83 Matching Annotations
1. Jan 2023
2. www.complexityexplorer.org www.complexityexplorer.org
1. What it means to be a member of this or that class is a complex, interpretative matter; but tracking how many times a person has been to the opera is not. You can count the latter, and (the bargain goes) facts about those numbers may illuminate facts about the deeper concepts. For example, counting opera-going might be used to measure how immigrants move up the social class ladder across generations. Crucially, operationalization is not definition. A good operationalization does not redefine the concept of interest (it does not say "to be a member of the Russian intelligentsia is just to have gone to the opera at least once"). Rather, it makes an argument for why the concept, as best understood, may lead to certain measurable consequences, and why those measurements might provide a signal of the underlying concept.

This is a good example of the fuzzy sorts of boundaries created by adding probabilities to individuals and putting them into (equivalence) classes. They can provide distributions of likelihoods.

This expands on: https://hypothes.is/a/3FVi6JtXEe2Xwp_BIaCv5g

2. Signal relationships are (usually) symmetric: if knowledge of X tells you about Y, then knowledge of Y tells you about X.

Reframing signal relationships into probability spaces may mean that signal relationships are symmetric.

How far can this be pressed? They'll also likely be reflexive and transitive (though the probability may be smaller here) and thus make an equivalence relation.

How far can we press this idea of equivalence relations here with respect to our work? Presumably it would work to the level of providing at least good general distribution?

#### URL

3. Nov 2022
4. wexler.free.fr wexler.free.fr
1. Amos Tversky's famous "The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences".

#### URL

5. stats.stackexchange.com stats.stackexchange.com
1. The random process has outcomes

## Notation of a random process that has outcomes

The "universal set" aka "sample space" of all possible outcomes is sometimes denoted by $$U$$, $$S$$, or $$\Omega$$: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample_space

## Probability theory & measure theory

From what I recall, the notation, $$\Omega$$, was mainly used in higher-level grad courses on probability theory. ie, when trying to frame things in probability theory as a special case of measure theory things/ideas/processes. eg, a probability space, $$(\cal{F}, \Omega, P)$$ where $$\cal{F}$$ is a $$\sigma\text{-field}$$ aka $$\sigma\text{-algebra}$$ and $$P$$ is a probability density function on any element of $$\cal{F}$$ and $$P(\Omega)=1.$$

Somehow, the definition of a sigma-field captures the notion of what we want out of something that's measurable, but it's unclear to me why so let's see where writing through this takes me.

## Working through why a sigma-algebra yields a coherent notion of measureable

A sigma-algebra $$\cal{F}$$ on a set $$\Omega$$ is defined somewhat close to the definition of a topology $$\tau$$ on some space $$X$$. They're both collections of sub-collections of the set/space of reference (ie, $$\tau \sub 2^X$$ and $$\cal{F} \sub 2^\Omega$$). Also, they're both defined to contain their underlying set/space (ie, $$X \in \tau$$ and $$\Omega \in \cal{F}$$).

Additionally, they both contain the empty set but for (maybe) different reasons, definitionally. For a topology, it's simply defined to contain both the whole space and the empty set (ie, $$X \in \tau$$ and $$\empty \in \tau$$). In a sigma-algebra's case, it's defined to be closed under complements, so since $$\Omega \in \cal{F}$$ the complement must also be in $$\cal{F}$$... but the complement of the universal set $$\Omega$$ is the empty set, so $$\empty \in \cal{F}$$.

I think this might be where the similarity ends, since a topology need not be closed under complements (but probably has a special property when it is, although I'm not sure what; oh wait, the complement of open is closed in topology, so it'd be clopen! Not sure what this would really entail though 🤷‍♀️). Moreover, a topology is closed under arbitrary unions (which includes uncountable), but a sigma-algebra is closed under countable unions. Hmm... Maybe this restriction to countable unions is what gives a coherent notion of being measurable? I suspect it also has to do with Banach-Tarski paradox. ie, cutting a sphere into 5 pieces and rearranging in a clever way so that you get 2 sphere's that each have the volume of the original sphere; I mean, WTF, if 1 sphere's volume equals the volume of 2 sphere's, then we're definitely not able to measure stuff any more.

And now I'm starting to vaguely recall that this what sigma-fields essentially outlaw/ban from being possible. It's also related to something important in measure theory called a Lebeque measure, although I'm not really sure what that is (something about doing a Riemann integral but picking the partition on the y-axis/codomain instead of on the x-axis/domain, maybe?)

