Culture as the ‘genetic code’ of the next leap

Capacity for deep collaboration calls for…

That this talent for organization and management is rare among men is proved by the fact that it invariably secures for its possessor enormous rewards, no matter where or under what laws or conditions.

The analysis presented in this ar-ticle offers some starting points for potentially fruitful dialogue.

. In thediscursive construction of creativity, the analysis reveals an emphasis on productive outcomesof creative efforts, positioning makers as designers, engineers, and the like, and raising ques-tions about other kinds of making that might be ignored in makerspaces. Finally, when dis-cussing learning, the analysis argues that polarized accounts present in the data set positionformal educational content, styles, and pedagogies in negative ways and oversimplify thedistinctions between formal and informal learning settings.

this article reveals howcommon themes are being discursively constructed in relation to the future of public libraries,maker cultures, and informal learning. The analysis highlights tensions and questions thatemerge through the discursive construction of making, makers, and makerspaces in the field oflibrary and information studies. The article employs discourse analysis to examine professionallibrary journal articles and blog posts published from 2011–14 that focus on makerspaces inpublic libraries.

The analysis in this article reveals how key themes—the future of public libraries, DIY andmaker cultures, and informal learning—are being constructed in current discussions aboutmakerspaces in public libraries

St Columba Columba (521-597), known as Colm Cille in Ireland, went to the west coast of Scotland and to the island of Iona to do penance and escape from the blood spilled in his family battles at home in Ireland.

se voirappliquer le tarif maximal pour les prestationsservies [avant la rectification], mesure quiconstituait une sanction pécuniaire au sensdes dispositions de l’article L. 123-1 du codedes relations entre le public etl’administration62 ».

here are seven classes of fats in our diet seven and some of them will save your life and some of them will kill you

Dans un récent jugement, le tribunal administratif de Lyon est venu rappeler les obligations qui incombent au Rectorat lors de la convocation de l’élève devant la commission académique d’appel (article R. 511-49 du code de l’éducation).

"Le chef d'établissement a l'obligation de transmettre à la commission d'appel les décisions motivées ainsi que tous les éléments susceptibles de l'éclairer (Article D.331-35 - Code de l'éducation)." Cela signifie qu'une décision insuffisamment motivée du chef d'établissement peut être annulée.

Toute décision d'orientation post-3e non conforme à la demande de la famille doit obligatoirement être motivée. Le chef d'établissement est tenu de mettre en avant des éléments objectifs sur lesquels repose sa décision. "Les motivations comportent des éléments objectifs ayant fondé les décisions, en termes de connaissances, de capacités et d'intérêts (Article D331-34 - Code de l'éducation)."

En cas de désaccord sur l'orientation, le chef d'établissement a l'obligation de recevoir en entretien la famille avant de rendre sa décision finale. "Tout désaccord avec la proposition du conseil de classe fait l'objet d'un entretien préalable à la décision du chef d'établissement (Article L.331-8 - Code de l'éducation)."

this dualism probably isn’t right given today’s complexities

Solutions to avoid Collapse‘ - that’s why it’s failing!

33(3) of Regulation 2016/679), the procedure for assessing and notifying data protection breaches personal data(Article 34 of Regulation 2016/679), procedures for keeping an internal register of data protection breaches (Article33 of Regulation 2016/679) and a register of processing activities and the scope of the register of categories ofprocessing activities (Article 30 of Regulation 2016/679

Depuis la révision constitutionnelle de 2003, la péréquation est un objectif de valeur constitutionnelle. L’article 72-2 de la Constitution dispose que : La loi prévoit des dispositifs de péréquation destinés à favoriser l'égalité entre les collectivités territoriales.

article 24 de la loin°2000-321 du 12 avril 2000 relative aux droits des citoyens dans leurs relations avec lesadministrations

A t-test is an inferential statistic used to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two groups and how they are related

Celui qui allait ép0user Haoua de- vait étre un homme capable de verser de l’argent et des cadeaux a sa famille, c'est la dot, c’est ainsi.

