2,559 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2021
    1. Demande déposée parl’administré entraînant unexamen par l’administration(Article L112-3 CRPA)
    2. L’exercice de ce droit est soumis à une condition d’identification del’usager. L’administration saisie est tenue d’accuser réception de lademande soit de façon instantanée soit dans un délai de 10 joursmaximum.
    1. Qualinclus, Guide d'auto-évaluation pour une école inclusive permet de nourrir la réflexion et les échanges pour les équipes pédagogiques et éducatives qui mettent en place une démarche d'auto-évaluation et d'amélioration continue de la qualité. Il s'adresse aux chefs d'établissement et à l'ensemble de la communauté éducative.

    2. à l'ensemble de la communauté éducative

      Qualinclus, Guide d'auto-évaluation pour une école inclusive permet de nourrir la réflexion et les échanges pour les équipes pédagogiques et éducatives qui mettent en place une démarche d'auto-évaluation et d'amélioration continue de la qualité. Il s'adresse aux chefs d'établissement et à l'ensemble de la communauté éducative.

    1. Fiche 3.6 -  Travailler la communication interne au sein de l’établissement

      C'est le seul point ou l'on voit apparaitre à la marge les parents d'élèves. et aucunement des RPE et de leurs associations.

      voici les points cités comme à vérifier • Faciliter l’appropriation de l’information diffusée pour les personnels et les usagers : taux de sollicitation pour demander des informations au sujet de questions ayant déjà fait l’objet d’une communication, taux de réponses aux sollicitations de l’établissement avant d’éventuelles relances…

      • Indicateur de visibilité : nombre de connexion à l’ENT de l’établissement, nombre de contributeurs internes au site et autres outils de communication…
      
      • Indicateurs relatifs aux familles : taux de participation aux élections du conseil d’administration, aux réunions parents/professeurs, aux différentes actions, groupes de travail ou manifestations auxquelles elles sont invitées.
      
      • Indicateurs d’enquêtes de satisfaction (construites en interne).
      
      • Identification claire par l’ensemble des membres de la communauté scolaire des « référents communication » de l’établissement.
      
    1. On peut remarquer qu'il n'est aucunement question de santé ou de la place des parents et de leurs représentants dans cette évaluation de l qualité

    Tags

    Annotators

    1. La charte Marianne s’applique dans l’ensemble des services déconcentrés de l’Etat recevant du public depuis le 3 janvier 2005.
    1. Observatoires départementaux de la protection de l’enfance (ODPE) : création d’une Association départementale d’entraide des personnes accueillies en protection de l’enfance (ADEPAPE), questionnaire en ligne, élaboration du schéma départemental, etc.
    2. Conseil Français des associations des droits de l’enfant (COFRADE)

      La FCPE fait partie de la COFRADE

  2. eduscol.education.fr eduscol.education.fr
    1. Qualéduc Qualéduc est un outil mis à disposition des établissements et des corps d'inspection pour développer une démarche d'assurance qualité fondée sur l'amélioration continue. Mis à jour : décembre 2020
    1. Les personnes morales (sociétés et associations) peuvent aussi porter plainte pour défendre leurs intérêts ou les objectifs qu'elles poursuivent.
    1. Nevertheless, co-hyponyms are not necessarily incompatible in all senses. A queen and mother are both hyponyms of woman but there is nothing preventing the queen from being a mother.

      not necessarily incompatible in all senses.

      so is this only a concern/possibility when the word in question is a polyseme?

      but there is nothing preventing the queen from being a mother

      The meaning of the "incompatibility" relation seems really ambiguous. What does that mean precisely?

      And how would we know for sure if an incompatibility (such as a peach is not a plum) or lack of incompatibility (a queen can be a mother and a mother can be a queen) is a sufficient condition to cause it to be or not be a co-hyponym?

      Oh. I guess it says

      Co-hyponyms are often but not always related to one another by the relation of incompatibility.

      so it actually can't ever be used to prove or disprove (sufficient/necessary condition) that something is a co-hyponym. So that observation, while interesting, is not helpful in a practical / deterministic way...

    2. It consists of two relations; the first one being exemplified in "An X is a Y" (simple hyponymy) while the second relation is "An X is a kind/type of Y". The second relation is said to be more discriminating and can be classified more specifically under the concept of taxonomy.

