What if consensus at the group meeting does not last after the meeting is over?

Argumente für die Verbindung von ecological economics, Dekolonisierung, degrowth, notwendiger ökologischer Transformation und Bioregionalismus. Der verbindende Faktor ist das Wachstum der Wirtschaft in den High Income Countries durch Ausbeutung von global verteilten ökologischen Ressourcen.

for - World Social Forum - failure to reach action consensus

The key here seems to be the noncommitted actors. Who are they? Why are they noncommitted? Are there areas where noncommittment doesn't occur?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change

How do you plan to make collective decisions?

See also:

Alas, many things really must be experienced to be understood. We didn’t have much of an experience to deliver to them though — after all, the whole point of all this evangelizing was to get people to give us money to pay for developing the software in the first place! [...] When people ask me about my life’s ambitions, I often joke that my goal is to become independently wealthy so that I can afford to get some work done. Mainly that’s about being able to do things without having to explain them first, so that the finished product can be the explanation. I think this will be a major labor saving improvement.

From http://habitatchronicles.com/2004/04/you-cant-tell-people-anything/

blockchain uses method to batch transactions into block. Establishing which node can submit a block to the chain is the blockchain consensus model or consensus algorithm.

they clearly find consensus decision making and production of a product much less satisfying

ReconfigBehSci on Twitter: ‘RT @psychmag: This looks very interesting, and several of the speakers have contributed to our Covid coverage https://t.co/pOE34Vy94e and /…’ / Twitter. (n.d.). Retrieved 22 March 2022, from https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1486007937818583055

Białek, Michał, Ethan Andrew Meyers, Patricia Arriaga, Damian Harateh, and Arkadiusz Urbanek. ‘COVID-19 Vaccine Sceptics Are Persuaded by pro-Vaccine Expert Consensus Messaging’. PsyArXiv, 14 January 2022. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kgsy3.

Vega-Oliveros, D. A., Grande, H. L. C., Iannelli, F., & Vazquez, F. (2021). Bi-layer voter model: Modeling intolerant/tolerant positions and bots in opinion dynamics. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 230(14–15), 2875–2886. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00151-8

Adaryukov, J. A., Grunevski, S., Reed, D. D., & Pleskac, T. (2022). I’m wearing a mask, but are they?: Perceptions of Self-Other Differences in COVID-19 Health Behaviors. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6rb4t

Santos, H. C., Meyer, M., & Chabris, C. (2021). Reports of the Death of Expertise May Be Exaggerated: Limits on Knowledge Resistance in Health and Medicine. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6wy53

Kan, U., Feng, M., & Porter, M. A. (2021). An Adaptive Bounded-Confidence Model of Opinion Dynamics on Networks. ArXiv:2112.05856 [Physics]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.05856

Jamieson, K. H. (2021). How conspiracists exploited COVID-19 science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01217-2

Nature Portfolio on Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved 3 November 2021, from https://twitter.com/NaturePortfolio/status/1455668301284130820

Shahsavari, S., Holur, P., Wang, T., Tangherlini, T. R., & Roychowdhury, V. (2020). Conspiracy in the time of corona: automatic detection of emerging COVID-19 conspiracy theories in social media and the news. Journal of Computational Social Science, 3(2), 279–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00086-5

Bunker, C. J., & Varnum, M. E. W. (2021). How Strong is the Association Between Social Media Use and False Consensus? [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/eyjaq

Sturgis, P., Brunton-Smith, I., & Jackson, J. (2021). Trust in science, social consensus and vaccine confidence. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01115-7

Il y a un peu confusion des genres. Certes le nouveau modèle est influencé par les pratiques du secteur bancaire. Le G20 ayant sommé le Board de l'IAS de revoir sa copie suite à la crise financière, c'est un peu logique. Cela dit c'est un grand pas de l'IASB car le normalisateur comptable ne souhaitait pas "sectoriser" la norme comptable. Cependant ce sont les établissements financiers qui utilisent le plus la norme sur les instruments financiers (IFRS9).

Keshmirian, A., Bahrami, B., & Deroy, O. (2021, April 27). Many Heads Are More Utilitarian Than One. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7e3dc

Hackathon: Climate denial and COVID-19 misinformation: birds of a feather? : BehSciAsk. (n.d.). Reddit. Retrieved 6 March 2021, from https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciAsk/comments/jjk00r/hackathon_climate_denial_and_covid19/

van der Linden, S. (2021). The Gateway Belief Model (GBM): A review and research agenda for communicating the scientific consensus on climate change. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.01.005

Debunking Handbook 2020 | Center For Climate Change Communication. (n.d.). Retrieved 16 February 2021, from https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/debunking-handbook-2020/

A federated model requires some type of consensus to form to accept changes. This is great to promote consensus, but reaching consensus takes time and results in an inability to adapt quickly.