Chaque élève a droit au respect de son intégrité physique et morale, au respect de sa libertéde conscience, au respect de son travail et de ses biens, à la liberté d’expression. Chacun doituser de ces droits dans un esprit de tolérance et de respect d’autrui (article R. 421-5 du codede l’éducation)

A very important project under construction, to regenerate and cosmo-localize our world

l'article 6 de la Déclaration des Droits de l'Homme et du Citoyen rédigé le 26 00:05:06 août 1789 place le mérite au cœur de l'organisation sociale tous les citoyens étant égaux à ses yeux sont également admissibles à toute dignité place et emploi public selon leur capacité et 00:05:19 sans autre distinction que celle de leur vertuus et de leurs talents

le premier article sur les discriminations en France c'est 94 dans Code pénal c'est 00:56:25 l'article 2251 du code pénal qui n'existe pas avant 94 donc il y a vraiment des j'allais dire des échelles de temps qui sont assez différentes dans ces valeurs

The AI-powered article summarizer

Participants were asked to listen to 40 short English speech samples, half of which contained grammatical errors against articles (e.g., a/an, the).

Art. D 411-2 du code de l’éducation

article L. 212-15

article L. 216-1

Finding the engramSheena A. Josselyn1–4, Stefan Köhler5,6 and Paul W. Frankland1–4Abstract | Many attempts have been made to localize the physical trace of a memory, orengram, in the brain. However, until recently, engrams have remained largely elusive. In thisReview, we develop four defining criteria that enable us to critically assess the recentprogress that has been made towards finding the engram. Recent ‘capture’ studies use novelapproaches to tag populations of neurons that are active during memory encoding, therebyallowing these engram-associated neurons to be manipulated at later times. We proposethat findings from these capture studies represent considerable progress in allowing us toobserve, erase and express the engram

The resulting system effec-tively models diagram genera-tion as a compilation process,where the compilation targetis a constrained optimizationproblem rather than (say) a bi-nary executable or a static im-age.

In contrast to visuospatial attention, language function is widely accepted to lateralize to the (dominant) left hemisphere (Friederici, 2017). Tissue damage to the left temporo-parietal cortex has been reported, for decades, to cause impairments of semantic processing – key to reading and other elaborate forms of language comprehension (Binder et al., 2009; Hartwigsen et al., 2016; Seghier, 2013).

Depending on the researcher, CEN is often referred to as the executive-control network (ECN), or the frontoparietal network (FPN), and is sometimes divided to CEN and the dorsal attention network (DAN) [i.e., Ref. (29)].

It has been demonstrated that areas most commonly activated following top-down cues to attend to particular locations, features, or objects are located along the dorsal parts of the parietal cortex. Such areas include inferior parietal lobule (IPL), dorsomedial regions referred to as superior parietal lobule (SPL), as well as more medial regions along the precuneus gyrus (Yantis et al., 2002; Giesbrecht et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2003; Yantis and Serences, 2003; Figure 1). Several top-down tasks have been shows to successfully engage dorsal regions of the parietal cortex, namely those involving spatial (Kastner et al., 1999; Corbetta et al., 2000; Hopfinger et al., 2000; Shomstein and Behrmann, 2006; Chiu and Yantis, 2009; Greenberg et al., 2010) as well as non-spatial shifts of attention (Giesbrecht et al., 2003; Yantis and Serences, 2003; Shomstein and Yantis, 2004b, 2006; Tamber-Rosenau et al., 2011).

The frontoparietal control system includes many regions identified as supporting cognitive control and decision-making processes including lateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and inferior parietal lobule.

In brief, each of the networks comprised peak regions that were isolated in a multivariate spatio-temporal PLS (Krishnan et al., 2011) analysis of three tasks: autobiographical planning, visuospatial planning, and counting. The autobiographical planning task involved primarily internally directed cognition, with participants making personal plans in response to cued goals (e.g. freedom from debt). The visuospatial planning task was the Tower of London, which involves primarily externally directed cognition, as participants determine the minimum number of moves to solve a visual puzzle. The counting task involved the sequential counting of vowels in random letter sequences, a low-demand externally directed task.

Here we report a patient with a lesion of the superior parietal lobe who shows both sensory and motor deficits consistent with an inability to maintain such an internal representation between updates. Our findings suggest that the superior parietal lobe is critical for sensorimotor integration, by maintaining an internal representation of the body's state. <div class="c-nature-box c-nature-box--side " data-component="entitlement-box"> <div class="js-access-button"> <a href="https://wayf.springernature.com?redirect_uri&#x3D;https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Farticles%2Fnn1098_529" class="c-article__button" data-test="ra21" data-track="click" data-track-action="institution access" data-track-label="button"> <svg class="u-icon" width="18" height="18" aria-hidden="true" focusable="false"><use href="#icon-institution"></use></svg> <span class="c-article__button-text">Access through your institution</span> </a> </div> <div class="js-buy-button"> <a href="#access-options" class="c-article__button c-article__button--inverted" data-test="ra21" data-track="click" data-track-action="buy or subscribe" data-track-label="button"> <span>Buy or subscribe</span> </a> </div> </div>

Superior parietal damage was reliably associated with deficits on tests involving the manipulation and rearrangement of information in working memory, but not on working memory tests requiring only rehearsal and retrieval processes, nor on tests of long-term memory. These results indicate that superior parietal cortex is critically important for the manipulation of information in working memory.