      So I think what this saying, rather indirectly (from the other direction), if I'm understanding correctly, is that the relationships that can be inferred from looking at a taxonomy are ambiguous, because a taxonomy includes 2 kinds of relationships, but encodes them in the same way (conflates them together as if they were both hyponyms--er, well, this is saying that the are both kinds of hyponyms):

      • "An X is a Y" (simple hyponymy)
      • "An X is a kind/type of Y".

      Actually, I may have read it wrong / misunderstood it... While it's not ruling out that simple hyponymy may sometimes be used in a taxonomy, it is be saying that the "second relation" is "more specifically under the concept of taxonomy" ... which is not really clear, but seems to mean that it is more appropriate / better for use as a criterion in a taxonomy.


      Okay, so define "simple hyponymy" and name the other kind of hyponymy that is referenced here.

    3. The hierarchical structure of semantic fields can be mostly seen in hyponymy.

      Good explanation about semantic fields.

      I assume the same or an even stronger statement can be made about semantic classes (which to me are like more clear-cut, distinct semantic fields), then? 

    1. Taxonomies are often represented as is-a hierarchies where each level is more specific (in mathematical language "a subset of") the level above it. For example, a basic biology taxonomy would have concepts such as mammal, which is a subset of animal, and dogs and cats, which are subsets of mammal. This kind of taxonomy is called an is-a model because the specific objects are considered as instances of a concept. For example, Fido is-an instance of the concept dog and Fluffy is-a cat.
    2. In the simple biology example, dog is a hypernym and Fido is one of its hyponyms. A word can be both a hyponym and a hypernym. For example, dog is a hyponym of mammal and also a hypernym of Fido.

      I wish they hadn't used tokens/objects in this example. Wouldn't it be just as clear or clearer if they had stuck to only comparing types/classes?

      It may be okay to mix them like that in some contexts, but in other cases it seems like this would be suffering from ignoring/conflating/[better word?] the Type–token distinction.

      Does linguistics just not make the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type%E2%80%93token_distinction ?

      This statement seems to reinforce that idea:

      words that are examples of categories are hyponyms

      because an example of a category/class/type could be either a sub-class or an instance of that category/class/type, right?

    1. semantic domain or semantic field

      What, then, is the difference between a semantic domain and a semantic field? The way they are used here, it's almost as if they are listing them in order to emphasis that they are synonyms ... but I'm not sure.

      From the later examples of basketball (https://hyp.is/ynKbXI1BEeuEheME3sLYrQ/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_domain) and coffee shop, however, I am pretty certain that semantic domain is quite different from (broader than) semantic field.

    1. (Not answered on this stub article)

      What, precisely, is the distinction/difference between a semantic class and a semantic field? At the very least, you would say that they are themselves both very much within the same semantic field.

      So, is a semantic class distinct from a semantic field in that semantic class is a more well-defined/clear-cut semantic field? And a semantic field is a more fluid, nebulous, not well-defined field (in the same sense as a magnetic field, which has no distinct boundary whatsoever, only a decay as you move further away from its source) ("semantic fields are constantly flowing into each other")?

      If so, could you even say that a semantic class is a kind of (hyponym) of semantic field?

      Maybe I should pose this question on a semantics forum.

    1. Le conseil académique des associations éducatives complémentaires de l'enseignement public (C.A.A.E.C.E.P.) Un C.A.A.E.C.E.P. est créé dans chaque académie afin de favoriser la concertation entre l'administration de l'éducation nationale et ses partenaires. Il donne son avis sur les demandes d'agrément formulées par les associations dont les activités s'exercent au niveau local et sur les propositions de retrait d'agrément. Sont concernées les associations qui : organisent des activités qui s'inscrivent dans des projets d'école ou d'établissement et pouvant se dérouler en dehors du temps scolaire interviennent pendant le temps scolaire en appui aux activités d'enseignement œuvrent dans les domaines de la recherche pédagogique, de la formation des équipes pédagogiques et des autres membres de la communauté éducative Parmi les 15 membres du C.A.A.E.C.E.P., trois sont des représentants des organisations représentatives de parents d'élèves.
    1. Il convient de veiller à ce qu’ils détiennent les informations nécessaires à l’exercice de leur mandat : ils doivent disposer des mêmes documents que les autres membres de l’instance concernée. Cela ne signifie pas qu’ils ont dans tous les cas connaissance en même temps des mêmes informations.
    2. Par ailleurs, un local peut être mis à la disposition des représentants de parents d’élèves, de manière temporaire ou permanente, dans les mêmes conditions que pour les associations de parents d’élèves.
    3. Les réunions des conseils d’école, des conseils d’administration, des conseils de classe et des conseils de discipline sont fixées de manière à permettre la représentation des parents d’élèves
    1. those aspects of a linguistic unit, such as a morpheme, word, or sentence,

      Speaking of ambiguity...