And with that, I think I've got some intuition about how fundamental sigma-algebras are to letting us handle probability and uncertainty.

## Back to probability theory

So then events like $$E_1$$ and $$E_2$$ that are elements of the set of sub-collections, $$\cal{F}$$, of the possibility space $$\Omega$$. Like, maybe $$\Omega$$ is the set of all possible outcomes of rolling 2 dice, but $$E_1$$ could be a simple event (ie, just one outcome like rolling a 2) while $$E_2$$ could be a compound(?) event (ie, more than one, like rolling an even number). Notably, $$E_1$$ & $$E_2$$ are NOT elements of the sample space $$\Omega$$; they're elements of the powerset of our possibility space (ie, the set of all possible subsets of $$\Omega$$ denoted by $$2^\Omega$$). So maybe this explains why the "closed under complements" is needed; if you roll a 2, you should also be able to NOT roll a 2. And the property that a sigma-algebra must "contain the whole space" might be what's needed to give rise to a notion of a complete measure (conjecture about complete measures: everything in the measurable space can be assigned a value where that part of the measurable space does, in fact, represent some constitutive part of the whole).

## But what about these "random events"?

Ah, so that's where random variables come into play (and probably why in probability theory they prefer to use $$\Omega$$ for the sample space instead of $$X$$ like a base space in topology). There's a function, that is, a mapping from outcomes of this "random event" (eg, a role of 2 dice) to a space in which we can associate (ie, assign) a sense of distance (ie, our sigma-algebra). What confuses me is that we see things like "$$P(X=x)$$" which we interpret as "probability that our random variable, $$X$$, ends up being some particular outcome $$x$$." But it's also said that $$X$$ is a real-valued function, ie, takes some arbitrary elements (eg, events like rolling an even number) and assigns them a real number (ie, some $$x \in \mathbb{R}$$).

Aha! I think I recall the missing link: the notation "$$X=x$$" is really a shorthand for "$$X(\omega)=x$$" where $$\omega \in \cal{F}$$. But something that still feels unreconciled is that our probability metric, $$P$$, is just taking some real value to another real value... So which one is our sigma-algebra, the inputs of $$P$$ or the inputs of $$X$$? 🤔 Hmm... Well, I guess it has the be the set of elements that $$X$$ is mapping into $$\mathbb{R}$$ since $$X\text{'s}$$ input is a small omega $$\omega$$ (which is probably an element of big omega $$\Omega$$ based on the conventions of small notation being elements of big notation), so $$X\text{'s}$$ domain much be the sigma-algrebra?

Let's try to generate a plausible example of this in action... Maybe something with an inequality like "$$X\ge 1$$". Okay, yeah, how about $$X$$ is a random variable for the random process of how long it takes a customer to get through a grocery line. So $$X$$ is mapping the elements of our sigma-algebra (ie, what customers actually end up experiencing in the real world) into a subset of the reals, namely $$[0,\infty)$$ because their time in line could be 0 minutes or infinite minutes (geesh, 😬 what a life that would be, huh?). Okay, so then I can ask a question like "What's the probability that $$X$$ takes on a value greater than or equal to 1 minute?" which I think translates to "$$P\left(X(\omega)\ge 1\right)$$" which is really attempting to model this whole "random event" of "What's gonna happen to a particular person on average?"

So this makes me wonder... Is this fact that $$X$$ can model this "random event" (at all) what people mean when they say something is a stochastic model? That there's a probability distribution it generates which affords us some way of dealing with navigating the uncertainty of the "random event"? If so, then sigma-algebras seem to serve as a kind of gateway and/or foundation into specific cognitive practices (ie, learning to think & reason probabilistically) that affords us a way out of being overwhelmed by our anxiety or fear and can help us reclaim some agency and autonomy in situations with uncertainty.

#### URL

6. Sep 2022
7. Local file Local file
1. B. V. Gnf.di.xko

He wrote with/worked with Khinchin and Kolmogorov.