Interactivity Fosters Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction

Minimal phenomenal experience: Meditation, tonic alertness, and the phenomenology of “pure” consciousness Articles https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2020.I.46 Published 2020-03-24 Thomas Metzinger

Causal Emergence in Discrete & Continuous DynamicalSystemsThomas F. Varley 1,2March 31, 2020

Procéder chaque fois que nécessaire à la reconstitution de l’état civil des MNA conformémentà l’article 8 de la CIDE.

Modifier et clarifier la rédaction de l’article 388 du code civil en interdisant le recours auxexamens d’âge osseux.

Tu vois sur ces côteaux fertiles Des troupeaux riches & nombreux ; Ceux qui les gardent sont heureux, Et ceux qui les ont sont tranquilles.

those who got the updated booster had one-tenth the risk of being hospitalized compared with those who are unvaccinated

Given the broad aim of the right of access, the aim of the right of access is notsuitable to be analysed as a precondition for the exercise of the right of accessby the controller as part of its assessment of access requests. Thus, controllersshould not assess “why” the data subject is requesting access, but only “what”the data subject is requesting (see section 3 on the analysis of the request) andwhether they hold personal data relating to that individual (see section 4).Therefore, for example, the controller should not deny access on the groundsor the suspicion that the requested data could be used by the data subject todefend themselves in court in the event of a dismissal or a commercial disputewith the controller9.

l Les États parties prennent toutes les mesures appropriées pour veillerà ce que la discipline scolaire soit appliquée d’une manière compatibleavec la dignité de l’enfant en tant qu’être humain et conformément à laprésente Convention

l’enseignement secondaire, sous ses différentes formes, y compris l’en-seignement secondaire technique et professionnel, doit être généralisé etrendu accessible à tous par tous les moyens appropriés et notamment parl’instauration progressive de la gratuité

RECOMMANDATION N°8La Défenseure des droits recommandeau ministre des Solidarités, de l’Autonomieet des Personnes handicapées et à la ministredéléguée chargée des Personneshandicapées :• De rappeler aux MDPH d’adopter un PPSafin, conformément à l’article D. 351-5 ducode de l’éducation, de définir et coordonnerles modalités de déroulement de la scolaritéet les actions pédagogiques, psychologiques,éducatives, sociales, médicales etparamédicales répondant aux besoinsparticuliers des élèves présentant unhandicap ;• D’inviter les CDPAH à préciser, dansleurs décisions, les activités à réaliserpar les AESH affectés auprès des enfants

Le droit à un logement convenable tel quedéfini par l’ONU, issu de l’article 11 du PIDESCet des observations du CODESC sur le droit aulogement, implique davantage que le logementseul. En effet, « Un logement n’est pasconvenable si ses occupants ne disposent pasd’eau potable, d’installations d’assainissementsuffisantes, d’une source d’énergie pour fairela cuisine, de chauffage, d’éclairage, d’un lieude stockage pour la nourriture ou de dispositifsd’évacuation des ordures ménagères »

recommandation 6Mettre en œuvre sur l’ensemble du territoire le dispositif prévu par l’article 108 de la loi pour uneRépublique numérique, intégré à l’article L. 115-3 du code de l’action sociale et des familles, quiprévoit que toute personne ou famille éprouvant des difficultés particulières, au regard notammentde son patrimoine, de l’insuffisance de ses ressources ou de ses conditions d’existence, a droit à uneaide de la collectivité pour disposer de la fourniture d’un service de téléphonie fixe et d’un serviced’accès à internet.Suites données depuis trois ansCette aide était depuis 2016 en phase d’expérimentation dans trois départements : la Seine-Saint-Denis, la Haute-Saône et la Marne. Les modalités d’obtention de l’aide sont déterminées par lesconseils départementaux. Elles peuvent donc différer en fonction du lieu d’habitation. Les résultatsde cette expérimentation montrent que le dispositif a été très peu suivi car les travailleurs sociauxétaient peu informés et outillés pour le mobiliser. La généralisation n’est pas prévue à ce jour.