      Are the examples in the list "such as a morpheme, word, or sentence" examples of

      • aspects of a linguistic unit or of:
      • linguistic units themselves ?

      Unless you are already fairly familiar with those terms -- in particular, linguistic unit -- it may not be clear.

      I believe these are given as examples of "linguistic unit", in order to clarify what we mean by "linguistic unit" — perhaps (ironically) precisely because many people would be unfamiliar with that expression/term.

    1. Semantics: deals with the formal properties and interrelation of signs and symbols, without regard to meaning.

      Is a branch (of a field/discipline) considered a hyponym?? 

    1. Function (computer science) Function (engineering) Function (mathematics)

      Is this a polyseme?

      Or is that only the case if the different distinct senses are all within the same "field"?

    1. Tout fonctionnaire civil ou militaire doit veiller à faire cesser immédiatement ou à prévenir les situations de conflits d’intérêts dans lesquelles il se trouve ou pourrait se trouver, à l’occasion du traitement d’un dossier par exemple, ou s’il siège dans une instance collégiale.

      impartialité

    1. Le devoir d’information : les fonctionnaires doivent satisfaire aux demandes d'information du public. Cette obligation est la traduction statutaire du principe de libre accès aux documents administratifs. Le devoir d’information est toutefois limité par le secret professionnel et par l'obligation de discrétion professionnelle.
    1. une charte d'utilisation du cahier de textes numérique pouvant être mise en place au sein de l'établissement.
    1. Recommandation n° 34 : s’assurer que dans les lieux d’hébergement de certains jeunes, comme les pensionnats ou les foyers de l’aide sociale à l’enfance, les protections menstruelles soient accessibles.

      qui s'en assure ?

    2. Recommandation n° 33 : multiplier les lieux de distributions de protections menstruelles dans les collèges et les lycées, en particulier dans les lieux de vie des élèves, et expérimenter la mise en place de distributeurs dans les toilettes.
    3. Considérant qu’offrir à chaque élève et à chaque étudiant des conditions convenables pour suivre leur scolarité est une question d’égalité des chances et participe du principe républicain de méritocratie, vos Rapporteures estiment qu’un effort doit aujourd’hui être fait pour mieux prendre en compte la précarité menstruelle en milieux scolaire et étudiant.
    1. Sociologist Michael Warner built on this some ten years later, saying:Counterpublics are spaces of circulation in which it is hoped that the poiesis of scenemaking will be transformative, not replicative merely.Poiesis is a fancy way of talking about the art and the act of creating, inventing — and it’s closely related to technique. Consciously making a scene that others can join in with.Economist Kim Crayton’s antiracism programme, Cause a Scene speaks directly to this: she is bringing a clear set of principles to life through leadership training and sharing content to achieve “strategic disruption of the status quo in technical organizations”.Making a scene is galvanising and welcoming, dynamic and inclusive by default.

      I like this idea of creating a space and causing a scene to pull people in.

      Not too dissimilar to the aculturation Hollywood does to help normalize certain activities just by showing them increasingly.

      Definitely want to circle back to this with additional examples and expand on it.

    1. This is not a fork. This is a repository of scripts to automatically build Microsoft's vscode repository into freely-licensed binaries with a community-driven default configuration.