2. A . Y A . K H I N C H I N

Aleksandr Yakovlevich Khinchin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Khinchin #### Annotators

8. www.scientificamerican.com www.scientificamerican.com
1. Running this simulation over many time steps, Lilian Weng of OSoMe found that as agents' attention became increasingly limited, the propagation of memes came to reflect the power-law distribution of actual social media: the probability that a meme would be shared a given number of times was roughly an inverse power of that number. For example, the likelihood of a meme being shared three times was approximately nine times less than that of its being shared once.

#### URL

9. Aug 2022
10. eprint.iacr.org eprint.iacr.org
1. Generating randomness.

EVM execution is deterministic. How to account for randomness?

Pesudo random generator, probability distribution.

#### URL

11. May 2022
12. docdrop.org docdrop.org
1. In the case ofLévi-Strauss, meanwhile, the card index continued to serve inimportant ways as a ‘memory crutch’, albeit with a key differencefrom previous uses of the index as an aide-memoire. In Lévi-Strauss’case, what the fallibility of memory takes away, the card index givesback via the workings of chance. As he explains in an interview withDidier Erebon:I get by when I work by accumulating notes – a bitabout everything, ideas captured on the fly,summaries of what I have read, references,quotations... And when I want to start a project, Ipull a packet of notes out of their pigeonhole anddeal them out like a deck of cards. This kind ofoperation, where chance plays a role, helps merevive my failing memory. (Cited in Krapp, 2006:361)For Krapp, the crucial point here is that, through his use of indexcards, Lévi-Strauss ‘seems to allow that the notes may either restorememory – or else restore the possibilities of contingency which givesthinking a chance under the conditions of modernity’ (2006: 361).

Claude Lévi-Strauss had a note taking practice in which he accumulated notes of ideas on the fly, summaries of what he read, references, and quotations. He kept them on cards which he would keep in a pigeonhole. When planning a project, he would pull them out and use them to "revive [his] failing memory."

Questions: - Did his system have any internal linkages? - How big was his system? (Manageable, unmanageable?) - Was it only used for memory, or was it also used for creativity? - Did the combinatorial reshufflings of his cards provide inspiration a la the Llullan arts?

Link this to the ideas of Raymond Llull's combinatorial arts.

#### URL

13. Apr 2022
1. ReconfigBehSci. (2021, February 1). @islaut1 @richarddmorey I think of strength of inference resting on P(not E|not H) (for coronavirus case). Search determines the conditional probability (and by total probability of course prob of evidence) but it isn’t itself the evidence. So, was siding with R. against what I thought you meant ;-) [Tweet]. @SciBeh. https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1356216290847944706

#### URL

15. Jan 2022
16. bio.libretexts.org bio.libretexts.org
1. If the round pea parent is heterozygous, there is a one-eighth probability that a random sample of three progeny peas will all be round.

Please clarify how you calculated 1:8 ratio. One plant has rr and the other plant has Rr. You create a table and get two Rr and two rr which makes the probability of getting three Rr or RR zero.

#### URL

17. Dec 2021
18. www.medrxiv.org www.medrxiv.org
1. Lai, J., German, J., Hong, F., Tai, S.-H. S., McPhaul, K. M., Milton, D. K., & Group, for the U. of M. S. R. (2021). Comparison of Saliva and Mid-Turbinate Swabs for Detection of COVID-19 (p. 2021.12.01.21267147). https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.01.21267147

#### URL

19. Oct 2021
20. www.washingtonpost.com www.washingtonpost.com
1. Washington Post. ‘Opinion | Remaining Unvaccinated in Public Should Be Considered as Bad as Drunken Driving’, 15 September 2021. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/09/15/remaining-unvaccinated-public-should-be-considered-bad-drunken-driving/.

#### URL

21. Sep 2021
1. Sam Wang on Twitter: “These are risk levels that you pose to other people. They’re compared with you as—A nonsmoker—A sober driver—A vaccinated person. Unvaccinated? 5x as likely to get sick, for 3x as long. Total risk to others? 15x a vaccinated person Details:https://t.co/ckTWaivK8n https://t.co/PhpLvX2dsm” / Twitter. (n.d.). Retrieved September 19, 2021, from https://twitter.com/SamWangPhD/status/1438361144759132167

#### URL

23. Aug 2021
1. Tim Plante, MD MHS on Twitter: “Just reported: About half of recent ICU patients with #Covid19 in #Vermont are vaccinated. Sounds like the vaccines aren’t working, right? WRONG. Vaccines are working and here’s why. But first, let’s talk a bit about unprotected sex. A thread. (Refs at the end.) 1/n https://t.co/iyQcfCDAfh” / Twitter. (n.d.). Retrieved August 27, 2021, from https://twitter.com/tbplante/status/1430222978961317896

