Inc, T. (n.d.). Independent SAGE @IndependentSage. Periscope. Retrieved July 17, 2020, from https://www.pscp.tv/IndependentSage/1lPKqLWLBeYxb

Peston on Twitter: “‘It wasn’t diverse enough, maybe it wasn’t nimble enough’ Sir Paul Nurse tells @Peston that SAGE needs to be truly multidisciplinary to perform its duties. #Peston https://t.co/3bUSxuFrj8” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved June 25, 2020, from https://twitter.com/itvpeston/status/1275917547012063238

Weed, M. (2020). Models and methods to analyse the interaction of evidence and policy in the first 100 days of the UK government’s response to COVID-19 (v1.1). https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/f73u4

Liverpool, C. W., Jessica Hamzelou, Adam Vaughan, Conrad Quilty-Harper and Layal. (n.d.). Covid-19 news: UK could eliminate coronavirus entirely, say scientists. New Scientist. Retrieved July 9, 2020, from https://www.newscientist.com/article/2237475-covid-19-news-uk-could-eliminate-coronavirus-entirely-say-scientists/

Wilson, C. (n.d.). Why hasn’t the UK seen a second wave of the coronavirus? New Scientist. Retrieved July 9, 2020, from https://www.newscientist.com/article/2248216-why-hasnt-the-uk-seen-a-second-wave-of-the-coronavirus/

Devi Sridhar and Adriel Chen: Scotland’s slow and steady approach to covid-19 may lead to a more sustainable future. (2020, June 30). The BMJ. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/06/30/devi-sridhar-and-adriel-chen-scotlands-slow-and-steady-approach-to-covid-19-may-lead-to-a-more-sustainable-future/

Vaughan, A. (n.d.). R number. New Scientist. Retrieved June 29, 2020, from https://www.newscientist.com/term/r-number/

Landler, M., & Castle, S. (2020, June 26). For Boris Johnson’s Science Advisers, Pressure, Anxieties and ‘Pastoral Support.’ The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/26/world/europe/sage-britain-coronavirus-ferguson.html

Reicher, S. (2020, June 24). The way Boris Johnson has eased lockdown sends all the wrong messages | Stephen Reicher. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jun/24/boris-johnson-ease-lockdown-england

Independent SAGE. (2020, June 21). "NEW: Independent SAGE has evaluated the scientific evidence on social distancing & concludes it is not safe to reduce it from 2m to 1m indoors as government proposes". Twitter. https://twitter.com/IndependentSage/status/1274729064272670721

Independent SAGE on Twitter: “NEW: Independent SAGE has evaluated the scientific evidence on social distancing & concludes it is not safe to reduce it from 2m to 1m indoors as government proposes https://t.co/GHgJ6SXW7C” / Twitter. (n.d.). Twitter. Retrieved June 22, 2020, from https://twitter.com/independentsage/status/1274727763786809344

DELVE group publishes evidence paper on the use of face masks in tackling Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic | Royal Society. (2020 May 04). https://royalsociety.org/news/2020/05/delve-group-publishes-evidence-paper-on-use-of-face-masks/

McKie, R. (2020, June 14). Lancet editor attacks UK government for “catastrophic” handling of Covid-19 pandemic. The Observer. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/14/lancet-editor-attacks-uk-government-for-catastrophic-handling-of-covid-19-pandemic

Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling (SPI-M). (n.d.). GOV.UK. Retrieved June 14, 2020, from https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/scientific-pandemic-influenza-subgroup-on-modelling

Scally, G., Jacobson, B., & Abbasi, K. (2020). The UK’s public health response to covid-19. BMJ, m1932. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1932

Fast-Tracking COVID-19 Submissions. (n.d.). Association for Psychological Science - APS. Retrieved June 11, 2020, from https://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/psychological_science/psci-covid-19

Bull, P. (2020, May 10). Why you can ignore reviews of scientific code by commercial software developers. Lumps “n” Bumps. https://philbull.wordpress.com/2020/05/10/why-you-can-ignore-reviews-of-scientific-code-by-commercial-software-developers/

Hahn, U. (2020 May 10). Open policy processes for COVID-19. Reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/BehSciMeta/comments/gggw9h/open_policy_processes_for_covid19/

Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE): Coronavirus (COVID-19) response. (n.d.). GOV.UK. Retrieved June 2, 2020, from https://www.gov.uk/government/groups/scientific-advisory-group-for-emergencies-sage-coronavirus-covid-19-response

Simpson, C. R., Thomas, B. D., Challen, K., De Angelis, D., Fragaszy, E., Goodacre, S., Hayward, A., Lim, W. S., Rubin, G. J., Semple, M. G., & Knight, M. (2020). The UK hibernated pandemic influenza research portfolio: Triggered for COVID-19. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, S1473309920303984. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30398-4

Vallance, P. (2020, May 30). We are learning a lot, including how to do it better next time. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/30/will-have-learned-lot-including-do-better-next-time-science/

Spinney, L. (2020, May 31). Covid-19 expert Karl Friston: “Germany may have more immunological ‘dark matter.’” The Observer. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/31/covid-19-expert-karl-friston-germany-may-have-more-immunological-dark-matter

Davis, N. (2020, May 4). Rival Sage group says Covid-19 policy must be clarified. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/04/rival-sage-group-covid-19-policy-clarified-david-king

Ford, J. (2020, April 15). The battle at the heart of British science over coronavirus | Free to read. https://www.ft.com/content/1e390ac6-7e2c-11ea-8fdb-7ec06edeef84

Rusbridger, Alan. ‘Sage Coronavirus Expert: We’ve Had an Epidemic That to Some Degree Could Have Been Avoided’. Accessed 29 May 2020. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/science-and-technology/alan-rusbridger-sage-jeremy-farrar-covid-19-coronavirus-dominic-cummings-herd-immunity.

Kupferschmidt, K. (2020, May 11). U.K. government should not keep scientific advice secret, former chief adviser says. Science | AAAS. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/05/uk-government-should-not-keep-scientific-advice-secret-former-chief-adviser-says

Smallman, M. ‘Independent Sage’ group is an oxymoron. (2020, May 5). Research Professional News. https://www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-political-science-blog-2020-5-independent-sage-group-is-an-oxymoron/

Independent SAGE: 4th May first Committee Meeting. (2020 May 04). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7uBwyr0sdg

Lewis, P., & Conn, D. (2020, May 8). UK scientists condemn “Stalinist” attempt to censor Covid-19 advice. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/08/revealed-uk-scientists-fury-over-attempt-to-censor-covid-19-advice

Horton, R. (2020). Offline: Independent science advice for COVID-19—at last. The Lancet, 395(10235), 1472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31098-9

Large majority of researchers are willing to have a chat with a practitioner, without getting paid. Knowing the researcher directly/indirectly helps, no A/B test

Practioners prefer being matched

Practitioners are not in a hurry when looking to talk to researchers

Mindset of practitioners looking to be matche

How to ask if the consultation session was useful

How to get people to share their expertise in a group

Just got to think about our roles, in view of annotation. Using “curation” as a term for collecting URLs sounds like usurping the title of “curator”. But there’s something to be said about the role involved. From the whole “guide on the side” angle to the issue with finding appropriate resources based on a wealth of expertise.