      almost without a doubt, inspired by: chromium vs. chrome

    1. Or if you need to change the way the string is assembled, you can provide a proc, for example: if defined?(BetterErrors) BetterErrors.editor = proc { |file, line| "vscode://file/%{file}:%{line}" % { file: URI.encode_www_form_component(file), line: line } } end
    1. Les nouvelles dispositions émanant du décret n°2019-906 prévoient que le Conseil d’Administration de l’établissement doit désormais établir, à partir des enquêtes trimestriellessur les sanctions, un rapport relatif au fonctionnement pédagogique et des conditions matérielles de fonctionnement dont une partie est consacrée au bilan des décisions rendues en matière disciplinaire, élaboré à partir du registre des sanctions de l’établissement, et des suites données par le chef d’établissement aux demandes écrites de saisine du conseil de discipline émanant d’un membre de la communauté éducative
      • 1:35:06 Quelles sont les choses fausses sur les ados ? (sommeil)
      • 1:14:37 au delà de l'adolescence, la vraie question est autant de se poser la question de savoir quel est le monde qu'on va laisser pour les enfants de demain mais aussi quels sont les enfants qu'on va-t-on laisser au monde de demain ?
      • 1:18:05 Vote démocratique et émotion "et on a notamment nous fini une étude qui est intéressante parce que l'on parlait du vote qui était de se dire de se poser la question finalement comment on fait pour affiner un peu les modèles pour déterminer quelle est la le la probabilité que les gens aillent voter à un moment donné et on a simplement posé comme question d'habitude on pose comme question l'intention de vote s p à quel point vous avez l'intention d'aller voter dimanche et on a juste rajouté nous une petite question qui est l'anticipation du regret on a dit aux gens à quel point vous aurez des regrettés si vous n'allez pas voter dimanche et bien le fait de poser juste cette petite question ça affine grandement les modèles sur l'abstention le jour de l'élection et donc on pourrait se dire ça ceux qui anticipent plus de regrets ils vont ceux qui anticipent plus de regrets ils vont donc nous on n'a pas le faire parce que tu sais qu'il y a une il y a toujours des commissions électorales
      • 43:22 Des conseils pour se comprendre: Se parler (le rôle de l'éducation nationale)
    1. he goes on to talk about third party problems and how you're never guaranteed something is written correctly or that even if it is you don't know if it's the most optimal solution
    2. I would much rather have a "cosine" module than a "trigonometry" module because chances are good I only need a small fraction of the utilities provided by the larger trig module.
    3. Sure sometimes my changes get rejected, but it almost always comes with a reason why and I can work together with the maintainer to come up with a sensible solution to my issue.
    4. Second, I don't agree that there are too many small modules. In fact, I wish every common function existed as its own module. Even the maintainers of utility libraries like Underscore and Lodash have realized the benefits of modularity and allowed you to install individual utilities from their library as separate modules. From where I sit that seems like a smart move. Why should I import the entirety of Underscore just to use one function? Instead I'd rather see more "function suites" where a bunch of utilities are all published separately but under a namespace or some kind of common name prefix to make them easier to find. The way Underscore and Lodash have approached this issue is perfect. It gives consumers of their packages options and flexibility while still letting people like Dave import the whole entire library if that's what they really want to do.
    1. Whenever majorities trample upon the rights of minorities—when men are denied even the privilege of having their causes of complaint examined into—when measures, which they deem for their relief, are rejected by the despotism of a silent majority at a second reading—when such become the rules of our legislation, the Congress of this Union will no longer justly represent a republican people.
    1. JavaScript needs to fly from its comfy nest, and learn to survive on its own, on equal terms with other languages and run-times. It’s time to grow up, kid.
    2. If JavaScript were detached from the client and server platforms, the pressure of being a monoculture would be lifted — the next iteration of the JavaScript language or run-time would no longer have to please every developer in the world, but instead could focus on pleasing a much smaller audience of developers who love JavaScript and thrive with it, while enabling others to move to alternative languages or run-times.
    3. Despite a growing variety of languages that compile to JavaScript, the language itself remains the dominant language in both client-side and server-side eco-systems for web development. The idea of replacing JavaScript with languages that compile to JavaScript, has been explored, and for whatever reasons, it hasn’t really liberated anyone from JavaScript.
    4. We standardize on a finite subset of JS (such as asm.js) — and avoid the endless struggle through future iterations of the JavaScript language, competing super-sets and transpilers

      asm.js and RPython sound similar (restrictive subsets)

    5. agree to accept JavaScript for what it is, but start to think of it as a kind of VM for other languages
    1. Sure, you have a few extra newlines and semicolons, but the minifier will remove them anyway so no harm.
    2. What is the point of avoiding the semicolon in concat_javascript_sources

      For how detailed and insightful his analysis was -- which didn't elaborate or even touch on his not understanding the reason for adding the semicolon -- it sure appeared like he knew what it was for. Otherwise, the whole issue would/should have been about how he didn't understand that, not on how to keep adding the semicolon but do so in a faster way!