#### URL

25. journals.sagepub.com journals.sagepub.com
1. Sun, Q., Lu, J., Zhang, H., & Liu, Y. (2021). Social Distance Reduces the Biases of Overweighting Small Probabilities and Underweighting Large Probabilities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(8), 1309–1324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220969051

#### URL

26. Jul 2021
27. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
1. Moore, D. A., Backus, M., & Little, A. T. (2021). Constraints on Thinking Cause Overprecision [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/evcx2

#### URL

28. Jun 2021
29. science.sciencemag.org science.sciencemag.org
1. Cheng, Y., Ma, N., Witt, C., Rapp, S., Wild, P. S., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U., & Su, H. (2021). Face masks effectively limit the probability of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg6296

#### URL

30. May 2021
31. 80000hours.org 80000hours.org
1. think of your career as a series of experiments designed to help you learn about yourself and test out potentially great longer-term paths

I wonder if there's a connection here to Duke, A. (2019). Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don’t Have All the Facts. Portfolio.

I haven't read the book but it's on my list.

#### URL

1. Dr Ellie Murray. (2021, May 7). I’m seeing a lot of “these people are over-estimating risk” chatter that doesn’t acknowledge that the probability you die if you get covid is always less than the probability anyone dies if you get covid. It’s not “over-estimation” to consider community impacts. [Tweet]. @EpiEllie. https://twitter.com/EpiEllie/status/1390792624777334797

#### URL

33. Apr 2021
34. stats.libretexts.org stats.libretexts.org
1. Events AAA and BBB are mutually exclusive (cannot both occur at once) if they have no elements in common.

Events $$A$$ and $$B$$ are mutually exclusive (cannot both occur at once) if they have no elements in common.

Events $$A$$ and $$B$$ are mutually exclusive if: $$P(A∩B)=0$$

2. The complement of an event AAA in a sample space SSS, denoted AcAcA^c, is the collection of all outcomes in SSS that are not elements of the set AAA. It corresponds to negating any description in words of the event AAA.

The complement of an event $$A$$ in a sample space $$S$$, denoted $$A^c$$, is the collection of all outcomes in $$S$$ that are not elements of the set $$A$$. It corresponds to negating any description in words of the event $$A$$.

The complement of an event $$A$$ consists of all outcomes of the experiment that do not result in event $$A$$.

Complement formula:

$$P(A^c)=1-P(A)$$

#### URL

35. seeing-theory.brown.edu seeing-theory.brown.edu

#### URL

36. Mar 2021
37. www.namics.nysaes.cornell.edu www.namics.nysaes.cornell.edu
1. In each of the games moves are entirely determined by chance; there is no opportunity to make decisions regarding play. (This, of course, is one reason why most adults with any intellectual capacity have little interest in playing the games for extended times, especially since no money or alcohol is involved.)

The entire motivation for this study.

#### URL

38. arxiv.org arxiv.org
1. Devriendt, K., Martin-Gutierrez, S., & Lambiotte, R. (2020). Variance and covariance of distributions on graphs. ArXiv:2008.09155 [Physics, Stat]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.09155

#### URL

39. onlinelibrary.wiley.com onlinelibrary.wiley.com
1. Traczyk, J., Fulawka, K., Lenda, D., & Zaleskiewicz, T. (n.d.). Consistency in probability processing as a function of affective context and numeracy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2206

#### URL

40. www.cdc.gov www.cdc.gov
1. <small><cite class='h-cite via'> <span class='p-author h-card'>hyperlink.academy</span> in The Future of Textbooks (<time class='dt-published'>03/18/2021 23:54:19</time>)</cite></small>

#### URL

41. arxiv.org arxiv.org
1. Hota, Ashish R., Tanya Sneh, and Kavish Gupta. ‘Impacts of Game-Theoretic Activation on Epidemic Spread over Dynamical Networks’. ArXiv:2011.00445 [Physics], 1 November 2020. http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.00445.

#### URL

42. danallosso.substack.com danallosso.substack.com
1. He introduces the idea of the apophatic: what we can't put into words, but is important and vaguely understood. This term comes from Orthodox theology, where people defined god by saying what it was not.