such processing can still be associated with increased risks because it takes place outside the EU, for example due to conflicting national laws or disproportionate government access in a third country.

if the same controller or processor is processing data outside the EU without disclosing it to another controller or processor (e.g. where an employee of an EU controller travels abroad and has access to the data of that controller while being in a third country or in case of direct collection from individuals in the EU under Article 3(2) GDPR), the processing activity should not be regarded as a transfer under Chapter V of the GDPR

Similarly, for atransfer of personal data to a controller or processor in a third country who is already subject to theGDPR for the given processing, it has to be noted that the GDPR already applies in its entirety

Example 12: Controller in the EU uses a processor in the EU subject to third country legislationThe Danish Company X, acting as controller, engages Company Y established in the EU as a processoron its behalf. Company Y is a subsidiary of the third country parent Company Z. Company Y isprocessing the data of Company X exclusively in the EU and there is no one outside the EU, includingthe parent Company Z, who has access to the data. Additionally, it follows from the contract betweenCompany X and Company Y that Company Y shall only process the personal data on documentedinstructions from Company X, unless required to do so by EU or Member State law to which CompanyY is subject. Company Y is however subject to third country legislation with extraterritorial effect,which in this case means that Company Y may receive access requests from third country authorities.Since Company Y is not in a third country (but an EU company subject to Article 3(1) GDPR), thedisclosure of data from the controller Company X to the processor Company Y does not amount to atransfer and Chapter V of the GDPR does not apply. As mentioned, there is however a possibility thatCompany Y receives access requests from third country authorities and should Company Y comply withsuch request, such disclosure of data would be considered a transfer under Chapter V. Where CompanyY complies with a request in violation of the controller’s instructions and thus Article 28 GDPR,Company Y shall be considered an independent controller of that processing under Article 28(10)GDPR. In this situation, the controller Company X should, before engaging the processor, assess thesecircumstances in order to ensure that, as required by Article 28 GDPR, it only uses processors providingsufficient guarantees to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures so that theprocessing is in line with the GDPR, including Chapter V, as well as to ensure that there is a contract orlegal act governing the processing by the processor.

Some examples of how personal data could be “made available” are by creating an account, grantingaccess rights to an existing account, “confirming”/”accepting” an effective request for remote access,embedding a hard drive or submitting a password to a file. It should be kept in mind that remote accessfrom a third country (even if it takes place only by means of displaying personal data on a screen, forexample in support situations, troubleshooting or for administration purposes) and/or storage in acloud situated outside the EEA offered by a service provider, is also considered to be a transfer,provided that the three criteria outlined in paragraph 9 above are met.

Example 9: A subsidiary (controller) in the EU shares data with its parent company (processor) in athird countryThe Irish Company X, which is a subsidiary of the parent Company Y in a third country, disclosespersonal data of its employees to Company Y to be stored in a centralised HR database by the parentcompany in the third country. In this case the Irish Company X processes (and discloses) the data in itscapacity of employer and hence as a controller, while the parent company is a processor. Company Xis subject to the GDPR pursuant to Article 3(1) for this processing and Company Y is situated in a thirdcountry. The disclosure therefore qualifies as a transfer to a third country within the meaning ofChapter V of the GDPR.

n addition, this second criterion cannot be considered as fulfilled when there is no controller orprocessor sending or making the data available (i.e. no “exporter”) to another controller or processor,such as when data are disclosed directly by the data subject15 to the recipient.

Example 8: Employee of a controller in the EU travels to a third country on a business tripGeorge, employee of A, a company based in Poland, travels to a third country for a meeting bringinghis laptop. During his stay abroad, George turns on his computer and accesses remotely personal dataon his company’s databases to finish a memo. This bringing of the laptop and remote access ofpersonal data from a third country, does not qualify as a transfer of personal data, since George is notanother controller, but an employee, and thus an integral part of the controller (A).19 Therefore, thetransmission is carried out within the same controller (A). The processing, including the remote accessand the processing activities carried out by George after the access, are performed by the Polishcompany, i.e. a controller established in the Union subject to Article 3(1) of the GDPR. It can, however,be noted that in case George, in his capacity as an employee of A, would send or make data availableto another controller or processor in the third country, the data flow in question would amount to atransfer under Chapter V; from the exporter (A) in the EU to such importer in the third country.