      Then again, this comment from 3 months afterwards, indicates he may not think they are even necessary: https://github.com/rails/sprockets/issues/388#issuecomment-252417741

      Anyway, just in case he really didn't know, the comment shortly below partly answers the question:

      Since the common problem with concatenating JavaScript files is the lack of semicolons, automatically adding one (that, like Sam said, will then be removed by the minifier if it's unnecessary) seems on the surface to be a perfectly fine speed optimization.

      This also alludes to the problem: https://github.com/rails/sprockets/issues/388#issuecomment-257312994

      But the explicit answer/explanation to this question still remains unspoken: because if you don't add them between concatenated files -- as I discovered just to day -- you will run into this error:

         (intermediate value)(...) is not a function
             at something.source.js:1
      

      , apparently because when it concatenated those 2 files together, it tried to evaluate it as:

         ({
           // other.js
         })()
         (function() {
           // something.js
         })();
      

      It makes sense that a ; is needed.

    1. This semi-colon is added to prevent changing the code behaviour (the famous line ending with parentheses, etc) Most people will use a JS minifier If they don't, a single extra character is unlikely to change much If I'm right about all the above: Why don't we simply always add a semi-colon regardless of what the file ends with?
    1. I'd suggest there ought to be config to disable source maps specifically, and specifically for either CSS or JS (not alwasy both), without turning off debug mode. As you note, debug mode does all sorts of different things that you might want with or without source maps.
    1. # This behavior can be disabled with: # # environment.unregister_postprocessor 'application/javascript', Sprockets::SafetyColons

      but it appears to no longer be possible in latest version...

    1. This is a huge disadvantage to all web developers. Why can't we at least have the ability to turn validation messages off? Why do we have to re-implement a validation system when you already have one in place, but all we want is the validation aspect and not the built in messaging? By taking away the ability to style elements that CHROME adds to the browser window, it is hurting developers professional appearance. We just want to use Chrome's WONDERFUL validation system with our own error messages. Either let us style them, or let us hide them, but don't make us re-invent the wheel just because you don't want our code to be "browser specific". Writing a new validation system just for Chrome is going to be much more "browser (chrome) specific" code than setting "::-webkit-validation-bubble, ::-webkit-validation-bubble * { display: none; }. This isn't just an annoyance, it's a huge disadvantage to any developer who wants to easily utilize Chrome's built in validation. I usually brag about how wonderful Chrome is, but I'm starting to think it's heading in another direction...

    1. Alkaati ba jàpp na sàcc.

      Le gardien de la paix a pris un voleur.

      alkaati bi -- policeman.

      ba -- the (indicates remoteness).

      jàpp v. -- grab, take, stop.

      na -- (?).

      sàcc bi -- thief.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9gOjBhk1q0

    2. Noo mën a def dinga fey alamaan bi.

      Quoi que tu fasses, tu paieras l'amende.

      noo -- you (?)

      mën v. -- power ; be stronger than 💪🏽; can, will.

      a -- (?).

      def v. -- do, commit, execute; to put.

      dinga -- you will.

      fey v. -- turn off, switch off 📴, appease; pay 💵.

      alamaan bi -- (French: l'amende) fine.

      bi -- the.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y6PTqs1uCc

    3. Peñe, kenn du ko able.

      Un peigne, personne ne le prête.

      peñe bi -- (French) comb.

      kenn -- no one.

      du -- to be (negative). ➖

      ko -- it.

      able v. -- to lend.

    4. Ab paaka la yore.

      Il a un couteau sur lui.

      ab -- a.

      paaka bi -- (Portuguese) knife. 🔪

      la -- he (?).

      yore v. -- to have under his dependence, to have in his charge, to have in the hands.

    5. Sëriñ boobu aj na daaw, doomam a ko wuutu léegi.

      Ce marabout est décédé l'an dernier, c'est son fils qui le remplace maintenant.

      sëriñ bi -- marabout.

      boobu -- this.

      aj (Arabic: Hajj) v. -- make the pilgrimage to Mecca. 🕋; deceased ☠️ (for a religious personality).

      na -- he (?).

      daaw n. -- last year. 🗓

      doom+am (doom) ji -- child by descent 👶🏽; doll🪆; to have a child.