Too often as humans we're focused on what is immediately in front of us and not what is missing.

This same thing plagues our science in that we're only publishing positive results and not negative results.

From an information theoretic perspective, we're throwing away half (or more?) of the information we're generating. We might be able to go much farther much faster if we were keeping and publishing all of our results in better fashion.

Is there a better word for this negative information? #openquestions

#### URL

43. kids.frontiersin.org kids.frontiersin.org

#### URL

44. psycnet.apa.org psycnet.apa.org
1. Unrealistic optimism about future life events: A cautionary note. (n.d.). Retrieved March 4, 2021, from https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2010-22979-001.pdf?auth_token=a25fd4b7f008a50b15fd7b0f1fdb222fc38373f4

#### URL

45. Feb 2021
1. Westreich, D., & Iliinsky, N. (2014). Epidemiology Visualized: The Prosecutor’s Fallacy. American Journal of Epidemiology, 179(9), 1125–1127. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwu025

#### URL

47. osf.io osf.io
1. Hanea, A., Wilkinson, D. P., McBride, M., Lyon, A., Ravenzwaaij, D. van, Thorn, F. S., Gray, C. T., Mandel, D. R., Willcox, A., Gould, E., Smith, E., Mody, F., Bush, M., Fidler, F., Fraser, H., & Wintle, B. (2021). Mathematically aggregating experts’ predictions of possible futures. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/rxmh7

#### URL

48. Dec 2020
49. cims.nyu.edu cims.nyu.edu
1. gromov

Mikhael Gromov's docs at NYU

#### URL

50. chem.libretexts.org chem.libretexts.org
1. Nodes A wave function node occurs at points where the wave function is zero and changes signs. The electron has zero probability of being located at a node.

Nodes

#### URL

51. Oct 2020
52. seeing-theory.brown.edu seeing-theory.brown.edu
1. Kunin, D. (n.d.). Seeing Theory. Retrieved October 27, 2020, from http://seeingtheory.io

#### URL

1. David Spiegelhalter and False Positives. (2020, October 14). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmiEzi54lBI&feature=youtu.be

#### URL

54. www.agweb.com www.agweb.com
1. the hand of God

#### URL

55. parenting.nytimes.com parenting.nytimes.com
1. How this phenomenon translates into absolute, rather than relative, risk, however, is a bit thorny. A large study published in 2018, for instance, found that among women who had children between 34 and 47, 2.2 percent developed breast cancer within three to seven years after they gave birth (among women who never had children, the rate was 1.9 percent). Over all, according to the American Cancer Society, women between 40 and 49 have a 1.5 percent chance of developing breast cancer.

The rates here are so low as to be nearly negligible on their face. Why bother reporting it?

#### URL

56. www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk
1. This result of Erd ̋os [E] is famous not because it has large numbers of applications,nor because it is difficult, nor because it solved a long-standing open problem. Its famerests on the fact that it opened the floodgates to probabilistic arguments in combinatorics.If you understand Erd ̋os’s simple argument (or one of many other similar arguments) then,lodged in your mind will be a general principle along the following lines:if one is trying to maximize the size of some structure under certain constraints, andif the constraints seem to force the extremal examples to be spread about in a uniformsort of way, then choosing an example randomly is likely to give a good answer.Once you become aware of this principle, your mathematical power immediately increases.

#### URL

58. Sep 2020
1. Holman, E. A., Thompson, R. R., Garfin, D. R., & Silver, R. C. (2020). The unfolding COVID-19 pandemic: A probability-based, nationally representative study of mental health in the U.S. Science Advances, eabd5390. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd5390

#### URL

60. Aug 2020
61. www.medrxiv.org www.medrxiv.org
1. Ray, E. L., Wattanachit, N., Niemi, J., Kanji, A. H., House, K., Cramer, E. Y., Bracher, J., Zheng, A., Yamana, T. K., Xiong, X., Woody, S., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Walraven, R. L., Tomar, V., Sherratt, K., Sheldon, D., Reiner, R. C., Prakash, B. A., … Consortium, C.-19 F. H. (2020). Ensemble Forecasts of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the U.S. MedRxiv, 2020.08.19.20177493. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.19.20177493

#### URL

62. covid-19.iza.org covid-19.iza.org
1. Explaining Governors’ Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States. COVID-19 and the Labor Market. (n.d.). IZA – Institute of Labor Economics. Retrieved August 8, 2020, from https://covid-19.iza.org/publications/dp13137/

