaboration is not consensus. You don't need to ask people for their input, and they shouldn't ask you "Why didn't you ask me?" You don't have to wait for people to provide input, if you did ask them. We believe in permissionless innovation- you don't need to involve people but everyone can contribute. This is core to how we iterate, since we want smaller teams moving quickly rather than large teams achieving consensus slowly.
-
We do the smallest thing possible and get it out as quickly as possible.
-
We should counteract that by having short toes and feel comfortable letting others contribute to our domain.
-
Give negative feedback in the smallest setting possible.
-
-
about.gitlab.com about.gitlab.com
-
it is worth opening a merge request with the minimal viable change instead of opening an issue encouraging open feedback on the problem without proposing any specific change directly.
-
-
about.gitlab.com about.gitlab.com
-
Receiving Feedback
-
-
github.com github.com
-
happy to PR given consensus
-
-
noticeable.io noticeable.io
-
Wouldn't let me annotate a selection on this page:
Reinforce your feedback loop
The Timeline centralizes all your changes. It allows customers to browse updates, share and send feedback. Collected reactions provide the right information for improving your product and reducing churn.
-
-
loadimpact.com loadimpact.com
-
We check in our code at the entry point of a pipeline, version control (Git and Github in our case), and then it’s taken through a series of steps aimed at assuring quality and lowering risk of releases. Automation helps us keep these steps out of our way while maintaining control through fast feedback loops (context-switching is our enemy). If any step of the pipeline breaks (or fails) we want to be alerted in our communication channel of choice (in our case Slack), and it needs to happen as quickly as possible while we’re in the right context.
-
-
blog.zipboard.co blog.zipboard.co
-
Feedback needs to be specific in nature, as well as confirmatory and corrective. This way the learners know what they did right and wrong.
how to give feedback
-
-
gsantner.net gsantner.net
-
You can contact me via anything listed in the Contact section - preferably E-Mail or Matrix. Other places to give feedback are GitHub (Issues, Stars, Following) and Google Play.
-