    1. Le règlement intérieur fait-il l'objet d'un « contrôle de légalité » par les autorités de tutelle ?Une fois voté, il doit faire l'objet d'une transmission au recteur d'académie pour les lycées et à l'inspecteur d'académie pour les collèges. Il ne devient véritablement effectif qu'après un délai de 15 jours suivant sa transmission.
  3. Feb 2021
    1. Currently, only Right signals are wired up.

      So what happens if a task returns a Left signal?? Will it still go Right? Will it error?

    1. charte d’utilisation

      La charte vient d'être mise à jour, il faut la commenter

    2. responsables élèves

      le terme "responsable élève" ne fait pas partie du vocabulaire des familles. il faudrait à minima l'expliciter.

    1. The entire framework is based on small, clean Ruby structures that can be executed programmatically.
    2. Using a terminus to indicate a certain outcome - in turn - allows for much stronger interfaces across nested activities and less guessing! For example, in the new endpoint gem, the not_found terminus is then wired to a special “404 track” that handles the case of “model not found”. The beautiful thing here is: there is no guessing by inspecting ctx[:model] or the like - the not_found end has only one meaning!
    3. A major improvement here is the ability to maintain more than two explicit termini. In 2.0, you had the success and the failure termini (or “ends” as we used to call them). Now, additional ends such as not_found can be leveraged to communicate a non-binary outcome of your activity or operation.
    4. The new 2.1 version comes with a few necessary but reasonable changes in method signatures. As painful as that might sound to your Rails-spoiled ears, we preferred to fix design mistakes now before dragging them on forever.
    5. The new call API is much more consistent and takes away another thing we kept explaining to new users - an indicator for a flawed API.
    6. It’s so simple that I sometimes wonder why it took years to develop it!
    1. Let’s start with the same number dividing example, which returns 0 when the error happens. Maybe instead we can indicate that the result was not successful without any explicit numerical value?
    2. You can use container values, that wraps actual success or error value into a thin wrapper with utility methods to work with this value. That’s exactly why we have created @dry-python/returns project. So you can make your functions return something meaningful, typed, and safe.
    1. The latter are important examples which usually also exist in "purely" functional programming languages.

      How can they exist and it still be considered pure??

      I guess that's not quite the same / as bad as saying something had side effects in a purely functional programming context, right?

    1. provide interfaces so you don’t have to think about them

      Question to myself: Is not having to think about it actually a good goal to have? Is it at odds with making intentional/well-considered decisions?  Obviously there are still many of interesting decisions to make even when using a framework that provides conventions and standardization and makes some decisions for you...

    1. If you ask my former students, they will tell you that as a teacher, my goal is to do nothing. I dream of the day when I can sit at my desk, feet propped up, reading a book, while the classroom bursts with activity and learning around me.
    1. What is the opposite of free content?

      The opposite of free/open-source software is proprietary software or non-free software (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprietary_software).

      So should we call the opposite of free content "non-free content"? Or "proprietary content"?

      Seems likes either would be fine.

      Looks like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content prefers the term "non-free content".

      Couldn't find anyone contrasting these 2 terms (like I could no doubt find for software):

      Not to be confused with:

      • paid content ... just like:
      • free content should not be confused with gratis content (?)
      • free software should not be confused with freeware
    1. <small><cite class='h-cite via'> <span class='p-author h-card'>tantek</span> in #meta 2021-02-21 (<time class='dt-published'>02/22/2021 08:49:58</time>)</cite></small>

    1. Note: This question has been edited since it was asked. The original title was "Test whether a glob has any matches in bash". The specific shell, 'bash', was dropped from the question after I published my answer. The editing of the question's title makes my answer appear to be in error. I hope someone can amend or at least address this change.
    1. Beware, though: What you are about to see is not particularly elegant. In fact, the TTY subsystem — while quite functional from a user's point of view — is a twisty little mess of special cases. To understand how this came to be, we have to go back in time.
    1. The Quest for Truth

      The quest for Truth is everywhere and not limited to the economic topics linked here. This is just a topic that started a thought process where I had access to a convenient tool (Hypothesis) to bookmark my thoughts and research.

      Primary thought is: The Quest for Truth. Subcategories would provide a structured topic for the thought. In this case the subcategory would be: US Economy, Inflation

      The TRUTH is a concept comprised of inconsistencies and targets that frequently move.