#### URL

63. www.nber.org www.nber.org
1. Lo, A. W., Siah, K. W., & Wong, C. H. (2020). Estimating Probabilities of Success of Vaccine and Other Anti-Infective Therapeutic Development Programs (Working Paper No. 27176; Working Paper Series). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27176

#### URL

64. www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
1. BBC Radio 4—The Political School, Episode 1. (n.d.). BBC. Retrieved August 2, 2020, from https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000kv6v

#### URL

65. Jul 2020
66. osf.io osf.io
1. Andia, T., Mantilla, C., Rodriguez-Lesmes, P., Criado, L., Gomez, J. S., Ortiz, S., Quintero, A., Rincón, H., & Romero, S. (2020). Mentioning anosmia improves how community pharmacies handle phone call requests during the COVID-19 pandemic: An audit study in Colombia [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/s2z47

#### URL

67. www.nature.com www.nature.com
1. Block, P., Hoffman, M., Raabe, I. J., Dowd, J. B., Rahal, C., Kashyap, R., & Mills, M. C. (2020). Social network-based distancing strategies to flatten the COVID-19 curve in a post-lockdown world. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(6), 588–596. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0898-6

#### URL

68. www.sciencedirect.com www.sciencedirect.com
1. Argument Quality in Real World Argumentation. (2020). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.004

#### URL

69. Jun 2020
1. ReconfigBehSci on Twitter: “Fellow behavioural scientists, I had a lightbulb moment yesterday. I suspect I might have been unusually slow here, and you all clocked this months ago, but thought I’d share nevertheless: I’ve lost count of how often I’ve been told ‘You only have a 1/100 chance of dying’” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved June 27, 2020, from https://twitter.com/scibeh/status/1276434777856446464

#### URL

71. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
1. Veltri, G. A., Prof, Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Folkvord, F., Theben, A., & Gaskell, G. (2020, April 29). The impact of online platform transparency of information on consumer’s choices. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/htja5

#### URL

72. psycnet.apa.org psycnet.apa.org
1. Attali, Y., Budescu, D., & Arieli-Attali, M. (2020). An item response approach to calibration of confidence judgments. Decision, 7(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000111

#### URL

73. psycnet.apa.org psycnet.apa.org
1. Winman, A., Hansson, P., & Juslin, P. (2004). Subjective Probability Intervals: How to Reduce Overconfidence by Interval Evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(6), 1167–1175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1167

#### URL

74. psycnet.apa.org psycnet.apa.org
1. Erev, I., Wallsten, T. S., & Budescu, D. V. (1994). Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes. Psychological Review, 101(3), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.519

#### URL

75. May 2020
76. www.sjdm.org www.sjdm.org
1. [Jdm-society] Decision on re-opening economies. (n.d.). Retrieved April 21, 2020, from http://www.sjdm.org/mail-archive/jdm-society/2020-April/008496.html

#### URL

77. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
1. Dhami, M. K., & Mandel, D. R. (2020). UK and US policies for communicating probability in intelligence analysis: A review [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kuyhb

#### URL

78. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
1. Moore, D. A., & Wallsten, T. S. (2020). Rolling Forecasts. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ryvg3

#### URL

1. Dr Muge Cevik on Twitter

#### URL

79. www.nass.usda.gov www.nass.usda.gov

#### URL

1. Thread by @taaltree: Antibody tests are coming online. Never before have humans needed to understand Bayes rule more. Let’s talk about why it’s critical NOT to a…. (n.d.). Retrieved April 21, 2020, from https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1248467731545911296.html

#### URL

81. Apr 2020
82. psyarxiv.com psyarxiv.com
1. Mandel, D. R., Wallsten, T. S., & Budescu, D. (2020, April 20). Numerically-Bounded Language Schemes Are Unlikely to Communicate Uncertainty Effectively. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9f6ev

#### URL

83. math.stackexchange.com math.stackexchange.com
1. Therefore, En=2n+1−2=2(2n−1)

Simplified formula for the expected number of tosses (e) to get n consecutive heads (n≥1):

$$e_n=2(2^n-1)$$

For example, to get 5 consecutive heads, we've to toss the coin 62 times:

$$e_n=2(2^5-1)=62$$

We can also start with the longer analysis of the 5 scenarios:

1. If we get a tail immediately (probability 1/2) then the expected number is e+1.
2. If we get a head then a tail (probability 1/4), then the expected number is e+2.
3. If we get two head then a tail (probability 1/8), then the expected number is e+2.
4. If we get three head then a tail (probability 1/16), then the expected number is e+4.
5. If we get four heads then a tail (probability 1/32), then the expected number is e+5.
6. Finally, if our first 5 tosses are heads, then the expected number is 5.