Schmid, P., Schwarzer, M., & Betsch, C. (n.d.). Weight-of-Evidence Strategies to Mitigate the Influence of Messages of Science Denialism in Public Discussions. Journal of Cognition, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.125

Maia, H. P., Ferreira, S. C., & Martins, M. L. (2020). Adaptive network approach for emergence of societal bubbles. ArXiv:2010.08635 [Nlin, Physics:Physics]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.08635

Reynolds, M. (2020, October 7). There is no ‘scientific divide’ over herd immunity. Wired UK. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/great-barrington-declaration-herd-immunity-scientific-divide

Kekecs, Z., Szaszi, B., & Aczel, B. (2020). ECO, an expert consensus procedure for developing robust scientific outputs [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9gqru

Merchants of Doubt. (2020). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Merchants_of_Doubt&oldid=950272903

ReconfigBehSci on Twitter: “brief video describing the https://t.co/zDXjvZFtkM initiative here: https://t.co/8rJEuDj7B4” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved July 5, 2020, from https://twitter.com/scibeh/status/1279123525916405762

Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S. A., Kotcher, J., Bergquist, P., Ballew, M. T., Goldberg, M. H., Gustafson, A., & Wang, X. (2020). Climate change in the American Mind: April 2020 [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8439q

Haven, T. L., Errington, T. M., Gleditsch, K., van Grootel, L., Jacobs, A. M., Kern, F., Piñeiro, R., Rosenblatt, F., & Mokkink, L. (2020). Preregistering Qualitative Research: A Delphi Study [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/pz9jr

Khan, S., & Hult Khazaie, D. (2020). Social Psychology and Pandemics: Exploring Consensus about Research Priorities and Strategies using the Delphi Method [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yhw74

Czarnek, G., Szwed, P., & Kossowska, M. (2020). Trust and attitudes toward vaccination: Study report. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dpa35

Czarnek, G., Szwed, P., & Kossowska, M. (2020). Political ideology and attitudes toward vaccination: Study report. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uwehk

Peixoto, T. P. (2020). Revealing consensus and dissensus between network partitions. ArXiv:2005.13977 [Physics, Stat]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.13977

Tomohiro, I. (2020, May 8). Consensus among group members’ shared leadership ratings polarizes group performance. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/psjeu

Researchers: Show world leaders how to behave in a crisis. (2020). Nature, 580(7801), 7–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00926-4

resolução do problema de consenso em sistemas distribuídos assíncronos

propriedades de um algoritmo de consenso

o problema de consenso em sistemas assíncronos

o problema de consenso em sistemas distribuídos assíncronos é impossível de resolver

modelos de falha considerados

interesse apenas em sistemas assíncronos

Resume a lógica do teorema CAP

Descreve propriedades fundamentais de um sistema distribuído.

This is a decent little explanation for how smart contracts execute on blockchains. Author missed in "Due to the properties of the blockchain" to say that all nodes must also come to consensus about how the code was executed and therefore "applications that run exactly...". We will later discuss deterministic code execution in relation to this

<big>评：</big><br/><br/>比特币工程师 Lopp 的此番回应是一件很刺激的事情，就像听到尼采说「上帝死了」一样令人激动。在 19 世纪，便有人说：「上帝是一个无用而且很花钱的假设，因此我们不需要他」。200 年后，依然有人扛着如是的观点大旗在卖力宣扬革命。这说明什么？<br/><br/>说明后资本主义时代，人的精神依然处于被压迫、剥削、异化的状态。价值是必须能够被验证的东西，and that's why we have fewer and fewer nice things.

<big>评：</big><br/><br/>What did Jimmy specifically mean when he talked about the group of “Bitcoin users”? And similarly, how to define the gap between the military and the civilian when we talk about some certain power to follow?<br/><br/>可供参考的是，在《人性的弱点》一书里，作者卡耐基反复强调着「人始终只关注自己的利益」。更好的规则？更好的秩序？在利益面前皆为浮云。选择站队的权力确实由个体掌握，但这并不影响到权力是否会被团体以违背个体意志的方式行使。更何况个体意志并不总是「弱者」的代名词，「作恶」也绝非市场垄断者一家之嫌。

Consensus building tool used by Wikidata and others.

Unlike other approaches to learning new PM concepts that span many disciplines and competencies, we help you focus on your strengths and concerns within groups, while developing a holistic solution, that optimally increases your competitive advantage.

Steps to Creating a Group:

• Join the Community
• Create your Own Group
• Invite Others to Join

This group can help you create your own group.

• To create a Group, select "New Group"
• Select a Category that best fits the purpose of your Group.
• Give your Group a title, a description
• Make the Group Private or Public.
• You can also select " Invite Only Group", so only people that are invited can join and see the group.

I'm fascinated by this point.

This was/is one of the critiques of (Rap) Genius as well: hip as its authoritative voice was, it nonetheless moved toward the encyclopedia. Though the company has since pivoted to allow more individual commentary than encyclopedic exposition--I don't think they've quite worked this out in the UI yet--the original site, and the part I think that is still most compelling was the Wikipedia for rap lyrics.

But from a pedagogical perspective, that expository mode of analysis was really only one, and perhaps not even the most important, use of collaborative annotation. For my part, I allowed teachers to duplicate texts and create their own versions, instructing their students to annotate however thy wanted them to: authoritatively, discursively, inquisitively, with GIFs.

In contrast with “The Digital”, the Schutz-like we-ness coupled with “rightfulness” makes for thick layering.

Same issue perceived with Genius.

Spot on.