      Targets (data, methods, people, time, semantics, agenda, demographic, motive, means, media, money, status) hold a position in time long enough to fulfill a purpose or agenda. Sometimes they don't consciously change, but history over time shines light and opens cracks in original narrative that leads to new truth's, real or imagined.

      Verifying and validating certain Truth is very difficult. Why is That?
    1. Psychologists, at least psychologists who write textbooks, not only show no interest in the origin and development of love or affection, but they seem to be unaware of its very existence.

      There is little to no information about love in our textbook, which leads me to believe that love is one emotion that was not historically explored.

  4. www.metacritic.com www.metacritic.com
    1. Please, do not buy this. I am really tired of "games" that are given critical praise because its cool to praise or because its political correct to do. I will break up my review in points so its clear why I dislike this "game" : 1) This is not a game. This is a short story, like an interactive book. 2) This game is so short, that I completed it in a 3 hour bus ride. It was boring. 3) Its a story of a girl that have to take the reigns of her life after divorce. WOMAN EMPOWERMENT. Now you know why this game is rated so highly 4) This is a MOBILE GAME. I paid $3 to play on an iphone (after watching a gaming channel give it GOTY contender. Needless to say, I never watched that gaming channel again). I FELT I WAS ROBBED OF TIME AND $3. Imagine how much I hated this game to feel like I was robbed even though it costed me only $3. 5) This game costs $7 on the eshop. You could buy CELESTE for $9 on sale on the Eshop. That is a great game. I recently bought Hollow Knight for $7 on Playstation. This interactive novel should not be sold as a game. Period. It is a waste of time and money.

      Nothing wrong with interactive novels being sold in the same store as games... as long as it's clear what it is (no false advertising).

      Somewhat agree with some of the other points...

    1. compose(Add, x: x, y: 3)

      How is this better than simply:

      Add.run(x: x, y: 3)
      

      ?

      I guess if we did that we would also have to remember to handle merging errors from that outcome into self...

    2. It's an implementation of the command pattern in Ruby.
    1. For the usage in society, see Second-class citizen.
      1. Ironic that this reference is ostensibly about the usage of "first-class citizen" in society, yet it links to a seemingly-mismatched (by name only, that is) article, entitled "second-class citizen".

      2. Ironic that the first-class (unqualified) article is about the figurative meaning of "citizen" used in computer science, and that the page describing first-class and second-class status of the more literal citizens in society is relegated to what I kind of think is a second-class position in the encyclopedia (because it takes the #2 position numerically, even though it is (at least as is implied in this reference) also about first-class citizens (though the word "first-class" does not appear a single time in that article, so maybe this reference is the one that is more ironic/incorrect).

    1. with ActiveForm-Rails, validations is the responsability of the form and not of the models. There is no need to synchronize errors from the form to the models and vice versa.

      But if you intend to save to a model after the form validates, then you can't escape the models' validations:

      either you check that the models pass their own validations ahead of time (like I want to do, and I think @mattheworiordan was wanting to do), or you have to accept that one of the following outcomes is possible/inevitable if the models' own validations fail:

      1. if you use object.save then it may silently fail to save
      2. if you use object.save then it will fail to save and raise an error

      Are either of those outcomes acceptable to you? To me, they seem not to be. Hence we must also check for / handle the models' validations. Hence we need a way to aggregate errors from both the form object (context-specific validations) and from the models (unconditional/invariant validations that should always be checked by the model), and present them to the user.

      What do you guys find to be the best way to accomplish that?

      I am interested to know what best practices you use / still use today after all these years. I keep finding myself running into this same problem/need, which is how I ended up looking for what the current options are for form objects today...

    1. Report: This price didn't exist on the store This price did show on the store but the game could not be bought This was a very short price made by a mistake (glitch)
    1. SpyandMonitor is authentic and professional hackers for hire service provider around the globe. You can't find a better ethical hacker to hire online near me what you can find and rent a hacker with Spy and Monitor. The contact information is below.

      Spy and Monitor having most talented teams of hackers for hire. We offer the best Cyber Security services for Scam investigation, Email password recovery, Fixing hacked website and phone hacking.

    1. un projet d’éducation humaniste qui pense l’élève dans toutes ses dimensions essentielles (psychologique, sociale, morale...)
    2. la recherche pour garder un temps d’avance sur les politiques éducatives

      Que dit la recherche sur le fait d'impliquer les familles ?