Chapter V does not apply to “internal processing”, i.e. where data is not disclosed bytransmission or otherwise made available to another controller or processor, including where suchprocessing takes place outside the EU

Such instruments should, forexample, address the measures to be taken in case of conflict of laws between third country legislationand the GDPR and in the event of third country requests for disclosure of data.

Example 6: Processor in the EU sends data back to its controller in a third countryXYZ Inc., a controller without an EU establishment, sends personal data of its employees/customers,all of them data subjects not located in the EU, to the processor ABC Ltd. for processing in the EU, onbehalf of XYZ. ABC re-transmits the data to XYZ. The processing performed by ABC, the processor, iscovered by the GDPR for processor specific obligations pursuant to Article 3(1), since ABC is establishedin the EU. Since XYZ is a controller in a third country, the disclosure of data from ABC to XYZ is regardedas a transfer of personal data and therefore Chapter V applies.

Example 3: Controller in a third country receives data directly from a data subject in the EU (but notunder Article 3(2) GDPR) and uses a processor outside the EU for some processing activitiesMaria, living in Italy, decides to book a room in a hotel in New York using a form on the hotel website.Personal data are collected directly by the hotel which does not target/monitor individuals in the EEA.In this case, no transfer takes place since data are passed directly by the data subject and directlycollected by the controller. Also, since no targeting or monitoring activities of individuals in the EEAare taking place by the hotel, the GDPR will not apply, including with regard to any processing activitiescarried out by non-EEA processors on behalf of the hote

Expert Opinionon theCurrent State of U.S. Surveillance Law and AuthoritiesfromProf. Stephen I. Vladeck,University of Texas School of Law

section 702 is compulsory in the sense that, when the United States hasissued a directive to an electronic communication service provider that is authorizedby its annual certification to the FISA Court under section 702, the provider musteither (1) comply; or (2) challenge the directive in the FISA Court

In light of this confirmation by the data controller that it does not seek to rely on consent in thiscontext, there can be no dispute that, as a matter of fact, Facebook is not relying on consent as thelawful basis for the processing complained of. It has nonetheless been argued on the Complainant’sbehalf that Facebook must rely on consent, and that Facebook led the Complainant to believe thatit was relying on consent

Data Policy and related materialsometimes, on the contrary, demonstrate an oversupply of very high level, generalised information atthe expense of a more concise and meaningful delivery of the essential information necessary for thedata subject to understand the processing being undertaken and to exercise his/her rights in ameaningful way. Furthermore, while Facebook has chosen to provide its transparency information byway of pieces of text, there are other options available, such as the possible incorporation of tables,which might enable Facebook to provide the information required in a clear and concise manner,particularly in the case of an information requirement comprising a number of linked elements. Theimportance of concision cannot be overstated nonetheless. Facebook is entitled to provide additionalinformation to its user above and beyond that required by Article 13 and can provide whateveradditional information it wishes. However, it must first comply with more specific obligations under theGDPR, and then secondly ensure that the additional information does not have the effect of creatinginformation fatigue or otherwise diluting the effective delivery of the statutorily required information.That is simply what the GDPR requires.

Where several operators are jointly responsible for the same processing, the law does not require each of them to have access to the personal data concerned.

If you are a publisher, you better toss aside those ‘secret’ service provider data protection addendum and get ready to embrace ‘public’ joint-controller agreements with Facebook and other providers of plugins.

Considering the above120 and in light of the specific circumstances of the processing, the EDPB finds that the IE SA could not have concluded in paragraph 115 of the Draft Decision that the contact information processing may be regarded as necessary for the performance of a contract between Meta IE and child users.

As noted by the IE SA, the HTML publication of contact information was not considered necessary by Facebook’s Security Team and was subsequently discontinued117. The EDPB considers that the analysis of the principle of data minimisation (Article 5(1)(c) GDPR) is relevant for the necessity assessment on the basis of Article 6(1)(b) GDPR118. Consequently, the EDPB further finds that such analysis should have complemented the LSA’s assessment on the necessity of the processing for the performance of the contract, with specific regard to the publication of the contact information in the HTML source code on the Instagram website. The EDPB considers that the IE SA could not have concluded that the publication of the contact information of child users in the HTML source code may be regarded as

Assessment of processing on the basis of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR‌

Proceedings against a controller or a processor shall be brought before the courts of the Member State where the controller or processor has an establishment. 2Alternatively, such proceedings may be brought before the courts of the Member State where the data subject has his or her habitual residence