Thus:

#### URL

97. Sep 2017
98. thebulletin.org thebulletin.org
1. Terrorist use of an actual nuclear bomb is a low-probability event

Low probability and high impact but not a black swan

#### URL

99. Feb 2017
100. static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
1. These two qualities, therefore, PROBABILITY and PLAUSIBILITY

This is an important set of terms to think through in terms of come to think about and with rhetoric.

2. CHAPTER VI

Chapter VII: General Audience Awareness

But, really, Mere Rhetoric has a nice (I'm assuming she's mostly on point here) summary of some of the concepts to follow.

#### URL

101. Jan 2017
102. static1.squarespace.com static1.squarespace.com
1. Hume considers the possibility that there is, indeed, complete relativism in this matter. But his purpose is to find ways to reduce or eliminate disagreement, to set a standard

A rhetorical concern dating back to at least Aristotle: how to decide upon things in the realm of the probable rather than the absolute.

#### URL

103. Nov 2016
104. journals.plos.org journals.plos.org
1. Finally, by assuming the non-detection of a species to indicate absence from a given grid cell, we introduced an extra level of error into our models. This error depends on the probability of false absence given imperfect detection (i.e., the probability that a species was present but remained undetected in a given grid cell ): the higher this probability, the higher the risk of incorrectly quantifying species-climate relationships .

This will be an ongoing challenge for species distribution modeling, because most of the data appropriate for these purposes is not collected in such a way as to allow the straightforward application of standard detection probability/occupancy models. This could potentially be addressed by developing models for detection probability based on species and habitat type. These models could be built on smaller/different datasets that include the required data for estimating detectability.

#### URL

105. Jul 2016
106. www.quantamagazine.org www.quantamagazine.org
1. hyperuniform distribution - Appears random at smaller scales, but more predictable at larger scales.

#### URL

107. Feb 2016
108. blog.cloudera.com blog.cloudera.com
1. Great explanation of 15 common probability distributions: Bernouli, Uniform, Binomial, Geometric, Negative Binomial, Exponential, Weibull, Hypergeometric, Poisson, Normal, Log Normal, Student's t, Chi-Squared, Gamma, Beta.

#### URL

109. Jan 2016
110. blogs.scientificamerican.com blogs.scientificamerican.com
1. P(B|E) = P(B) X P(E|B) / P(E), with P standing for probability, B for belief and E for evidence. P(B) is the probability that B is true, and P(E) is the probability that E is true. P(B|E) means the probability of B if E is true, and P(E|B) is the probability of E if B is true.

#### URL

111. phys.org phys.org
1. paradox of unanimity - Unanimous or nearly unanimous agreement doesn't always indicate the correct answer. If agreement is unlikely, it indicates a problem with the system.

Witnesses who only saw a suspect for a moment are not likely to be able to pick them out of a lineup accurately. If several witnesses all pick the same suspect, you should be suspicious that bias is at work. Perhaps these witnesses were cherry-picked, or they were somehow encouraged to choose a particular suspect.

#### URL

112. Oct 2015
113. davidar.io davidar.io
1. Nearly all ap­pli­ca­tions of prob­a­bil­ity to cryp­tog­ra­phy de­pend on the fac­tor prin­ci­ple (or Bayes’ The­o­rem).

This is easily the most interesting sentence in the paper: Turing used Bayesian analysis for code-breaking during WWII.

#### URL

114. Oct 2013
115. rhetoric.eserver.org rhetoric.eserver.org
1. Now the propositions of Rhetoric are Complete Proofs, Probabilities, and Signs.

From chapter 2.

#### URL

116. rhetoric.eserver.org rhetoric.eserver.org
1. the materials of enthymemes are Probabilities and Signs

#### URL

117. rhetoric.eserver.org rhetoric.eserver.org
1. The premisses from which enthymemes are formed are "probabilities" and "signs"