    3. qui doit être fortement encouragée au service des usagers : élèves, familles et enseignants.

      C'est une conception du projet de l'académie ? Sérieusement ? Cette conception est réductrice, au mieux un projet de service, elle positionne les autres comme usagers

    4. Après une phase de conception, un temps de conversatio

      pas avec les parents en tout cas

    5. fixe le cap pour la communauté éducative.

      parlez pour vous les parents n'y sont pas sérieusement associés alors qu'ils font officiellement partie de cette communauté éducative dont vous dites assurer la gouvernance...

    6. r l’implication négociée et contractualisée de l’ensemble des acteurs audités

      dont les parents ?

    7. Un Club des partenaires pour le numérique et le bâti scolaire

      Etonnamment nous ne sommes ni dans la communauté ni parmi les partenaires... la notion de club est encore une optique de prestige prémium alors qu'il s'agit de l'école de la république

    1. you'll want to update Devise's generated views to remove references to passwords, since you don't need them any more

      Doesn't this contradict the statement

      This strategy plays well with most other Devise strategies

      (which includes password strategies)?


      One thing that wasn't clear from their instructions was whether magic links could be used as an option in addition to regular password log-ins. On the one hand they say:

      This strategy plays well with most other Devise strategies (see notes on other Devise strategies).

      but on the other hand they say:

      you'll want to update Devise's generated views to remove references to passwords, since you don't need them any more

    1. Universal Links allow you to register a series of domains that are allowed to interact with an installed application. If the application is not installed, the universal link is opened with Safari, allowing you to inform the user of the existence of an application or whatever is necessary.
    1. Implicit intents do not name a specific component, but instead declare a general action to perform, which allows a component from another app to handle it. For example, if you want to show the user a location on a map, you can use an implicit intent to request that another capable app show a specified location on a map.
    1. The other day, I overheard two developers discussing pros and cons of various version control systems. I only caught this fragment: “… What sucks about Git is that when you look at a merge commit, you can’t really see what changed!”. It wasn’t the first time I heard such complaints. Time to debunk Git merge commits.
    1. Now let me ask you, do you write JS for a single page application differently from a "traditional" web application? I sure hope you do! In a "traditional" application, you can get away with being sloppy because every time the user navigates to a new page, their browser destroys the DOM and the JavaScript context. SPAs, though, require a more thoughtful approach.
    2. Turbolinks is a Single-Page Application Turbolinks doesn't just give you some of the benefits of a single-page app. Turbolinks is a single page app. Think about it: When someone visits your site, you serve them some HTML and Javascript. The JavaScript takes over and manages all subsequent changes to the DOM. If that's not a single-page app, I don't know what is.
    3. we plan to migrate to Angular 1, and we'll finish out the decade on React

      Wrong direction: I'd recommend migrate from Angular to React.

    1. You use grid-area, so the place for the side nav is allocated at start. If you hide (or even delete) the side nav, that won't change anything about this. You have to do a little trick: Set the width for the first column to 0 and change the grid-gap because otherwise you will have a (not needed) gap at the left.
    1. And if there's a suitable vulnerability, it might be possible to trigger it even without using <iframe>, <img> or <a> element, so it's not worth considering for this issue.
    1. cultural capital

      Introduced by Pierre Bourdieu in the 1970s, the concept has been utilized across a wide spectrum of contemporary sociological research. Cultural capital refers to ‘knowledge’ or ‘skills’ in the broadest sense. Thus, on the production side, cultural capital consists of knowledge about comportment (e.g., what are considered to be the right kinds of professional dress and attitude) and knowledge associated with educational achievement (e.g., rhetorical ability). On the consumption side, cultural capital consists of capacities for discernment or ‘taste’, e.g., the ability to appreciate fine art or fine wine—here, in other words, cultural capital refers to ‘social status acquired through the ability to make cultural distinctions,’ to the ability to recognize and discriminate between the often-subtle categories and signifiers of a highly articulated cultural code. I'm quoting here from (and also heavily paraphrasing) Scott Lash, ‘Pierre Bourdieu: Cultural Economy and Social Change’, in this reader.

    1. Popup - You don't need to deal with these messages right away, yet at some point you will need to take action since these won't go away until explicitly say say you don't want them around anymore.
  5. Jan 2021