Every data subject should have the right to lodge a complaint with a single supervisory authority, in particular in the Member State of his or her habitual residence, and the right to an effective judicial remedy in accordance with Article 47 of the Charter if the data subject considers that his or her rights under this Regulation are infringed or where the supervisory authority does not act on a complaint, partially or wholly rejects or dismisses a complaint or does not act where such action is necessary to protect the rights of the data subject.

shall be reasonably necessary and proportionate to achieve the purpose(s) for which thepersonal information was collected or processed

rocessing of special categories of personal data 45. Subject to compliance with the Data Protection Regulation and any other relevant enactment or rule of law, the processing of special categories of personal data shall be lawful to the extent the processing is— (a) authorised by section 41 and sections 46 to 54 , or (b) otherwise authorised by Article 9.

collecting and checking the content of declarations of private interests, of personal data that are liable to disclose indirectly the political opinions, trade union membership or sexual orientation of a natural person constitutes processing of special categories of personal data, for the purpose of those provisions.

those provisions cannot be interpreted as meaning that the processing of personal data that are liable indirectly to reveal sensitive information concerning a natural person is excluded from the strengthened protection regime prescribed by those provisions, if the effectiveness of that regime and the protection of the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons that it is intended to ensure are not to be compromised.

No major Articles were added or deleted. The individual property rights of the slave-owner was prioritized. No law could be passed about emancipation. Individuals could not free their own slaves. Immigration of slaves from other states could not be limited. Enslaved people continued to have the right to jury trials, punished as they would be against a White victim, “except in case of insurrection by such slave.”28 But to this was added: “or rape on a white female.”29 The nature of the changes make clear that the principle concern of the members of the secession Convention was to ensure the preservation of slavery.

2. Les Etats parties prennent toutes les mesures appropriées pour veiller à ce que la discipline scolaire soit appliquée d'une manière compatible avec la dignité de l'enfant en tant qu'être humain et conformément à la présente Convention

Cette intuition est juste, puisque c’estégalement une approche par la négative queretient la Convention internationale des droitsde l’enfant (CIDE) pour reconnaître, dans sonarticle 16, le droit au respect de la vie privée :« Nul enfant ne fera l’objet d’immixtionsarbitraires ou illégales dans sa vie privée, safamille, son domicile ou sa correspondance,ni d’atteintes illégales à son honneur ou à saréputation »

Cette intuition est juste, puisque c’estégalement une approche par la négative queretient la Convention internationale des droitsde l’enfant (CIDE) pour reconnaître, dans sonarticle 16, le droit au respect de la vie privée :« Nul enfant ne fera l’objet d’immixtionsarbitraires ou illégales dans sa vie privée, safamille, son domicile ou sa correspondance,ni d’atteintes illégales à son honneur ou à saréputation »

Chacun a droit au respect de sa vie privée

16 - droit del’enfant à la protection contre les immixtionsarbitraires ou illégales dans sa vie privée, safamille, son domicile, sa correspondance etcontre les atteintes illégales à son honneur et àsa réputation.

Cette intuition est juste, puisque c’estégalement une approche par la négative queretient la Convention internationale des droitsde l’enfant (CIDE) pour reconnaître, dans sonarticle 16, le droit au respect de la vie privée :« Nul enfant ne fera l’objet d’immixtionsarbitraires ou illégales dans sa vie privée, safamille, son domicile ou sa correspondance,ni d’atteintes illégales à son honneur ou à saréputation ».

Dr. Miho Ohsaki re-examined workshe and her group had previously published and confirmed that the results are indeed meaningless in the sensedescribed in this work (Ohsaki et al., 2002). She has subsequently been able to redefine the clustering subroutine inher work to allow more meaningful pattern discovery (Ohsaki et al., 2003)

Quadrants I and II: The average student’s scores on basic skills assessments increase by21 percentiles when engaged in non-interactive, multimodal learning (includes using textwith visuals, text with audio, watching and listening to animations or lectures that effectivelyuse visuals, etc.) in comparison to traditional, single-mode learning. When that situationshifts from non-interactive to interactive, multimedia learning (such as engagement insimulations, modeling, and real-world experiences – most often in collaborative teams orgroups), results are not quite as high, with average gains at 9 percentiles. While notstatistically significant, these results are still positive.

Article 13 ‐ Nul ne peut se prévaloir de son appartenancereligieuse pour refuser de se conformer aux règlesapplicables dans l'École de la République

1. Les Etats parties reconnaissent le droit de l'enfant à l'éducation, et en particulier, en vue d'assurer l'exercice de ce droit progressivement et sur la base de l'égalité des chances